Achievement in Training: Recorded Video Compared to Face-to-Face Environments

Authors

  • Kate Quigley

Keywords:

Abstract

During the 2020-2021 years, it has been necessary for organizations to rethink how they conduct their daily operations in light of COVID-19 restrictions. One of the many activities within organizations is to provide new and recurrent training to their employees. In a similar vein, universities also had to make adaptations to instructional methods. This change provided an opportunity to compare student achievement in two different instructional modalities; one with lectures delivered in a full face-to-face format, and the other with recorded video lectures delivered in online platform. Both formats were conducted in morning and afternoon sessions. Three sets of test results were measured to compare the outcomes between two years. This study had mixed results, two of the three test results sets between the years showed no significant difference between face-to-face and recorded video lectures, while one of the three test results provided evidence that the results were different between instructional methods. The results of this study could provide applicable information to organizations and help to provide a roadmap for providing training in different formats. It is noteworthy that providing instruction in recorded video formats could be less expensive to organizations and also provide more flexibility for employees to fit recurrent t into their daily schedules.

How to Cite

Achievement in Training: Recorded Video Compared to Face-to-Face Environments. (2021). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 21(A7), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJMBRAVOL21IS7PG1

References

J Arias, J Swinton, K Anderson (2018) Online Vs. Face-to-Face: A Comparison of Student Outcomes with Random Assignment. 12(2), 1-23.

C Bigelow (2009) Comparing student performance in an online versus a face to face introductory turfgrass science course -A case study. 53(2), 2-7.

T Brockfeld, B Müller, J De Laffoli (2018) Video versus live lecture courses: A comparative evaluation of lecture types and results. 23(1), 1-6.

S Kinash, D Knight, M Mclean (2015) How does the use of technology in classrooms affect student learning?. 18(2), 129-139.

Christopher Lange, Jamie Costley (2020) Improving online video lectures: learning challenges created by media. 17(1).

W Leadbeater, T Shutterworth, J Couperthwaite, K Nightingale (2013) Evaluating the use and impact of lecture recording in undergraduates: Evidence for distinct approaches by different groups of students. 61, 185-192.

Mi Lee, Hongbok An (2018) A study of antecedents influencing eWOM for online lecture website. 42(7), 1048-1064.

Frances O'callaghan, David Neumann, Liz Jones, Peter Creed (2015) The use of lecture recordings in higher education: A review of institutional, student, and lecturer issues. 22(1), 399-415.

B Panther, W Wright, J (2012) Providing a flexible learning environment: Are on-line lectures the answer. 20(1), 72-82.

D Pons, L Walker, J Hollis, H Thomas (2013) Evaluation of student engagement with a lecture capture system. 40, 79-91.

Tomoko Traphagan, John Kucsera, Kyoko Kishi (2010) Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning. 58(1), 19-37.

Achievement in Training: Recorded Video Compared to Face-to-Face Environments

Published

2021-07-06

How to Cite

Achievement in Training: Recorded Video Compared to Face-to-Face Environments. (2021). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 21(A7), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJMBRAVOL21IS7PG1