The Effects of Entity Shielding on Claims to Assets: Implications for Financial Reporting

Todd Sayre

Authors

Todd Sayre

Keywords:

reporting entity; reporting perspective; entity shielding; liquidation protection

Abstract

Strong entity shielding enables corporations to shield firm assets not only from shareholders but also from each shareholder's personal creditors. This implies that corporations, not shareholders, own the firm assets. This paper tests this implication by examining legal scholarship on shareholder ownership. The results indicate that, unlike sole proprietors, shareholders have no legal claims to firm assets. This result responds to FASB/ISAB convergence discussions regarding whether corporate reports should take a proprietary or entity perspective. Shareholders have no claims to firm assets, yet balance sheets imply shareholders have exclusive claims to net assets, identical to those of sole proprietors. Therefore, the propriety perspective appears inappropriate for corporate balance sheets. The paper discusses how standard setters can use entity shielding to determine claims to firm assets as a principled approach to differentiate reporting perspectives among reporting entities.

Downloads

Article PDF

How to Cite

The Effects of Entity Shielding on Claims to Assets: Implications for Financial Reporting. (2022). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 22(D2), 21-34. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/102207

Download Citation

References

Armen Alchian, Harold Demsetz (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. 62, 173-196.

Stephen Bainbridge (2002) The Board of Directors as Nexus of Contracts: A Critique of Gulati, Klein & Zolt's 'Connected Contracts' Model. 2-05.

(2008) The New Corporation Governance in Theory and Practice.

Lucian Bebchuk, Arye (2005) The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power. 833-842.

Lawrence Becker, C (1977) Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations.

Margaret Blair, Lynn Stout (2003) Specific Investment and Corporate Law. 7(2), 473-500.

Lynn Stout (1999) A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law. 85(2), 247-328.

Randall Bodner, L Peter, Welsh (2005) Disney Directors Not Liable But Questions Remain. 19(9), 2-8.

Paul Bork (2005) Fiduciary Duties of a Director of a Delaware Corporation. 101.

Ezra Bowen (1926) The Concept of Private Property. 11, 41-48.

D Ciepley (2013) Beyond public and private: Toward a political theory of the corporation. 107(1), 139-158.

C Couchman (1921) GOVERNMENT SURPLUS MEDICAL STORES.. 197(5101), 1199.

G Dari-Mattiacci, O Gelderblom, J Jonker, E Perotti (2017) The emergence of the corporate form. 33(2), 193-236.

Harold Demsetz (1967) Frischmann's View of "Toward a Theory of Property Rights". 4(1), 347-359.

Reza Dibadj (2006) Delayering Corporate Law. 34, 469-533.

E Dodd, Merrick (1941) The Modern Corporation, Private Property, and Recent Federal Legislation. 54(6), 917.

David Donaldson (2005) The Nomination of Directors Under U.S. and German Law.

Frank Easterbrook, R Daniel, Fischel (1991) The Economic Structure of Corporate Law.

(1978) Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts. 167-167.

(Nove) Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 6.

(2010) The Conceptual Framework Project of FASB. 6, 105-112.

Daniel Greenwood (2006) Faith Based Investing: are shares entitled to the residual?. 32, 91-130.

Henry Hansmann, Reinier Kraakman (2000) The Essential Role of Organizational Law. 110(3), 387.

Henry Hansmann, Reinier Kraakman (2002) Property, Contract, and Verification: The Numerus Clausus Problem and the Divisibility of Rights. 31(S2), S373-S420.

R __ & Squire (2006) Law and the Rise of the Firm. 119, 1335.

H Hatfield (1909) Modern Accounting, Its Principles and Some of Its Problems.

Todd Henderson (2007) Everything Old Is New Again: Lessons from Dodge v.

Robert Hessen (1979) Robert Hessen (1983), 'The Modern Corporation and Private Property: A Reappraisal', 26, Journal of Law and Economics, pp. 273-89.. 30, 23-40.

Wesley Hohfeld (1913) Wesley Hohfeld, "Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning," 23 Yale Law Journal 16 (1913). 16, 45-82.

Wesley Hohfeld (1917) Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. 26(8), 710.

(2008) Exposure Draft: An improved Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting; Chapter 1: The Objective of Financial Reporting, Chapter 2: Qualitative Characteristics and Constraints on Decision-useful Financial Report-ing Information, Jointly with the FASB.

Paddy Ireland (2001) Defending the Rentier: Corporate Theory and the Reprivatisation of the Public Company.

A Levitt (2006) The Wolf of Wall Street. 18(2), 14.

Walter Lippmann (1985) Drift and Mastery.

Mark Loewenstein (2004) The Quiet Transformation of Corporate Law. 57, 384-385.

Thomas Merrill, Henry Smith (0111) What Happened to Property in Law and Economics?. 111(2), 357.

Robert Monks, Nell Minow (2001) Corporate Governance.

Munzer, R Stephen (1990) A Theory of Property.

William Paton (1922) W. A. Paton, Accounting Theory (New York: The Ronald Press Company 1922), p. 187.. 11-11.

A __&, Littleton (1940) An Introduction to Corporate Accounting Standards. 3.

J Penner (1996) The 'Bundle of Rights' Picture of Property Revisited. 43, 3-36.

(1994) Distributive Liberty: A Relational Model of Freedom, Coercion, and Property Law. 107(4), 859.

Rosamond Sprague (1908) The Rhetoric of Morality and Philosophy. 26(1), 97-98.

Lynn Stout (1995) Are Stock Markets Costly Casinos? Disagreement, Market Failure, and Securities Regulation. 81(3), 611.

Lynn Stout (2002) Bad and Not-So-Bad Arguments For Shareholder Primacy. 75, 1189.

(2012) Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations, and the Public. 1-149.

Janice Toner (2006) Property rights and ruralurban land conversion. 1, 53-84.

Carien Van Mourik (2014) The Equity Theories and the IASB Conceptual Framework. 11(2), 219-233.

Jeremy Waldron (1985) WHAT IS PRIVATE PROPERTY?. 5(3), 313-349.

Nigel Warburton (2001) Philosophy: The Classics.

Adam Winkler (2004) Corporate Law or the Law of Business? Stakeholders and Corporate Governance at the End of History. 67, 109.

Mark Weinstein (2003) Share Price Changes and the Arrival of Limited Liability in California. 32(11).

Mark Weinstein (2005) Limited Liability in California 1928-31: It's the Lawyers. 7(2), 439-483.

Maynard Jennifer (2017) Intangible assets.