The Role of Board Certification as a Cue to Competence of Eye Care Providers: An Empirical Analysis
Keywords:
credence services; health care; eye-care; board certification; optometrists
Abstract
Authors have long known of the need for "cues" to assess the competence and training of providers of credence services. In the case of health care providers such as eye care professionals, one such cue is whether the eye care professional is "board certified." This study of 500 consumers who had had an eye exam either from an optometrist or an ophthalmologist examines four questions: what factors are important to a consumer seeking an eye-care provider, what is communicated by an eye-care provider's claim of being board certified, whether there are differences in perception between board certification as applied to an optometrist and an ophthalmologist, and whether there are differences in the perceptions of optometrists who are board certified compared to those who are not board certified. The results show that board certification is an important cue for consumers in assessing the competence and expertise of optometrists and that board certification can be used to distinguish between an optometrist and an ophthalmologist. The results also show that optometrists who are board certified as seen as better trained and more competent than optometrists who are not board certified.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
A Adams, R Ekelund, J Jackson (2002) Occupational Licensing of a Credence Good: The Regulation of Midwifery. 69(3), 659-675.
E Babakus, Remington, S Lucas, G Carnell, C (1991) Issues in the Practice of Cosmetic Surgery: Consumers' Use of Information and Perceptions of Service Quality. 11(3), 12-18.
S Baldwin, J Mckenzie, E Capwell, C Hanson (2011) The Contributions of Credentialing and the Code of Ethics to Quality Assurance in the Health Education/Promotion Profession. 26(4), 217-229.
M Darby, E Karni (1973) Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud. 16(1), 67-88.
Eric Grosch (2006) Does specialty board certification influence clinical outcomes?. 12(5), 473-481.
Pauliina Hirvonen, Nina Helander (2001) Towards joint value creation processes in professional services. 13(4), 281-291.
Yi-Ching Hsieh, Shu-Ting Hiang (2004) A Study of the Impacts of Service Quality on Relationship Quality in Search-Experience-Credence Services. 15(1), 43-58.
Jozée Lapierre (1997) What does value mean in business‐to‐business professional services?. 8(5), 377-397.
V Mitchell (1994) Problems and Risks Associated with Purchasing Consultancy Services. 14(3), 315-339.
K Mitra, M Reiss, L Capella (1999) An Examination of Perceived Risk, Information Search, and Behavioral Intentions in Search, Experience, and Credence Services. 13(3), 208-232.
Kathleen Mortimer, Andrew Pressey (2013) Consumer information search and credence services: implications for service providers. 27(1), 49-58.
Phillip Nelson (1970) Information and Consumer Behavior. 78(2), 311-329.
A Ostrom, D Iacobucci (1995) Consumer Trade-Offs and the Evaluation of Services. 59(1), 17-28.
A Parasuraman, Valarie Zeithaml, Leonard Berry (1985) A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. 49(4), 41-50.
J Sun, H Keh, A Lee (2012) The Effect of Attribute Alignability on Service Evaluation: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty. 39, 831-847.
V Zeithaml, M Bitner (2000) Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm (2nd Edition).
Published
2016-04-10
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.