Analysis Status Quo and Strategies of Medical Ethics Evaluation System of Public Hospitals in China

Wang Yu; Tu Qing; Huang Li

Authors

Wang Yu
Tu Qing
Huang Li

Keywords:

medical ethics evaluation; china; negative list

Abstract

Ethics, an essential dimension of human research, is considered both as discipline and practice. For clinical research, ethically justified criteria for the design, conduct, and review of clinical investigation can be identified by obligations to both the researcher and human subject. Medical practitioners are expected to not only have the skills and knowledge relevant to their field but also with the ethical and legal expectations that arise out of the standard practices. A highest level of knowledge, awareness and understanding of ethics are expected in medical practice as it is the foundation of sound healthcare delivery system. Though literatures review, status quos of medical evaluation system are found in China. Although Chinese government attach extreme important to ethics evaluation, medical ethics education and building can be value by China. Negative List System is used in health management field firstly. Some suggestions are given to government to improve development of medical ethics evaluation system.

Downloads

How to Cite

Analysis Status Quo and Strategies of Medical Ethics Evaluation System of Public Hospitals in China. (2015). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 15(A8), 57-60. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/1736

Download Citation

References

J Wisely (2008) Research ethics committees. 58(553), 580.

M Martín-Arribas, I Rodríguez-Lozano, J Arias-Díaz (2012) Ethical review of research protocols: experience of a research ethics committee. 65(6), 525-529.

M Mcdonald, A Townsend, S Cox, N Paterson, D Lafrenière (2008) Trust in health research relationships: accounts of human subjects. 3(4), 35-47.

Jaya Kaushik, Manish Narang, Nupur Agarwal (2010) Informed consent in pediatric practice. 47(12), 1039-1046.

Kamela Scott, David Chesire, J Burns, Michael Nussbaum (2012) Proficiency of Surgical Faculty and Residents with Ethical Dilemmas: Is Modeling Enough?. 69(6), 780-784.

J Cohen, I Marcoux, J Bilsen, P Deboosere, G Van Der Wal, L Deliens (2006) European public acceptance of euthanasia: sociodemographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries. 63, 743-756.

G Ravindran (2008) Medical ethics education in India. 5(1), 18-19.

Laura Londra, Edward Wallach, Yulian Zhao (2014) Assisted reproduction: Ethical and legal issues. 19(5), 264-271.

Simon Tamayo-Velázquez, M Barrio-Cantalejo, I (2008) Advance directives in Spain. Perspectives from a medical bioethicist approach. 22, 346-354.

Luke Brewster, Dan Hall, Raymond Joehl (2011) Assessing Residents in Surgical Ethics: We Do It a Lot; We Only Know a Little. 171(2), 395-398.

M Baily (2011) Futility, autonomy, and cost in end-of-life care. 39(2), 172-182.

C Geppert, W Shelton (2012) A comparison of general medical and clinical ethics consultations: what can we learn from each other?. 87(4), 381-389.

Volnei Garrafa, Jan Solbakk, Susana Vidal, Claudio Lorenzo (2010) Between the needy and the greedy: the quest for a just and fair ethics of clinical research. 36(8), 500-504.

Elliot Tapper, Christian Vercler, Deborah Cruze, William Sexson (2010) Ethics Consultation at a Large Urban Public Teaching Hospital. 85(5), 433-438.

E Tapper (2013) Consults for conflict: the history of ethics consultation. 26(4), 417-422.

Mohamed Ghanem, M Kassem, A (2012) Knowledge, perceptions and practices towards medical ethics among physician residents of University of Alexandria Hospitals, Egypt. 18(9), 935-945.

J Luce (2013) Chronic disorders of consciousness following coma. 144(4), 1388-1393.

Y Zhou (2014) The negative list in foreign investment access. 7-8.