aoCorporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Case Study of Pakistan Oil and Gas Companies listed In Karachi Stock Exchangea

Authors

  • Dr. LaibA Dar

  • akram naseem

  • Ramiz Ur Rehman

Keywords:

Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance Mechanisms, Firm Performance Measures

Abstract

In this study the relationship between four Corporate Governance Mechanisms (board size, chief executive status, annual general meeting and audit committee) and two Firm Performance Measures (return on equity, ROE, and profit margin, PM), of Karachi Stock Exchange listed oil & gas firms is examinedfor the period 2004 -2010. The t-test and Multiple Regression analysis are applied to examine the significance & dependency of the above mentioned variables. By using the panel methodology and OLS as a method of estimation, the results provide an evidence of a significant effect and positive relationship between ROE and board size as well as annual general meeting. But ROE has negative relationship with audit committee and CEO status and both have significant effect on it. The results further expose a positive relationship between PM, board size and annual general meeting and they have no significant effect. The study, however, could not provide a significant effect between PM and audit committee. The CEO status and audit committee have a negative relationship with PM but CEO status has a significant effect. The implication of this is that the board size should be limited to a sizeable limit and that the post of the chief executive should be occupied by different persons.

How to Cite

aoCorporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Case Study of Pakistan Oil and Gas Companies listed In Karachi Stock Exchangea. (2011). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(8), 1-9. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/100115

References

R Anderson, S Mansi, D Reeb (2004) Board Characteristics, Accounting Report Integrity, and The Cost of Debt. 37, 315-342.

Lawrence Brown, Marcus Caylor (2004) Corporate Governance and Firm Performance.

C Botosan, M Plumlee (2001) Stock Option Expense: The Sword of Damocles Revealed. 15, 311-327.

David Yermack (1996) Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. 40(2), 185-211.

T Eisenberg, S Sundgren, M, Wells (1998) Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. 48, 35-54.

Martin Lipton, Jay Lorsch (1992) The Professionalization of Corporate Directors. 48, 71-78.

April Klein (2002) Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. 33(3), 375-400.

Brian Boyd (1994) CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. 16(4), 301-312.

B Baliga, R Moyer, Ramesh Rao (1994) CEO DUALITY AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: WHAT'S THE FUSS?. 17(1), 41-53.

S Berg, S Smith (1978) CEO and Board Chairman: A Quantitative Study of Dual versus Unitary Board Leadership. 34-39.

J Brickley, J Coles, G Jarrell (1997) Leadership Structure: Separating the CEO and Chairman of the Board. 3(3), 189-220.

E Fama, M Jensen (1983) Separation of Ownership and Control. 26(2), 301-325.

C Cordery (2005) The Annual General Meeting as an accountability mechanism.

Richard Marens (2002) Inventing Corporate Governance: The Mid-Century Emergence of Shareholder Activism. 8(4), 365-389.

M Marinetto (1998) The Shareholders strike back: issues in the research of shareholder activism. 7(3), 125133.

Rebecca Strätling (2003) General Meetings: a dispensable tool for corporate governance of listed companies?. 11(1), 74-82.

R Pitchforth (1994) Meetings Practice and Procedure in New Zealand.

John Roberts, Robert Scapens (1985) Accounting systems and systems of accountability - understanding accounting practices in their organisational contexts. 10(4), 443-456.

Jonathan Karpoff, Paul Malatesta, Ralph Walkling (1996) Corporate governance and shareholder initiatives: Empirical evidence. 42(3), 365-395.

(1999) Report on Corporate Governance.

R Walker (2004) Gaps in Guidelines on Audit Committees. 40(2), 157-192.

aoCorporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Case Study of Pakistan Oil and Gas Companies listed In Karachi Stock Exchangea

Published

2011-08-02

How to Cite

aoCorporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Case Study of Pakistan Oil and Gas Companies listed In Karachi Stock Exchangea. (2011). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(8), 1-9. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/100115