Corporate Sustainability Practices: A Review on the Measurements, Relevant Problems and a Proposition
Keywords:
CSP, TBL, GRI, Bursa Malaysia, Stakeholder Theory
Abstract
In recent years, corporate sustainability practices (CSP) or triple bottom line (TBL) is considered more important than just financial performance to the future success of business firms. Organizations are achieving significant benefits from incorporating sustainability in business. In addition to profit maximization, CSP is also considered to be a vital vehicle to reduce the corporate scandals. It is a common practice to engage in CSP by large companies in developed countries, but still, it is a controversial issue in developing countries. Moreover, given the critical role of CSP, government regulators are attaching more emphasis on such practices in business firms all over the world. Defining and measuring CSP is more than just an academic apprehension. In spite of nearly 50 years of previous research on sustainability, still, there is no certain standard for measuring CSP of an organization. The objectives of this article are to define CSP more clearly, discuss different techniques of measuring CSP and propose a new method for determining the CSP of firms following Bursa Malaysia Berhad reporting guideline-2015 which have been prepared according to Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) reporting framework.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
M Adams, B Thornton, M Sepehri (2012) The impact of the pursuit of sustainability on the financial performance of the firm. 1, 1-14.
N Ahmad, M Sulaiman, D Siswantoro (2003) Corporate social responsibility disclosure in Malaysia: An analysis of annual reports of KLSE performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance.
K Hussainey, M Walker (2009) The effects of voluntary disclosure and dividend propensity on prices leading earnings. 39(1), 37-55.
Ioannis Ioannou, George Serafeim (2012) What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. 43(9), 834-864.
Ioannis Ioannou, George Serafeim (2015) The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics. 36(7), 1053-1081.
I Ioannou, G Serafeim (2016) The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from four countries. 11-100.
M Janakiraman, P Jose (2007) Corporate environmental management: Imperatives for India.
Michael Jensen, William Meckling (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. 3(4), 305-360.
Madhu Khanna, Lisa Damon (1999) EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms. 37(1), 1-25.
D Krajnc, P Glavic (2005) A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. 43(2), 189-208.
Carin Labuschagne, Alan Brent, Ron Van Erck (2005) Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. 13(4), 373-385.
Karl Lins, Henri Servaes, Ane Tamayo (2017) Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. 72(4), 1785-1824.
Kerstin Lopatta, Frerich Buchholz, Thomas Kaspereit (2016) Asymmetric Information and Corporate Social Responsibility. 55(3), 458-488.
P Malarvizhi, R Matta (2016) Link between corporate environmental disclosure and firm performance"-perception or reality?. 36(1), 107-117.
D Mandelbaum (2007) Corporate sustainability strategies. 26(1), 27-42.
Joshua Margolis, Hillary Elfenbein, James Walsh (2007) Does it Pay to Be Good...And Does it Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance.
Joshua Margolis, James Walsh (2003) Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. 48(2), 268-305.
Markus Milne, Ralph Adler (1999) Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. 12(2), 237-256.
Nazli Mohd Ghazali (2007) Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: some Malaysian evidence. 7(3), 251-266.
Ivan Montiel, Javier Delgado-Ceballos (2014) Defining and Measuring Corporate Sustainability. 27(2), 113-139.
M Myers (2013) Qualitative research in business and management.
Norhasimah Nor, Norhabibi Bahari, Nor Adnan, Sheh Kamal, Inaliah Ali (2016) The Effects of Environmental Disclosure on Financial Performance in Malaysia. 35, 117-126.
(2001) Strategies for Sustainable Development.
T Ong, W Soh, B Teh, S Ng (2016) The hidden nexus: exploring financial determinants of fraud in Malaysian public listed companies. 20(2), 107-136.
Suaini Othman, Faizah Darus, Roshayani Arshad (2011) The influence of coercive isomorphism on corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation. 7(1), 119-135.
Francesco Perrini, Antonio Tencati (2006) Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. 15(5), 296-308.
Juana Rivera, Maria Muñoz, Jose Moneva (2017) Revisiting the Relationship Between Corporate Stakeholder Commitment and Social and Financial Performance. 25(6), 482-494.
Mustaruddin Saleh, Norhayah Zulkifli, Rusnah Muhamad (2011) Looking for evidence of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in an emerging market. 3(2), 165-190.
O San (2016) The hidden nexus: exploring financial determinants of fraud in Malaysian public listed companies. 20(2), 107-136.
C Searcy (2012) Corporate sustainability performance measurement systems: A review and research agenda. 107(3), 239-253.
Arun Sharma, Gopalkrishnan Iyer, Anuj Mehrotra, R Krishnan (2010) Sustainability and business-to-business marketing: A framework and implications. 39(2), 330-341.
M.-G Soana (2011) The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance in the Banking Sector. 104(1), 133-148.
C.-A Tetrault Sirsly (2015) Sustainability measures: a stakeholder focus beyond shareholders. 11(1), 17-31.
Harald Eichsteller (2017) Now Media - ... more to come!. 15-16.
J Unerman (1999) A critique of content analysis as a research method for corporate social reporting.
J Unerman (2000) Methodological issuesreflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. 13(5), 667-681.
Pieter Van Beurden, Tobias Gössling (2008) The Worth of Values - A Literature Review on the Relation Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. 82(2), 407-424.
Qian Wang, Junsheng Dou, Shenghua Jia (2016) A Meta-Analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance. 55(8), 1083-1121.
Manuela Weber (2008) The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. 26(4), 247-261.
John Butlin (1987) Our common future. By World commission on environment and development. (London, Oxford University Press, 1987, pp.383 £5.95.). 1(2), 284-287.
M.-L Wu (2006) Corporate social performance, corporate financial performance, and firm size: A meta-analysis. 8(1), 163-171.
Muhammad Zahid, Zulkipli Ghazali (2015) Corporate sustainability practices among Malaysian REITs and property listed companies. 12(2), 100-118.
D Zainal, N Zulkifli, Z Saleh (2013) Corporate social responsibility reporting in Malaysia: A comparison between shariah and non-shariah approved firms. 15(7), 1035-1046.
Daniel Zeghal, Sadrudin Ahmed (1990) Comparison of Social Responsibility Information Disclosure Media Used by Canadian Firms. 3(1), 38-53.
Published
2019-01-30
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.