Revisiting WACC

Authors

  • Prof. S. K. Mitra

Keywords:

Cash Flow Discounting, Cost of Capital, Net Present Value, WACC

Abstract

The paper compares classic WACC valuation method with equity cash flow and capital cash flow methods. As WACC method always use market values of debt and equity to determine weights, the method can give erroneous results whenever there are mismatches in the market valuation of debt. The tax-shield benefits are related to the actual interest amount that is based on the book value and therefore, the WACC computation method need to account tax shield benefits using book values. The paper used an example to compare valuation of a project using various valuation methods and found that the net present value obtained using modified version of the WACC, that used book value of debt to account tax shield, was comparable to other methods.

How to Cite

Revisiting WACC. (1969). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(A11), 89-95. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/100137

References

J Bierman (1993) Capital Budgeting in 1992: A Survey. 22(3), 24.

P Fernandez (2003) Equivalence of Ten Different Methods for Valuing Companies by Cash Flow Discounting.

Pablo Fernandez (2010) WACC: Definition, Misconceptions and Errors.

J Graham, C Harvey (2001) The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. 60(2-3), 187-243.

P Kruger, A Landier, D Thesmar (2011) The WACC Fallacy: The Real Effects of Using a Unique Discount Rate.

James Miles, John Ezzell (1980) The Weighted Average Cost of Capital, Perfect Capital Markets, and Project Life: A Clarification. 15(3), 719.

F Modigliani, M Miller (1958) The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. 48, 261-297.

R Ruback (2002) Capital Cash Flows: A Simple Approach to Valuing Risky Cash Flows. 31(2), 85-103.

Revisiting WACC

Published

1969-12-31

How to Cite

Revisiting WACC. (1969). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(A11), 89-95. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/100137