# Introduction n investment decision is a crucial decision for an investor to generate a fair return from the utilization of surplus funds. Making an investment decision requires to have a thorough consideration of many determinants, including the risk and return, liquidity, marketability and tax benefits, etc. Mutual fund paves the way for investing the investment in an asset group of preference such as equity or debt. Not only the large investors but also the small investors have been motivating to have exposure in the financial markets through a mutual fund. A mutual fund is a financial intermediary that pools money by selling shares to the public and invest the proceeds in a diversified portfolio of securities. Each share sold represents a proportional interest in the securities managed by the investment company on behalf of its unit-holders. In another word, an investment company that is entitled to collect money from investors and invests the money in stocks, bonds, money-market securities, or a combination of other securities referred to as a mutual fund. A mutual fund is a cost-efficient investment vehicle chosen by investors to have financial excellence in terms of obtaining high returns. Investors sharing a common investment objective become the shareholder of the fund by purchasing shares or units of the mutual fund. Investors may differ in buying the shares of the mutual fund depending on the personal investment objectives too. The parties who are involved with the management of the mutual funds are Sponsors, Board of Trustees, Asset Management Company and Custodian.Net Asset Value (NAV) is the intrinsic value and market price of the particular scheme.NAV shows the appreciation or depreciation of the money invested in a specific plan. Investors, or shareholders have been used interchangeably throughout the study. The role played by mutual funds has created economic motivation for the investors. By investing in mutual fund schemes, the investor can effectively achieve the benefits of diversification at a lower cost, even with a small amount of money. Investors are also able to reduce a variety of costs related to investment and management of portfolios as investors purchase the services of a presumably skilled financial advisor at less price than if the investor directly and individually negotiated with such an advisor. Most importantly, mutual funds provide liquidity for the investors as it can be bought or liquidated any day at the closing NAV. The number of assets in mutual funds have been growing significantly over time. Bangladesh has witnessed exponential growth in the mutual fund industry. The number of and assets in mutual funds have been growing notably over the years. mutual funds by the distinguished researchers around the globe. According to Biplob, M. N. K. (2017), the majority of the selected closed-end mutual funds in the Dhaka Stock Exchange can generate returns, which is greater than the benchmark market index (DSEX) in terms of risk and return based on the results of different risk-adjusted performance measures. This is inconsistent with the results of this research work as none of the mutual funds traded in the Chittagong Stock exchange can outperform the benchmark market index (CS 30). He also explored whether the mutual funds provide the benefits of diversification, market timing, and selectivity of securities to their investors. It is the finding of his study that 60% of the selected mutual funds are well diversified. Besides, He did not find any significant relationship between timing skill and return of funds. He also emphasized the development of the institutional environment for the gradual progress of the mutual fund industry in Bangladesh. According to Oleksandra, Lemeshko & Oldrich, R. (2015), mutual funds traded in emerging economies (evidence from BRIC, CEE, sea, and MENA regions) hardly generate returns above the market. The finding is that 4796 open-end active and non-active mutual funds from 27 emerging economies showed downward performance relative to their benchmarks. This underperforming trend continued to hold during the times of crisis, recession, the period of recovery and economic growth. Nonetheless, there are some topperforming funds in every region except MENA. These mutual funds continued to outperform irrespective of overall macroeconomic situation and local capital markets. This result is inconsistent with the findings of this research work. According to Zaheeruddin, M. Sivakumar, P. Reddy, K. S. (2013), ICICI mutual fund of India generated high returns and low risk among the selected funds. Besides, it has revealed that Birla Sun Life mutual fund possessed high risk. They also ranked these mutual funds as per the performance ratios. Accordingly, ICICI has ranked in the top position. So, this finding will add insights into the decision-making criteria of the eligible investors to employ the funds in an appropriate investment vehicle. According to Reddy, D. C. P. (2013), 14 schemes in India beat the benchmark return (Sensex). Besides, it has also revealed that 17 equity schemes have low total risk relative to benchmarks (Sensex, Nifty). According to Prajapati, P. K. P & Patel, P. M. (2012), the findings of the study reveal that all the mutual fund schemes in India have generated gain from 2007 to 2011. They have obtained it by using daily closing NAVs of mutual fund schemes of selected top five asset management companies from 1 st January 2007 to 31 st December 2011.Different risk -adjusted measures such as risk-return analysis, Sharape ratio, Treynor ratio, Jensen's measure ,etc. have been used to conduct this research work. Besides, funds are less volatile than benchmark indexes. According to Agarwal, S. & Mirza, N. (2017), Sharpe and Treynor ratio of the selected mutual fund schemes in India indicated that 90% of the mutual funds have outperformed than the benchmark. Besides, the downside risk is comparatively higher, too supported by the analysis of value at risk for mutual funds. According to Kiyamaz, H & Simsek, K. D. (2017), emerging markets of mutual funds differ from the developed markets based on liquidity, size and regulation. They took an attempt to examine the performance of US-based emerging mutual funds total of 300 mutual funds have been chosen as a sample of diversified emerging markets funds (equity fund 222 and bond fund 78) from January 2000 to May 2017. The findings show that 5% of diversified equity funds provide significant alphas to the investors as well as 6% of emerging market bond funds offer significant positive alphas. According to Kiymaz, H. (2015), it has been revealed that investor has positive alphas with investing in Chinese mutual funds. This is inconsistent with the results of this research work. Besides, there are enormous variations in generating returns by the Chinese mutual funds. These funds do not make an excess returns for the investors consistently. According to Qamruzzaman. (2014), abnormal returns have been generated by most of the mutual funds in Bangladesh compared to benchmark return. His finding supports the investigation of the performance evaluation of 32 mutual funds listed in DSE. According to Jayadev. (1996), mutual funds have not performed better than their benchmark indicator, and fund managers are not sufficiently able to use their market timing and selectivity skills. # III. # Objectives of the Study The prime aim of the paper is to evaluate the financial performance of the growth-oriented Bangladeshi close-end mutual funds traded in CS concerning the return of the benchmark index. Also, efforts have been there to identify the impact of the diversification and CS 30 on the return of the mutual funds. a) Hypotheses of the study H1. Returns of the benchmark index have influence on the return of the fund. H2. Diversification and the return of CS 30 have an impact on the returns of the fund. IV. # Research Methodology a) Sampling Ten close-end mutual funds among 36 have been chosen for the study. The period of the research work is 31 st January 2013 to 31 st December 2017. This sampling has conducted based on the market capitalization of the mutual funds. # b) Sources of the data collection The only the secondary source used to satisfy the objectives of this study. Quantitative data for conducting this research work have collected from the library of Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE). Monthly NAV of the ten mutual funds has obtained. Besides, the dividend of the mutual funds has also considered to correct the NAV. 3-months Treasury bill rate is assumed as the benchmark for the risk -free rate. # c) Data Analysis techniques Data Analysis techniques used for the study has shown below: 1. Sharpe's ratio 2. Treynor ratio 3. Jensen's Alpha 4. Regression analysis # V. Performance Evaluation of Mutual Funds: Discussion of the Empirical Findings a) Jensen's Alpha Michael Jensen, an American economist, has developed Jensen alpha, a portfolio performance measure to reflect the differentiation between the actual return of the portfolio and the expected return of the portfolio at a given level of systematic risk. Portfolio managers use Jensen's Alpha, a popular risk-adjusted performance measure to measure how much excess returns the portfolio has earned over and above the market returns as proposed by the CAPM model. A portfolio with a positive alpha outperforms the market and vice-versa. None of the ten mutual funds has been able to generate a higher return than the equilibrium return as evidenced by the negative alpha. Thus, it indicates that funds have underperformed the market reflecting the weak performance of the fund manager in fulfilling the investment objectives. # b) Treynor ratio Treynor ratio, a composite measure of portfolio performance, was developed by the Treynor to measure the excess return per unit of beta (systematic risk). It is also known as a reward to volatility ratio. The benchmark is the excess returns of the market over the market representing a superior performance of the fund. Four funds among the ten have experienced higher returns than the benchmark return in case of Treynor ratio. Also. VANGUARD AML RUPALI BANK BALANCED FUND has got the highest excess return over the risk -free return for taking per unit of systematic risk followed by Grameen Mutual Fund one: Scheme Two, First Janata Bank Mutual Fund and Popular Life First Mutual Fund. # c) Sharpe ratio William Sharpe, an American economist, developed Sharpe ratio, a risk-adjusted measure of performance, to evaluate the performance of a portfolio and its manager. It is also known as a reward to variability ratio as it measures the risk premium return per unit of total risk. All the mutual funds have a negative Sharpe ratio than that of the benchmark market index. Overall, mutual funds in Bangladesh are not in a good position than the benchmark index. The return of mutual funds failed to beat the return of CS 30. So, the fund manager needs to change the structure and investment strategy of the portfolio. # d) Diversification A coefficient of determination, a statistical tool, can be used to measure the diversification of the portfolio. It is known to all that the unsystematic risk can remove with good diversification of portfolio. It is determined by regressing the portfolio's additional return against the additional market return. A high value of the coefficient of determination is the indicator of greater diversification of fund and vice-versa. The higher value of the coefficient of determination indicates that funds are well diversified. GRAMEEN MUTUAL FUND ONE: SCHEME TWO has experienced the highest coefficient of determination (5.02601E-05), followed by the TRUST BANK FIRST MUTUAL FUND with the coefficient of determination of 2.42901E-06. The remaining eight have a lower coefficients of determination, indicating that they are not well-diversified portfolios and have some level of diversifiable risk. It has also identified that FIRST BANGLADESH FIXED INCOME FUND has obtained the lowest coefficient of determination among the ten mutual funds. # e) Regression analysis The Regression analysis has done to find whether there is any statistical relationship between the return of CS 30 (benchmark index) and the return of the .05 indicates only that there is an influence of the return of CS 30 on the return of each mutual fund. Values of significance an F in the regression analysis show that none of the mutual funds have F value of less than .05. It indicates that there is no statistical or significant relationship between the return of the CS 30 and the return of the mutual funds. So, the return of CS 30 does not influence on the return of the mutual funds. # VI. # Test of the Hypotheses # Hypotheses Remarks with discussion H1 H2 Inconsistent with H1 as Returns of the benchmark index have no influence on the return of the fund Inconsistent with H2 as Diversification and return of CS 30 have no impact on the returns of the fund. VII. # Limitations of the Study a. This study concentrates on only some selected closed-end mutual funds. This sample may not represent the actual performance of the mutual fund industry in Bangladesh. b. The irrationality of the investors is far away from this study. c. There may have factors beyond the NAV which have not considered in this study. d. This study is based on only secondary data. # VIII. # Conclusion Recently, many of the mutual funds are trading below their NAV, hurting the retail investors. Due to the poor performance of some of the mutual funds, investors are losing confidence in it, walking away, investing further. A low dividend makes the investors reluctant towards mutual funds. Lack of integrity and inefficiency in managing the funds by the issue managers have identified by the stock analyst as another reason for the poor performance of the mutual funds. Besides, it expects that non-performing mutual funds be liquidated from the market and return the money to the investors. Fund managers should comply the ethical practices, professionalism, and ruleregulation to build trust and confidence among the investors. With some risk -adjusted performance measurement, this paper found that hardly funds have generated superior returns than benchmark return. These findings show that the mutual funds traded in CSE fail to perform better than the CS 30. It strongly suggests that fund managers should develop investment strategy wisely within the framework of regulatory compliance so that more investors are prone to investing in mutual fund making a vibrant environment of investment for all. The findings of the study would assist the investors in making the correct investment decision supported by the historical data analysis of the mutual fund. 61First Bangladesh Fixed Income Fund-0.04649Grameen Mutual Fund One: Scheme Two-0.0502Lr Global Bangladesh Mutual Fund One-0.04491Trust Bank First Mutual Fund-0.0394First Janata Bank Mutual Fund-0.05627Popular Life First Mutual Fund-0.04619Php First Mutual Fund-0.04223Vanguard Aml Rupali Bank Balanced Fund-0.04761Green Delta Mutual Fund-0.04157Ab Bank 1st Mutual Fund-0.03743 62Name of the close-end mutual fundsTreynor ratioFirst Bangladesh Fixed Income Fund-2.092867802Grameen Mutual Fund One:Scheme Two5.618365765 -0.04235Lr Global Bangladesh Mutual Fund One-0.573476851Trust Bank First Mutual Fund-0.254628845First Janata Bank Mutual Fund0.200459048Popular Life First Mutual Fund1.767277375Php First Mutual Fund-0.503602701Vanguard Aml Rupali Bank Balanced Fund6.48001234 -0.04235Green Delta Mutual Fund-0.322985398 -0.04235Ab Bank 1st Mutual Fund-0.21584895 -0.04235 63Name of the close-end mutual fundsSharpe ratioFirst Bangladesh Fixed Income Fund-0.534675511Grameen Mutual Fund One:Scheme Two-0.963910856Lr Global Bangladesh Mutual Fund One-0.859165039Trust Bank First Mutual Fund-0.87010737First Janata Bank Mutual Fund-0.681775774Popular Life First Mutual Fund-0.822461929Php First Mutual Fund-0.71047734Vanguard Aml Rupali Bank Balanced Fund-1.138472964Green Delta Mutual Fund-1.025123113Ab Bank 1st Mutual Fund-0.789085754 64Name of the close-end mutual fundsCoefficient of determinationFirst Bangladesh Fixed Income Fund0.000111447Grameen Mutual Fund One: Scheme Two5.02601e-05Lr Global Bangladesh Mutual Fund One0.00231425Trust Bank First Mutual Fund2.42901e-06First Janata Bank Mutual Fund0.013607869Popular Life First Mutual Fund0.031548739Php First Mutual Fund0.003294697Vanguard Aml Rupali Bank Balanced Fund0.006994435Green Delta Mutual Fund0.003924868Ab Bank 1st Mutual Fund.163840585 65Name of the close-end mutual fundsSignificance FFirst Bangladesh Fixed Income Fund0.936193Grameen Mutual Fund One:Scheme Two0.957126Lr Global Bangladesh Mutual Fund One0.715107Trust Bank First Mutual Fund0.990571First Janata Bank Mutual Fund0.374747Popular Life First Mutual Fund0.174553Php First Mutual Fund0.663112Vanguard Aml Rupali Bank Balanced Fund0.525231Green Delta Mutual Fund0.634406Ab Bank 1st Mutual Fund0.01337 A Quantitative Approach to Evaluate the Financial Performance of Growth Oriented Bangladeshi Close-A Quantitative Approach to Evaluate the Financial Performance of Growth Oriented Bangladeshi Close-A Quantitative Approach to Evaluate the Financial Performance of Growth Oriented Bangladeshi Close-End Mutual Funds: An Empirical Study End Mutual Funds: An Empirical Study End Mutual Funds: An Empirical Study62 Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XX Issue II Version I Year 2020 ( ) C 64 Year 2020 Volume XX Issue II Version I ( ) C Global Journal of Management and Business ResearchRegression Statistics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations ANOVA df Regression 1 Residual 58 Total 59 Coefficients 0.010556865 0.000111447 -0.01712801 0.090256715 60 SS 5.27E-05 5.27E-05 0.006465 MS F 0.472484 0.008146 0.472537 Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept -0.04645493 0.016996 -2.73328 0.0083 X Variable 1 0.023449633 0.291651 0.080403 0.936193 Results of the Regression Analysis between the returns of GRAMEEN MUTUAL FUND ONE:SCHEME TWO and the Significance F 0.936193 Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0% -0.08048 -0.01243 -0.08048 -0.01243 -0.56035 0.607252 -0.56035 0.607252 returns of CS 30 SUMMARY OUTPUT GRAMEEN MUTUAL FUND ONE: SCHEME TWO Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.007089 R Square 5.03E-05 Adjusted R Square -0.01719 Standard Error 0.052571 Observations 60 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 8.06E-06 8.06E-06 0.002915 0.957126 Residual 58 0.160294 0.002764 Total 59 0.160302 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0% Intercept -0.05021 0.0099 -5.0722 4.32E-06 -0.07003 -0.0304 -0.07003 -0.0304 X Variable 1 -0.00917 0.169875 -0.05399 0.957126 -0.34921 0.330869 -0.34921 0.330869 Results of the Regression Analysis between the returns of LR GLOBAL BANGLADESH MUTUAL FUND ONE and returns of CS 30 SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.048107 R Square 0.002314 Adjusted R Square -0.01489 Standard Error 0.057339 Observations 60 ANOVA df SS MS F F Significance Residual 58 0.190693 0.003288 Total 59 0.191135 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0% Intercept -0.05111 0.010282 -4.97099 6.24E-06 -0.07169 -0.03053 -0.07169 -0.03053 X Variable 1 -0.05253 0.143213 -0.36679 0.715107 -0.3392 0.234143 -0.3392 0.234143 Results of the Regression Analysis between the returns of the TRUST BANK FIRST MUTUAL FUND and the returns Results of the Regression Analysis between the returns of the POPULAR LIFE FIRST MUTUAL FUND and the returns of CS 30 SUMMARY OUTPUT Results of the Regression analysis between the returns of the VANGUARD AML RUPALI BANK BALANCED FUND and the returns of CS 30 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat Upper Lower Upper P-value Lower 95% 95% 95.0% 95.0% SUMMARY OUTPUT Intercept -0.05066 0.008495 -5.96384 1.56E-07 -0.06767 -0.03366 -0.06767 -0.03366 Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.17762 R Square 0.031549 Adjusted R Square Regression Statistics 0.08363274 X Variable 1 -0.05657 0.11833 -0.47806 0.63440 6 -0.29343 0.18029 -0.29343 0.180295 5 Multiple R 1 0.014851 Standard Error 0.054895 0.00699443 R Square 5 Observations 60 ANOVA Adjusted R -0.01012635 SUMMARY OUTPUT Square of CS 30 SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.001559 R Square 2.43E-06 Adjusted R Square -0.01724 Standard Error 0.05524 Observations 60 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 4.3E-07 4.3E-07 0.000141 0.990571 Residual 58 0.176983 0.003051 Total 59 0.176983 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0% Intercept -0.04718 0.009905 -4.7628 1.32E-05 -0.067 -0.02735 -0.067 -0.02735 X Variable 1 0.001638 0.137969 0.011869 0.990571 -0.27454 0.277812 -0.27454 0.277812 Results of the Regression Analysis between the returns of the FIRST JANATA BANK MUTUAL FUND and the returns of CS 30 SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.116652772 R Square 0.013607869 Adjusted R Square -0.003398892 Standard Error 0.068828834 Observations 60 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 0.003791 0.003791 0.800145 0.374747 Residual 58 0.27477 0.004737 Total 59 0.27856 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value 95.0% 95.0% Intercept -0.03879343 0.012342 -3.14328 0.002632 -0.0635 -0.01409 -0.0635 -0.01409 1 0.153774644 0.17191 0.894508 0.374747 -0.19034 0.497889 -0.19034 0.497889 Total 59 0.130697 X Variable Residual 58 5 0.130184 0.00224 Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower Upper df SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 0.005694 0.005694 1.889436 0.174553 Residual 58 0.174778 0.003013 Total 59 0.180472 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0% Intercept -0.0545 0.009843 -5.53676 7.8E-07 -0.0742 -0.0348 -0.0742 -0.0348 X Variable 1 -0.18846 0.137107 -1.37457 0.174553 -0.46291 0.085987 -0.46291 0.085987 Results of the Regression Analysis between the returns of the PHP FIRST MUTUAL FUND and the returns of CS 30 SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.057399 R Square 0.003295 Adjusted R Square -0.01389 Standard Error 0.0659 Observations 60 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 0.000833 0.000833 0.191724 0.663112 Residual 58 0.251883 0.004343 Total 59 0.252715 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0% Intercept -0.04252 0.011817 -3.59833 0.000664 -0.06617 -0.01887 -0.06617 -0.01887 X Variable 1 0.07207 0.164594 0.437863 0.663112 -0.2574 0.401541 -0.2574 0.401541 Standard Error 0.04211267 6 Observations 60 ANOVA df SS MS Significanc Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.404772263 R Square 0.163840585 Adjusted R 0.149424043 Square F e F Regression 1 0.000725 0.00072 5 0.40853 5 0.525231 Residual 58 0.102862 0.00177 3 Total 59 0.103586 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0% Intercept -0.04395544 2 0.007551 -5.82097 2.68E-07 -0.05907 -0.02884 -0.05907 -0.02884 X Variable 1 0.06722911 3 0.105182 0.63916 7 0.52523 1 -0.14332 Standard Error 0.054881147 Observations 60 ANOVA df SS MS F Significanc e F Regression 1 0.03423 0.03423 11.3647 6 0.01337 Residual 58 0.174693 0.00301 2 Total 59 0.208923 0.27777 4 -0.14332 0.277774 Results of the Regression Analysis between the returns of the GREEN DELTA MUTUAL FUND and the returns of CS 30 SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.062649 R Square 0.003925 Adjusted R Square -0.01325 Standard Error 0.047377 Observations 60 ANOVA df SS MS F Significanc e F Regression 1 0.000513 0.00051 3 0.22853 9 0.634406 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat Upper Lower Upper P-value Lower 95% 95% 95.0% 95.0% Intercept -0.069587066 0.009841 -7.07132 2.22E-09 -0.08929 -0.04989 -0.08929 -0.04989 X Variable 1 -0.462097307 0.137073 -3.37117 0.00133 7 ----0.73648 0.18772 0.73648 0.1877261 Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XX Issue II Version I Year 2020 ( ) C 63 Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XX Issue II Version I Year 2020 ( ) CRegression10.0004420.0004420.1345380.715107© 2020 Global Journals © 2020 Global Journals© 2020 Global Journals © 2020 Global Journals * The Performance of the sample mutual fund schemes DC PReddy IQSR Journal of Business and Management 2013 * A performance evaluation of Chinese mutual funds HKiymaz 10.1108/IJoEM-09-2014-0136 International journal of emerging markets 10 4 2015 * The Performance of US-based emerging market mutual funds H &Kiyamaz Simsek .10.1108/JCMS-10-2017-003 Journal of Capital Markets studies 1 1 2017 * an analysis of monthly returns Finance India X 1996 Jayadev * Performance evaluation of equity mutual funds in countries with emerging economies: Evidence from LemeshkoOleksandra Oldrich 2015 * Performance Evaluation of Bangladesh Mutual Fund MN KBiplob International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences 6 3 2017 * Performance evaluation of mutual funds in India with special reference to selected financial intermediaries MZaheeruddin PSivakumar KSReddy IOSR Journal of Business and Management 7 2 2013 * Comparative study on performance evaluation of mutual fund schemes of Indian companies PKPrajapati PMPatel Science & Commerce 3 3 2012 Journal of Arts * Comparative Study on performance evaluation of mutual fund schemes in Bangladesh: An analysis of monthly returns Qamruzzaman 10.4172/2162-6359.1000428 Journal of Business Studies Quarterly 5 2014 * A study on the riskadjusted performance of mutual funds industry in India SAgarwal NMirza Review of Innovation and Competitiveness 3 1 2017 * Appendix-1 * Name of the close-end mutual funds Market Capitalization Amount in BDT * First Bangladesh Fixed Income Fund 4 20 * Grameen Mutual Fund One: Scheme Two 2,827 167 50 * Lr Global Bangladesh Mutual Fund One 2,457 534 80 * Trust Bank First Mutual Fund 1 0 * First Janata Bank Mutual Fund 1 40 * 622.00 Popular Life First Mutual Fund 1 * Php First Mutual Fund 1 60 * Vanguard Aml Rupali Bank Balanced Fund 1,603 500.00 324 * Green Delta Mutual Fund 1,395,000 000.00 * Ab Bank 1st Mutual Fund 1,389,712 931 40 * Ebl First Mutual Fund 1 70 * Southeast Bank 1st Mutual Fund 1,367,044 910.00 * 464.00 Ebl Nrb Mutual Fund 1 * Dbh First Mutual Fund 1,128,000 000.00 * Ific Bank 1st Mutual Fund 1,064,258 203 80 * Icb Amcl Second Nrb Mutual Fund 1,020,000 000.00 * Vanguard Aml Bd Finance Mutual Fund One 959 000.00 744 * Exim Bank 1st Mutual Fund 904,004 831 60 * Nccbl Mutual Fund-1 878 10 * Icb Amcl Sonali Bank Limited 1st Mutual Fund 860,000 000.00 * 000,000.00 Mbl 1st Mutual Fund 860 * Aibl 1st Islamic Mutual Fund 810,000 000.00 * 900.00 Icb Amcl First Agrani Bank Mutual Fund 775 * 000.00 Ifil Islamic Mutual Fund-1 760 * Nli First Mutual Fund 755,007 000.00 * 000,000.00 Seml Ibbl Shariah Fund 720 * Prime Bank 1st Icb Amcl Mutual Fund 710,000 000.00 * 000.00 Scheme Of Reliance Ins. Mf 695 * 340.00 Asian Tiger Sandhani Life Growth Fund 667 * 000,000.00 Icb Amcl Third Nrb Mutual Fund 630 * Icb Employees Provident Mutual Fund One 525,000 000.00 * 800.00 Capm Bdbl Mutual Fund 01 441 * Phoenix Finance 1st Mutual Fund 420,000 000.00 * 000,000.00 Icb Amcl Second Mutual Fund 405 * 000,000.00 Seml Lecture Equity Management Fund 370 * Prime Finance First Mutual Fund 286,000 000.00