Impact of Firm Size on Profitability: A Comparative Study of Islamic Bank and Commercial Bank in Pakistan

Authors

  • Syed Atif Ali

Keywords:

profitability, commercial bank, islamic bank, firm size

Abstract

This article shows the impact of banking size on the profitability of Commercial and Islamic Banks operating in the Pakistan for the period 2008-2012. In Pakistan Banking organizations provide fund for other organizational developments. This analysis is done in the context of firm size and profitability. Using data from 5 Commercial and 5 Islamic Banks, our observed study provides partial support to the hypothetical predictions. In study we use the measure the profitability of Commercial Bank and Islamic Bank in Pakistan like return on assets and firm size of all Banks like number of branches. The relationships between size and profitability measures are statistically show that Islamic Banks become more profitable with the respect of small size because there is no relation between Bank size and profitability. The regressions investigation that, there is optimistic association between Firm size and Profitability in Commercial Bank Ltd, but there is no relationship between firm size and profitability in Islamic Banks.

How to Cite

Impact of Firm Size on Profitability: A Comparative Study of Islamic Bank and Commercial Bank in Pakistan. (2018). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 18(C5), 31-35. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/2563

References

A Ahmad, N Khababa (1999) The banking sector and financial markets. 12, 70-88.

Aigbe Akhigbe, James Mcnulty (2005) Profit efficiency sources and differences among small and large U.S. commercial banks. 29(3), 289-299.

Farrukh Ijaz, Anum Akmal, Syeda Gillani (2012) The Determinants of the Pakistan Islamic Banking Industry Profitability: Panel Evidence. 02(11), 77-91.

S Ali (2012) Efficiency and profitability analysis of investment banking in Pakistan. 4(2), 1067-1083.

H Al-Tamimi (2010) Factors Influencing Performance of the UAE Islamic and Conventional National Banks. 4(2), 1-9.

Muhammad Ali, Talat Hussain (2011) Murabaha Perceptions of Islamic Bankers: Case of Pakistan. 2(2), 42-58.

Humayon Dar, John Presley (2003) Islamic Banking.

Gregory Dess, Richard Robinson (1984) Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit. 5(3), 265-273.

Rajeev Dhawan (2001) Firm size and productivity differential: theory and evidence from a panel of US firms. 44(3), 269-293.

T Edris (1997) Services considered important to business customers and determinants of Bank selection in Kuwait: A segmentation analysis. 15(4), 126-133.

Sheila Yussof, Razali Haron (2000) The ASEAN Market: Cross-Border Collaboration in Islamic Finance between Malaysia and Thailand. 04, 21-39.

Shelagh Heffernan, Maggie Fu (2008) The Determinants of Bank Performance in China.

M Jaffar, I Manarvi (2011) Performance Comparison of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Pakistan. 11(1), 59-66.

G Lumpkin, Gregory Dess (1996) Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. 21(1), 135.

M Marcus (1969) Profitability and size of firm. 104-107.

M Noulas (1997) Portfolio Mix and Large Bank profitability in the USA. 505-512.

Lawrence Seiford, Joe Zhu (1999) Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks. 45(9), 1270-1288.

Ch Spathis, K Kosmidou, M Doumpos (2002) Assessing Profitability Factor in the Greek Banking System. 9, 517-530.

M Tarawneh (2006) Comparison of financial Performance in the Banking Sector: Some Evidence from Omani Commercial Banks. 3, 101-112.

A Wilder (1985) The Effect of Firm Size on Profit Rate in U.S. Manufacturing. 181-190.

Impact of Firm Size on Profitability: A Comparative Study of Islamic Bank and Commercial Bank in Pakistan

Published

2018-08-06

How to Cite

Impact of Firm Size on Profitability: A Comparative Study of Islamic Bank and Commercial Bank in Pakistan. (2018). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 18(C5), 31-35. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/2563