Evaluation of Mutual Funds Performance in Bangladesh: Investors and Market Perspective

Authors

  • Tanvir Mohammad Hayder Arif

  • S M Rakibul Anwar

Keywords:

mutual funds, performance evaluation and bangladesh

Abstract

Net assets value is the widely used techniques to know the fund's overall performance. NAV calculation of mutual funds in Bangladesh is guided by Bangladesh securities exchange commission (BSEC). Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio and Jensen's Alpha are the three popular indicators that are used by investor and researcher to know the performance of mutual fund. In this paper an attempt is made to evaluate the performance of 31 growth oriented mutual funds on the basis of weekly NAV and Weekly close price compared to benchmark returns. For this purpose, risk adjusted performance measures suggested by Jenson, Treynor and Sharpe are employed widely known as Treynor ratio, Sharpe ratio, and Jensen's alpha. This study found that over the research period selected mutual funds shows large negative return than and downward trend in comparison to market return.

How to Cite

Evaluation of Mutual Funds Performance in Bangladesh: Investors and Market Perspective. (2017). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 16(C9), 1-9. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/2123

References

M Abdullah, K Parvez (2012) Corporate Governance of Mutual Fund in Bangladesh. 3(6), 103-112.

B Abbasi, S Shah (2012) Mutual funds performance evaluation: A case of Pakistani mutual funds industry in Years 2008-10. 12(17), 79-85.

R Ali, . Qudous (2012) Performance Evaluation of Selected Open Ended Mutual Funds in Pakistan. 3(9), 1076-1083.

J Annaert, J Van Den Broeck, R Vander Vennet (2003) Determinants of mutual fund under performance: A Bayesian stochastic frontier approach. 151(3), 617-632.

Brad Barber, Xing Huang, Terrance Odean (2000) Which Risk Factors Matter to Investors? Evidence from Mutual Fund Flows. 1-47.

M Ferreira, A Keswani, A Miguel, S Ramos The Determinants of Mutual Fund Performance: A Cross-Country Study.

Armando Gomes (2000) Going Public without Governance: Managerial Reputation Effects. 55(2), 615-646.

Sweta Goel, Mukta Mani (2012) Efficiency measurement of open-ended mutual fund schemes with respect to Indian mutual fund industry. 9(2), 140.

Aneel Keswani, David Stolin (2005) Mutual Fund Performance Persistence and Competition: A Cross-Sector Analysis.

Ajay Khorana, Henri Servaes (1999) The Determinants of Mutual Fund Starts.

M Monjazeb, E Ramazanpour (2013) A Study of Factors Influencing Individual Investors in Mutual Funds Selection. 3(15), 1707-1711.

M Qamruzzaman (2014) http://www.innspub.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/IJB-V4No1-p158-166.pdf. 4(1), 158-166.

Muhammad Raza, Muhammad Nazam, Faiz Rasool, Muhammad Ullah (2013) Assessing the Return and Risk Equity Mutual Funds: A Case Study from the Financial Markets of Pakistan. 9(3), 337-354.

E Remolona, P Kleiman, D Gruenstein (1997) Market returns and mutual fund flows. 33-52.

A Rahman, F Qiang, S Barua (2012) Mutual fund performance: An analysis of monthly returns of an emerging market. 17.

S Shah, Syed Hijazi (2005) Performance Evaluation of Mutual Funds in Pakistan. 44(4), 863-876.

Mahreen Mahmud, Nawazish Mirza (2011) An Evaluation of Mutual Fund Performance in an Emerging Economy: The Case of Pakistan. 16(Special Edition), 301-316.

Evaluation of Mutual Funds Performance in Bangladesh: Investors and Market Perspective

Published

2017-01-26

How to Cite

Evaluation of Mutual Funds Performance in Bangladesh: Investors and Market Perspective. (2017). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 16(C9), 1-9. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/2123