CEO's Commitment Bias and its Firm R&D Level Bayesian Network Method: Evidence Form Tunisia

Authors

  • Hamza Fadhila

  • Azouzi Mohamed Ali

  • Jarboui Anis

Keywords:

bayesian network method, ceo's incentives, commitment bias, executive power, innovation, loss aversion, managerial discretion, myopia, optimism, overconfidence

Abstract

In this paper we approach as to whether CEO's incentives may lead to a positive manager's innovation behavior. We search in this work to study this relationship conforming to the prediction of the theory of commitment. Accordingly, we hypothesize that CEO's incentives can persuade a favorable attitude toward innovation but it can lead to an authentic behavior only with the presence of commitment bias. The proposed model of this paper uses Bayesian Network Method to examine this relationship. CEO's attitude has been measured by means of a questionnaire comprising several items. As for the selected sample, it has been composed of some 220 Tunisian executives. Our results have revealed the efficient role of governance mechanism as a persuasive communication on the CEO's attitude; however, only managers who note a high commitment level behave authentically to their attitude and decide R&D investment. This article has implications for the development of new referential in building corporate governance system by incorporating the commitment dimension to manage well the managerial discretion.

Downloads

How to Cite

CEO’s Commitment Bias and its Firm R&D Level Bayesian Network Method: Evidence Form Tunisia. (2013). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 13(43), 31-44. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/

Author Biographies

Hamza Fadhila

Fadhila Hamza is an Associate Professor in the Department of Accounting at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University. She holds a PhD in Accounting and financial methods from the University of Sfax, Tunisia.

Azouzi Mohamed Ali

Dr. Mohamed Ali Azouzi is an Assistant Professor and researcher specializing in finance and accounting methods. He is affiliated with the University of Sfax and the University of Monastir in Tunisia. His work primarily explores corporate social responsibility, behavioral finance, and managerial decision-making, including the impact of CEO emotional biases and incentives on firm innovation and capital structure.

References

F. Abdullah, G. Weiyu, M. Vivek (2002) The relation of managerial holdings with Tobin's Q and R&D expenditures: Evidence from Japanese firms. 10(1), 66-71.

A. Agrawal, G. Mandelker (1987) Managerial Incentives and Corporate Investment and Financing Decisions. 42, 823-837.

T. Amabile (1996) Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. 3-17. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429501234-1

P. Audia, E. Locke, K. Smith (2000) THE PARADOX OF SUCCESS: AN ARCHIVAL AND A LABORATORY STUDY OF STRATEGIC PERSISTENCE FOLLOWING RADICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE. 43(5), 837-853. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556413

Itzhak Ben-David, John Graham, Campbell Harvey (2007) Managerial Overconfidence and Corporate Policies. 11, 55-190.

J. Bizjak, M. Lemmon, L. Naveen (2008) Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation?☆. 90(2), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.08.007

Jorge Brusa, Wayne Lee, Carole Shook (2007) Golden parachutes, managerial incentives and shareholders' wealth. 35(4), 346-356. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350910935830

J. Chappé, J-F Verlhiac, T. Meyer (2007) Optimisme et pessimisme comparatifs consécutifs à l'exposition à plusieurs messages menaçants. 57(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2006.07.001

G. Charreaux (2008) À la recherche du lien perdu entre caractéristiques des dirigeants et performance de la firme: gouvernance et latitude managériale. 1080502.

Chen Zheng, H. Wu, S. (2011) Senior manager overconfidence, managerial discretion and dividend policy: A study of Chinese listed companies. 5(32), 2641-1265.

Jianxin Chi, Shane Johnson (2008) The Value of Vesting Restrictions on Managerial Stock and Option Holdings. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1136298

Myeong-Hyeon Cho (1998) Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: An empirical analysis. 47(1), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(97)00039-1

J. Coles, N. Daniel, L. Naveen (2006) Managerial incentives and risk-taking☆. 79(2), 431-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.09.004

John Core, Wayne Guay (2002) Estimating the Value of Employee Stock Option Portfolios and Their Sensitivities to Price and Volatility. 40(3), 613-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.00064

E. Deci (1975) Intrinsic motivation.

Deschamps, R. J. C. et Joule (2005) La communication engageante au service de la réduction de l'abstentionnisme électoral : une application en milieu universitaire. 55(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2004.05.002

A. Dodonova, Y. Khoroshilov (2006) Optimal Incentive Contracts for Don Durfee (2006).Pay Daze: Linking pay to performance is harder than it looks. http://www.cfo.com

B. Francis, I. Hasan, Q. Wu (2012) Do Corporate Boards Affect Firm Performance? New Evidence from the Financial Crisis. 11.

Jennifer Francis, Abbie Smith (1995) Agency costs and innovation: Some empirical evidence. 19(2-3), 383-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)00389-m

Gervais S, Heaton JB, Odean T (2003) Overconfidence, Investment Policy, and Executive Stock Options.

Griffin Gilovich T, Kahneman (Eds.) (2002) Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment.

F. Girandola (2005) Action and Commitment theory. In. V. Alexandre., et W. asparski (Eds.). 12, 117-130.

F. Girandola, F. Michelik, R. Joule (2008) Promouvoir la pratique physique chez les étudiants: communication et communication engageante. 10-11.

Dirk Hackbarth (2008) Managerial traits and capital structure decisions. J. Finan. Quant. 43(4), 843-881. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002210900001437x

Haleblian J, Finkelstein S (1993) Top Management Team Size, CEO Dominance, and Firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of Environmental Turbulence and Discretion. Acad. Manage. 36(4), 844-863. https://doi.org/10.2307/256761

Hambrick D.C, Finkelstein S (1987) Managerial Discretion: A Bridge between Polar Views of Organizational Outcomes. 9, 369-406.

D. Hambrick, E. Abrahamson (1995) Assessing the Amount of Managerial Discretion In Different Industries. 38, 1427-1441.

F. Hamza, A. Jarboui (2012) Investor's Commitment Bias and Escalation of Firm's investment decision.

R. Haugen, L. Senbet (1981) Resolving the Agency Problems of External Capital through Options. 36, 629-647.

Bengt Holmstrom (1989) Agency costs and innovation. 12(3), 305-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(89)90025-5

Michael Jensen, William Meckling (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x

R. Joule, F. Girandola, F. Bernard (2007) How Can People Be Induced to Willingly Change Their Behavior? The Path from Persuasive Communication to Binding Communication.

Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. 47(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

John Knopf, Jouahn Nam, John Thornton (2002) The Volatility and Price Sensitivities of Managerial Stock Option Portfolios and Corporate Hedging. 57(2), 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00442

Stacey Kole (1997) The complexity of compensation contracts. 43(1), 79-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(96)00888-4

Josh Lerner, Julie Wulf (2007) Innovation and Incentives: Evidence from Corporate R&D. 89(4), 634-644. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.4.634

Li JT, Tang Y (2010) CEO Hubris and Firm Risk Taking in China: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion. 53(1), 45-69.

Gustavo Manso (2007) Motivating Innovation. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.891514

James March (1991) Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

J. McCullers (1978) Issues in learning and motivation.

K. McGraw (1978) Issues in learning and motivation.

John Meyer, David Stanley, Lynne Herscovitch, Laryssa Topolnytsky (2002) Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. 61(1), 20-52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842

John Meyer, Natalie Allen (1991) A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. 1(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z

J. Mitchell, Timothy Hart, Sorin Valcea, David Townsend (2009) Becoming the boss: Discretion and postsuccession success in family firms. Entrep. 33(6), 1201-1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00341.x

P. Oyer (2004) Why Do Firms Use Incentives That Have No Incentive Effects?. 59, 1619-1649.

Shivaram Rajgopal, Terry Shevlin (2002) Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking. 33(2), 145-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(02)00042-3

B. Reed (2007) Stock-option packages spur risky CEO behavior; CEOs have less incentive to carefully analyze risk.

Alexander Rothman, Peter Salovey (1997) Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. 121(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3

Kimberly Sawers, Arnold Wright, Valentina Zamora (2006) Loss Aversion, Instant Endowment and Risk-Bearing: The Relation between Stock-Based Compensation and Managerial Risk-Seeking Behavior. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.864224

H. Shefrin (2001) BEHAVIORAL CORPORATE FINANCE. 14(3), 113-124.

Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. 5(4), 297-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00122574

Ingo Walter (2009) Wholesale Banking Compensation and Systemic Risk.

Peter Wirtz (2011) The cognitive dimension of corporate governance in fast growing entrepreneurial firms. 29(6), 431-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2011.06.004

CEO's Commitment Bias and its Firm R&D Level Bayesian Network Method: Evidence Form Tunisia

Published

2013-12-16

How to Cite

CEO’s Commitment Bias and its Firm R&D Level Bayesian Network Method: Evidence Form Tunisia. (2013). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 13(43), 31-44. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/