The Association between Board Size, Independence and Firm Performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia

Authors

  • Mohammed Alshetwi

Keywords:

board size, board independence, firm performance, saudi nonfinancial listed firms

Abstract

This study examines the association between board size, independence and firm performance in Saudi nonfinancial listed firms. The sample consists of 329 firms during the period 2013 to 2015. Both between-and within-firms variation analysis are used to test the hypotheses. The study finds that neither board independence nor board size is linked to firm performance, but some evidence (from additional tests) supports the argument that nonexecutive members of the board of directors may lack real independence; in this case they would be both less effective and more costly for firms. Together, these findings are consistent with the view that business structure in Saudi Arabia is dominated by a tribal system that gives more attention to personal relationships instead of skill and competency in selecting member of the board of directors.

How to Cite

The Association between Board Size, Independence and Firm Performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. (2017). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 17(D1), 17-28. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/2204

References

S Alves (2014) The Effect of Board Independence on the Earnings Quality: Evidence from Portuguese Listed Companies. 8(3), 24-44.

Sanjai Bhagat, Bernard Black (2002) The Non-Correlation Between Board Independence and Long-Term Firm Performance. 27, 231-274.

S Cheng, J Evans, H Nagarajan, N, J (2008) Board size and firm performance: the moderating effects of the market for corporate control. 31, 121-145.

J Coles, N Daniel, L Naveen (2008) Boards: Does one size fit all☆. 87(2), 329-356.

J Dahya, J Mcconnell (2007) Board Composition, Corporate Performance, and the Cadbury Committee Recommendation. 42(3), 535-564.

Dan Dalton, Catherine Daily, Alan Ellstrand, Jonathan Johnson (1998) Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. 19(3), 269-290.

D Dalton, R Johnson, J Ellstrand, A (1999) Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. 42(6), 674-686.

Theodore Eisenberg, Stefan Sundgren, Martin Wells (1998) Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. 48(1), 35-54.

Y Fallatah, D Dickins (2012) Corporate governance and firm performance and value in Saudi Arabia. 6(36), 10025-10034.

Fitriya Fauzi, S Locke (2012) Equity Ownership and Capital Structure Determinants: A Study of New Zealand-Listed Firms. 8(2), 43-67.

Sharifah Fuzi, Syahrina Halim, M Julizaerma (2016) Board Independence and Firm Performance. 37, 460-465.

R Haniffa, M Hudaib (2006) Corporate Governance Structure and performance of Malaysian Listed Companies. 33(7), 1034-1062.

Paul Guest (2009) The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK. 15(4), 385-404.

Kevin Hendry, Geoffrey Kiel (2004) The Role of the Board in Firm Strategy: integrating agency and organisational control perspectives. 12(4), 500-520.

Benjamin Hermalin, Michael Weisbach (1988) The Determinants of Board Composition. 19(4), 589.

Amy Hillman, Thomas Dalziel (2003) Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives. 28(3), 383-396.

M Hossain, A Prevost, K Rao, R, P (2001) Corporate Governance in New Zealand: The Effect of the 1993 Companies Act on the Relation between Board Composition and Firm Performance. 9, 119-145.

Jolien Huybrechts, Wim Voordeckers, Bert D'espallier, Nadine Lybaert, Anita Van Gils (2016) The Board's Demography-Firm Performance Relationship Revisited: A Bayesian Approach. 54(3), 992-1007.

Michael Jensen (1993) The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. 48(3), 831-880.

M Jensen, W Meckling (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. 3, 305-360.

S Larmou, N Vafeas (2010) The relation between board size and firm performance in firms with a history of poor operating performance. 14, 61-85.

C Luan, M Tang (2007) Where is independent Director Efficacy?. 15(4), 636-643.

Krishna Reddy, Stuart Locke, Frank Scrimgeour, Abeyratna Gunasekarage (2008) Corporate governance practices of small cap companies and their financial performance: an empirical study in New Zealand. 4(1), 51.

Y Wang, J Oliver (2009) Board composition and firm performance variance: Australian evidence. 22(2), 196-212.

David Yermack (1996) Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. 40(2), 185-211.

Shaker Zahra, John Pearce (1989) Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model. 15(2), 291-334.

The Association between Board Size, Independence and Firm Performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia

Published

2017-03-23

How to Cite

The Association between Board Size, Independence and Firm Performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. (2017). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 17(D1), 17-28. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/2204