Active Learning and Critical Thinking in Marketing: Using

C. M. Sashi

Authors

C. M. Sashi

Keywords:

active learning, experiential learning, critical thinking, marketing theory, marketing education, Socratic method

Abstract

This paper proposes using "exercises" (articles to spur Socratic dialogue), a pedagogical innovation to foster learning of critical concepts in marketing. Exercises enable students relatively unfamiliar with business and strategic decision making to learn marketing theory by applying concepts to better understand and solve current problems confronting an actual company. By allowing students to apply concepts in specific, feature-rich, real contexts, exercises stimulate critical thinking ability in the best traditions of the Socratic method. Exercises inspire understanding, analysis, and problem solving through reading, reflection, discussion, and application of marketing concepts. Learning from peers by sharing information and applying marketing concepts to generate insights about compelling problems helps enhance student retention of critical ideas.

Downloads

How to Cite

Active Learning and Critical Thinking in Marketing: Using. (2015). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 15(E2), 1-9. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/1686

Download Citation

References

D Bacon, K Stewart (2006) How Fast Do Students Forget What They Learn in Consumer Behavior? A Longitudinal Study. 28, 181-192.

W Bearden, P Ellen, R Netemeyer (2000) Challenges and Prospects Facing Doctoral Education in Marketing. 10(Spring), 1-14.

Gregory Black, Clayton Daughtrey, Jeffrey Lewis (2014) The Importance of Course Design on Classroom Performance of Marketing Students. 24(3), 213-226.

Dawn Burton (2003) Rethinking the UK System of Doctoral Training in Marketing. 19(7-8), 883-904.

D Clayson, D Haley (2005) Marketing Models in Education: Students as Customers, Products, or Partners. 15(Spring), 1-10.

A Cunningham (1999) Confessions of a Reflective Practitioner: Meeting the Challenges of Marketing's Destruction. 33(7/8), 685-697.

N Diamond, S Koernig, Z Iqbal (2008) Uniting Active and Deep Learning to Teach Problem-Solving Skills. 30, 116-129.

S Dibb, C Simoes, R Wensley (2014) Establishing the Scope of Marketing Practice: Insights from Practitioners. 48(1/2), 380-404.

D Finch, J Nadeau, O' Norm, Reilly (2013) The Future of Marketing Education: A Practitioner's Perspective. 35, 54-67.

Nancy Frontczak (1998) A Paradigm for the Selection, Use and Development of Experiential Learning Activities in Marketing Education. 8(3), 25-33.

Timothy Graeff, R (2010) Strategic Teaching for Active Learning. 20(3), 265-278.

D Gray, J Peltier, J Schibrowsky (2012) The Journal of Marketing Education: Past, Present, and Future. 34, 217-237.

T Hughes, A Tapp, R Hughes (2008) Achieving Effective Academic/Practitioner Knowledge Exchange in Marketing. 24(1-2), 221-240.

M Johnson, J Malinowski (2001) Navigating the Active Learning Swamp: Creating an Inviting Environment for Learning. 31, 172-177.

D Kolb (1984) Experiential Learning.

P Kotler, G Armstrong (2014) Principles of Marketing.

T Li, B Greenberg (2009) Examination of a Discontinuous Innovation Adoption in an MBA Marketing Curriculum: A Partnership Perspective. 29(Spring), 51-61.

Zaida Martínez, Brian Toyne, Richard Menger (2000) Research Expectations at Business Schools: Responding to Changing Business Education Pressures. 16(7), 761-778.

C Meyers, T Jones (1993) Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom.

A Molin, J Stoll (2013) IKEA's Iconic Meatball Drawn Into Horse-Meat Scandal.

S Morgan, L Martin, B Howard, P Mihalek (2005) Active Learning: What is it and Why Should I Use it?. 32, 19-223.

S Nassauer (2011) Old Ketchup Packet Heads for Trash.

J Pearce, Ii, P Bonner (2000) The Views of Marketing Faculty on the Major Controversies in Collegiate Business Education Reform. 16(7), 779-791.

Michael Prince (2004) Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. 93(3), 223-231.

D Reibstein, G Day, J Wind (2009) Guest Editorial: Is Marketing Academia Losing its Way. 73, 1-3.

Reg Revans (2011) ABC of Action Learning.

B Schee (2012) The Influence of New Product Characteristics on Rate of Adoption: Increasing Student Comprehension with the Bidding for Buyers Game. 34(3), 251-264.

John Schibrowsky, James Peltier, Thomas Boyt (2002) A Professional School Approach to Marketing Education. 24(1), 43-55.

R Schlee, K Harich (2010) Knowledge and Skill Requirements for Marketing Jobs in the 21 st Century. 32, 341-352.

Steven Taylor, Gary Hunter, Horace Melton, Stephen Goodwin (2011) Student Engagement and Marketing Classes. 33(1), 73-92.

Angela Tregear, Suzanne Dobson, Mary Brennan, Sharron Kuznesof (2010) Critically divided?. 44(1/2), 66-86.

Robert Wheeler (2008) Experiential Learning: Impact of Two Instructional Methods on Student - Instructor Interaction, Student Critical Thinking, and Student Course Evaluations. 12(1), 63-78.

Theresa Wilson (2014) It Takes One to Know One: A Class Exercise in Mental Models. 24(1), 65-68.

Mark Young, Eve Caudill, J Murphy (2008) Evaluating Experiential Learning Activities. 13(1), 28-40.