\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Examine the Effect of Social Factors on Information Technology Acceptance in Accounting Profession by Using TAM Model},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2012-07 2012-06-09 (revised: 2012 July 09 June 2012)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2012-07 2012-06-09}
\title{Examine the Effect of Social Factors on Information Technology Acceptance in Accounting Profession by Using TAM Model}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Morteza  Ramazani}

             \affil[1]{  Islamic Azad University}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 10 May 2012 Accepted: 30 May 2012 Published: 9 June 2012}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


Nowadays, Information technology (IT) is considered as a very important and most useful part of industry, economic and culture, accounting is the system of recording and summarizing business which provide the users with information in their decision making process this research tries to examine the effect of social factors on IT acceptance to by using TAM model. The research method is descriptivesurvey based on which the author used descriptive and deductive statistic to meet the research goals. The results Keywords : system usage, Perceived usefulness, Perceived ease use, information technology, Social factors and accounting profession. indicate the lack of perceived ease of use among ease accountants.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{system usage, Perceived usefulness, Perceived ease use, information technology, Social factors and accounting profession}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
hat factors make a person to admit new technology in his profession? Are these factors merely dependant on technology specially and its factors? To how extent persons' factores affect this fission? How do these factors affect the process of technology acceptance?\par
Considering the rapid expansion of using computer in the organizations, IT has developed its dominion over all aspects of our life. Virtually each organization empheizes on greater importance of computer science and skills. Computer has absolute domination over some fields as education, commerce, hubbies and our daily life. For example, computer, internet, multimedia and computer nets utilized in education and educational institutes have employed technological tools to improve the quality of their performance and directions in general, organizations use IT to enhance efficiency, effectiveness and improvement of quality in their performance because the believe that the informational technology can provide organizations with valuable opportunities to enhance efficiency and performance  {\ref (awm and Quinet, 2002)}. It is necessary to state that organizations have not always equal opportunities to benefit from technology because they don't use IT systems in effective way. Bradly and Rashel believe that organizations use their financial resources to purchase and establish computer systems and fry to improve their performance but they are not always successful in their operations. When there is a resistance against using technology it is difficult to point oriented goals than organizations will lose their money, time and other resources  {\ref (Nuan, 2001)}. In this research we try to examine the effect of social factors on IT acceptance Iranian accountants by following written assays in this field among (Hyo-Jeong Kim, Michael Mannino and Robert J. \hyperref[b10]{Nieschwietz, 2009)}.In this research, social factors have been classified into three groups as research main variables Internalization and Image. 
\section[{II.}]{II.} 
\section[{Theoretical Background a) Technology Acceptance Model}]{Theoretical Background a) Technology Acceptance Model}\par
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is most influential model of testing information system. TAM posits that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use technology  {\ref (Davis et al.1989}; Venkatesh and Morris 2000; Venkatesh, Morris and Davis 2003) determine an individual's intention to use a system with intention to use serving as a mediator of actual system use. TAM model is shown in Figure  {\ref .}1 Perceived usefulness is also seen as being directly impacted by perceived ease of use. Perceived usefulness is the extent to individual believes that using an information system will enhance his/her productivity. Perceived ease of use technology is extending to individual perceived that using an information system is free of effort \hyperref[b4]{(Davis et al. 1989}). \hyperref[b17]{Moon and Kim (2001)} stated perceived playfulness is the extent to an individual perceives attentions which are related on the interaction within information system. 
\section[{b) The Use of ICT in Accounting Education}]{b) The Use of ICT in Accounting Education}\par
In the past years several researchers have studied the application of technology in the accounting classroom \hyperref[b1]{(Apostolou et al, 2001}\hyperref[b32]{, Watson et al, 2003)}. \hyperref[b7]{Halibi et al (2002)} surveyed introductory accounting trainees to determine trainee attitudes towards teleteaching versus traditional in-class lectures. They found that most trainees preferred the traditional face-to-face approach of teaching. Moreover, \hyperref[b11]{Lane and Porch (2002)} studied the impact of computer aided learning on performance of accounting undergraduates in the UK and found that computer-aided learning technology has negatively affected the trainees' perception of accounting as a subject. \hyperref[b21]{Peterson and Reider (2002)} reported that trainees had an overall positive experience for the use of computers in certification in financial management. \hyperref[b2]{Crandall and Philips (2002)} found that hypertext learning could be used in accounting classes to enhance case based instruction. \hyperref[b23]{Rudolph et al (2002)} found that only 17\% of the trainees would take another interactive television course when examining the impact of interactive television on learning. \hyperref[b13]{Mahoney and Welch (2002)} reported that 96\% of their accounting trainees sample indicated that the use of PC movies was very beneficial. These findings indicate that there is a variety of reactions towards the use of advanced and different information and communication technologies in teaching in general and in specific disciplines in particular.\par
The sample of accounting trainees studied by \hyperref[b16]{McCourt and Radcliff (2000)} reported that computer based instruction made the material more interesting and stimulating from trainees in the UK. Moreover, \hyperref[b6]{Green, Reinstein, and McWilliams (2000)} found that trainees' interest in accounting increased in the interactive courseware group when compared with the traditional lecture problem solving group and that trainees generally found the interactive courseware to be easy to use and as effective as the traditional methods. Most of the research was conducted in developed nations. No present evidence indicates that such research and results can be applied to developing nations, especially with the varying environments and the role of different cultures that affects the introduction, diffusion and use of information and communication technology. The Technology Acceptance Model-TAM ) is suitable for testing the application of IT in accounting education in developing nations since it has shown robustness across the spectrum of IT applications, has been well researched, and gives easily interpretable results \hyperref[b22]{(Rose and Straub, 1998)}. In other terms, TAM has been reported to be a consistently good predictor of the use of IT in developed countries \hyperref[b8]{(Kamel and Assem, 2003}\hyperref[b22]{, Rose and Straub 1998}\hyperref[b0]{, Adams et al, 1992} {\ref and 1985)}.\par
Loch, \hyperref[b12]{Straub and Sevcik (2000)} offer two main reasons why the transfer of IT to developing nations is difficult and that relate to a) the cultural differences affecting systems development and implementation and b) the prevailing government policies and regulations that influence IT transfer. Within the context of testing the effectiveness and reliability of using information and communication technology in teaching accounting, it is important to assess the role of culture in the technology transfer in light of the arguments made by \hyperref[b12]{Loch et al (2000)}. The impact of the role of culture represents a milestone in the successful diffusion of IT since it varies from one nation to another and is bound to a number of complex definitions and shared values amongst other aspects \hyperref[b24]{(Straub et al, 2002)}. It is important to note that research has proved in many contexts that culture impacts the acceptance of technology. Respectively, it is important to understand the impacts and role of culture to be able to project the likelihood of the success of the introduction of IT  {\ref (Loch el al, 2000)}. However, the role of culture is more or less localized and that is why it is important to study the role of culture within the environment of implementation because although the role of culture is powerful, cross cultural conflicts Perceived Usefulness Perceived Ease of use 
\section[{Behavioral Intention to Use}]{Behavioral Intention to Use}\par
Actual System Use between different nations affects the IT systems and processes (Straub e al, 2001). 
\section[{III.}]{III.} 
\section[{Research Objectives}]{Research Objectives}\par
This research tries to examine the effect of social variables on IT acceptance among Iranian accountants. Determine the affect of social factors makes firms' managers to provide reliable and on-time information for correct decision making by investing on employees' facilities and education. IV. 
\section[{Research Hypothesis}]{Research Hypothesis}\par
1. Perceived usefulness has positive effect on IT acceptance among Iranian accountants. 2. Perceived Ease of use has positive effect on IT acceptance among Iranian accountants.\par
3. Perceived Ease of use has positive effect on perceived usefulness. 4. Social factors have positive effect on perceived usefulness among Iranian accountants. 
\section[{Social factors have positive effect on perceived}]{Social factors have positive effect on perceived}\par
Ease of use among Iranian accountants.\par
V. 
\section[{Research Model}]{Research Model}\par
This "When an individual accepts in fluence because the content of the induce behavior the ideas and actions of which it is composed is intrinsically rewarding."  {\ref (Kelman, 1958, 53)}. 
\section[{Internalization}]{Internalization}\par
"The degree to which use of an innovation is perceived to enhance one's status in one's social system  {\ref (Moore and Benbasat, 1991, 195)}. 
\section[{Image}]{Image}\par
Social factors are also considered as external variables. \hyperref[b27]{Thompson et al. (1991)} were interested in social factors which had a strong influence on PC utilization. \hyperref[b14]{Malhotra and Galletta (1999)} tried to understand the role of social influences in the TAM and found that identi fication and internalization had a strong positive relationship with attitude toward using while compliance had a weaker negative relationship with attitude toward using. Subjective norm is influenced by both peer and superior \hyperref[b15]{(Mathieson, 1991;}\hyperref[b26]{Taylor and Todd, 1995)}. The effect of subjective norm on technology acceptance had conflicting results.  reported no significant relationship between 2. Determine the extent of social factors affection technology acceptance.\par
1. Therefore this research insists on following objectives:System Usage Perceived Usefulness\par
Perceived Ease of Use Social Factors social norms and usage because of the weak psychometric properties of their social norms scale and particular IS context. \hyperref[b15]{Mathieson (1991)} found no significant effect of subjective norm on intention while Taylor and Todd (1995) found a significant effect on intention.  showed that subjective norm had a strong influence on technology usage decisions; however the effect of subjective norm was diminished over time. Through the TAM2, Venkatesh and Davis (2000) explained a large impact of social influence process (subjective norms, voluntariness, and image) on technology acceptance. Social influence process significantly affects the technology acceptance through perceived usefulness  {\ref (Venkatesh and Davis, 2000)}. Subjective norms are positively related to intention and moderated by experience and voluntariness, and also negatively associated with perceived usefulness and moderated by experience. Subjective norms positively influence image and image positively affects perceived usefulness. Through the UTAUT model,  confirmed that social influence was a direct determinant of intention to use. 
\section[{VI. Research Methodology}]{VI. Research Methodology}\par
In this study, research methodology is descriptive-survey and in applied kind. In the direction of entrance to research district have also used field method. In the direction of gathering required information in research has been also driven profit two data primary and secondary bunches that in direction of secondary data, documents, evidences, books, articles, internet, searching motors and connected sites are collected circles. Techniques of interview and questionnaire have also used for gathering primary research data at statistical society simultaneously and questionnaire has used by likert five choices spectrums perfectly agree or disagree.\par
Statistical population uses these study active accountants in profession that use IT whether in case or continuously.\par
In process of data use method of descriptive and decomposing and analyzing statistic and interpreting information inferential statistics methods in respect testing present variables in research, correlation of independent variables on each other has been used Pearson correlation coefficient method. 
\section[{VII.}]{VII.} 
\section[{Result And Analyze a) Research Validity and Reliability}]{Result And Analyze a) Research Validity and Reliability}\par
With regard to the fact that a good test must has some desirable features such as objectivity, executive ease of use, practicable, is of interpretation and expression, validity and reliability. Second Hypothesis : With regard to Pearson Correlation -0.160 and P-value = 0.054 hypothesis in the level of error 0.01 is rejected then could resulted that perceived ease of use hasn't positive effect on technology acceptance by Iranian accountant.\par
Third Hypothesis : With regard to Pearson Correlation 0.337 and P-value = 0.00 hypothesis in the level of error 0.01 is accepted then could resulted that perceived ease of use has positive impact on perceived use fullness. Fourth Hypothesis : With regard to Pearson Correlation 0.203 and P-value = 0.014 hypothesis in the level of error 0.01 is accepted then could resulted that existence of social factors has positive impact on perceived use fullness by Iranian accountant.\par
Fifth Hypothesis : With regard to Pearson Correlation 0.260 and P-value = 0.002 hypothesis in the level of error 0.01 is accept then could resulted that existence of social factors had positive impact on perceived ease of use by accountant.\par
VIII. 
\section[{Results And Research Findings}]{Results And Research Findings}\par
Research results indicate second hypothesis refusal which demonstrates the lack of accountant's motive to learn IT. Acceptance of first hypothesis indicates the perceived usefulness among accountants acceptance of third hypothesis denotes direct effect of perceived ease of use on perceived usefulness.\par
Also, the acceptance of forth hypothesis demonstrates the positive effect of social factors on perceived usefulness in other words. The acceptance of forth hypothesis states the positive effect of social factors on perceived ease of use indicating the perceived ease of use among accountants and their colleagues and making positive approach toward perceived ease of use.\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png}
\caption{\label{fig_0}Fig. 1 :}\end{figure}
  \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{No} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.3309484193011647\textwidth}P{0.09193011647254576\textwidth}P{0.24608985024958405\textwidth}P{0.06788685524126456\textwidth}P{0.07071547420965058\textwidth}P{0.042429284525790346\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{6}{l}{Table No.1, Reliability Statistics Cranach's Alpha N of Items 0.260 Accept 0.002 .828 Fifth Hypothesis Social Factors Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N 145}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2, Pearson Correlation Results}\tabcellsep \\
Hypotheses\tabcellsep Factors\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Perceived Usefulness\tabcellsep Perceived Ease of Use\tabcellsep Result\\
First Hypothesis\tabcellsep System Usage\tabcellsep Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)\tabcellsep 0.368 0.000\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Accept\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep N\tabcellsep 145\tabcellsep \\
Second Hypothesis\tabcellsep System Usage\tabcellsep Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep -0.160 0.054\tabcellsep Reject\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep N\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 145\\
Third Hypothesis\tabcellsep Perceived Usefulness\tabcellsep Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0.337 0.000\tabcellsep Accept\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep N\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 145\\
Forth Hypothesis\tabcellsep Social Factors\tabcellsep Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)\tabcellsep 0.203 0.014\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Accept\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep N\tabcellsep 145\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table No .}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XII Issue XI Version I} 			\footnote{© 2012 Global Journals Inc. (US) July} 		 		\backmatter  			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Watson et al. ()]{b32}\label{b32} 	 		‘Accounting Education Literature Review’.  		 			S Watson 		,  		 			B Apostolou 		,  		 			J Hassel 		,  		 			S Webber 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Accounting Education}  		2003. 2000-2002. 21  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Apostolou et al. ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘Accounting Education Literature Review (1997-1999)’.  		 			B Apostolou 		,  		 			S Watson 		,  		 			J Hassel 		,  		 			S Webber 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Accounting Education}  		2001. 19  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Rudolph et al. ()]{b23}\label{b23} 	 		‘Assessing the Effectiveness of Interactive Television Instruction in an Upper Division Accounting Course’.  		 			H Rudolph 		,  		 			R Seay 		,  		 			M Milkman 		.  	 	 		\textit{Advances in Accounting Education}  		2002. 3  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Kamel and Assem ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘Assessing the Introduction of Electronic Banking in Egypt Using the Technology Acceptance Model’.  		 			S Kamel 		,  		 			A Assem 		.  	 	 		\textit{Annals of Cases on Information Technology}  		2003. Idea Group Publishing. 5 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Kelman ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		‘Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change?’.  		 			H C Kelman 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Conflict Resolution}  		1958. 2  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Lane and Porch ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		‘Computer Aided Learning (CAL) and its Impact on the Performance of Non-Specialists Accounting Undergraduates’.  		 			A Lane 		,  		 			M Porch 		.  	 	 		\textit{Accounting Education}  		2002. 11  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Mccourt and Radcliff ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		‘Computer Based Instruction in a Professionally Accredited Undergraduate Tax Course’.  		 			P Mccourt 		,  		 			B Radcliff 		.  	 	 		\textit{Accounting Education}  		2000. 9  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Moore and Benbasat ()]{b18}\label{b18} 	 		‘Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation’.  		 			G C Moore 		,  		 			I Benbasat 		.  	 	 		\textit{Information Systems Research}  		1991. 2  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Nunn and Quinet ()]{b19}\label{b19} 	 		‘Evaluating the Effects of Information Technology on Problem-Oriented Policing’.  		 			S Nunn 		,  		 			K Quinet 		.  	 	 		\textit{Evaluation Review}  		2002. 26 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Moon and Kim ()]{b17}\label{b17} 	 		‘Extending the TAM for a world-wide0web context’.  		 			J Moon 		,  		 			Y Kim 		.  	 	 		\textit{Information \& Management}  		2001. 38 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Malhotra and Galletta ()]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		‘Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation’.  		 			Y Malhotra 		,  		 			D F Galletta 		.  	 	 		\textit{Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences},  				 (the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences)  		1999. 1 p. 1006.  	 
\bibitem[Kim et al. ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		‘information technology acceptance in the internal audit profession: impact of technology features and complexity’.  		 			H Kim 		,  		 			M Mannino 		,  		 			Nieschwietz 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Accounting Information System}  		2009. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Loch et al. ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		\textit{IT Transfer to Egypt: A Process Model for Developing Countries. (National Science Foundation Proposal Number},  		 			K Loch 		,  		 			D Straub 		,  		 			G Sevcik 		.  		2000. 0082473.  	 
\bibitem[Adams et al. ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		‘Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication’.  		 			D Adams 		,  		 			R Nelson 		,  		 			P Todd 		.  	 	 		\textit{MIS Quarterly}  		1992. 16  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Davis ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘Perceived usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology’.  		 			F Davis 		.  	 	 		\textit{MIS Quarterly}  		1989. 13  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Davis ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		‘Perceived usefulness, Perceived Ease of use and user acceptance technology’.  		 			F D Davis 		.  	 	 		\textit{MIS Quality}  		1989. 13 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Peterson and Reider ()]{b21}\label{b21} 	 		‘Perceptions of Computer Based Testing: A Focus on CFM Examination’.  		 			B Peterson 		,  		 			B Reider 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Accounting Education}  		2002. 20  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Thompson et al. ()]{b27}\label{b27} 	 		‘Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization’.  		 			R L Thompson 		,  		 			C A Higgins 		,  		 			J M Howell 		.  	 	 		\textit{MIS Quarterly}  		1991. 15  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Nunn ()]{b20}\label{b20} 	 		‘Police Information Technology: Assessing the Effects of Computerization on Urban Police Functions’.  		 			S Nunn 		.  	 	 		\textit{Public Administration Review}  		2001. 61 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Rose and Straub ()]{b22}\label{b22} 	 		‘Predicting General IT Use: Applying TAM to the Arabic World’.  		 			G Rose 		,  		 			D Straub 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Global Information Management}  		1998. 6  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Mathieson ()]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		‘Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior’.  		 			K Mathieson 		.  	 	 		\textit{Information System Research}  		1991. 2  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Mahoney and Welch ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		‘Teaching Accounting Information Systems Using Personal Computer Movies’.  		 			L Mahoney 		,  		 			J Welch 		.  	 	 		\textit{Advances in Accounting Education}  		2002. 4  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Halibi et al. ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘Tele Teaching Accounting Lectures Across a Multi Campus: A Students Perspective’.  		 			A Halibi 		,  		 			J Tuovein 		,  		 			J Maxfield 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Accounting Education}  		2002. 11  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Straub et al. ()]{b24}\label{b24} 	 		‘Toward a Theory-based Measurement of Culture’.  		 			D Straub 		,  		 			K Loch 		,  		 			R Evaristo 		,  		 			E Karahanna 		,  		 			M Srite 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Global Information Management}  		2002. 10  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Straub et al. ()]{b25}\label{b25} 	 		‘Transfer of Information Technology to Developing Countries: A Test of cultural influence modeling in the Arab World’.  		 			D Straub 		,  		 			K Lock 		,  		 			C Hill 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Global Information Management}  		2001. 9  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Taylor ()]{b26}\label{b26} 	 		‘Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models’.  		 			S Taylor 		,  		 			Todd 		,  		 			P 		.  	 	 		\textit{Information Systems Research}  		1995. 6  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Davis et al. ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		‘User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models’.  		 			F D Davis 		,  		 			R P Bagozzi 		,  		 			P R Warshaw 		.  	 	 		\textit{Management Science}  		1989. 35  (8)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Venkatesh et al. ()]{b30}\label{b30} 	 		‘User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view’.  		 			V Venkatesh 		,  		 			M G Morris 		,  		 			G B Davis 		,  		 			F D Davis 		.  	 	 		\textit{MIS Quarterly}  		2003. 27  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Venkatesh et al. ()]{b31}\label{b31} 	 		‘User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view’.  		 			V Venkatesh 		,  		 			M G Morris 		,  		 			G B Davis 		,  		 			F D Davis 		.  	 	 		\textit{MIS Quarterly}  		2003. 27 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Crandall and Philips ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		‘Using Hypertext in Instructional Material: Helping Students Link Accounting Concept Knowledge to Case Applications’.  		 			D Crandall 		,  		 			F Philips 		.  	 	 		\textit{Issues in Accounting Education}  		2002. 17  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Green et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘Using Interactive Courseware to Teach the Procedural Components of Introductory Financial Accounting’.  		 			B Green 		,  		 			A Reinstein 		,  		 			D Mcwilliams 		.  	 	 		\textit{Advances in Accounting Education}  		2000. 3  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Venkatesh and &morris ()]{b28}\label{b28} 	 		‘Why don't men ever stop to ask for direction? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior’.  		 			V Venkatesh 		,  		 			M G \&morris 		.  	 	 		\textit{MIS Quarrterly}  		2000. 24 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Venkatesh and Morris ()]{b29}\label{b29} 	 		‘Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social Influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior’.  		 			V Venkatesh 		,  		 			M G Morris 		.  	 	 		\textit{MIS Quarterly}  		2000. 24  (1)  p. .  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
