\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter \IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}% {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}% {\RequirePackage{color}} \usepackage{colortbl} \usepackage{wrapfig} \usepackage{ifxetex} \ifxetex \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{xunicode} \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash} \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{} \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}} \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}} \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}} \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}} \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono} \else \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}% {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \PrerenderUnicode{–} }% {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{float} \usepackage[]{ucs} \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash } \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{} \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}} \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}} \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,} \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ } \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>} \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}} \def\textJapanese{} \def\textChinese{} \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{} \fi \def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small} \DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25} \usepackage{relsize} \RequirePackage{array} \def\@testpach{\@chclass \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@ \else \z@ \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}% \@chnum \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else \z@ \@chclass \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else \if \@nextchar !6 \else \if \@nextchar @7 \else \if \@nextchar (8 \else \if \@nextchar )9 \else 10 \@chnum \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else \if \@nextchar p4 \else \if \@nextchar b5 \else \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi} \gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr} \def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}} \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \def\abbr{} \def\corr{} \def\expan{} \def\gap{} \def\orig{} \def\reg{} \def\ref{} \def\sic{} \def\persName{}\def\name{} \def\placeName{} \def\orgName{} \def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}} \def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}} \def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}} \def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}} \def\textquoted#1{‘#1’} \def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}} \def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}} \def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}} \def\titlem{\itshape} \newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{bibl}{}{} \newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{rubric}{}{} \newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par } \newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}} \newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}} \definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75} \def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}} \DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@} \def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}} \begingroup \catcode`\_=\active \gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}} \endgroup \mathcode`\_=\string"8000 \catcode`\_=12\relax \usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry} \usepackage{framed} \definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} \usepackage{fancyvrb} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{marginnote} \renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1} \renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize} \def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif} \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage[pdftitle={The Mediating Role of Marketing Strategy in the Effect of Antecedents on Export Performance of Leather and Textile Exporting Companies in Ethiopia}, pdfauthor={}]{hyperref} \hyperbaseurl{} \paperwidth210mm \paperheight297mm \def\@pnumwidth{1.55em} \def\@tocrmarg {2.55em} \def\@dotsep{4.5} \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \clubpenalty=8000 \emergencystretch 3em \hbadness=4000 \hyphenpenalty=400 \pretolerance=750 \tolerance=2000 \vbadness=4000 \widowpenalty=10000 \renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}% {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}} \renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}% {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large}} \renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}% {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\large}} \renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}% {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\normalsize}} \renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}% {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}% {-1em}% {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}} \def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt} \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par \endgroup} \def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}} \def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}} \def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}} \def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}} \@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{} \@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{} \newif\if@mainmatter \@mainmattertrue \def\chaptername{Chapter} \def\frontmatter{% \pagenumbering{roman} \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section} \def\theHsection{\roman{section}} \def\@chapapp{}% } \def\mainmatter{% \cleardoublepage \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter} \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \pagenumbering{arabic} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6} \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}% \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section} \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}} } \def\backmatter{% \cleardoublepage \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}% \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}} \appendix } \newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{% \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}% {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}% \leftmargin\labelwidth \advance\leftmargin\labelsep \@openbib@code \usecounter{enumiv}% \let\p@enumiv\@empty \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}% }% \sloppy \clubpenalty4000 \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty \widowpenalty4000% \sfcode`\.\@m}% {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}% \endlist} \def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}} \parskip0pt \parindent1em \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \newenvironment{reflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{sansreflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{specHead}[2]% {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}% \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}% \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}% \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}% }{} \def\TheFullDate{2018-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2018)} \def\TheID{\makeatother } \def\TheDate{2018-01-15} \title{The Mediating Role of Marketing Strategy in the Effect of Antecedents on Export Performance of Leather and Textile Exporting Companies in Ethiopia} \author{}\makeatletter \makeatletter \newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{% \clearpage \if@twoside \ifodd\c@page \hbox{}\newpage \if@twocolumn \hbox{}\newpage \fi \fi \fi } \makeatother \makeatletter \thispagestyle{empty} \markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author} \renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@ \belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@ \def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep 1pt} } \makeatother \fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm} \fancyhf{} \setlength{\headheight}{14pt} \fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} \fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} \fancyfoot[RO]{} \fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID} \fancyfoot[LE]{} \fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID} \hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true} \fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}} \date{} \usepackage{authblk} \providecommand{\keywords}[1] { \footnotesize \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1 } \usepackage{graphicx,xcolor} \definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81} \definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9} \definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70} \definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} \renewenvironment{abstract}{% \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space} }{% \vskip8pt \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt } \usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos} \makeatother \usepackage{lineno} \linenumbers \begin{document} \author[1]{Dr. Getie Andualem Imiru} \affil[1]{ Addis Ababa University-School of Commerce} \renewcommand\Authands{ and } \date{\small \em Received: 9 December 2017 Accepted: 3 January 2018 Published: 15 January 2018} \maketitle \begin{abstract} This study examined the impact of specific firm characteristics, environmental characteristics and marketing mix strategy on export marketing performance. Data were gathered using a structured questionnaire from firms engaged in leather and leather related products, textile and garment exporting companies operating in Ethiopia. Although a total of 278 questionnaires were distributed to a sample of exporter from leather and textile sectors 253 questionnaires were returned at the end of the data collection process, which gave the response rate of 91 per cent. Correlation, regression and path analysis were used to analyse the data. Firm characteristics, Industry characteristics, Export market characteristics, and Product adaptation influence Export performance significantly at 95% confidence interval with a sig. level of 0.000, 0.000, 0.029, and 0.001 respectively. The variable firm characteristics significantly affect export performance and partially mediated by product adaption. When the mediator variable removed from the model its direct value dropped from 0.31 to 0.18 and the direct effect is still significant after mediator enters the model. Product characteristics, export market characteristics and industry characteristics significantly affect export market performance. Among these variables product characteristics and industry characteristics are found to be partially mediated by export market strategy. \end{abstract} \keywords{export, marketing, performance, marketing mix, strategy, leather, textiles ethiopia.} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}} \end{textblock*} \let\tabcellsep& \section[{II. Statement of the Problem}]{II. Statement of the Problem}\par In the international marketing context, a handful of studies (e.g., \hyperref[b12]{Bilkey 1982} \hyperref[b65]{Rosson and Ford 1982)} have suggested that export performance is influenced by export marketing strategy. Because of conceptual and methodological problems associated with these studies, however, their results are fragmented and the relationship between export marketing strategy and export performance remains an unresolved issue \hyperref[b0]{(Aaby and Slater 1989;}\hyperref[b52]{Madsen 1987)}.\par Trade is positively associated with growth performance. Therefore, exporting could be considered as a strategic activity at firm, industry and country levels {\ref (Kaimakoudi, 2014)}. Companies have to seek new opportunities in the market. Firms can be proactive by anticipating future demands and opportunities in the market, participating in emerging markets, shaping the environment, and introducing new products and brands before their rivals {\ref (Venkatraman, 1989)}. Therefore, proactiveness can provide companies to be a financial leader {\ref (Zou et al, 1998)}. The multiplicity of measures used and the fragmented nature of the findings bring additional need for a fresh look into the construct of export performance from both scholars' and practitioners' perspectives. In their qualitative study, Carneiro and colleagues (2016) found that, there are similarities on practitioners' and scholars' views of export performance, ranging from multi-dimensional conceptualization, preference for economic measures and market measures to infrequent use of learning and behavioural measures. Ethiopia is the 91st largest export economy in the world and the 80th most complex economy according to the Economic Complexity Index (ECI). In 2016, Ethiopia exported \$1.71B and imported \$19.1B, resulting in a negative trade balance of \$17.3B. In 2016 the GDP of Ethiopia was \$72.4B and its GDP per capita was \$1.73k atlas {\ref (2017)}. Until 2013, the major agricultural export crop was coffee, providing about 26.4\% of Ethiopia's foreign exchange earnings. In the beginning of 2014, oilseeds he study report is organized into seven sections. Firstly, statement of the problem is briefly highlighted. Secondly; Research questions are articulated; thirdly, literature review related to key areas in which the present study extends to the previous literature on the export marketing strategy-performance relationship are highlighted; fourthly, a broad conceptual framework of export marketing strategy and performance is proposed; fifthly, the design of the study and the methodological procedures are described; sixthly, the findings of the study are presented and discussed; finally, a statement of conclusion, recommendation and further area of investigation are proposed.\par T exports have been more important. Coffee is critical to the Ethiopian economy. More than 15 million people (25\% of the population) derive their livelihood from the coffee sector.\par Other exports include live animals, leather and leather products, chemicals, gold, pulses, oilseeds, flowers, fruits and vegetables and khat (or qat). Crossborder trade by pastoralists is often informal and beyond state control and regulation. In East Africa, over 95\% of cross-border trade is through unofficial channels and the unofficial trade of live cattle, camels, sheep and goats from Ethiopia sold to Somalia, Kenya and Djibouti generates an estimated total value of between US\$250 and US\$300 million annually (100 times more than the official figure). Recent initiatives have sought to document and regulate this trade. Dependent on a few vulnerable crops for its foreign exchange earnings and reliant on imported oil, Ethiopia lacks sufficient foreign exchange.\par According to the World Bank news report, the newly completed Addis Ababa-Djibouti railway line significantly eases trade logistics related constraints. The Group's report also lauded Addis Ababa in the area of developing industrial parks and power generation efforts which they say is expected to improve export performance and stimulate growth in the short to medium-term world bank (2017). Over the longer term, countries highly dependent on one or a few commodity products should work to diversify their export bases.\par The major export products of Ethiopia include coffee, livestock products (leather, live animals and meat), oil seeds and pulses, fruits, vegetables and flowers, textiles, natural gum, spices and mineral products. In addition to the efforts underway to increase the export supply of these products and to improve their quality, investments in other currently unexploited, higher value-added, export sectors is highly encouraged. Recognizing that large capital investments are needed to exploit these resources; various incentives are currently provided to encourage foreign investments (including joint ventures and marketing arrangements) so that the sector provides meaningful contribution to the Country's development. In Ethiopia there are around 914 exporters engaged in the following product categories: leather and leather products, textile and garments, in oil seeds, coffee/roasted coffee General export, pulses or cereals, spices, live animals, flower, textiles etc.; Most of the exporting companies are established for the last 26 years since the government liberalized the economy after the command economy of the military government steeped down. The exporters of Ethiopia can be classified into 34 product categories. \section[{III. Research Questions}]{III. Research Questions}\par With globalization of markets and competition, foreign markets have become increasingly viable and natural opportunities for growth -oriented domestic firms the following questions were raised in this study. ? Can the marketing strategy-performance relationship be empirically verified by internal forces such as firm and product characteristics and external forces such as industry and export market characteristics? \section[{IV. Scope of the Study}]{IV. Scope of the Study}\par This study is delimited to three major Ethiopian exporting companies engaged leather and leather products, textile and Garment products. The study units are all employees participating in formulating, implementing and monitoring, evaluating and control export marketing strategies. The major cities included Addis Ababa, Bahir Dar, Gondar, Hawassa, Nathreth and Dire Dawa. The variables under this study are delimited to firm characteristics, product characteristics, industry characteristics, export market characteristics, Elements of Marketing Strategy (product adaptation, price competitiveness, support to foreign distributer and promotion adaptation) and export marketing performance. Methodologically, it is delimited to three major chain retail stores. \section[{V. Literature Review}]{V. Literature Review}\par In this study three distinctive features should be noted at the outset. ? Firstly, the unit of analysis is an individual exporting company which is defined as marketing of a specific product in a specific export market. ? Secondly, export performance is determined by export marketing strategy and marketing strategy is influenced by internal and external environments of the firm. Furthermore, export performance is conceived as the accomplishment of strategic as well as economic objectives. ? Thirdly, data have been collected through structured research questions with marketing managers directly involved in the export ventures studied.\par Firms at different stages (initial foreign market entry, expansion of national markets, and global rationalization) differ in their international experience, extent of international involvement, strategic thrust, international levers, and strategic decisions (Douglas and Craig 1989). \section[{a) Internal forces}]{a) Internal forces}\par Internal forces contain firm and product characteristics. \section[{i. Firm Characteristics}]{i. Firm Characteristics}\par Firm's capabilities and constraints profoundly influence their choice of marketing strategy and ability to execute the chosen strategy \hyperref[b1]{(Aaker 1988} {\ref (Aaker , porter 1980))}. Key assets and skills of a firm constitute its sources of sustainable competitive advantage (day and Wensley 1988; porter 1985). Possession of assets such as international experience, extent of international business involvement, and resources available for export development affect export marketing strategy and performance.\par ii. Product Characteristics\par The specific marketing strategy in an export venture is influenced by product characteristics {\ref (Cavusgil, Zou, and Naidu 1993;}\hyperref[b22]{Cooper and Kleinschmidt 1985;}\hyperref[b53]{McGuinness and Little 1981)}. Product attributes can affect the positional competitive advantage {\ref (Day and Wensley 1988)}, which influences the choice of an offensive or defensive strategy \hyperref[b21]{(Cook 1983)}. Relevant product characteristics that influence export marketing strategy include culture specificity, strength of patent, unit value, uniqueness, age, and service/maintenance requirements of product. \section[{b) Industry forces}]{b) Industry forces}\par Industry forces includes industry characteristics and export market characteristics. \section[{i. Industry Characteristics}]{i. Industry Characteristics}\par The intensity of exporting activity and the nature of export marketing strategy vary considerably across industries. This is largely a result of the varying nature of industries \hyperref[b60]{(Porter 1980)}. Industry structure has been considered a key determinant of firms' strategy in domestic market context \hyperref[b44]{(Kerin, Mahajan, and Varadarajan 1990;}\hyperref[b60]{Porter 1980}). In export marketing, analysis of the relationship between industry structure and marketing strategy must incorporate the significant variations in the market systems, government interventions, and presence of foreign competitors across markets. In addition, technology intensiveness and intensity of price competition in the industry also must be considered as the relevant correlates of adaptation of marketing strategy \hyperref[b38]{(Jain 1989)}. \section[{ii. Export Market Characteristics}]{ii. Export Market Characteristics}\par Conditions in foreign markets pose both opportunities and threats for exporters. Export marketing strategy must be formulated in such a way to match a firm's strengths with market opportunities and neutralize the firm's strategic weaknesses, or to overcome market threats \hyperref[b1]{(Aaker 1988;} {\ref Terostra 1987)}. Consequently, export marketing strategy tends to be conditioned by export market characteristics {\ref (Cavusgil, Zou, and Naidu 1993;}\hyperref[b22]{Cooper and Kleinschmidt 1985;}\hyperref[b65]{Rosson and Ford 1982)}. The key characteristics of the export market that can affect the choice of export marketing strategy include demand potential, cultural similarity to home market, familiarity with the product, brand familiarity of export customers, and similarity of legal and regulatory frameworks.\par iii. Export Marketing Performance Export performance is defined as the extent to which a firm's objectives, both economic and strategic, with respect to exporting a product into a foreign market, are achieved through planning and execution of export marketing strategy. A firm usually initiates an export venture with a number of objectives, which can be economic (i.e. profits, sales, or costs) and/or strategic (i.e. market expansion, competitive response, gaining a foothold in foreign market, or increasing the awareness of the product/firm). Subsequent to formulation and implementation of export marketing strategy, some objectives can be achieved fully, others only marginally. The extent to which a venture's strategic and economic objectives are achieved is therefore a gauge of the performance in the export venture. Export marketing strategy is the means by which a firm respond to the interplay of internal and external forces to meet the objectives of the export venture. It involves all aspects of the conventional marketing plan, including product, promotion, pricing, and distribution. In international marketing, the key consideration is whether the marketing strategy should be standardized or adapted to the conditions of the foreign market \hyperref[b28]{(Douglas and Craig 1989)}. The degree of marketing adaptation versus standardization is a function of product, industry, market, organization, and environmental characteristics \hyperref[b15]{(Buzzell 1968}; Cavusgil, Zou, and Naidu 1993; Jain 1989; Wakters 1986). Therefore, we evaluate export marketing strategy along the standardization adaptation continuum. \section[{d) Relationship between Export Marketing Strategy and Export Performance}]{d) Relationship between Export Marketing Strategy and Export Performance}\par The relationship between export marketing strategy and performance has been investigated as part of a stream of exporting literature involved with explaining the success or failure of a firm's exporting activities. These studies typically attempt to identify key factors that contribute to successful export marketing. Among the key success factors highlighted are export marketing strategy; management attitudes; and other firm, industry, product and export market factors {\ref (} \hyperref[b65]{Rosson and Ford 1982)}. In their review article, \hyperref[b0]{Aaby and Slater (1989)} suggest that export performance is direct influenced by a firm's business strategy.\par With few exceptions, previous studies have been conducted at the overall firm level. As a result, export marketing strategy and performance were conceptualized as firm specific characteristics. An underlying theoretical justification for firm level studies is the theory of internalization \hyperref[b14]{(Buckley and Casson 1985;}\hyperref[b66]{Rugman 1981}), which states that, in an imperfect market, firms should internalize the firm specific advantages, both tangible and intangible, to extract maximum economic rent. Because firm specific advantages are derived not only from the development and marketing of a particular product but also from the total learning process of the firm, export performance could be investigated at the firm level.\par Though these studies have contributed to our knowledge of export behaviour, there are notable limitations associated with firm level investigations of export marketing strategy and performance. Considerable variations in export marketing strategy and performance often exist across various product market export ventures of the same firm. It is unrealistic to expect that the same marketing strategy can lead to the same results in all export market ventures {\ref (Douglas and Wind 1987)}. Consequently, if the export marketing strategy performance relationship is investigated at the overall firm level, aggregating all product market export ventures, confounded findings are likely to result \hyperref[b52]{(Madsen 1987)}. Therefore, the position taken in this research is that the individual product market export venture must be taken as the unit of study to obtain a more precise measurement of the export marketing strategy performance relationship.\par Previous studies have viewed exporting simply as a means of realizing the economic goals of the firm. Performance has been measured in terms of sales or profits, with no deliberate attempt to relate it to a firm's strategic and competitive goals, such as gaining a foothold in foreign markets or neutralizing competitive pressure the firm faces in the domestic market. Furthermore, these studies have posited that firm, product, industry, and export market factors determine export performance directly. The central role of proactive marketing strategy in determining export performance has not been emphasized. As a result, research on exporting is becoming increasingly isolated, with inquiries consisting of a "mosaic" of autonomous endeavours \hyperref[b0]{(Aaby and Slater 1989)}.\par The need for strategic considerations in marketing theory has been emphasized by \hyperref[b25]{Day and Wensley (1983)}, \hyperref[b48]{Lambkin and Day (1989)}, and {\ref Wind and Robertson (1983)}. Increasingly, firms have treated export markets as strategic as well as economic opportunities. Given intense international competition, it is believed that export marketing research can be enriched if exporting inquiries incorporate strategic considerations. This implies that exporting should be viewed as a firm's strategic response to the interplay of internal and external forces, export marketing strategy should be emphasized as a key determinant of export performance, and the strategic dimensions of export performance must be tapped.\par The other issue is related to the diversity of conceptualization and measurement of export marketing strategy and performance and the simplistic nature of research approaches employed in some previous studies. Both \hyperref[b52]{Madsen (1987)} and \hyperref[b0]{Aaby and Slater (1989)} observe that export marketing strategy and performance were conceptualized and operationalized in many different ways by different researchers. They point out that researchers previously have made little effort to identify measurement difficulties, sampling, validity, or particular technical problems. Data collection methods have ranged from unstructured personal discussions to structured mail surveys to in depth interviews, and analytical approaches have ranged from simple frequencies to sophisticated multivariate techniques. As a result, confusing and even contradictory findings have surfaced in the literature (e.g., the effect of firm size on export performance). These discrepant findings hinder not only practice, but also theory development in export marketing. Hence, there is an urgent need for an integrated approach to export marketing inquiry. Such an approach must explicitly deal with the measurement as well as conceptualization of export marketing strategy, export performance, and factors internal and external to the firm using a structured questionnaire. \section[{VI. Conceptual Framework and Hypothesis of the Study}]{VI. Conceptual Framework and Hypothesis of the Study}\par In this research; Internal forces (Firm characteristics and product characteristics) \& Industry forces (industry characteristics and export market characteristics) are proposed to be related to marketing mix strategy and export performance. \section[{a) Conceptual Framework of the study}]{a) Conceptual Framework of the study}\par Exporting can be conceptualized as a strategic response by management to the interplay of internal and external forces. The particular theoretical perspective adopted here is the principle of strategy environment coalignment \hyperref[b3]{(Aldrich 1979;}\hyperref[b60]{Porter 1980}; Venkatraman and Prescott 1990), which states that the "fit" between strategy and its context whether it is the external environment \hyperref[b4]{(Anderson and Zeithaml 1984;}\hyperref[b34]{Hofer 1975)} or organizational characteristics \hyperref[b18]{(Chandler 1962}; Gupta and Govindarajan 1984) has significant positive implications for firm performance framework of industrial organization (cf. Scherer and Ross 1990) and rests on two premises: (1) Organizations are dependent on their environments for resources \hyperref[b57]{(Pfeffer and Salancik 1978)} and ( {\ref 2}) Organizations can manage this dependence by developing and maintaining strategies {\ref (Hofer and Schendel 1978)}.\par The framework postulates that marketing strategy in an exporting company is determined by internal forces such as firm and product characteristics and external forces such as industry and export market characteristics. The performance of the export venture, in turn, is determined by export marketing strategy and firm Characteristics (e.g., a firm's capability.) A survey was designed to obtain the effects of antecedent variables and marketing mix strategy on export performance of leather and textile companies. The population of the study was all exporters operating in Ethiopia. The data for the analysis was developed and applied to a sample of members of major two exporters product categories (leather and leather products and textile and garment products which has been operating since 1986. \section[{b) Research Instrument}]{b) Research Instrument}\par The questionnaire was prepared following an exhaustive literature review and all constructs were measured with existing scales. The questionnaire consisted of questions related to the constructs and measures needed in the study. The final, refined instrument contained six groups of variables intended to measure firm, product, industry, and export market characteristics, as well as export marketing strategy and performance. The five groups of explanatory variables were measured primarily by five-point Likert scales. All items were measured on a five-point Likert-type scale where 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. 278 Questionnaires were distributed to exporters. All of the participants were either the corporate strategist or marketing strategists of the case companies. In order to test the proposed hypotheses, 253 responses were obtained from exporters. \section[{VIII. Measures and Model}]{VIII. Measures and Model}\par All measures were adopted from different existing literature in the field. Firm Characteristics were measured using eleven items. Product Characteristics were measured using seven items; industry characteristic was measured from two items; export market characteristic was measured from seven items. In addition, export marketing strategy were considered as a mediating role such as product adaptation were measured using six items, price competitiveness three items, promotion adaptation six items and support to foreign distributors three items. \section[{IX. Result and Discussion}]{IX. Result and Discussion} \section[{a) Demographic Profile}]{a) Demographic Profile}\par Although a total of 278 questionnaires were distributed to a sample of exporter from total exporter of 914 in the country. Only 253 questionnaires were returned at the end of the data collection process, which gave the response rate of 91 per cent. The demographic profile of the respondents is shown in Table \hyperref[tab_1]{1}. \section[{b) Reliability Analysis}]{b) Reliability Analysis}\par Reliability analysis were conducted prior to the regression analysis in order to identify the appropriate items for the analysis. The consistency reliability and the value of Cronbach's alpha will determine the variables' reliability and measure the consistency of a multiple item scale {\ref (Sekaran, 2003)}. Table \hyperref[tab_3]{2} shows the summary of the reliability analysis and factor loadings for all the measurement items used in multiple regression analysis. Therefore, Cronbach alpha coefficients (0.915) which are by far above0.70 which demonstrates an excellent internal consistency. To perform correlation and linear regression analysis on the data, the researcher has created an index for each of the constructs or variables that represent the value of the construct by averaging the subject responses to items. \section[{Model}]{Model}Y 1 = a + b 1 X 1 + b 2 X 2 + b 3 X 3 + b 4 X 4 + e Y 2 = a + b 5 X 5 + b 6 X 6 + b 7 X 7 + b 8 X 8+ + \section[{d) Correlation Analysis}]{d) Correlation Analysis}\par A correlation is a measure of how strongly two variables relate to each other. Correlation coefficients are frequently used to describe data because they are relatively easy to use and provide a great deal of information in just a single value \hyperref[b54]{(Mooi \&Sarstedt, 2011)}. Karl Pearson's coefficient of correlation or simple correlation is the most widely used Method of measuring the degree of relationship between two variables \hyperref[b47]{(Kotari, 2004)}.\par The calculated value of the correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to 1, where -1 indicates a perfect negative relation (the relationship is perfectly linear) and 1 indicates a perfectly positive relationship. A correlation coefficient of 0 indicates that there is no correlation \hyperref[b54]{(Mooi \& Sarstedt, 2011)}.\par The below table shows the Pearson correlation result with its significant level. When we see the correlation of Firm characteristics with Export performance it has a significant positive Pearson correlation of 0.334 at 0.01 confidence interval. With regard to Industry characteristics it has a significant negative Pearson correlation of -0.177 at 0.01 confidence interval. But, when we see the correlation of product characteristics and export market characteristics the correlation is not significant. \section[{e) Regression Analysis}]{e) Regression Analysis}\par In its simplest form, regression analysis allows market researchers to analyze relationships between one independent and one dependent variable. In marketing applications, the dependent variable is usually the outcome we care about, while the independent variables are the instruments we have to achieve those outcomes with. It can also help make predictions \hyperref[b54]{(Mooi and Sarstedt, 2011)}. \section[{i. Antecedent Forces on Export Market Strategy}]{i. Antecedent Forces on Export Market Strategy}\par The following tables are extracted from SPSS in order to perform a regression analysis between independent variables and dependent variable. The model for this regression was: influence Export market strategy significantly at 95\% confidence interval with a sig. level of 0.000, 0.037, 0.024, 0.000, and 0.000 respectively. As the constant and B values are known the model will be: Y 1 = 0.746 + 0.279X 1 -0.104X 2 -0.089X 3 + 0.719X 4 + 0.05 The above table shows the constant, beta, and significance level of each variable. It indicates that four variables which are; Firm characteristics, Industry characteristics, Export market characteristics, and Product adaptation influence Export performance significantly at 95\% confidence interval with a sig. level of 0.000,0.000, 0.029, and 0.001respectively.Among these variables the first three are antecedent forces and the last one is mediator variable.Y 1 = a + b 1 X 1 + b 2 X 2 + b 3 X 3 + b 4 X 4 + e. \section[{iii. AMOS Analysis for Mediation}]{iii. AMOS Analysis for Mediation}\par To identify the existence of mediation, a path diagram is drawn as a model for depicting a causal chain by using AMOS. The values associated with each path are standardized regression coefficients. These values represent the amount of change in Y given a standard deviation unit change in X. From a theoretical perspective, a significant reduction on the path demonstrates that a given mediator is indeed potent. Perfect mediation holds if the independent variable has no effect when the mediator is controlled \hyperref[b63]{(Reuben and David, 1986)}.\par If indirect effect is lower than direct effect even the mediator variables devouring significant path, the mediator variable should be excluding first to gain the result of direct effect. Subsequently, include the mediator variable in a model to gain the outcome. Once the direct effect is drop presented, one can be concluded that the mediation effect is occurs. (Afthanorhan W.M. etal, 2014).\par If the result of direct effect is suddenly increase once includes a mediator variable when all path coefficient is significant, calculate the result of indirect effect. If value of direct effect is higher than indirect effect, the non-mediation effect is not occurring. (Afthanorhan W.M. etal, 2014).\par The variable firm characteristics significantly affect export performance and partially mediated by product adaption since when the mediator variable removed from the model its direct value dropped from 0.31 to 0.18 and the direct effect is still significant after mediator enters the model. All the three variables which are product characteristics, export market characteristics and industry characteristics significantly affect export market performance. Among these variables product characteristics and industry characteristics partially mediated by export market strategy. Regarding to product characteristics; when the mediator variable removed from the model its direct value dropped from \section[{1.}]{1.}\par H1: Firm characteristics have a positive influence on the export marketing strategy, Accepted 2.\par H2: Product characteristics have a positive influence on the export marketing strategy.\par -Product characteristics have a significant effect on export marketing strategy but the effect is negative. Rejected 3.\par H3: Industry characteristics have a positive influence on the export marketing strategy.\par -Industry characteristics have a significant effect on export marketing strategy but the effect is negative. H5: Product adaptation has a positive and significant effect on export performance, Accepted 6.\par H6: Price competitiveness has a positive and significant effect on export performance, Accepted 7.\par H7: Promotion adaptation has a positive and significant effect on export performance. Rejected 8.\par H8: Support to Foreign Distributer/ Subsidiary has a positive effect on export performance. Rejected 9.\par H9: Product adaptation mediates the effect of Firm Characteristic on export performance, Accepted 0.39 to 0.31 and the direct effect is still significant after mediator enters the model. When we see industry characteristics the result of direct effect is suddenly increase once includes a mediator variable when all path coefficients are significant, and the value of direct effect is higher than indirect effect, in this case mediation effect is occurring. The correlation of Firm characteristics with Export performance has a significant positive Pearson correlation of 0.334 at 0.01 confidence interval. With regard to Industry characteristics it has a significant negative Pearson correlation of -0.177 at 0.01 confidence interval. But, when we see the correlation of product characteristics and export market characteristics the correlation is not significant. The correlation of export performance, production adaptation, and price competitiveness with export performance have a significant Person correlation of 0.263, 0.274, and 0.194 respectively at 0.01 confidence interval.\par The four variables which are Firm characteristics, Product characteristics, Industry characteristics, and Export market characteristics influence Export market strategy significantly at 95\% confidence interval with a sig. Level of 0.000, 0.037, 0.024, 0.000, and 0.000 respectively. Firm characteristics, Industry characteristics, Export market characteristics, and Product adaptation influence Export performance significantly at 95\% confidence interval with a sig. level of 0.000, 0.000, 0.029, and 0.001respectively.\par The variable firm characteristics significantly affect export performance and partially mediated by product adaption since when the mediator variable removed from the model its direct value dropped from 0.31 to 0.18 and the direct effect is still significant after mediator enters the model. product characteristics, export market characteristics and industry characteristics significantly affect export market performance. Among these variables product characteristics and industry characteristics partially mediated by export market strategy. \section[{XI. Limitation and Direction for Future Research}]{XI. Limitation and Direction for Future Research}\par This study has some shortcomings and limitations. The survey was conducted on leather and textile products -sectors given higher priority by the Ethiopian Government. The calibre possessed by some companies on the selected sectors for the study strategists have a low level of strategy formulation, implementation and controlling cultures. The findings can be generalized for other product categories in addition to reflecting sector specific results. For future research, another set of antecedents of export performance can be included in the research model. Moreover, Future researchers can use a minimum cut of point of income to be generated by exporting companies in order to show the role of the mediating variable on export performance across a wider range of exporting sector. Research in different sectors may still produce contribution to the field. \section[{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}]{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}\par Volume XVIII Issue II Version I Year ( )\begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{1}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png} \caption{\label{fig_0}Figure 1 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{2}\includegraphics[]{image-3.png} \caption{\label{fig_1}Figure 2 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_0}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{1} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.09417613636363636\textwidth}P{0.11832386363636362\textwidth}P{0.18352272727272728\textwidth}P{0.4539772727272727\textwidth}} Authors\tabcellsep Year\tabcellsep Performance\tabcellsep Dimensions or Indicators\\ Gracia et al\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2015 Export activity and export performance}\tabcellsep Resource commitment, experience, Firm size, export barriers, export performance\\ Spyropoulou et al\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2015 Brand advantages on export ventures}\tabcellsep Resources, competitive intensity, market distance and export entrepreneurship\\ Kaimakoudi\tabcellsep 2014\tabcellsep Investigating export performance and competitiveness\tabcellsep Strategies, competitiveness and export marketing\\ Adu-Gyamfi, Komeliussen\tabcellsep 2013\tabcellsep Antecedents of export performance in emerging markets\tabcellsep Resource commitment, experience, Firm size, export barriers, export performance\\ Papadopoulos and Martin\tabcellsep 2010\tabcellsep The influence of internationalization on export performance\tabcellsep Institutional commitment, international experience and export performance\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Overall performance, product quality, importers\\ Lages et al\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2009 Annual performance of an export venture}\tabcellsep satisfaction, relationship performance with importers\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep and suppliers.\\ Leonidou et al\tabcellsep 2002\tabcellsep Marketing strategy determinants of export performance\tabcellsep Export performance, managerial, organization and environmental factors\end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: O'class and weerawardena 2001The influences of firm and environment characteristics on marketing performanceUniqueness, performance, experience, marketing capabilities, environment and competitive intensity Zou et al. 1998 Financial export performance Financial, strategic and satisfaction with export venture Kats keas et al 1997 The influence of firm characteristics and export commitment on export performance c) Export Marketing Strategy]} \caption{\label{tab_1}Table 1 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{2} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.22050997782705098\textwidth}P{0.39390243902439026\textwidth}P{0.0942350332594235\textwidth}P{0.14135254988913526\textwidth}} Item\tabcellsep Description\tabcellsep Frequency\tabcellsep \%\\ \tabcellsep less than 50\tabcellsep 82\tabcellsep 32.4\\ Firm Size\tabcellsep 50-499\tabcellsep 106\tabcellsep 41.9\\ \tabcellsep 500-4,999\tabcellsep 65\tabcellsep 25.7\\ \tabcellsep less than 1000\tabcellsep 7\tabcellsep 2.8\\ \tabcellsep 1000-9,999\tabcellsep 38\tabcellsep 15.0\\ Annual Sales\tabcellsep 10,000-99,000\tabcellsep 22\tabcellsep 8.7\\ \tabcellsep 100,000-1,999,000\tabcellsep 82\tabcellsep 32.4\\ \tabcellsep 2,000,000 or more\tabcellsep 104\tabcellsep 41.1\\ \tabcellsep less than 5 years\tabcellsep 17\tabcellsep 6.7\\ \tabcellsep 5-10\tabcellsep 76\tabcellsep 30.0\\ Year of experience in international market\tabcellsep 11-20\tabcellsep 99\tabcellsep 39.1\\ \tabcellsep 21-30\tabcellsep 50\tabcellsep 19.8\\ \tabcellsep 31 or more\tabcellsep 11\tabcellsep 4.3\\ \tabcellsep 1-5\tabcellsep 43\tabcellsep 17.0\\ Number of market the firm operates\tabcellsep 6-10\tabcellsep 86\tabcellsep 34.0\\ \tabcellsep 11-20\tabcellsep 79\tabcellsep 31.2\\ \tabcellsep 21 or more\tabcellsep 31\tabcellsep 12.3\\ Type of Products\tabcellsep Consumer Products Industrial Products\tabcellsep 198 55\tabcellsep 78.3 21.7\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_3}Table 2 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{3} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.28765243902439025\textwidth}P{0.05701219512195122\textwidth}P{0.16844512195121952\textwidth}P{0.0725609756097561\textwidth}P{0.11920731707317074\textwidth}P{0.1451219512195122\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Descriptive Statistics}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep N\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Minimum Maximum}\tabcellsep Mean\tabcellsep Std. Deviation\\ Consumer buying decision\tabcellsep 253\tabcellsep 1.64\tabcellsep 4.82\tabcellsep 3.5305\tabcellsep .80449\\ Packaging color\tabcellsep 253\tabcellsep 1.71\tabcellsep 4.83\tabcellsep 3.4546\tabcellsep .79158\\ Background image\tabcellsep 253\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 5.00\tabcellsep 3.5692\tabcellsep .87636\\ Packaging Material\tabcellsep 253\tabcellsep 2.29\tabcellsep 4.43\tabcellsep 3.6863\tabcellsep .47175\\ Font Size\tabcellsep 253\tabcellsep 2.67\tabcellsep 5.00\tabcellsep 3.6319\tabcellsep .62828\\ Printed Information\tabcellsep 253\tabcellsep 2.00\tabcellsep 5.00\tabcellsep 3.9381\tabcellsep .77672\\ Innovation\tabcellsep 253\tabcellsep 2.00\tabcellsep 5.00\tabcellsep 3.5823\tabcellsep .73352\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_5}Table 3 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.16706896551724137\textwidth}P{0.33120689655172414\textwidth}P{0.09086206896551724\textwidth}P{0.085\textwidth}P{0.0718103448275862\textwidth}P{0.0571551724137931\textwidth}P{0.04689655172413793\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \multicolumn{5}{l}{Correlations of Independent and Dependent Variables}\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Export\tabcellsep Firm\tabcellsep Product\tabcellsep Industry\tabcellsep Export market\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep performance\tabcellsep characteristics\tabcellsep characteristics\tabcellsep characteristics\tabcellsep characteristics\\ Export performance\tabcellsep Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Firm characteristics\tabcellsep Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)\tabcellsep .334 ** .000\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Product characteristics\tabcellsep Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)\tabcellsep .082 .192\tabcellsep .708 ** .000\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Industry characteristics\tabcellsep Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)\tabcellsep -.177 ** .005\tabcellsep .519 ** .000\tabcellsep .669 ** .000\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \\ Export market characteristics\tabcellsep Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)\tabcellsep .110 .080\tabcellsep .136 * .030\tabcellsep .162 * .010\tabcellsep .349 ** .000\tabcellsep 1\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep N\tabcellsep 253\tabcellsep 253\tabcellsep 253\tabcellsep 253\end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed), * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level(2-tailed) ]} \caption{\label{tab_6}Table 4 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{6} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.007931570762052878\textwidth}P{0.14210730948678071\textwidth}P{0.010575427682737169\textwidth}P{0.013219284603421462\textwidth}P{0.013880248833592535\textwidth}P{0.01916796267496112\textwidth}P{0.01916796267496112\textwidth}P{0.022472783825816484\textwidth}P{0.026438569206842923\textwidth}P{0.02577760497667185\textwidth}P{0.031065318818040432\textwidth}P{0.029082426127527213\textwidth}P{0.036353032659409014\textwidth}P{0.029082426127527213\textwidth}P{0.03701399688958009\textwidth}P{0.035692068429237944\textwidth}P{0.042301710730948676\textwidth}P{0.035692068429237944\textwidth}P{0.046267496111975115\textwidth}P{0.04560653188180404\textwidth}P{0.024455676516329704\textwidth}P{0.09451788491446346\textwidth}P{0.062130637636080864\textwidth}} Correlations\tabcellsep Export Firm Product Industry Export market Production Price Promotion Support to foreign performance characteristics characteristics characteristics characteristics adaptation competitiveness Adaptation distributors\tabcellsep Export Pearson 1\tabcellsep performance Sig. (2)\tabcellsep Firm Pearson .334** 1\tabcellsep characteristics Sig. (2) .000\tabcellsep Product Pearson .082 .708** 1\tabcellsep characteristics Sig. (2) .192 .000\tabcellsep Industry Pearson -.177** .519** .669** 1\tabcellsep characteristics Sig. (2) .005 .000 .000\tabcellsep Export market Pearson .110 .136* .162* .349** 1\tabcellsep characteristics Sig. (2) .080 .030 .010 .000\tabcellsep Production Pearson .263** .309** .352** .308** .582** 1\tabcellsep adaptation Sig. (2) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000\tabcellsep Price Pearson .274** .403** .230** .159* .182** .304** 1\tabcellsep competitiveness Sig. (2) .000 .000 .000 .011 .004 .000\tabcellsep Promotion Pearson .194** .206** .024 .120 .540** .544** .338** 1\tabcellsep Adaptation Sig. (2) .002 .001 .700 .056 .000 .000 .000\tabcellsep Support to Pearson .085 .020 -.243** -.092 .359** .284** .081 .397** 1\tabcellsep foreign Sig. (2) distributors .180 .752 .000 .144 .000 .000 .197 .000\tabcellsep N 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253\tabcellsep tailed) --tailed), *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2\tabcellsep 35 Year Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XVIII Issue II Version I ( )\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep © 2018 Global Journals\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_7}Table 6 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{7} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.03333333333333333\textwidth}P{0.03888888888888888\textwidth}P{0.06666666666666667\textwidth}P{0.5444444444444444\textwidth}P{0.16666666666666666\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Model Summary\tabcellsep \\ Model\tabcellsep R\tabcellsep R Square\tabcellsep Adjusted R Square\tabcellsep Std. Error of the Estimate\\ 1\tabcellsep .697 a\tabcellsep .486\tabcellsep .477\tabcellsep .382\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{a. Predictors: (Constant), Expmachx, Firmchx, Indtychx, Prodtchx}\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_8}Table 7 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{8} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.3911827956989247\textwidth}P{0.24677419354838712\textwidth}P{0.08774193548387096\textwidth}P{0.027419354838709675\textwidth}P{0.02924731182795699\textwidth}P{0.03655913978494624\textwidth}P{0.012795698924731183\textwidth}P{0.01827956989247312\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep : ANOVA\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{ANOVA a}\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep Model\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Sum of Squares}\tabcellsep df\tabcellsep Mean Square\tabcellsep F\tabcellsep Sig.\\ \tabcellsep Regression\tabcellsep 34.169\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 8.542\tabcellsep 58.534\tabcellsep .000 b\\ 1\tabcellsep Residual\tabcellsep 36.192\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 248\tabcellsep .146\\ \tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 70.361\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 252\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{a. Dependent Variable: Expmarkstra, b. Predictors: (Constant), Expmachx, Firmchx, Indtychx, Prodtchx}\\ \multicolumn{4}{l}{In table 9 below the constant, beta, and}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{4}{l}{significance level of each variable is addressed. The}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{4}{l}{table indicates that the four variables which are Firm}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ characteristics,\tabcellsep Product\tabcellsep characteristics,\tabcellsep Industry\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{4}{l}{characteristics, and Export market characteristics}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_10}Table 8}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{9} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_11}Table 9 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{10} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}} Model Summary\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_12}Table 10 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{11} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.4573548387096774\textwidth}P{0.03070967741935484\textwidth}P{0.04167741935483871\textwidth}P{0.28077419354838706\textwidth}P{0.02193548387096774\textwidth}P{0.006580645161290323\textwidth}P{0.01096774193548387\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{: ANOVA}\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{ANOVA a}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep Model\tabcellsep Sum of Squares\tabcellsep df\tabcellsep Mean Square\tabcellsep F\tabcellsep Sig.\\ \tabcellsep Regression\tabcellsep 8.445\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 2.111\tabcellsep 7.738\tabcellsep .000 b\\ 1\tabcellsep Residual\tabcellsep 67.660\tabcellsep 248\tabcellsep .273\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 76.104\tabcellsep 252\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{7}{l}{a. Dependent Variable: Exmarper, b. Predictors: (Constant), Supptdis, pricompt, Prodadtn, PromAdtn}\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{The table below shows the constant, beta, and}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{which are Promotion Adaptation and Support to foreign}\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{significance level of each variable. It indicates that two}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{distributors is not influence Export market performance}\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{variables which are Product adaptation and Price}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{significantly. As the constant and B values are known}\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{competitiveness influence Export market performance}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{the model will be: Y 1 = 1.198 + 0.522X 1 -0.168X 2 +}\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{significantly at 95\% confidence interval with a sig. level}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{0.243X 3 + 0.056X 4 + 0.05}\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{of 0.010, and 0.001 respectively. The other two variables}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_13}Table 11}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{12} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.002607361963190184\textwidth}P{0.2737730061349693\textwidth}P{0.2398773006134969\textwidth}P{0.08865030674846625\textwidth}P{0.11733128834355828\textwidth}P{0.0651840490797546\textwidth}P{0.06257668711656442\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Coefficients a\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep Model\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients B Std. Error Beta}\tabcellsep t\tabcellsep Sig.\\ \tabcellsep (Constant)\tabcellsep 2.656\tabcellsep .249\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 10.662\tabcellsep .000\\ \tabcellsep Product adaptation\tabcellsep .164\tabcellsep .063\tabcellsep .188\tabcellsep 2.588\tabcellsep .010\\ 1\tabcellsep Price competitiveness\tabcellsep .149\tabcellsep .046\tabcellsep .210\tabcellsep 3.255\tabcellsep .001\\ \tabcellsep Promotion Adaptation\tabcellsep .013\tabcellsep .058\tabcellsep .018\tabcellsep .230\tabcellsep .818\\ \tabcellsep Support to foreign distributors\tabcellsep .005\tabcellsep .045\tabcellsep .007\tabcellsep .109\tabcellsep .913\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{a. Dependent Variable: Exmarp}\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_14}Table 12 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{13} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.159375\textwidth}P{0.0425\textwidth}P{0.074375\textwidth}P{0.17\textwidth}P{0.095625\textwidth}P{0.23375\textwidth}P{0.074375\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep e1\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep .94\tabcellsep .11\\ \multicolumn{2}{l}{Firmchx}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep .33\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Exmarper\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Estimate\tabcellsep S.E.\tabcellsep C.R.\tabcellsep P\\ Exmarper\tabcellsep <---\tabcellsep Firmchx\tabcellsep 0.228\tabcellsep 0.041\tabcellsep 5.630\tabcellsep ***\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_15}Table 13 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{14} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.15572519083969466\textwidth}P{0.07786259541984733\textwidth}P{0.14274809160305343\textwidth}P{0.14923664122137403\textwidth}P{0.1232824427480916\textwidth}P{0.1232824427480916\textwidth}P{0.07786259541984733\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Estimate\tabcellsep S.E.\tabcellsep C.R.\tabcellsep P\\ Prodadtn\tabcellsep <---\tabcellsep Firmchx\tabcellsep 0.241\tabcellsep 0.047\tabcellsep 5.153\tabcellsep ***\\ Exmarper\tabcellsep <---\tabcellsep Firmchx\tabcellsep 0.191\tabcellsep 0.042\tabcellsep 4.553\tabcellsep ***\\ Exmarper\tabcellsep <---\tabcellsep Prodadtn\tabcellsep 0.155\tabcellsep 0.054\tabcellsep 2.881\tabcellsep 0.004\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_16}Table 14 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{15} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.0918918918918919\textwidth}P{0.04594594594594595\textwidth}P{0.0804054054054054\textwidth}P{0.2412162162162162\textwidth}P{0.19527027027027027\textwidth}P{0.19527027027027027\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Indirect Effect\tabcellsep Direct Effect\tabcellsep Result\\ Exmarper\tabcellsep <---\tabcellsep Firmchx\tabcellsep 0.0868\tabcellsep 0.18\tabcellsep Significant\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_17}Table 15 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{16} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.25225806451612903\textwidth}P{0.06580645161290323\textwidth}P{0.13161290322580646\textwidth}P{0.13161290322580646\textwidth}P{0.10419354838709677\textwidth}P{0.1096774193548387\textwidth}P{0.05483870967741935\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Estimate\tabcellsep S.E.\tabcellsep C.R.\tabcellsep P\\ Exmarper\tabcellsep <---\tabcellsep Prodtchx\tabcellsep 0.273\tabcellsep 0.055\tabcellsep 4.997\tabcellsep ***\\ Exmarper\tabcellsep <---\tabcellsep Expmachx\tabcellsep 0.265\tabcellsep 0.073\tabcellsep 3.657\tabcellsep ***\\ Exmarper\tabcellsep <---\tabcellsep Indtychx\tabcellsep -0.325\tabcellsep 0.052\tabcellsep -6.275\tabcellsep ***\\ © 2018 Global Journals\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_18}Table 16 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{17} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.39999999999999997\textwidth}P{0.19999999999999998\textwidth}P{0.19999999999999998\textwidth}P{0.049999999999999996\textwidth}} Estimate\tabcellsep S.E.\tabcellsep C.R.\tabcellsep P\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_19}Table 17 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{18} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.13076923076923078\textwidth}P{0.06538461538461539\textwidth}P{0.13076923076923078\textwidth}P{0.17435897435897435\textwidth}P{0.13621794871794873\textwidth}P{0.2125\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Indirect Effect\tabcellsep Direct Effect\tabcellsep Result\\ Exmarper\tabcellsep <---\tabcellsep Prodtchx\tabcellsep 0.042\tabcellsep 0.31\tabcellsep Significant\\ Exmarper\tabcellsep <---\tabcellsep Expmachx\tabcellsep 0.0528\tabcellsep 0.31\tabcellsep Significant\\ Exmarper\tabcellsep <---\tabcellsep Indtychx\tabcellsep 0.0192\tabcellsep 0.31\tabcellsep Significant\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_20}Table 18 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{19} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}} Hypothesis Test Results\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_21}Table 19 :}\end{figure} \footnote{© 2018 Global Journals} \backmatter \begin{bibitemlist}{1} \bibitem[ Atlas ()]{b7}\label{b7} \textit{}, \url{https://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/profile/country/eth/acceesed/15/11/2017} \textit{Atlas} 2016. \bibitem[Imf ()]{b37}\label{b37} \textit{}, Imf . \url{http://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2016/12/27} 2016. \bibitem[Parameswaran and Yaprak ()]{b56}\label{b56} ‘A Cross-National Comparison of Consumer Research Measures’. R Parameswaran , A Yaprak . \textit{Journal of International Business Studies} 1987. 18 (Spring) p. . \bibitem[Rugman ()]{b66}\label{b66} ‘A New Theory of the Multinational Enterprise: Internationalization versus Internalization’. Alan M Rugman . \textit{Columbia Journal of World Business} 1981. p. . \bibitem[Holzinger ()]{b35}\label{b35} ‘A Simple Method for Factor Analysis’. K J Holzinger . \textit{Psychometrika} 1944. 9 (4) p. . \bibitem[Hill and Still (1984)]{b33}\label{b33} ‘Adapting Products to LDC Tastes’. John S Hill , Richard R Still . \textit{Harvard Business Review} 1984. March -April. 62 p. . \bibitem[Christensen et al. ()]{b19}\label{b19} ‘An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Influencing Exporting Success of Brazilian Firms’. C H Christensen , A Da Rocha , R K Gertner . \textit{Journal of International Business Studies} 1987. 18 p. . \bibitem[Gupta and Govindarajan ()]{b31}\label{b31} ‘Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Characteristics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation’. A K Gupta , V Govindarajan . \textit{Academy of Management Journal} 1984. p. . \bibitem[Kashani and Quelch ()]{b41}\label{b41} ‘Can Sales Promotion Go Global?’. Kamran Kashani , John A Quelch . \textit{Business Horizon} 1990. 33 (3) p. . \bibitem[Buzzell (1968)]{b15}\label{b15} ‘Can You Standardize Multinational Marketing?’. Robert D Buzzell . \textit{Harvard Business Review} 1968. November -December. 49 p. . \bibitem[Chandler ()]{b18}\label{b18} A D Chandler . \textit{Strategy and Structure}, (Cambridge, MA) 1962. MIT Press. \bibitem[Bauerschmidt et al. ()]{b10}\label{b10} ‘Common Factors Underlying Barriers to Export: Studies in the U.S. Paper Industry’. A Bauerschmidt , D Sullivan , K Gillespie . \textit{Journal of International "business Studies} 1985. 16 p. . \bibitem[Piercy ()]{b59}\label{b59} ‘Company Internationalization: Active and Reactive Exporting’. N Piercy . \textit{European Journal of Marketing} 1981a. 13 (3) p. . \bibitem[Porter ()]{b60}\label{b60} \textit{Competitive Strategy}, Michael E Porter . 1980. New York: Free Press. \bibitem[Kerin et al. ()]{b44}\label{b44} \textit{Contemporary Perspectives on Strategic Market Planning}, Roger A Kerin , P Rajan Vijay Mahajan , Varadarajan . 1990. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon. \bibitem[Bello and Williamson ()]{b11}\label{b11} ‘contractual Arrangements and Marketing Practices in the Indirect Export Channel’. D C Bello , N C Williamson . \textit{Journal of International Business Studies} 1985. 16 (Summer) p. . \bibitem[Quelch and Hoff (1986)]{b61}\label{b61} ‘Customizing Global Marketing’. John A Quelch , Edward J Hoff . \textit{Harvard Business Review} 1986. May-June. p. . \bibitem[Land ()]{b49}\label{b49} \textit{Does It pay to Follow PIMS Signals?}, Stephan Land . 1978. PIMSLETTER, 8. Cambridge, MA: Strategic Planning Institute. \bibitem[Madsen and Koed ()]{b52}\label{b52} ‘Empirical Export Performance Studies: A Review of Conceptualizations and Findings’. Tage Madsen , Koed . \textit{Advances in International Marketing}, S. Tamer Cavusgil (Greenwich, CT) 1987. JAI Press. 2 p. . \bibitem[Douglas and Craig ()]{b28}\label{b28} ‘Evolution of Global Marketing Strategy: Scale, Scope and Synergy’. Susan P Douglas , C Samuel Craig . \textit{Columbia Journal of World Business} 1989. p. . \bibitem[Lambkin and Day (1989)]{b48}\label{b48} ‘Evolutionary Processes in Competitive Markets: Beyond the Product Life Cycle’. M Lambkin , G S Day . \textit{Journal of Marketing} 1989. July. 53 p. . \bibitem[Kaynak and Kothari ()]{b42}\label{b42} ‘Export Behaviour of Small and Medium Sized Manufacturers: Some Policy Guidelines for International Marketers’. E Kaynak , V Kothari . \textit{Management International Review} 1984. 24 (2) p. . \bibitem[Fenwick and Amine ()]{b30}\label{b30} ‘Export Performance and Export Policy: Evidence from the U.K. Clothing Industry’. Ian Fenwick , Lyn Amine . \textit{Journal of Operational Research Society} 1979. 30 (8) p. . \bibitem[Axinn ()]{b8}\label{b8} ‘Export Performance: Do Managerial Perceptions Make A Difference?’. C N Axinn . \textit{International Marketing Review} 1988. (Summer) p. . \bibitem[Levitt (1983)]{b51}\label{b51} ‘Globalization of Markets’. Theodore Levitt . \textit{Harvard Business Review} 1983. May-June. p. . \bibitem[Diamantopoulos and Inglis ()]{b27}\label{b27} ‘Identifying Differences Between High and Low Involvement Exporters’. A Diamantopoulos , K Inglis . \textit{International Marketing Review} 1988. 5 (Summer) p. . \bibitem[Killough (1978)]{b45}\label{b45} ‘Improved Payoff from Transnational Advertising’. James Killough . \textit{Harvard Business Review} 1978. July -August. p. . \bibitem[Kirpalani and Macintosh ()]{b46}\label{b46} ‘International Marketing Effectiveness of Technology Oriented Small Firms’. V H Kirpalani , N B Macintosh . \textit{Journal of International Business Studies} 1980. Winter. 10 p. . \bibitem[Cateora ()]{b16}\label{b16} \textit{International Marketing, 7 th ed}, P R Cateora . 1990. Boston: Irwin. \bibitem[Kotari ()]{b47}\label{b47} C R Kotari . \textit{Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques}, (India) 2004. (2nd ed. New Age International Publisher) \bibitem[Lawley and Maxwell ()]{b50}\label{b50} D N Lawley , A E Maxwell . \textit{Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method}, (London) 1963. Butterworth \& Co. Ltd. \bibitem[Urban (1977)]{b20}\label{b20} ‘Life-Style Analysis to Profile Women in International Markets’. Christine D Urban . \textit{Journal of Marketing} 1977. July. 41 p. . \bibitem[Boster ()]{b29}\label{b29} ‘Machiavellian Beliefs and Personality: Construct Invalidity of the Machiavellianism Dimension’. F J Boster . \textit{Journal of Personality and Social Psychology} 1982. 43 (6) p. . \bibitem[Aaby and Slater ()]{b0}\label{b0} ‘Management Influences on Export Performance: A Review of the empirical Literature 1978-88’. Nils-Erik Aaby , Stanley F Slater . \textit{International Marketing Review} 1989. 6 (4) p. . \bibitem[Johnston and Czinkota ()]{b40}\label{b40} ‘Managerial Motivations as Determinants of Industrial Export Behaviour’. W J Johnston , M R Czinkota . \textit{Export \textbackslash management\textbackslash ; An \textbackslash international Context, Czinkota}, MR, G Tesar (ed.) (New York) 1982. Praeger Publishers. \bibitem[Rosson and Ford ()]{b65}\label{b65} ‘Manufacturer Overseas Distributor Relations and export Performance’. P J Rosson , L D Ford . \textit{Journal of International Business Studies} 1982. 13 p. . \bibitem[Denis and Depelteau ()]{b26}\label{b26} ‘Market Knowledge, Diversification, and Export Expansion’. J E Denis , D Depelteau . \textit{Journal of International Business Studies} 1985. 16 p. . \bibitem[Robinson and Fornell ()]{b64}\label{b64} \textit{Market Pioneering and Sustainable Market Share Advantage}, William T Robinson , Claes Fornell . 1986. Cambridge, MA: Strategic Planning Institute. 39. (PIMSLETTER) \bibitem[Cook and Jr ()]{b21}\label{b21} ‘Marketing Strategy and differential Advantage’. V J Cook , Jr . \textit{Journal of Marketing} 1983. 47 (Spring) p. . \bibitem[Day and Wensley ()]{b25}\label{b25} ‘Marketing Theory with a Strategic Orientation’. G S Day , R Wensley . \textit{Journal of Marketing} 1983. 47 p. . \bibitem[Mooi and Sarstedt ()]{b54}\label{b54} E Mooi , M Sarstedt . \textit{A Concise Guide to Market Research the Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics}, (Heidelberg, Germany) 2011. \bibitem[Keegan ()]{b43}\label{b43} ‘Multinational Product Planning: Strategic Alternatives’. Warren J Keegan . \textit{Journal of Marketing} 1969. 33 (1) p. . \bibitem[Guttman ()]{b32}\label{b32} \textit{Multiple Group Methods for Common Factor Analysis: Their Basis, Computation, and Interpretation}, L Guttman . 1952. 22 p. . \bibitem[Hunter (1987)]{b39}\label{b39} ‘On the Assessment of Unidimensional Measurement: Internal and External Consistency, and Overall Consistency Criteria’. John E Hunter . \textit{Journal of Marketing Research} 1987. November. 14 p. . \bibitem[Aldrich ()]{b3}\label{b3} \textit{Organizations and Environments}, H Aldrich . 1979. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. \bibitem[Cohen and Nicol ()]{b67}\label{b67} ‘PACKAGE 1980: A System of FORTRAN Routines for the Analysis of Correlational Data’. S H Cohen , T S Nicol . \textit{prepared with the support of Academic Computing Services}, (Waco, Texas) 1980. Baylor University \bibitem[Angelmar and Pras ()]{b6}\label{b6} ‘Product Acceptance by Middlemen in Export Channels’. R Angelmar , B Pras . \textit{Journal of Business Research} 1984. 121 p. . \bibitem[Phillips et al. ()]{b58}\label{b58} ‘Product Quality, Cost Position, and Business Performance: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses’. Lynn W Phillips , Dae Chang , Robert D Buzzell . \textit{Journal of Marketing} 1983. 47 (Spring) p. . \bibitem[Anderson and Gerbing (1982)]{b5}\label{b5} ‘Some Methods for Respecifying Measurement Models to Obtain Unidimensional Construct Measurement’. James C Anderson , David W Gerbing . \textit{Journal of Marketing Research} 1982. November. 19 p. . \bibitem[Anderson and Zeithaml ()]{b4}\label{b4} ‘Stage of Product Life Cycle, Business Strategy, and Business Performance’. C Anderson , C P Zeithaml . \textit{Academy of Management Journal} 1984. 27 p. . \bibitem[Jain (1989)]{b38}\label{b38} ‘Standardization of International Marketing Strategy: Some Research Hypotheses’. Subhash C Jain . \textit{Journal of Marketing} 1989. January. 53 p. . \bibitem[Aaker ()]{b1}\label{b1} \textit{Strategic Market Management, 2 nd ed}, David A Aaker . 1988. New York: John Wiley \& Sons, Inc. \bibitem[Schendel ()]{b23}\label{b23} \textit{Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts}, D Schendel . 1978. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing. \bibitem[Cavusgil and Tamer ()]{b17}\label{b17} ‘Success Factors in Export Marketing: An Empirical Analysis’. S Cavusgil , Tamer . \textit{Journal of International Marketing and Marketing Research} 1983. 8 (2) p. . \bibitem[Afthanorhan and Ahmad ()]{b2}\label{b2} ‘Testing the Mediation Effect Using Covariance Based Structural Equation Modelling with Amos’. W M Afthanorhan , S Ahmad , MamatI . \textit{American International Journal of Research in Humanities} 2014. Arts and Social Sciences. \bibitem[Daniels and Robles ()]{b24}\label{b24} ‘The Choice of Technology and Export Commitment: the Peruvian Textile Industry’. J D Daniels , F Robles . \textit{Journal of International Business Studies} 1985. 16 p. . \bibitem[Buckley and Casson ()]{b14}\label{b14} \textit{The Economic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise}, Peter J Buckley , Mark Casson . 1985. New York: St. Martin's Press. \bibitem[Brady and Bearden ()]{b13}\label{b13} ‘The Effects of Managerial Attitudes on Alternative Exporting Methods’. D L Brady , W O Bearden . \textit{Journal of International Business Studies} 1979. 10 (3) p. . \bibitem[Pfeffer and Salancik ()]{b57}\label{b57} \textit{The External Control of Organizations}, J Pfeffer , G R Salancik . 1978. New York: Harper \& Row. \bibitem[Ohmae (1989)]{b55}\label{b55} ‘The Global Logic of Strategic Alliances’. Kenichi Ohmae . \textit{Harvard Business Review} 1989. March -April. p. . \bibitem[Cooper and Kleinschmidt ()]{b22}\label{b22} ‘The Impact of Export Strategy on Export Sales Performance’. R G Cooper , E J Kleinschmidt . \textit{Journal of International Business Studies} 1985. 16 (Spring) p. . \bibitem[Reid ()]{b62}\label{b62} ‘The Impact of Size on Export Behaviour in Small Firms’. S D Reid . \textit{Export Management: An International Context}, M R Czinkota, G Tesar (ed.) (New York) 1982. Praeger Publishers. \bibitem[Mcguinness and Little ()]{b53}\label{b53} ‘The Influence of Product Characteristics on the Export Performance of New Industrial Products’. N W Mcguinness , B Little . \textit{Journal of Marketing} 1981. 45 (Spring) p. . \bibitem[Reuben and David ()]{b63}\label{b63} ‘The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations’. M Reuben , A David . \textit{Journal of Personality and Social Psychology} 1986. American Psychological Association, Inc. 51 (6) p. . \bibitem[Wind ()]{b69}\label{b69} ‘The Myth of Globalization’. Yoram Wind . \textit{Columbia Journal of World Business} 1987. Winter. \bibitem[Gale ()]{b9}\label{b9} \textit{The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance}, B T Gale . 1987. New York: Free Press. \bibitem[Hofer ()]{b34}\label{b34} ‘Toward A Contingency Theory of Business Strategy’. C W Hofer . \textit{Academy of Management Journal} 1975. 18 p. . \bibitem[Hunter and Gerbing ()]{b36}\label{b36} ‘Unidimensional Measurement, Second Order Factor Analysis and Causal Models’. John E Hunter , David W Gerbing . \textit{Research in Organizational Behavior}, B W Staw, L L Cummings (ed.) (Greenwich, CT) 1982. JAI Press. 4. \bibitem[Bilkey ()]{b12}\label{b12} ‘Variables Associated with Export Profitability’. Warren J Bilkey . \textit{Journal of International Business Studies} 1982. 13 p. . \bibitem[World]{b68}\label{b68} \textit{World}, \url{http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2016/12/06/world-bank-group-launches-its-5th-economic-update-for-ethiopia} \end{bibitemlist} \end{document}