El perfil del líder como factor contingente en la adaptación de la estructura organizacional de los Proyectos: Un Análisis Cualitativo en América Latina

Authors

  • Jose Luis Gonzalez Rugel

Keywords:

América Latina., diseño estructural, Estructura organizacional, gestión de proyectos, liderazgo

Abstract

La gestión de proyectos contemporánea requiere estructuras organizacionales flexibles, capaces de responder a la complejidad, la incertidumbre y el dinamismo de los entornos empresariales actuales. Aunque la literatura ha clasificado tradicionalmente las estructuras de proyectos en funcionales, matriciales y proyectizadas, aún persiste una brecha en la comprensión del papel que desempeña el perfil del líder en la adaptación práctica de dichas estructuras. Este estudio tiene como propósito analizar cómo el perfil del líder de proyecto actúa como factor contingente en la configuración, ajuste y operacionalización de la estructura organizacional de proyectos en América Latina. Se adoptó un enfoque cualitativo de carácter exploratorio, basado en entrevistas semiestructuradas realizadas a 20 líderes de proyectos de diversos sectores y países de la región. El análisis de los datos se efectuó mediante codificación temática asistida por MAXQDA 24 y análisis exploratorio de coocurrencias semánticas, siguiendo los criterios de rigor cualitativo de credibilidad, transferibilidad, dependencia y confirmabilidad propuestos por Lincoln y Guba (1985). Los resultados muestran que el liderazgo no sustituye la gobernanza organizacional, la PMO ni la estructura corporativa matriz; más bien, opera como una capacidad de agencia situada que permite adaptar roles, flujos de decisión, mecanismos de coordinación y formas de integración dentro de límites institucionales existentes. Los hallazgos contribuyen a la teoría de la contingencia y al diseño organizacional de proyectos al proponer una lectura del liderazgo como modulador estructural en contextos latinoamericanos. Dado el carácter exploratorio del estudio y el tamaño de la muestra, los resultados no buscan generalización estadística, sino transferibilidad analítica para futuras investigaciones empíricas.

Downloads

How to Cite

El perfil del líder como factor contingente en la adaptación de la estructura organizacional de los Proyectos: Un Análisis Cualitativo en América Latina. (2026). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 26(3), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJMBRA258785

Author Biography

Jose Luis Gonzalez Rugel

Jose Luis Gonzalez is a researcher affiliated with Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo.

References

J. Adams, L. Adams (1997) The virtual project: Managing tomorrow's team today. 11(1). https://secure.tutorsglobe.com/Atten_files/1924_352143_1_3.pdf

D. A. Aga, N. Noorderhaven, B. Vallejo (2016) Transformational leadership and project success: The mediating role of team-building. 34(5), 806-818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.012

G. A. Ahmady, M. Mehrpour, A. Nikooravesh (2016) Organizational Structure. 230, 455-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.057

V. S. Anantatmula (2010) Project Manager Leadership Role in Improving Project Performance. 22(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2010.11431849

M. Aubry, M. Lavoie-Tremblay (2018) Rethinking organizational design for managing multiple projects. 36(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.012

A. Belout, C. Gauvreau (2004) Factors influencing project success: The impact of human resource management. 22(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00003-6

B. Blaskovics (2018) Aspects of digital project management. 7(2), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.17708/DRMJ.2018.v07n02a03

V. Braun, V. Clarke (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

T. N. Carroll, R. M. Burton (2012) A contingency approach to designing project organizations: theory and tools. 2(1-2), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2011.641118

K. B. Chuah, V. M. Rao Tummala, M. M. Nkasu (1995) Project management structures in Hong Kong industries. 13(4), 253-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(94)00022-5

S. R. Clegg, M. Kornberger (2003) Modernism, Postmodernism, Management and Organization Theory. 21, 57-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-558X(03)21003-X

J. W. Creswell (2014) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.

T. T. T. Doan, L. C. T. Nguyen, T. D. N. Nguyen (2020) Emotional intelligence and project success: The roles of transformational leadership and organizational commitment. 7(3), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no3.223

L. Donaldson (2006) The contingency theory of organizational design: Challenges and opportunities. 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34173-0_2

R. Drazin, A. H. Van de Ven (1985) Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. 30(4), 514-539. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392695

I. Dumitrascu-Băldău, D. D. Dumitrascu, G. Dobrota (2021) Predictive model for the factors influencing international project success: A data mining approach. 13(7), Article 3819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073819

Y. Fernando, T. Walters, M. N. Ismail, Y. W. Seo, M. Kaimasu (2018) Managing project success using project risk and green supply chain management: A survey of automotive industry. 11(2), 332-365. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-01-2017-0007

P. Fiala (2004) Projektové řízení: Modely, metody, analýzy.

R. C. Ford, W. A. Randolph (1992) Cross-Functional Structures: A Review and Integration of Matrix Organization and Project Management. 18(2), 267-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800204

(2021) The practice of qualitative data analysis: Research examples using MAXQDA. https://doi.org/10.36192/978-3-948768058

B. G. Glaser, A. L. Strauss (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.

J. L. Gonzalez, I. Fierro (2025) From rigid models to agile teams: Lessons from project organizational structures for educational planning and innovation. 15(3), 230-248. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2025-0094

C. F. Gray, S. Dworatschek, D. H. Gobeli, H. Knoepfel, E. W. Larson (1990) International comparison of project organization structures: use and effectiveness. 8(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(90)90005-V

M. Hällgren (2010) Groupthink in temporary organizations. 3(1), 94-110. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371011014044

T. Jitpaiboon, S. M. Smith, Q. Gu (2019) Critical Success Factors Affecting Project Performance: An Analysis of Tools, Practices, and Managerial Support. 50(3), 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819833545

R. Joslin, R. Müller (2015) Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. 33(6), 1377-1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.005

H. Jun Park, M. Jeong Park (2009) Types of network governance and network performance: Community development project case. 13(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2009.10805142

H. Kerzner (2009) Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling.

L. Krpan, D. V. Ivandić, M. Talajić (2025) Artificial intelligence and ONA: Transforming project management practices. 15(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.56889/aqcy3444

E. W. Larson, D. H. Gobeli (1989) Significance of Project Management Development Success. 36(2), 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.18828

T. G. Lechler, D. Dvir (2010) An alternative taxonomy of project management structures: Linking project management structures and project success. 57(2), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2044441

L. Lee-Kelley, T. Sankey (2008) Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: A case study. 26(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.010

Y. S. Lincoln, E. G. Guba (1985) Naturalistic inquiry.

G. Locatelli, L. Ika, N. Drouin, R. Müller, M. Huemann, J. Söderlund, J. Geraldi, S. Clegg (2023) A Manifesto for project management research. 20(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12568

R. A. Lundin, A. Söderholm (1995) A theory of the temporary organization. 11(4), 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U

F. Luthans, T. I. Stewart (1977) A General Contingency Theory of Management. 2(2), 181-195. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4409038

R. J. Might, W. A. Fischer (1985) The Role of Structural Factors in Determining Project Management Success. EM-32(2), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1985.6447584

H. Mintzberg (1979) The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research.

N. Modig (2007) A continuum of organizations formed to carry out projects: Temporary and stationary organization forms. 25(8), 807-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.008

R. Müller, N. Drouin, S. Sankaran (2019) Modeling Organizational Project Management. 50(4), 499-513. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819847876

R. Müller, K. Jugdev (2012) Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott-the elucidation of project success. 5(4), 757-775. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371211269040

R. Müller, J. R. Turner (2007) Matching the project manager's leadership style to project type. 25(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.04.003

L. H. Nguyen, T. Watanabe (2017) The impact of project organizational culture on the performance of construction projects. 9(5), Article 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050781

D. Otley (2016) The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980-2014. 31, 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.001

P. Patanakul, J. Chen, G. S. Lynn (2012) Autonomous teams and new product development. 29(5), 734-750. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00934.x

M. Pilkienė, R. Alonderienė, A. Chmieliauskas, S. Šimkonis, R. Müller (2018) The governance of horizontal leadership in projects. 36(7), 913-924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.06.002

Project Management Institute (2017) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide).

E. Ries (2011) The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses.

H. J. Rubin, I. S. Rubin (2012) Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data.

J. R. San Cristóbal, V. Fernández, E. Diaz (2018) An analysis of the main project organizational structures: Advantages, disadvantages, and factors affecting their selection. 138, 791-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.103

A. J. Shenhar (2001) One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. 47(3), 394-414. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772

A. J. Shenhar, D. Dvir (1996) Toward a typological theory of project management. 25(4), 607-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00877-2

L. C. Stuckenbruck, A. Zomorrodian (1987) Project management: the promise for developing countries. 5(3), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(87)90022-6

K. Swart, T. Bond-Barnard, R. Chugh (2022) Challenges and critical success factors of digital communication, collaboration and knowledge sharing in project management virtual teams: a review. 10(4), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm100404

J. R. Turner, R. Müller (2005) The project manager's leadership style as a success factor on projects: A literature review. 36(2), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280503600206

J. R. Turner, M. Miterev (2019) The Organizational Design of the Project-Based Organization. 50(4), 487-498. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819859746

C. M. Zani, J. Denicol, T. Broyd (2024) Organisation design in megaprojects: A systematic literature review and research agenda. 42(6), Article 102634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102634

El perfil del líder como factor contingente en la adaptación de la estructura organizacional de los Proyectos: Un Análisis Cualitativo en América Latina

Published

2026-10-07

How to Cite

El perfil del líder como factor contingente en la adaptación de la estructura organizacional de los Proyectos: Un Análisis Cualitativo en América Latina. (2026). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 26(3), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJMBRA258785