Liquidity Value at Risk Modeling: Volume and Implied Volatility Adjustment

Authors

  • Ozge Yurukoglu

Keywords:

risk, liquidity, var, expected shortfall, l_var, constant spread aproach, exogenous spread aproach, endogenous price aproach, cost of liquidty

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate whether there is the momentum effect across 23 indices-level anomaly in Amman Stock Exchange (ASE). This study also compares and contrasts the momentum strategy with both early-stage and late-stage momentum strategies. By using a sample of 23 Jordanian indices for the period from 2005 to 2015, this paper provide economically large momentum profits over the past 6, 9 and 12 months tend to outperform in the future. In addition, this study provides convincing evidence that late-stage momentum strategy consistently generates stronger profits than does the traditional momentum strategy. Although the CAPM model can explain the momentum profits, late-stage momentum strategy cannot completely explained by the CAPM model.

How to Cite

Liquidity Value at Risk Modeling: Volume and Implied Volatility Adjustment. (2016). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 16(37), 17-22. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/

References

P. Artzner, Eber Delbaen F, J.M, D. Heath (1997) Thinking Coherently. 10(November), 68-71.

Philippe Artzner, Freddy Delbaen, Jean‐marc Eber, David Heath (1999) Coherent Measures of Risk. 9(3), 203-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00068

Anil Bangia, Francis Diebold, Til Schuermann, John Stroughair (1999) Modeling Liquidity Risk, with Implications for Traditional Market Risk Measurement and Management. http://www.fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/99/9906.pdf(01.08.2011

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2008) Liquidity Risk: Management and Supervisory Challanges.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2008) Principles for Sound Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision. 143-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119444497.app1

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2010) Basel III: International Framework For Liquidity Risk Measurement, Standards and Monitoring.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2012) Monitoring Indicators For Intraday Liquidity Management.

Dimitris Bertsimas, Andrew Lo (1998) Optimal control of execution costs. 1(1), 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1386-4181(97)00012-8

A. Bervas (2006) Financial Regulation and Liquidity Risk Management. 8, 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137389237.0010

F. Black (1971) Toward a Fully Automated Stock Exchange, Part II. 27, 29-34.

N. Chriss, R. Almgren (1998) Optimal Liquidation.

Kevin Dowd (2005) Measuring Market Risk. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118673485

Y. Hisata, Y. Yamai (2000) Research Toward The Practical Application of Liquidity Risk Evaluation Methods. 83-128.

R. Jarrow, A. Subramanian (1997) Mopping up Liquidity. 170-173.

P. Jorion (2000) Value at Risk, 2nd Edition, McGraw Hill, New York.

J. Qi, W. Ng (2009) Liquidity Adjusted Intraday Value at Risk. 1-3.

Liquidity Value at Risk Modeling: Volume and Implied Volatility Adjustment

Published

2016-11-04

How to Cite

Liquidity Value at Risk Modeling: Volume and Implied Volatility Adjustment. (2016). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 16(37), 17-22. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/