Entrepreneurship, Church Hegemony and Theological Seminary Education in South-South Nigeria

Abam

Authors

Abam

Keywords:

curriculum outcomes, psycho-social characteristics, entrepreneurial abilities

Abstract

This study aims to ascertain the relationship between and among curriculum outcomes, personality traits, gender role stereotype, and common business practices and entrepreneurial abilities of theological seminary graduates. The study used export-facto research design and examined the effects of curriculum outcome, personality traits, gender role stereotypes, common business practices on entrepreneurial abilities on theological seminary graduates using five questionnaires. Results indicated that the independent variables when taken together correlated negatively with the dependent variable. The correlation was weak. It also showed that majority of the independent variables did not predict or contribute to the dependent variable. Only cognitive curriculum outcomes did the study was limited to theological seminary graduates, and their learning outcomes, personality trait, gender role stereotype, common business practices, and entrepreneurial abilities.

Downloads

How to Cite

Entrepreneurship, Church Hegemony and Theological Seminary Education in South-South Nigeria. (2013). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 13(G6), 19-23. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/1040

Download Citation

References

Kathleen Anderson, Gaea Leinhardt (2002) Maps as Representations: Expert Novice Comparison of Projection Understanding. 20(3), 283-321.

M; Arai, M Wanca-Thibautt, P Shockley-Zalabak (2001) Communication theory and Training approaches for multi cultural diverse organisations: Have academics and practitioners missed the connections. 30, 45-55.

W Chase, H Simon (1973) Perception in chess. 4, 55-81.

K Ericsson, N Charness (1994) Experts performance: Its structure and acquisition. 49, 725-747.

Fernand Gobet, Herbert Simon (1996) Templates in Chess Memory: A Mechanism for Recalling Several Boards. 31(1), 1-40.

D Johnson, R Johnson (1990) Cooperative learning and achievement.

J Leighton (2006) Teaching and assessing deductive reasoning skills. 74(2), 109-136.

R Mahoney (2001) Strategic Communication.

A Morris (2002) Mathematics reasoning: Adult's ability to make the inductive-deductive distinction. 20, 79-118.

G Row Lands (2001) Staff or Goblet. 93-93.

J Schmidtke, R Badhesha, S Moore (2008) The effects of diversity training on specific and general attitudes towards diversity. 2(2), 87-106.

J Slavin (1992) When and why does cooperative learning increase achievements? Theoretical, empirical perspectives.

J Slavin (1996) Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We Need to Know. 21(1), 43-69.

Noreen Webb (1992) Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups. 147-172.

G Yetter, T ; Gutkin, R Saunders, S Song (2006) Unknown Title. 74(2), 137-159.