The Causal Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditure in Jordan

Authors

  • Hussein Ali Al-Zeaud

Keywords:

government expenditures, revenues, Granger causality, VECM

Abstract

The main purpose of the study is to examine the causal relationship between government revenues and expenditures of the Jordan government over the period from 1990 to 2011 using Granger causality and VECM tests methodology. Which provides channels of causation between government revenues (GR) and government expenditures (GE).The empirical results show that bidirectional causality running between revenues and expenditure. This result supports lend support to the fiscal synchronization hypothesis, implying that government of Jordan makes its revenues and expenditures decisions simultaneously. On other hand, it shows that allocated expenditures decide the amount of revenues which in turn affects the size of expenditures for the present and the next fiscal year(s).Thus the policy maker should pay attention to the bidirectional causality between government expenditures and revenues which might complicate the government's efforts to control the budget deficit and may contribute in explaining the high national debt figure.

How to Cite

The Causal Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditure in Jordan. (2014). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 14(29), 49-57. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/

References

A. Afonso, C. Rault (2009) Bootstrap Panel Granger-Causality between Government Spending and Revenue in the EU. 29(4), 2542-2548.

M. Aslan, Taşdemir M (2009) 'Is Fiscal Synchronization Hypothesis Relevant for Turkey?.

Benjamin Cheng (1999) Causality between taxes and expenditures: Evidence from Latin American countries. 23(2), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02745952

Tsangyao Chang, Wen Liu, Steven Caudill (2002) Tax-and-spend, spend-and-tax, or fiscal synchronization: new evidence for ten countries. 34(12), 1553-1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840110103265

(2010) Evidence from Cointegration and Causality Tests with Endogenous Structural Breaks' Journal of Money. 12, 14-25. http://tsd.cbi.ir/

(2010) Economic Res and Policy Department, Economic Time Series Database. http://tsd.cbi.ir/

Ali Darrat (1998) Tax and Spend, or Spend and and Spending: Evidence from Egypt Jordan. 28.

Hirotugu Akike (1969) Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. 21(1), 243-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02532251

Mathematics, M. Wallace, J. Warner (1986) Government Spending and Taxation: What Causes What?. 2, 630.

R. McNown (1994) Do Revenue or Expenditures Respond to Budgetary Disequilibria?. 52, 311.

Robert Barro (1974) Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?. 82(6), 1095-1117. https://doi.org/10.1086/260266

John Baffes, Anwar Shah (1994) Causality and Comovement between Taxes and Expenditures: Historical Evidence from. 1095-1118.

(1994) Argentina, Brazil and Mexico," Journal of Development Economics. 44, 311-31.

R. Blackley, Paul (1986) Causality between Revenues and Expenditures and the Size of Federal Budget. 14(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114218601400202

Quarterly (1991) Budget Balance Through Revenue or Spending Adjustment? Some Historical Evidence for the United States. 27(2), 139-156.

James Buchanan (1978) Richard W Wegner (1978 ) "Dialogues Concerning Fiscal Religion. 4, 627-636.

Tsangyao Chang, Gengnan Chiang (2009) Revisiting the Government Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from 15 OECD Countries based on the Panel Data Approach‟. 59(2), 13.

J. Eita, D. Mbazima (2008) The causal relationship between government revenue and expenditure in Namibia. 2.

Robert Engle, Clive Granger (1987) Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. 55(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236

M. Friedman (1978) The Limitations of Tax Limitation. 7-14.

C. Granger (1969) Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. 37(3), 424. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791

Neelesh Gounder, Paresh Narayan, Arti Prasad (2007) an Empiric Investigation of the Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditure: The Case of the Fiji Islands. 34(3), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290710726711

Craig Hakkio, Mark Rush (1991) Cointegration: how short is the long run?. 10(4), 571-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5606(91)90008-8

Mohammad Hasan, Ian Lincoln (1997) Tax then spend or spend then tax? Experience in the UK. 4(4), 237-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/758518502

Kevin Hoover, Steven Sheffrin (1992) Causation, Spending, and Taxes: Sand in the Sandbox or Tax Collector for the Welfare State?. 82, 225-248.

S∅ren Johansen, Katarina Juselius (1992) Testing structural hypotheses in a multivariate cointegration analysis of the PPP and the UIP for UK. 53(1-3), 211-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90086-7

Soren Johansen (1991) Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models. 59(6), 1551. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938278

David Joulfaian, Rajen Mookerjee (1991) Dynamics of Government revenues and expenditures in industrial economies. 23(12), 1839-1844. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849100000173

Y. Keho (2010) Budget Balance through Revenue or Spending Adjustments? An Econometric Analysis of the Ivorian Budgetary Process. 2, 1-011.

Stephen Miller, Frank Russek (1990) Co-Integration and Error-Correction Models: The Temporal Causality between Government Taxes and Spending. 57(1), 221. https://doi.org/10.2307/1060491

Meltzer, Richard (1981) A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. 89, 914-924.

Maysam Mohsen, Abbas Rezazadeh (2012) The Oil Exporting Countries, International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering (IJEME) IJEME Volume 2. 2, 95-97.

L. Xiaoming (2001) Government Revenue, Government Expenditure, and Temporal Causality: Evidence from China. 23, 485-497.

Mohammad Yousef (2012) The Causality between Government Revenue and Government Expenditure in Iran, International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research 5 (1): 129-145. Relationship between Revenue and Expenditure in Oil Exporting Countries. 5, 129-145.

Expenditures, European Research (2012) 68(3), 340-344.

R. Musgrave (1966) Principles of Budget Determination. 34.

L. Nanthakumar, R. Taha (2007) Have Taxes Led Government Expenditure in Malaysia?Journal of International Management Studies.

Paresh Narayan, Seema Narayan (2006) Government revenue and government expenditure nexus: evidence from developing countries. 38(3), 285-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500369209

Oluwole Owoye (1995) The causal relationship between taxes and expenditures in the G7 countries: cointegration and error-correction models. 2(1), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/135048595357744

Taofik Mohammed (2012) Testing the Revenue and Expenditure Nexus in Nigeria: An Application of the Bound Test.

Approach, European Sciences, Onafowora (2011) The Relationship between Tax Revenues and Government Expenditures in European Union and Non- European Union OECD Countries. 27(3).

P. Phillips, P. Perron (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression.

Kevin Ross, James Payne (1998) A Reexamination of Budgetary Disequilibria. 26, 67-79.

Rafaqet, Mahmood (2012) The causal and cointegration relationship between government revenue and government expenditure.

Pakistan (2012) Relationship between Government Spending and Revenue: Evidence from. 3(12).

The Causal Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditure in Jordan

Published

2014-08-15

How to Cite

The Causal Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditure in Jordan. (2014). Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 14(29), 49-57. https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/view/