Les Facteurs Stimulant L'achat Des Consommateurs A Le'gard Des Produits Contrefaits: Cas Des Me'dicaments Dans La Ville De Dschang-Cameroun
Keywords:
behavior of the consumers, countereiting and pharmaceutical drug
Abstract
The phenomenon of counterfeiting and its consequences to the enterprises and the brands is a disaster which is very interesting in all economies. We are propose to determine the factors that are must often prominent on the behavior of the consumers on what concerns the buying of counterfeit drugs. In effect, this study was realized at the base of an interview of the sample of 250 persons. We have had as variables dependent the frequency of buying was .the frequency of buying was explained by four principal constituent who were used like variables who explained the behavior of consumers vis a vis the counterfeit to know the knowledge of the counterfeit product .The satisfaction, the motivation. Each constituent understood a certain number of variables all the spirit of the literature review. Experienced from the methodology of Mallet (2004) we proceeded to and analyses of two level to know descriptive and explanation. We have carried out the test by multinomial logistic regression, the reasoned that the frequency of buying of drugs which are of the daughting quality is significantly influence bye the knowledge of the product, the satisfaction of the illness, the motivation of the buyer. Then we should react on the factors in order to reduce and eliminate the frequency of buying. We have noticed that the satisfaction is the most determine variable which push the users to consume the counterfeit products. Keyswords: behavior of the consumers, countereiting and pharmaceutical drug.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
S. Ang, P. Cheng, E. Lim, S. Tambyah (2001) s'il vous plait, séparez tous les mots qui sont collés «Spotthedifference: consumerrespon sesto wardcounterfeits. (3), 218-235.
F. Bielen, C. Sempels (2006) Vers une meilleure compréhension de la relation entre l'intangibilité des services et le risque perçu: impact de la connaissance et de et de l'utilisation. 206(1/5), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.69777/363180
P. Bloch, R. Bush, L. Campbell (1993) «Consumer Accomplicesinproductcounterfeiting». 10(4), 27-36.
WontgdataN CordellV, Kieschnick R.L (1996) «Intention de poursuivre la contrefaçon: Rôle de l'attitude légal et les traits déterminants du prod-uit. 41-53.
Alain D'astous, Ezzedine Gargouri (2001) Consumer evaluations of brand imitations. 35(1/2), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560110363391
W. GentryJ, PutrevuS, ShulzC, S. Commuri (2001) «Hownow Ralph Lauren? » The separation of brand and product in a counter feitculture. 28.
GreenRobertT, T. Smith (2002) Executiveinsights:counteringbrandcounterfeit ers. 10(4), 89-106.
M. GrossmanG, C. Shapiro (1988) «Counterfeitproducttrade»,The American Economic Review. 59-75.
P. Gutmann (1982) «Thesubteterraneaneconomy». 33(6), 26-28.
HiltonB, Chen ChoiC.J (2004) The Ethics of Counterfeiting in the Fashion Industry: Quality, Credence and Profit Issues. 55(3), 345-354.
J. Jacoby, L. (1972) «Thecomponentsofperceivedrisk, in Venkatesan, M (ed.)» Advancesin Consumer Research. 382-393.
S. Mallet (2004) «A la recherché des origines du risqué perçu à l'égard de l'achat d'un produit», les troisièmes journées normandes de la consommation, colloque société et consommation, Rouen; 11 et 12 Mars. 12.
Morrinm Jacoby, J. (2000) Trademarkdilution: empiricalmeasuresforanelusiveconcept. 19(2), 265-276.
Moulinsj-L (2004) «Risqueperçuetfidélitésàlama rque:uneanalyseexploratoire». 199-4.
NiaA, Zaichkowsky J.L (2000) «Docounte rfeitdevaluetheownershipofluxurybrands?» Journal of Product and Brand Management. 9(7), 485-497.
RicoeurP (1979) Soi-mêmecommeunautre.
M. Phall, A. Teahet, Lee (2008) «Targeting buyersofcounterfeitsof Iuxurybrands: A study on attitudes of Singapor eanconsumers». Journal of Targefing. 1, 3-15.
Gail Tom, Barbara Garibaldi, Yvette Zeng, Julie Pilcher (1998) Consumer demand for counterfeit goods. 15(5), 405-421. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199808)15:5
C. Viot, A. LeRoux, F. Kremer (2004) « les déterminants de l'achat de produit de contrefaçon: une exploration du côté obscur du comportement du consommateur », Revue International de Marketing.
Wee C.H, Tan S.-J, CheokK.-H (1995) « Les déterminants des faux prix dans l'intention de poursuivre les produits contrefaits ». 12(6), 19-46.
L. Zaichkowsky (1999) National brand respons.
Published
2014-08-25
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.