An Examination of Florida Hospices: Does For-Profit or Nonprofit Status Impact the Quality of Patient Care?
Keywords:
Abstract
When the Medicare Hospice Benefit program was initially introduced, the market was dominated by non-profit hospices. Today, however, this is no longer the case. Although nonprofits are often associated with a higher quality of care, the financial incentives created by the Medicare Hospice Benefit program have resulted with a for-profit dominated market. The specific problem examined was the impact of organizational constructs on the quality of patient care in the state of Florida. The purpose of this study was to determine whether any significant differences were present in the quality of hospice patient care resulting from differing ownership types utilizing a Contingency Theory approach. A quantitative comparative analysis was conducted utilizing descriptive statistics and ANOVA analyses. The participants for the study included all licensed Florida hospices that submitted the State of Florida Department of Elder Affairs Hospice Demographic and Outcome Measures Report between 2010 and 2015. The findings indicated an underrepresentation of for-profit hospices in the state of Florida, with no statistically significant differences between the quality of care in for-profit and nonprofit hospices. Both of these findings are inconsistent with previous research.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
T Black (1999) Doing Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences: An Integrated Approach to Research Design, Measurement and Statistics.
Maureen Canavan, Melissa Aldridge Carlson, Heather Sipsma, Elizabeth Bradley (2013) Hospice for Nursing Home Residents: Does Ownership Type Matter?. 16(10), 1221-1226.
S Gandhi (2012) Differences between nonprofit and for-profit hospices: Patient selection and quality. 12(2), 107-127.
M Hughes, T Smith (2014) The growth of palliative care in the United States. 35, 459-475.
(2015) Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Fred Luthans, Todd Stewart (1977) A General Contingency Theory of Management. 2(2), 181.
(2015) Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC).
Kelly Noe, Dana Forgione (2014) Economic incentives in the hospice care setting: A comparison of for-profit and nonprofit providers. 26(2), 233-270.
T Ricketts (2011) The health care workforce: Will it be ready as the boomers age? A review of how we can know (or not know) the answer. 32, 417-430.
Andy Sharma (2015) Appreciating migration flows for health/social services planning: A case study of older adults leaving from New York to Florida. 62, 85-96.
Donald Taylor (2013) Medicare as Insurance Innovator. 30(6), 556-557.
J Thompson, A Carlson, M Bradley, E (2012) US hospice industry experienced considerable turbulence from changes in ownership, growth, and shift to for-profit status. 31(6), 1286-1293.
P Vogt (2007) Quantitative Research Methods for Professionals.
Melissa Wachterman, Edward Marcantonio, Roger Davis, Ellen Mccarthy (2011) Association of Hospice Agency Profit Status With Patient Diagnosis, Location of Care, and Length of Stay. 305(5), 472.
Published
2017-10-23
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.