Regret and Responsibility: A Discourse Analysis of CEO Apologies in Corporate Crisis Management
Abstract
This study investigates the rhetorical strategies employed in public CEO apologies issued in response to major corporate crises between 2010 and 2024. Drawing from a corpus of ten high-profile apology statements-including video transcripts, written releases, and interview excerpts-this paper applies a combined framework of Appraisal Theory and Image Repair Theory to analyze how top executives linguistically construct responsibility, express regret, and attempt to repair stakeholder trust. The findings reveal consistent patterns in evaluative language use, responsibility-taking, emotional appeals, and institutional ethos. Variations in tone, modality, and audience engagement across industries are also examined. By situating these discursive features within the broader context of crisis management and leadership communication, this study offers interdisciplinary insights into how language functions as a managerial tool for damage control and reputational rehabilitation.
Downloads
How to Cite
References
P Baker, T Mcenery (2015) Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora.
M Bednarek (2006) Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus.
W Benoit (1995) Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies.
S Brinson, W Benoit (1996) Dow Corning's image repair strategies in the breast implant crisis. 44(1), 29-41.
An-Sofie Claeys, Verolien Cauberghe (2015) What makes crisis response strategies work? The impact of crisis involvement and message framing. 67(2), 182-189.
W Coombs (2007) Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. 10(3), 163-176.
W Coombs (2014) Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding.
C Fombrun (1996) Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image.
J Flowerdew, J Richardson (2018) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies.
F Frandsen, W Johansen (2017) Organizational crisis communication: A multivocal approach. 22(3), 377-389.
E Hartelius (2020) Rhetoric and/of the Common(s). 53(3), 293-300.
Keith Hearit (2006) Crisis Management By Apology.
T Hutchinson, A Waters (1987) English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach.
S Johansson, K Elsbach (2022) Navigating blame and trust: A linguistic and reputational analysis of CEO crisis communication. 47(1), 103-119.
S Liu, X Li (2021) A multimodal critical discourse analysis of corporate apologies by Starbucks CEO from the perspective of crisis management. 3(2), 114-136.
J Martin, P White (2005) The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English.
C Tardy (2020) Genre-based writing instruction: Moving beyond the five-paragraph essay.
G Thompson, L Alba-Juez (2014) Evaluation in context.
T Tyler, J Cameron (2020) Accountability in corporate apologies: A linguistic analysis of CEO statements. 57(2), 145-167.
R Ulmer, T Sellnow, M Seeger (2014) Effective crisis communication: Moving from crisis to opportunity.
Q Wang, C Ngai, -B Singh, R (2021) A discursive analysis of crisis response strategies in.
Published
2025-10-06
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.