What Defines Success: Analysis of Pakistan Telecom Industry

Authors

  • Saif Ur Rahman

Keywords:

Benchmarking, Customer satisfaction, exploration, oligopolistic competition, customer retention

Abstract

Extensive study and in depth interviews with the management of telecom stated different factors that identify top performers from average performers in the telecom sector. Certain globally recognized factors required to outstand as a company are still valid for MNC's operating in Pakistan, whereas contextual factors cannot be overlooked. Mobilink is conscious about its operations which is one of the top companies of Pakistan in telecom sector. Ufone and Telenor are fighting to be the number 2. This is a serious threat for Ufone as it has been on number 2 till 2007 till replaced by Telenor, even though it entered almost at the same time aswarid which is at number 4 in the competition. Instaphone collapsed as it did not respond timely to technology, opportunities, and exploitation of others ideas, neither paid enough attention to bringing value addition to their services or packages which caused customer dissatisfaction and eventually ended in losing customers to competitors.

How to Cite

What Defines Success: Analysis of Pakistan Telecom Industry. (2013). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 13(E3), 15-22. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/932

References

Ilan Alon, James Higgins (2005) Global leadership success through emotional and cultural intelligences. 48(6), 501-512.

Dev Boojihawon, Pavlos Dimitratos, Stephen Young (2007) Characteristics and influences of multinational subsidiary entrepreneurial culture: The case of the advertising sector. 16(5), 549-572.

C Carr, C Garcia (2003) Globalisation and strategic choice: How multinational and local company perspectives differ: A spanish case study. 21(6), 671-685.

T Davies (2002) The "real" success factors on projects. 20, 185-190.

R Dipietro, K Murphy, M Rivera, C Muller (2007) Unknown Title. 19(7), 524-536.

L Gratton (1996) Implementing a strategic vision-Key factors for success. 29(3), 290-303.

Akmal Hyder, Lars Eriksson (2005) Success is not enough: The spectacular rise and fall of a strategic alliance between two multinationals. 34(8), 783-796.

J Lee, J Lee, H Lee (2003) Exploration and exploitation in the presence of network externalities. 49(4), 553-570.

C Lee, K Lee, M Pennings (2001) Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology based ventures. 22, 615-640.

Michel Leseure, Tarik Driouchi (2010) Exploitation versus exploration in multinational firms: Implications for the future of international business. 42(9), 937-951.

J Ranyard, R Fildes (1998) Winners and losers: adding organisational value. 49(4), 355-368.

D Reid, S Zylidopoulos (2004) Cause and consequences of the lack of strategic foresight in the decisions of multinational enterprises to enter China. 36, 237-252.

Deepak Sethi, Stephen Guisinger (2002) Liability of foreignness to competitive advantage. 8(3), 223-240.

A Shah (1996) Strategy implementation: a study of crtical factors. 32, 42-55.

What Defines Success: Analysis of Pakistan Telecom Industry

Published

2013-03-15

How to Cite

What Defines Success: Analysis of Pakistan Telecom Industry. (2013). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 13(E3), 15-22. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/932