Comprendre Laimpact Du Conservatisme Sur La Performance Internationale Des Entreprises Familiales : Un Etat De Laart

Authors

  • Hind Hourmat Allah

Keywords:

conservatism, family business, culture, internationalization, performance

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to reflect on the relationship between conservatism as a state of mind and the international performance of family businesses. To achieve this, we opted for a dialectical approach associated with a narrative synthesis. Thus, two theses were highlighted. The first considers conservatism as a factor inhibiting internationalization. Because of their emotional attachment to the business and the stability of property, family businesses generally show a greater reduction in their innovativeness and their proactive than non-family businesses. The second theory considers conservatism as neutral or sometimes challenging internationalization. Great importance was given to the complex social resources which are the product of interactions between family members, and which are likely to ensure greater international performance.

How to Cite

Comprendre Laimpact Du Conservatisme Sur La Performance Internationale Des Entreprises Familiales : Un Etat De Laart. (2016). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 16(32), 79-88. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/

References

J. Allouche, B. et Amman (1998) La confiance: Une explication des performances des entreprises familiales. 129-154.

J. Allouche, B. et Amman (2000) Allouche, J et Amman, B., 2000, «L'entreprise Familiale : un Etat de l'Art», Finance. 3, 1.

J. Arregle, P. Very (2003) et Raytcheva, S., 2003, « Capital social et avantages des firmes familiales : proposition d'un modèle intégrateur», in Fery, F & Laroche, H, Perspectives en Management Stratégique, Tome X. 37-61.

J. Astrachan (1988) H., 1988, «Family Firm and Community Culture», Family Business Review. 1(2), 165-189.

J. Barney (1986) Organizational culture: Can it be a source of competitive advantage?. 11(3), 656-665.

B. Basly (2005) Basly, B., 2005 « L'internationalisation de la PME familiale : une analyse fondée sur l'apprentissage organisationnel et le développement de la croissance », Thèse, Université Montesquieu - Bordeaux IV, 2005.

B. Basly (2007) Basly, B., 2007 « Conservatism: An Explanation Of The Financial Choices Of The Small And Medium Family Enterprise», Corporate ownership and control 5. 5, 459-469.

D. Denison, C. Leif, J. Ward (2004) L., 2004, « Culture in Family-owned Enterprises: Recognizing and Leveraging Unique Strengths », Family Business Review. 17(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00004.x

R. Donckels, E. Frohlich (1991) Are Family Businesses Really Different? European Experiences from STRATOS. 4(2), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00149.x

D. Durkheim (1964) The Division of Labor in Society. 262, 396-402.

E. Fama, MC. Jensen (1983) Separation of Ownership and Control. 26.

M. Gobel, T. Ong, A. Harris (2014) Gobel, M. S., Ong, T., & Harris, A. J. L., 2014, «A culture-by-context analysis of endowment effects», In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.). 2269-2274.

Habbershon T, Williams M. (1999) A ressource based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. 12(1), 1-25.

Helmke G (2004) et Levitsky S., 2004, «Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda», Perspectives on politics, vol 02, No. 2, 725-740.

G. Hofstede, G. Hofstede, M. Minkov (2010) Cultures et organisations: Nos programmations mentales » Pearson, 3ème édition. 634.

P. Jenster, S. Malone (1991) Resting on your Laurels: The Plateauing of the Owner-manager.

Reginald Litz (1995) A., 1995, « The Family Business: Toward Definitional Clarity ». 1995(1), 100-104. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1995.17536337

A. Miller (1994) Dynamic indicators of selfperceived conservatism. 35, 175-182.

J. Müller (2006) Comprehending conservatism: A new framework for analysis. 11(3), 359-65.

M. Mustakallio, E. Autio (2002) Governance, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Growth in Family Firms.

J. Nahapiet, S. Ghoshal (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. 24(2), 242-266.

Ranft A, O'Neill H, « Board Composition (2001) Board composition and high-flying founders: Hints of trouble to come?. 1, 126-138.

E. Schein (1996) H., 1996, «Culture: The Missing Concept in Organization Studies», Administrative Science Quarterly. 41(2), 229.

S. Schwartz (1994) Beyond Individualism/ Collectivism: New Cultural Dimensions of Values. 85-99.

S. Tangeaoui (1993) les entrepreneurs marocains: pouvoir, société et modernité.

T. Zellweger (2010) Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. 1(1), 54-63.

Comprendre Laimpact Du Conservatisme Sur La Performance Internationale Des Entreprises Familiales : Un Etat De Laart

Published

2016-09-26

How to Cite

Comprendre Laimpact Du Conservatisme Sur La Performance Internationale Des Entreprises Familiales : Un Etat De Laart. (2016). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 16(32), 79-88. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/