Quantifying Optimal Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model: A Theoretical Analysis

Authors

  • Ahmed Bellakhdhar

Keywords:

endogenous growth, R, social planner, monopolistic distortions, optimal policy

Abstract

This paper aims to characterize the optimal growth path of an endogenous growth model with domestic innovation, human capital and external technology spillovers through import of technologically advanced products and foreign direct investments. There are three sources of inefficiency in the model; monopolistic competition in the intermediate-goods sector, duplication externalities and spillovers in R&D. This raises the question of whether an adequate government intervention can provide the required incentives to correct these inefficiencies and make the decentralized economy to replicate the first-best solution attainable by a social planner. In this study, we find that the first-best optimum can be decentralized by means of a tax on capital income at a constant rate combined with equality between the share of public spending in the total expenditure on education net of subsidy and the tax on labor income and a time-varying subsidy to R&D. Unlike previous works that focus solely on the steady state, we take explicitly into account the transitional dynamics as well.

How to Cite

Quantifying Optimal Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model: A Theoretical Analysis. (2019). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 19(30), 1-16. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/2860

References

Maria Alvarez-Pelaez, Christian Groth (2005) Too little or too much R&D?. 49(2), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(03)00045-x

Lutz Arnold (2000) Endogenous growth with physical capital, human capital and product variety: A comment. 44(8), 1599-1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(00)00063-5

- (2000) Endogenous technological change: a note on stability. 16(1), 219-226.

Susanto Basu (1996) Procyclical Productivity: Increasing Returns or Cyclical Utilization?.

Robert Barro (1990) Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogeneous Growth. 98(5, Part 2), S103-S125. https://doi.org/10.1086/261726

David Coe, Elhanan Helpman (1995) International R&D spillovers. 39(5), 859-887. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(94)00100-e

David Coe, Elhanan Helpman, Alexander Hoffmaister (1997) North-South R & D Spillovers. 107(440), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00146

T. Del Barrio-Castro, E. Lopez-Bazo, G. Serrano-Domingo (2002) New evidence on international R&D spillovers, human capital and productivity in the OECD. 77(1), 41-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(02)00090-3

H.-J Engelbrecht (1997) International R&D spillovers, human capital and productivity in OECD economies: An empirical investigation. 41(8), 1479-1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(96)00046-3

Michael Funke, Holger Strulik (2000) On endogenous growth with physical capital, human capital and product variety. 44(3), 491-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(98)00072-5

M. Gômez (2011) Duplication externalities in an endogenous growth model with physical capital, human capital, and R&D. 28(1-2), 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.09.013

Zvi Griliches (1992) The Search for R&D Spillovers. 94(0), S29. https://doi.org/10.2307/3440244

Gene Grossman, Elhanan Helpman (1991) Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth. 58(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298044

Volker Grossmann, Thomas Steger, Timo Trimborn (2010) Dynamically Optimal R&D Subsidization. 3153. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1660363

-, -, - (2010) Quantifying Optimal Growth Policy.

Jang-Ting Guo, Kevin Lansing (1999) Optimal taxation of capital income with imperfectly competitive product markets. 23(7), 967-995. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1889(98)00047-5

Joonkyung Ha, Peter Howitt (2007) Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi‐Endogenous Growth Theory. 39(4), 733-774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00045.x

Maurizio Iacopetta (2011) Formal education and public knowledge. 35(5), 676-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2011.01.006

Charles Jones (1995) R & D-Based Models of Economic Growth. 103(4), 759-784. https://doi.org/10.1086/262002

J. Williams (2000) Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. 5(1), 65-85.

R. Judd, Kenneth (1987) The Welfare Cost of Factor Taxation in a Perfect-Foresight Model. 95(4), 675-709. https://doi.org/10.1086/261481

R. Judd, Kenneth (1999) Optimal taxation and spending in general competitive growth models. 71(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(98)00054-1

S. Kortum (1993) Equilibrium R&D and the patent-R&D ratio: U. S. evidence. 83(2), 450-457.

Val Lambson, Kerk Phillips (2007) Market structure and Schumpeterian growth. 62(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.09.014

Jacob Madsen (2008) Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: testing the knowledge production function using international data. 13(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-007-9024-0

Jakob Madsen, Shishir Saxena, James Ang (2010) The Indian growth miracle and endogenous growth. 93(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.06.002

Stefan Norrbin (1993) The Relation between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry: A Contradiction. 101(6), 1149-1164. https://doi.org/10.1086/261918

M. Porter, S. Stern (2000) Measuring the "Ideas" Production Function: Evidence from International Patent Output.

Paul Romer (1990) Endogenous Technological Change. 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725

Andreas Savvides, Marios Zachariadis (2005) International Technology Diffusion and the Growth of TFP in the Manufacturing Sector of Developing Economies. 9(4), 482-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2005.00289.x

Tiago Sequeira (2011) R&D SPILLOVERS IN AN ENDOGENOUS GROWTH MODEL WITH PHYSICAL CAPITAL, HUMAN CAPITAL, AND VARIETIES. 15(2), 223-239. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100509991155

Thomas Steger (2005) Welfare Implications of Non‐scale R&D‐based Growth Models. 107(4), 737-757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2005.00426.x

Nancy Stokey (1995) R&D and Economic Growth. 62(3), 469. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298038

H. Strulik (2007) Too Much of a Good Thing? The Quantitative Economics of R&D‐driven Growth Revisited. 109(2), 369-386.

Timo Trimborn, Karl-Josef Koch, Thomas Steger (2008) MULTIDIMENSIONAL TRANSITIONAL DYNAMICS: A SIMPLE NUMERICAL PROCEDURE. 12(3), 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100507070034

Stephen Turnovsky (2000) Fiscal policy, elastic labor supply, and endogenous growth. 45(1), 185-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3932(99)00047-1

Quantifying Optimal Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model: A Theoretical Analysis

Published

2019-07-31

How to Cite

Quantifying Optimal Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model: A Theoretical Analysis. (2019). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 19(30), 1-16. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/2860