Impact of Childcare Assistance (A Work-Life Balance Practice) on Employee Retention in Indian IT Sector
Keywords:
childcare assistance, employee retention, family friendly practices, work-life balance, spillover theory
Abstract
This paper examines the impact of childcare assistance on employee retention as part of a work-life balance practice based on empirical evidence drawn from IT Sector in Hyderabad, India. A total of 300 samples with 30 samples (Assistant Managers, Managers, and Sr. Managers) from each company had been included from the Ten IT companies based on simple random sampling. Managerial personnel from HR, Marketing, Finance, Operations and Technical functions are included in the study. The study shows that when the average childcare assistance score increases, the average employee retention score also increases proportionately. The study reveals positive correlation and significant association between Employee Retention and childcare assistance. The findings of the study shows that majority of the managerial personnel are able to increase their retention levels with the help of childcare assistance as one of the important work-life balance practice. The study concludes with a conceptual framework which explains how spillover theory helps in increasing employee retention and also how management and co-worker support helps in smooth implementation of childcare assistance in increasing Employee Retention as a part in achieving work-life balance.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
A Bernstein (2002) Too many workers? Not for long.
M Blair-Loy, A Wharton (2002) Employees' Use of Work-Family Policies and the Workplace Social Context. 80(3), 813-845.
J Bond (1987) Accommodating Pregnancy in the Workplace, National Council of Jewish Women.
C Curson (1986) Flexible Patterns of Work.
Debra Schwartz (1996) The impact of workfamily policies on women's career development. 11(1), 5-19.
Elizabeth Calvin, W, Janice (2008) Women and work-life balance: is home-based business ownership the solution?. 27(3), 258-275.
Doha International Family Institute (difi) (1993) Work-Family Balance: Challenges and Experiences of Omani Families.
D Friedman (1989) The productivity effects of workplace centers.
Michael Frone, John Yardley (1996) Workplace family‐supportive programmes: Predictors of employed parents' importance ratings. 69(4), 351-366.
L Gain (1999) Using Consumer Views in Performance Indicators for Children's Services: Annotated Bibliography.
Ellen Galinsky, Peter Stein (1990) The Impact of Human Resource Policies on Employees. 11(4), 368-383.
Ellen Galinsky, D Friedman, C Hernandez (1991) 8. Toward a New View of Work and Family Life. 168-186.
Ellen Galinsky, James Bond (1998) The Second Work-Life Balance Study: Results from the Employers' Survey: Executive Summary.
Bradley Googins, Dianne Burden (1987) Vulnerability of Working Parents: Balancing Work and Home Roles. 32(4), 295-300.
K Perry (1982) Employers and Child Care: Establishing Services through the Workplace.
J Perry-Smith, T Blum (2000) WORK-FAMILY HUMAN RESOURCE BUNDLES AND PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE.. 43(6), 1107-1117.
C Piotrkoski, D Hughes, J Pleck, S Kessler-Sklar, G Staines (1993) The Experience of Childbearing Women in the Workplace: The Impact of Family friendly Policies and Practices, National Council of Jewish Women.
B Gutek, R Repetti, D Silver (1988) Nonwork roles and stress at work. 141-174.
J Haar, C Spell (2003) Where is the justice? Examining work-family backlash in New Zealand: the potential for employee resentment. 28(1), 59-75.
Karen Hegtvedt, Jody Clay-Warner, Elizabeth Ferrigno (2002) Reactions to Injustice: Factors Affecting Workers' Resentment toward Family-Friendly Policies. 65(4), 386.
Hewitt Associates (1995) Work and Family Benefits Provided by Major US Employers in.
T Jick, L Mitz (1985) Sex differences in work stress. 10, 408-420.
A Johnson (1995) The business case for workfamily programmes. 180, 53-58.
B Klein (1986) Missed work and lost hours. 109, 26-30.
Ellen Kossek, Victor Nichol (1992) THE EFFECTS OF ON‐SITE CHILD CARE ON EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES AND PERFORMANCE. 45(3), 485-509.
M Leiter, M Durup (1996) Work, home, and in-between: A longitudinal study of spillover. 32, 29-47.
S Lewis, C Cooper (1988) Stress in dual-earner couples. 3.
A Mitchell (1992) Child Care Bulletin: National Child Care Information Center.
H Northcott (1983) Who stays home? Working parents and sick children. 6, 387-394.
S Poelmans, N Chinchilla, P Cardona (2003) The adoption of family-friendly HRM policies. Competing for scarce resources in the labour market. 24, 128-147.
A Ramachandra Aryasri, S Suman Babu (2007) Work-Life Balance-A holistic Approach. 7(1), 1-11.
Felice Schwartz (1989) Management Women and the New Facts of Life. 4(5), 65-76.
C Thompson, L Beauvais, K Lyness (1999) When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and workfamily conflict. 54, 392-415.
Timothy Keiningham (2006) Does parent satisfaction with a childcare provider matter for loyalty?. 23(7), 470-479.
S Uma Devi (2002) Globalization, Information Technology and Asian Indian Women in US.
C Venkata Ratnam, V Chandra (2009) Work-Life Balance: Review of Literature. 2(3), 89-97.
R Winifred (2003) Organizational Change, Globalization, and Work-Family Programmes: Case Studies from India and the United States. Chapter submitted to Work-Family Interface in International Perspective.
Published
2013-08-16
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.