Supply Chain Network Design: A Strategic Centralization of Hazardous Commodity

Authors

  • Mustafa Hashem M. Al-Naser

Keywords:

strategic decision, distribution, network design, hazardous materials, environmental impact

Abstract

Supply Chain Management field presents its management, consultants, and professionals with a set of various decisions to be made at the strategic, tactical and operational phases. One critical component of these decisions is the supply chain network design. Each firm, during the establishment phase, is required to properly design its network by strategically positioning its distribution facilities to optimize the overall cost of its supply chain. This paper illustrates the importance of such decision; specifically, in relation to the storage of hazardous commodity while covering strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with this decision. Furthermore, the paper presents a potential model for managing hazardous materials that can lead to a significant reduction in the warehousing cost; if executed properly.

Downloads

How to Cite

Supply Chain Network Design: A Strategic Centralization of Hazardous Commodity. (2023). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 23(G2), 55-58. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/102927

References

(2023) The total Scope of Supply Chain Management.

(2023) Defining Hazardous Materials.

(2023) NFPA classification of hazardous materials. 674-676.

(2023) Factors to consider while selecting a warehouse.

Pankaj Bora, Abhishek Singh (2023) New insights into designing metallacarborane based room temperature hydrogen storage media. 139(16).

(2023) Managing risks. 70-77.

(2023) Inventory Management Techniques and Best Practices.

Young Kim (2023) SWOT Analysis in Sport.

Supply Chain Network Design: A Strategic Centralization of  Hazardous Commodity

Published

2023-11-24

How to Cite

Supply Chain Network Design: A Strategic Centralization of Hazardous Commodity. (2023). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 23(G2), 55-58. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/102927