Remittances and Competition: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach
Keywords:
Abstract
The phenomenal growth of remittances in recent times has caught the attention of governments particularly in the developing countries, international organizations, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and the private sector, due to its importance as a viable source of external financing. The main problem identified in transferring these monies is that the competitive environment for money transfers in Nigeria is highly constrained. This is due to a near-monopolistic hold on the market by one money transfer organization (MTO) and the fact that banks are the only entities legally authorized to perform international payments. Findings from the policy analysis matrix results shows divergence in the revenue, costs and profits were negative (-2989360,-172074, -268246, -2549040). This indicates that the society value remittances more than the market. The PCR was negative which shows that the system is not competitive and a negative SRP shows a tax on inbound transfer. The study concluded that money transfer service as rendered by banks and their partners in Nigeria is not competitive. Governments and policy makers can contribute to improving competition, lowering transaction costs, and reducing informality.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
(0145) McLuhan Watch 14-15 periodicals: À la page 59; L'Actualité macluhanisme 3, 5, 8, 22, 40ff, 104; 6; Arguments 24; Artforum 2; Art & as cyclone 34, 36-7; and écriture Text 3; L'Aurore 5; Beyond 14; Blast 37; as philosophical bomb 105; 56; C Theory 11; CJPST 11, 17, 69; poltergeists of 106 Carrefour 5, 105, 120; Critique 4, M(a)cLuhanites 7, 85, 106 18; Le Devoir 5, 119; Dew-Line Mcreader 61 Newsletter 1, 15, 50, 72; Combat 24, Mcwork 12 120; Economist 3; Elle 24; Esprit masses 3; mass form 94-5; see also 24; Explorations 1, 13, 16, 107, 110; implosion L'Express 5; Le Figaro 4, 24, 50; media: environments 1, 8, 12, 14, 38, 27, Figaro Littéraire 120; Flash Art 2; 29; structure of 19, 38; Forces 6, 99, 100; Fortune 24; technologies 29, 67 Impulse 3; Life 24; Les lettres misnomers: existentialist 25; nouvelles 75; Le Monde 5, 16, 74, phenomenologist 21-2; 25-6; 121; Nouvel Observateur 57, 119; structuralist 25-6 On the Beach 3; Parachute 3; Paris MM 59 Match 24; Partis Pris 5; Playboy M.McL. 62 99, 102; La Presse 5, 100, 119; La Moog synthesizer 10; ambient Quinzaine littéraire 4, 18; Reader's soundscapes 11-12 Digest 24; Science et Vie 5; Sept-mosaic method 5, 25; and sociology 18 Jours 5; Tel Quel 38; Time 24, 27, multiplexage analogique de 28; TLS 34; Toronto Star 20; composantes (MAC) 48 Toronto Telegram 47; Traverses 82; mythologies 21, 24-5, 30-2; political Utopie 83; Varsity Graduate 16; mythology 29; and sociology 30 Wired 1, 13, 105 Phase Alternative Line (PAL) 48 Narcissus 68 postmodernism 4, 8, 11, 23, 64-67, 111; anti- 38; and late capitalism 10, 111-12; neo-baroque 25; objet petit a 7, 52, 54, 59, 60, 63; little a potlatch 4; triphasic models 99, 54; objet petit tas 52; sublime object 112-13, 116 59 potentialization 8 Office de radiodiffusion-télévision primitivism 106ff; postmodern 70; see française (ORTF) 44, 46, 56, 57 also tribalism Ontario Science Centre (OSC) 10 probe 12, 80 orality 39-41, 43, 49, 50, 63, 100, psychoanalysis 19, 53, 56, 63, 110; 107; as web 39 rationalisation 38 panic 64-6 Québec 1, 99; Concordia University 9; participation 13, 71, 83, 86, 88, 92; French Canadian culture 91-2, 99; referendum mode 89; simulation of Hydro-Québec 6, 100; Montréal 4- 87 5, 104; nationalism 91, 100, 102; pataphysics 55 October Crisis 104; racist. 1, 149-149.
(1999) What has Asia learned about surging capital flows?.
E Monke, S Pearson (1989) The Policy Analysis Matrix for Agricultural Development. 18-19.
M Orozco (2007) Remittances, Competition, and Fair Financial Access Opportunities in Nigeria.
(2013) Migration and Remittance Flows: Recent Trends and Outlook, 2013-2016.
C Freund, N Spatafora (2008) Remittances: Transaction Costs, Determinants, and Informal Flows. 86, 356-366.
William Masters, Alex Winter‐nelson (1995) Measuring the Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Activities: Domestic Resource Costs and the Social Cost‐Benefit Ratio. 77(2), 243-250.
(2013) Migration and Remittances: Recent Developments and Outlook.
Published
2014-07-03
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.