Global Business and Cybernetic Neocolonialism (A Non Mainstream Approach to Impossible Trinity of Globalization)

Authors

  • Dragoljub Stojanov

Keywords:

competitiveness, Development, globalizetion, illusion, trinity

Abstract

In this paper I wish to suggest that « obsession» of a transition economy with competitiveness and trade openness, together with « hands off» sort of economic policy, may hardly lead an-infant economy‖(a transition economy) towards-real incomeconvergence and caching up with mature developed economy on her long-run development path. Moreover, such an obsession may have deflationary impact upon an economy defined as «factordriven economy, let alone on an « aid-driven economy». However, I point out that in time of extant and particularly future globalization of the world economy no country is (will be) in a position to enjoy own economic development strategy. I conclude that a virtual-market state is devoid of both political and economic sovereignty and therefore becomes a slave of cybernetic neocolonialism. The impossible trinity of globalization: globalization-political independence-economic independence is an issue to be resolved by new world economic order and the economist's worldwide if the world prefers to enjoy common benefits of achieved technological progress. I propose that such a successful solution requires a new economic theory and policy..

Downloads

How to Cite

Global Business and Cybernetic Neocolonialism (A Non Mainstream Approach to Impossible Trinity of Globalization). (2013). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 13(31), 11-18. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/103305

References

I. Adelamn (2001) Fallacies in Development Theory and Their Implications for Policy, in ―Frontiers of Development Economics‖, ed. by G.

I. Adelman (1999) THE Role of Government in Economic Development, Working paprer 890.

B. Balasa (1980) the Process of Industrial Development and Alternative Development Strategies, IFS, Princeton.

R. Baldwin (1982) the Inefficacy of Trade Policy, IFS, Princeton.

J. Bhagwati (2004) Defense of Globalization.

W. Baumo (1979) Economics Principles and Policy, Harcourt, Brace & Co.

S. Bichler, J. - Nitzan (2012) The Asymptotes of Power, Paper read at the 2nd Annual Conference of the Forum on Capital as Power, ―The Capitalist Mode of Power: Past, Present, Future‖, October 20- 21, 2011, York University. 1-45.

R. Florida, T. Gulden, C. Mellander (2008) The rise of the mega-region, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 1(3), 459-476.

Jeffrey Frankel (1999) No Single Currency Regime is Right for all Countries or at all Times. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7338

R. Hilferding (1952) Finansijski capital, Kultura, Beograd.

B. Horvat (1993) the Program for Economic Development for Croatia.

Branko Horvat (1999) The Evolution of International Trade Theory. 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333983386

B. Horvat (2001) New Deal for Croatia.

M. Keynes (1932) Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren, in Essays in Persuasion, Harcourt, Brace & Co.

C. KINDELBERGER (1978) Government and International Trade, IFS.

Paul Krugman (1994) Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. 73(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.2307/20045917

P. Krugman (1994) Competitiveness: Does it Matter.

P. Krugman, J. Stiglitz (1992) Towards a Counterrevolution in Development Theory, World Bank.

D. Lumb (1990) What does it mean to join the World Economy, OECD?.

Angus Maddison (2001) The World Economy, OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264189980-en

E. Mandel (1972) Decline of the Dollar: a Marxist view of the monetary crisis.

S. Marris (1984) Managing the world economy: Will we ever learn? International Finance Section.

P. McCann (2008) Globalization and Economic geography: the world is curved, not flat, Cambridge Journal of Regions. 1(3), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn002

M. Panic (2003) Supply-Side Strategy for Productivity, Competitiveness and Convergence for the EU and the CEECs.

M. Porter (1998) The New Global Economy and Developing Countries.

D. Rodrik (1997) Has Globalization Gone Too Far.

S. Schuker (1988) American Reparations to Germany 1919-1933, IFS.

J. Stiglitz (2002) Globalization and its Discontents.

J. Stiiglitz, B. -Greenwald (2006) Helping Infant Economies growth: Foundations of Trade Policy for Developing Countries.

S. Schuker (1988) American Reparations to Germany, 1919-33: Implications for the Third World Debt Crisis, International Finance Section.

D. Stojanov (1995) „Some Unresolved Macroeconomic Issues of the Transition Process in Former Socialist Countries ―, In Economic Price of the Peace, Paris, 1995.

D. Stojanov (1996) Macroeconomic Policy Issues Relating to Transition to a Market Economy in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

D. Stojanov (1997) Economic Development Strategy for B&H, UNDP, team leader and main author.

D. Stojanov (2001) B&H Since 1995: Transition and Reconstruction of the Economy, in «International Support Policies to South-East European Countries- Lessons not) Learned». 1.

D. Stojanov (2004) Hungary and B&H: A Success and a Failure of Transition, Hungarian Academy of Science.

D. Stojanov (2009) Economics of Peacemaking: Lessons from B&H, the Portland Trust, London.

D. Stojanov (2012) Economic Theory at Crossroad. 3.

D. Stojanov (2013) Ekonomska kriza I kriza ekonomske znanosti, EFRI.

The Speaks (2007) silent majority, n.

World Bank, European Commission, EBRD (1996) Bosnia and Herzegovina on the Road to Recovery, World Bank.

L. Summers (2000) The New Wealth of Nations.

Hambrecht & Quits Technology Conference, San Francisco.

M. Wolf (2004) Why Globalization Works.

Global Business and Cybernetic Neocolonialism (A Non Mainstream Approach to Impossible Trinity of Globalization)

Published

2013-09-10

How to Cite

Global Business and Cybernetic Neocolonialism (A Non Mainstream Approach to Impossible Trinity of Globalization). (2013). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 13(31), 11-18. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/103305