The Structuring Role of Network Actor in the Mechanistic - Organic Hybridization of the Quality Approach in Public Hospital

Dagou Hermann Wenceslas DAGOU

Authors

Dagou Hermann Wenceslas DAGOU

Keywords:

hybridization, quality approach, sponsor, ecosystem, process

Abstract

This research is part of the process of adopting innovations in public organizations. It tries to understand how the quality approach implements a hybridization between mechanistic logic and organic logic. Interviews and a literature review examine this issue through four ISO 9001 certifications in a public hospital of last resort. The theory of the network actor is mobilized to infer interpretations. The results show the presence of a mechanical logic based on the application of the precepts of quality. Organic logic, on the other hand, begins with the ability to bridge incompatibilities and build the branch's trust network. Hybridization is a dynamic device linking the project, sponsor, process, feedback, ecosystem and environment.

Downloads

How to Cite

The Structuring Role of Network Actor in the Mechanistic - Organic Hybridization of the Quality Approach in Public Hospital. (2019). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 19(D3), 57-68. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/2814

Download Citation

References

J Alford, S Yates (2014) Mapping public value processes. 27(4), 334-352.

Julie Battilana, Matthew Lee (2014) Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing - Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises. 8(1), 397-441.

D Bédé, S Bédé, A Fiorello, N Et Maumon (2012) L'appropriation d'un outil de gestion de la qualité à travers le prisme de la légitimité: le cas d'un Institut d'Administration des Entreprises. 54(4), 83-106.

John Bryson, Barbara Crosby, Laura Bloomberg (2014) Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. 74(4), 445-456.

John Bryson, Kathryn Quick, Carissa Slotterback, Barbara Crosby (2013) Designing Public Participation Processes. 73(1), 23-34.

Michel Callon (1986) Pour une sociologie des controverses technologiques. 36, 135-157.

Alexandra Collm, Kuno Schedler (2013) Strategies for Introducing Organizational Innovation to Public Service Organizations. 16(1), 140-161.

Hanna De Vries, Victor Bekkers, Lars Tummers (2016) INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA. 94(1), 146-166.

Jean‐louis Denis, Ewan Ferlie, Nicolette Van Gestel (2015) UNDERSTANDING HYBRIDITY IN PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS. 93(2), 273-289.

Benjamin Dreveton (2017) Les outils du contrôle de gestion : des vecteurs de valeurs pour l'organisation publique ?. Tome 23(3), 9-28.

Benjamin Dreveton, Sébastien Rocher (2014) Janus réconcilié : associer traduction et purification pour analyser la trajectoire des outils de gestion. N° 103(4), 67-88.

Arnaud Eve, Pierre-Antoine Sprimont (2016) Perceptions et attitudes liées à la norme ISO 9001 : une analyse auprès de salariés opérationnels. Tome 22(1), 27-52.

Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Sandra Naoom, Frances Wallace (2005) Core Implementation Components. 19(5), 531-540.

K Fryer, J Antony, A Douglas (2007) Critical success factors of continuous improvement in the public sector: a literature review and some key findings. 19(5), 497-517.

A Halachmi (1995) Measure of Excellence. 9-23.

Vassili Joannidès, Stéphane Jaumier, Séverine Le Loarne-Lemaire (2013) La fabrique du contrôle : une ethnométhodologie du choix des outils de gestion. Tome 19(3), 87-116.

Lise Justesen, Jan Mouritsen (2011) Effects of actor‐network theory in accounting research. 24(2), 161-193.

Scott Leavengood, Timothy Anderson, Tugrul Daim (2012) Exploring linkage of quality management to innovation. 25(9-10), 1126-1140.

Daniel Lozeau (1999) Des rituels et des hommes: la gestion de la qualité en milieu hospitalier au Québec. 42(4), 542-565.

K Luder (1992) A contingency model of governmental accounting innovations in the political administrative environment. 7, 99-127.

E Maclouf, M Et De Fabregues (2015) Quand la rationalité des gestionnaires publics sauve l'organisation: L'« échec raisonné » des centres de services partagés au ministère de la Justice. 250(5), 159-175.

Peter Miller, Liisa Kurunmäki, Ted O'leary (2008) Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk. 33(7-8), 942-967.

Stephanie Moulton (2009) Putting Together the Publicness Puzzle: A Framework for Realized Publicness. 69(5), 889-900.

C Okafor, J Fatile, G Et Ejalonibu (2014) Public Service Innovations and Changing Ethos in Africa. 2(4), 46-71.

Ludivine Perray-Redslob, Julien Malaurent (2015) Traduction d'un outil de contrôle de gestion dans le secteur public. 41(250), 49-64.

Erk Piening (2011) Insights into the Process Dynamics of Innovation Implementation. 13(1), 127-157.

H.-O Pyun (2013) Hybridation du New Public Management : cas de gestion des administrateurs territoriaux en France. N° 65(7), 32-47.

Sylvie Rolland (2009) Un bilan de 20 ans de certification des systèmes de management de la qualité : les apports perçus de la certification ISO 9000 par les managers. n° 29(9), 31-51.

C Skelcher, S Smith (2015) Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits. 93(2), 433-448.

P Upping, J Oliver (2011) Accounting change model for the public sector: adapting Luder's model for developing countries. 7(1), 364-380.

Fredrika Wiesel, Sven Modell (2014) From New Public Management to New Public Governance? Hybridization and Implications for Public Sector Consumerism. 30(2), 175-205.