Dynamic Optimization of Portfolios 2018 to 2024

Authors

  • Dr. Elmo Tambosi Filho

Keywords:

Dynamic Modeling, Stochastic Optimizing, Non-linear Programming.

Abstract

Investors are always willing to receive more data. This has become especially true for the application of modern portfolio theory to the institutional asset allocation process, which requires quantitative estimates of risk and return. When long-term data series are unavailable for analysis, it has become common practice to use recent data only. The danger is that these data may not be representative of future performance. Although longer data series are of poorer quality, are difficult to obtain, and may reflect various political and economic regimes, they often paint a very different picture of emerging market performance. This paper presents an application of a stochastic nonlinear optimization model of portfolios including transaction costs in the Brazilian financial market. In order to have that, portfolio theory and optimal control were used as theoretical basis. The first strategy tries to allocate the whole available wealth, not considering the risk associated to portfolio (deterministic result). In this case the investor obtained profits of 7,23% a month, taking into account the three risk aversion levels during the whole planning period [see column (7)]. On the contrary, the results from of the stochastic algorithm obtained profits of 1,34% a month and 18,06% a year, if the investor has low risk aversion. The profits would be 0,88% a month and 11,02% a year for a medium risk aversion investor. And with high risk aversion, the investor obtains 0,62% a month and 7,66% a year.

Downloads

How to Cite

Dynamic Optimization of Portfolios 2018 to 2024. (2026). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 26(C1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJMBRC156164

Author Biography

Dr. Elmo Tambosi Filho

Elmo Tambosi Filho is a researcher affiliated with Methodist University.

References

R Brafman, I Engel (2009) Directional Decomposition of Multiattribute Utility Functions. 5783, 192-202.

W Charemza, F Derek, Deadman (1997) New Directions in Econometric Practice: General to Specific Modelling, Cointegration, and Vector Autoregression. 5(7), 234-245.

K. Cuthbertson, G Stephen, P Mark, Taylor (1992) Applied Econometric Techniques. 115, 167-180.

R Engle, C Granger (1987) Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. 55(2), 251-276.

J Francis, Stephen ARCHER (1971) Portfolio Analysis. 4, 59-107.

J Francis (1991) Investments: Analysis and Management. 9, 228-246.

S G, M Stephenson (1990) Optimal Control of Non-lineal Stochastic Models. 13, 67-78.

P Jorion, W Goetzmann (1999) Re-Emerging Markets. 34.

R Leal, G Silva (1998) O Mercosul e a Integração Regional dos Mercados Acionário Argentino e Brasileiro. 38(4), 37 - 45.

M L (1997) Instabilidade e Criatividade nos Mercados Financeiros: Condições de Inserção dos Países do Grupo da América Latina. 38, 48-60.

Donald Kein, Ananth Madhavan (1997) Transactions Costs and Investment Style: an Inter-exchange Analysis of Institutional Equity Trades. 46, 265-292.

Harry Markowitz (1952) Portfolio Selection. 7(1).

J Mullin (1993) Emerging Equity Markets in the Global Economy.

Robert Samohyl (1994) Applications of Stochastic Optimal Control Through Simulation.

Robert Samohyl (1997) Non-linear Stochastic Optimal Control Through Simulation with an Example Using the HMMS Paint Factory Dates. 4(2), 507-512.

J Tobin (1958) Liquidity Preference the Behavior towards Risk. 2(5), 65-86.

Dynamic Optimization of Portfolios 2018 to 2024

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Dynamic Optimization of Portfolios 2018 to 2024. (2026). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 26(C1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJMBRC156164