Quantifying Optimal Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model: A Theoretical Analysis
Keywords:
endogenous growth, R, social planner, monopolistic distortions, optimal policy
Abstract
This paper aims to characterize the optimal growth path of an endogenous growth model with domestic innovation, human capital and external technology spillovers through import of technologically advanced products and foreign direct investments. There are three sources of inefficiency in the model; monopolistic competition in the intermediate-goods sector, duplication externalities and spillovers in R&D. This raises the question of whether an adequate government intervention can provide the required incentives to correct these inefficiencies and make the decentralized economy to replicate the first-best solution attainable by a social planner. In this study, we find that the first-best optimum can be decentralized by means of a tax on capital income at a constant rate combined with equality between the share of public spending in the total expenditure on education net of subsidy and the tax on labor income and a time-varying subsidy to R&D. Unlike previous works that focus solely on the steady state, we take explicitly into account the transitional dynamics as well.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
Maria Alvarez-Pelaez, Christian Groth (2005) Too little or too much R&D?. 49(2), 437-456.
Lutz Arnold (2000) Endogenous growth with physical capital, human capital and product variety: A comment. 44(8), 1599-1605.
Lutz Arnold (2000) Endogenous technological change: a note on stability. 16(1), 219-226.
S Basu (1996) Procyclical productivity: Increasing returns or cyclical utilization. 111(3), 709-751.
Robert Barro (1990) Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogeneous Growth. 98(5, Part 2), S103-S125.
David Coe, Elhanan Helpman (1995) International R&D spillovers. 39(5), 859-887.
David Coe, Elhanan Helpman, Alexander Hoffmaister (1997) North-South R & D Spillovers. 107(440), 134-149.
Tomás Del Barrio-Castro, Enrique López-Bazo, Guadalupe Serrano-Domingo (2002) New evidence on international R&D spillovers, human capital and productivity in the OECD. 77(1), 41-45.
H.-J Engelbrecht (1997) International R&D spillovers, human capital and productivity in OECD economies: An empirical investigation. 41(8), 1479-1488.
M Funke, H Strulik (2000) On endogenous growth with physical capital, human capital and product variety. 44(3), 491-515.
M Gômez (2011) Duplication externalities in an endogenous growth model with physical capital, human capital, and R&D. 28(1-2), 181-187.
Zvi Griliches (1992) The Search for R&D Spillovers. 94(0), S29.
Gene Grossman, Elhanan Helpman (1991) Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth. 58(1), 43.
Volker Grossmann, Thomas Steger, Timo Trimborn (2010) Dynamically Optimal R&D Subsidization. 3153.
N Stern (2010) Public Policy for Growth and Poverty Reduction. 49(1), 5-25.
Joonkyung Ha, Peter Howitt (2007) Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi‐Endogenous Growth Theory. 39(4), 733-774.
Maurizio Iacopetta (2011) Formal education and public knowledge. 35(5), 676-693.
C Jones (1995) R&D-based models of economic growth. 103(4), 759-784.
J Williams (2000) Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. 5(1), 65-85.
R Judd, Kenneth (1987) The Welfare Cost of Factor Taxation in a Perfect-Foresight Model. 95(4), 675-709.
R Judd, Kenneth (1999) Optimal taxation and spending in general competitive growth models. 71(1), 1-26.
S Kortum (1993) Equilibrium R&D and the patent-R&D ratio: U. S. evidence. 83(2), 450-457.
V Lambson, K Phillips (2007) Market structure and Schumpeterian growth. 62(1), 47-62.
Jacob Madsen (2008) Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: testing the knowledge production function using international data. 13(1), 1-26.
Jacob Madsen, S Saxena, James Ang (2010) The Indian Growth Miracle and Endogenous Growth. 93, 37-48.
S Norrbin (1993) The relation between price and marginal cost in U.S. industry: A contradiction. 101(6), 1149-1164.
Michael Porter, Scott Stern (2000) Measuring the "Ideas" Production Function: Evidence from International Patent Output.
P Romer (1990) Endogenous technological change. 98(5), 71-S102.
Andreas Savvides, Marios Zachariadis (2005) International Technology Diffusion and the Growth of TFP in the Manufacturing Sector of Developing Economies. 9(4), 482-501.
T Sequeira (2011) R&D spillovers in an endogenous growth model with physical capital, human capital, and varieties.
T Steger (2005) Welfare implications of non-scale R&D-based growth models. 107(4), 737-757.
Nancy Stokey (1995) R&D and Economic Growth. 62(3), 469.
Holger Strulik (2007) Too Much of a Good Thing? The Quantitative Economics of R&D‐driven Growth Revisited. 109(2), 369-386.
Timo Trimborn, Karl-Josef Koch, Thomas Steger (2008) MULTIDIMENSIONAL TRANSITIONAL DYNAMICS: A SIMPLE NUMERICAL PROCEDURE. 12(3), 301-319.
Stephen Turnovsky (2000) Fiscal policy, elastic labor supply, and endogenous growth. 45(1), 185-210.
Published
2019-09-12
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.