\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter \IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}% {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}% {\RequirePackage{color}} \usepackage{colortbl} \usepackage{wrapfig} \usepackage{ifxetex} \ifxetex \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{xunicode} \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash} \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{} \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}} \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}} \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}} \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}} \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono} \else \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}% {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \PrerenderUnicode{–} }% {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{float} \usepackage[]{ucs} \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash } \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{} \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}} \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}} \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,} \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ } \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>} \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}} \def\textJapanese{} \def\textChinese{} \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{} \fi \def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small} \DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25} \usepackage{relsize} \RequirePackage{array} \def\@testpach{\@chclass \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@ \else \z@ \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}% \@chnum \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else \z@ \@chclass \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else \if \@nextchar !6 \else \if \@nextchar @7 \else \if \@nextchar (8 \else \if \@nextchar )9 \else 10 \@chnum \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else \if \@nextchar p4 \else \if \@nextchar b5 \else \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi} \gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr} \def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}} \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \def\abbr{} \def\corr{} \def\expan{} \def\gap{} \def\orig{} \def\reg{} \def\ref{} \def\sic{} \def\persName{}\def\name{} \def\placeName{} \def\orgName{} \def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}} \def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}} \def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}} \def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}} \def\textquoted#1{‘#1’} \def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}} \def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}} \def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}} \def\titlem{\itshape} \newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{bibl}{}{} \newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{rubric}{}{} \newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par } \newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}} \newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}} \definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75} \def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}} \DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@} \def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}} \begingroup \catcode`\_=\active \gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}} \endgroup \mathcode`\_=\string"8000 \catcode`\_=12\relax \usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry} \usepackage{framed} \definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} \usepackage{fancyvrb} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{marginnote} \renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1} \renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize} \def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif} \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage[pdftitle={The Impact of Intellectual Capital Dimensions on Organizational Performance of Public Hospitals in Jordan}, pdfauthor={}]{hyperref} \hyperbaseurl{} \paperwidth210mm \paperheight297mm \def\@pnumwidth{1.55em} \def\@tocrmarg {2.55em} \def\@dotsep{4.5} \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \clubpenalty=8000 \emergencystretch 3em \hbadness=4000 \hyphenpenalty=400 \pretolerance=750 \tolerance=2000 \vbadness=4000 \widowpenalty=10000 \renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}% {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}} \renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}% {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large}} \renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}% {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\large}} \renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}% {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\normalsize}} \renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}% {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}% {-1em}% {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}} \def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt} \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par \endgroup} \def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}} \def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}} \def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}} \def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}} \@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{} \@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{} \newif\if@mainmatter \@mainmattertrue \def\chaptername{Chapter} \def\frontmatter{% \pagenumbering{roman} \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section} \def\theHsection{\roman{section}} \def\@chapapp{}% } \def\mainmatter{% \cleardoublepage \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter} \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \pagenumbering{arabic} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6} \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}% \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section} \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}} } \def\backmatter{% \cleardoublepage \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}% \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}} \appendix } \newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{% \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}% {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}% \leftmargin\labelwidth \advance\leftmargin\labelsep \@openbib@code \usecounter{enumiv}% \let\p@enumiv\@empty \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}% }% \sloppy \clubpenalty4000 \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty \widowpenalty4000% \sfcode`\.\@m}% {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}% \endlist} \def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}} \parskip0pt \parindent1em \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \newenvironment{reflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{sansreflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{specHead}[2]% {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}% \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}% \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}% \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}% }{} \def\TheFullDate{2017-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2017)} \def\TheID{\makeatother } \def\TheDate{2017-01-15} \title{The Impact of Intellectual Capital Dimensions on Organizational Performance of Public Hospitals in Jordan} \author{}\makeatletter \makeatletter \newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{% \clearpage \if@twoside \ifodd\c@page \hbox{}\newpage \if@twocolumn \hbox{}\newpage \fi \fi \fi } \makeatother \makeatletter \thispagestyle{empty} \markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author} \renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@ \belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@ \def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep 1pt} } \makeatother \fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm} \fancyhf{} \setlength{\headheight}{14pt} \fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} \fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} \fancyfoot[RO]{} \fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID} \fancyfoot[LE]{} \fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID} \hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true} \fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}} \date{} \usepackage{authblk} \providecommand{\keywords}[1] { \footnotesize \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1 } \usepackage{graphicx,xcolor} \definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81} \definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9} \definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70} \definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} \renewenvironment{abstract}{% \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space} }{% \vskip8pt \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt } \usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos} \makeatother \usepackage{lineno} \linenumbers \begin{document} \author[1]{Riad Ahmad Mohammed Abazeed} \affil[1]{ Al al-Bayt University} \renewcommand\Authands{ and } \date{\small \em Received: 12 December 2016 Accepted: 4 January 2017 Published: 15 January 2017} \maketitle \begin{abstract} The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of intellectual capital (IC) dimensions on organizational performance (OP). IC, in this study, conceptualized as a variables comprises three main dimensions: human capital (HC), structural capital (SC), and relational capital (RC). The sample of the study consisted of 500 employees randomly selected from five public hospitals in the northern region of Jordan. Data were collected by a questionnaire developed base on the literature of intellectual capital and organizational performance. The number of questionnaires returned was 473 questionnaires. The questionnaire used in the study included 20 items, each of the variables was measured using 5 items anchored on five-point Likert scale. HC was measured by items related to employees? knowledge, skills, experiences, education, motivation, commitment, creativity and innovation. SC items concerned organizational efficiency and effectiveness, procedures, culture, product or service-oriented innovation, and intangibles such as patents, image and trade secrets. While, RC items included organizational relationships with stakeholders, agreements, customer contribution and satisfaction. Finally, OP was measured using indicators concerned customer, employee development, individual and job fit. IMB SPSS-V.23 was used to analyze the collected data. The results supported the three hypotheses suggested in the study. That is, HC, SC, and RC were significantly influence OP. In agreement with prior studies, this study found a significant impact of IC dimensions on OP. the difference is that the current study is conducted in healthcare sector, particularly, in public hospitals. public hospitals are recommended to invest in their intellectual capital in order to improve OP. Future studies is required in more public hospitals in the kingdom in order to ensure generalizability of the findings. \end{abstract} \keywords{intellectual capital, organizational performance.} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}} \end{textblock*} \let\tabcellsep& \section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par oing over organizations of different sizes, industries as well as countries with a clear-sighted view brings to light that the efficient and effective exploitation of tangible assets only is far from enough the endeavor capital needed to effectuate fine organizational performance. Variegated drivers were recommended in a vast bundle of organizational literature to ameliorate OP. However, many organizations are still shunning instead of running after those recommendations. Similar standpoints found in the literature signified the importance of both physical and intellectual assets for organizations to enhance OP \hyperref[b50]{(Wanjala, 2013)}. Even though the historical regard of the economic assets as a foremost measure of OP, new trends were emerged and justified using the intellectual assets as a complementary indicator of OP \hyperref[b21]{(Hudgins, 2014)}. Instances of these trends embody the remarkable gap between book value and market value of the organization {\ref (Chen et al., 2005 and}\hyperref[b14]{Curado et al., 2014)} in favor of market value \hyperref[b45]{(Smriti and Das, 2017)}, which signifiesthat the added value is devolved upon latent assets or, in other words, intangible or intellectual assets. Such intellectuals are more difficult to imitate than tangibles \hyperref[b16]{(Ghatak, 2013)}, on top of the nature of these intangibles as rare \hyperref[b40]{(Pucci et al., 2015)} and hard to substitute assets \hyperref[b3]{(Amin et al., 2014)}.\par Hence, one vein of the literature called organizations upon to pay more attention to intellectual capital as a well-established mean used to induce better levels of OP \hyperref[b49]{(Wang and Chang, 2005} \hyperref[b17]{Gogan et al., 2016 and}\hyperref[b28]{Koc, 2017)}.\par More than one view of ICwere detected in the literature. One general view took it as invaluable knowledge generating value to the organization \hyperref[b19]{(Hashim et al., 2015)}. A more specific view rated IC as a multi-dimensional concept made up of accumulated capitals pertaining human, structural and relational assets that furnish the organization with essential competencies required to make its objectives real \hyperref[b5]{(Awan and}\hyperref[b5]{Saeed, 2015 and}\hyperref[b12]{Chein, 2013)}. A third view of the concept considered a combined perspective embraced the aforesaid views. It defined IC as a collection of knowledge sources that exist in the organization's people, structure and customers and can be processed into value \hyperref[b52]{(Wu and Sivalogathasan, 2013;}\hyperref[b34]{Noordin and}\hyperref[b34]{Mohtar, 2013 and}\hyperref[b24]{Joshi et al., 2013)}. It was acknowledged that IC covers abundant components related to these three bins of IC. Examples of these components are similar to organizational knowledge, culture, and innovation \hyperref[b23]{(Janosevic et al., 2013a)}, organizational technology, capabilities, and relationships \hyperref[b6]{(Badrabadi and Akbarpour, 2013)}, organizational \section[{Year ( )}]{Year ( )}\par A strategies and organizational structure \hyperref[b22]{(Janosevic et al., 2013b)}.\par Despite the absence of consensus on one clearcut definition of IC \hyperref[b38]{(Ozkan et al., 2016 and}\hyperref[b28]{Koc, 2017)}, the concept was operationalized with a common voice as a structure encompasses three principals: human capital, structural capital, and relational or customer capital \hyperref[b46]{(Stewart, 1997} {\ref (Chen et al., 2004}) and process capital \hyperref[b30]{(Lin, 2015)}. One study \hyperref[b49]{(Wang and Chang, 2005)} divided structural capital into innovation and process capital.\par IC has been figured up as a main source of the competitive advantage of organizations \hyperref[b45]{(Smriti and Das, 2017;}\hyperref[b41]{Saeed et al., 2013;} {\ref Ogbo et al., 2013and Seleim et al., 2007)} and sustainable organizational performance \hyperref[b32]{(Mondal and Ghosh, 2012)}. A well contribution of IC to OP in particular was cited in sundry empirical studies carried out in different industries and countries similar to information technology industry in Taiwan \hyperref[b49]{(Wang and Chang, 2005)}; software companies in Egypt \hyperref[b42]{(Seleim et al., 2007)}, pharmaceutical companies in USA \hyperref[b9]{(Bramhandkar et al., 2007)} \hyperref[b35]{(Nuryaman, 2015)}; drinking water distribution companies in Romania \hyperref[b17]{(Gogan et al., 2016)} and tourism and automobile industry in Turkey \hyperref[b28]{(Koc, 2017)}. In agreement with the above-listed research, the main aim of the present study is to explore the influence of IC on OP. However, the contribution of this study followed clearly from IC and OP operationalization, the sample and the model of the study, as well as the setting where the study took place.\par The study is structured as follows. The following section contains a review of the related literature, from which study hypotheses were drawn. The same section presents examples of definitions of the study variables and dimensions of IC and sub-dimensions of human capital, structural capital, and relational capital. The third section shows the methodology used in the study. It comprises sample of the study, measures used to assess the study variables, as well as data collection. Section four demonstrates data analysis and results. Section five sets forth discussion of the results and implications concluded. Finally, section six sets down limitations and future research directions provided by the study. \hyperref[b35]{Nuryaman (2015)} defined IC as a main component of the organization market value since which composed of the economic capital plus the intellectual capital of the organization. According to the author, IC represents a difference between book value and replacement assets of an organization. \section[{II}]{II}\par Pursuant to these definitions, IC was defined in this study as an integral part of the market value of an organization along with its economic capital, embodies all intangibles related to the organization itself such as management, procedures, trademarks, image, reputation, patents, culture, strategies, to the people of the organization such as knowledge, skills, experience, education, creativity, innovation, commitment, and engagement, and to the organizational relationship, either within the organization or with external stakeholders like customers and suppliers. \section[{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}]{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}\par Volume XVII Issue V Version I Year ( ) A key component of an organization's value. \hyperref[b55]{Zéghal and Maaloul (2010)} The entire accessible knowledge used by an organization to create value.A \section[{Wu et al. (2012)}]{Wu et al. (2012)}\par A set of organization-related abilities integrated with three types of capitals; human, structural and relational capital Nuryaman (2015)\par A major component of an organization's market value b) Dimensions of intellectual capital IC, in general, has been conceptualized in the literature as a construct comprised three main dimensions: human capital, structural (organizational)capital, and relational (customer or social) capital. Problem-solving and value creation procedures. \hyperref[b35]{Nuryaman (2015)} Hardware and software infrastructure, products and services innovations. \section[{Koc (2017)}]{Koc (2017)}\par Management philosophy, organizational culture, information and network systems, patents and copyrights, and trade secrets.\par iii. Sub-dimensions of RC Relational capital (RC), social or customer capital as called in some studies, incorporates all organizational relationships, either internal relationships between the management and employees or among employees themselves, or external relationships with stakeholders such as customers, suppliers \hyperref[b35]{(Nuryaman, 2015)}, research and development institutions as well as government \hyperref[b33]{(Mumtaz and Abbas, 2014)}. Moreover, RC includes all relationship-based outcomes like customer satisfaction (Khalique et al., 2011a), customer loyalty, organizational agreements \hyperref[b28]{(Koc, 2017)}, distribution channels, number of key customers \hyperref[b49]{(Wang and Chang, 2005)}. Mumtaz and Abbas (2014) attached other parts such as knowledge related to promotions and advertising practices (Table \hyperref[tab_8]{5}). \section[{c) Definition of organizational performance}]{c) Definition of organizational performance}\par The literature of OP is loaded with definitions with this construct. Definitions of OP reported by \hyperref[b5]{Awan and Saeed (2015)} indicated that OP represents the result of employees' task-oriented activities. In their definition of OP, Badrabadi and Akbarpour (2013) described OP as a result of the organizational processes execution and organizational goals achievement that embodies all success-related concepts. Lee at al. (2015) defined OP as an indication of the organization's competency to achieve its strategic goals and compete. \section[{d) Dimensions of organizational performance}]{d) Dimensions of organizational performance}\par Dimensions of OP in the literature can be divided into: financial and non-financial measures. {\ref Kaplan and Norton (1996)} The main focus of the present study is the influence of IC dimensions on OP. Lin (2015) used market value to measure OP. In a study conducted by \hyperref[b40]{Pucci et al. (2015)} to explore the relationship between IC and OP, OP was measured using return on investment, return on assets, return on sales, capital turnover, and return on equity. In a study of Egyptian firms \hyperref[b42]{(Seleim et al., 2007)}, OP was evaluated by export density of software companies. \section[{e) Human capital and OP}]{e) Human capital and OP}\par Cabrita and Bontis (2008) used a sample consisted of 253 participants selected from 53 banks in order to collect the required data to examine interactions among IC dimensions and OP. The results found significant interactions between the dimensions of IC, human capital, structural capital, and relational capital. In a word, the study concluded that IC together significantly impact OP. Particularly, human capital directly and indirectly affects OP. The same result was echoed in many prior studies {\ref (} {\ref 2015}) concluded a non-significant impact of structural capital on OP. Based on these results, the study hypothesized that: H2: structural capital has a significant impact on organizational performance. \section[{g) Relational capital and OP}]{g) Relational capital and OP}\par It was revealed by many studies that relational capital has a significant impact on OP \hyperref[b49]{(Wang and Chang, 2005)}.The results of \hyperref[b53]{Yang and Lin (2009)} showed that relational capital mediates the relationship between human resource practices and OP. That is, relational capital has an association with OP. \hyperref[b13]{Chen et al. (2014)} studied the relationship between IC and new product development. Specifically, they estimated the effects of human capital and organizational capital on customer capital which in turn affect the performance in terms of new product development. Their results showed that customer (relational) capital mediates the relationship between human capital and organizational capital and new product performance. In fact, many studies confirmed the positive impact of relational capital on OP \hyperref[b16]{(Ghatak, 2013 and}\hyperref[b5]{Awan and}\hyperref[b5]{Saeed, 2015)}. Based on these results, the study suggested that:\par H3: capital has a significant impact on organizational performance. \section[{III.}]{III.} \section[{Methodology a) Study tool, sample and data collection}]{Methodology a) Study tool, sample and data collection}\par A questionnaire was developed based on the literature. IC dimensions were measured adopting items from previous studies \hyperref[b49]{(Wang and Chang, 2005} \hyperref[b15]{Elfar et al., 2017)}. It included 20 items, each of the variables (HC, SC, RC, and OP) was measured using 5 items. Items of HC covered employees' knowledge, skills, experiences, education, motivation, commitment, creativity and innovation. SC items referred to organizational efficiency and effectiveness, procedures, culture, product or service-oriented innovation, and intangibles such as patents, image and trade secrets. On the other hand, RC items included organizational relationships with stakeholders, agreements, customer contribution and satisfaction. Finally, OP was measured using indicators concerned customer, employee development, individual and job fit, and knowledge performance. All items were measured using a five-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). A total of 500 employees were randomly selected from public hospitals operating in the northern region of Jordan. Exactly, 473 questionnaires were returned and used for statistical analysis. \section[{b) Reliability and validity}]{b) Reliability and validity}\par Reliability of the study tool was measured using Cronbach's alpha (?). The results of reliability illustrated in Table \hyperref[tab_12]{6} showed that the alpha values of HC, SC, RC, and OP were above 0.7 \hyperref[b19]{(Hashim et al., 2015)} to confirm the reliability of the questionnaire used in this study. The Average Variance Extracted (AVE) was used to evaluate the validity. The results of AVE confirmed that the items of each variable were correlates to the theoretical foundation of that variable. AVE values considered acceptable if these value is greater than 0.5 \hyperref[b18]{(Hair et al., 2011)}. \section[{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}]{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}\par Volume XVII Issue V Version I \section[{Year ( ) c) Model of the study and statistical methods used}]{Year ( ) c) Model of the study and statistical methods used}\par The model of the study is shown in Figure \hyperref[fig_0]{1}. It includes three main independent variables; human capital, structural capital, and relational capital. \section[{Data Analysis and Results}]{Data Analysis and Results} \section[{a) Correlation matrix}]{a) Correlation matrix}\par The results shown in Table \hyperref[tab_13]{7showed} significant correlations among independent variables (HC, SC, and RC) and dependent variable (OP). HC is significantly correlates to SC and RC (r = 0.579, 0.668. Sig. = 0.001, respectively) and to OP (r = 0.496, Sig. = 0.000). SC is significantly related to both RC (r = 0.643, Sig. = 0.002) and OP (r = 0.428, Sig. = 0.000). Moreover, RC is significantly associated with OP (r = 0.399, Sig. = 0.001). \section[{b) Regression prior assumption: Multicollinearity}]{b) Regression prior assumption: Multicollinearity}\par Collinearity statistics, i.e., tolerance and variance inflation factor (VIF) were calculated to check the assumption of multicollinearity. The results (Table \hyperref[tab_14]{8}) indicated that HC, SC, and RC have tolerance values greater than 0.1 and VIF value less than 10, which means that multicollinearity was not overreached \hyperref[b19]{(Hashim et al., 2015)}. \section[{c) Multiple regression analysis}]{c) Multiple regression analysis}\par The results of the study, as shown in Table \hyperref[tab_15]{9}, indicated that all predictors of intellectual capital explained 76.1\% of the variance in OP as expressed by R square (R 2 = 0.761). Human capital has a significant impact on OP (Std. beta = 0.274, t = 11.314, Sig. value = 0.000) that is, hypothesis H1 was accepted. Furthermore, structural capital has a significant impact on OP (Std. beta = 0.287, t = 9.112, Sig. value = 0.000). this result means that H2 was supported. Finally, the results pointed out a significant impact of relational capital on OP (Std. beta = 0.239, t = 7.845, Sig. value = 0.000). The results showed that structural capital has the largest beta value (0.287), followed by human capital (0.274), in comparison with relational capital (0.239). The results shown in Table \hyperref[tab_15]{9} is also depicted in Figure \hyperref[fig_2]{2}. \section[{Discussion}]{Discussion}\par Exploring the extent to which each of IC dimensions significantly has an impact of organizational performance was the main purpose of this study. Expressly, this study sought to determine the impact of human capital, structural capital, and relational capital on organizational performance. The results obtained by the study confirmed that these three dimensions have significant influences on organizational performance. The significant impact of human capital on organizational performance was supported by the current data. Similar result was found by many prior studies. \hyperref[b53]{Yang and Lin (2009)} found that human capital mediates the relationship between human resource management practices and organizational performance. According to Bontis and Fitzenz (2002), human capital plays a critical role in the enhancement of organizations' profitability. \hyperref[b35]{Nuryaman (2015)} indicated that human capital components such as individuals' capabilities and commitment enhance the organizational efficiency and productivity, which in turn affects the organization's ability to generate profit. The results of this study in relation to the impact of structural capital on OP were in line with results of numerous previous studies. The components of structural capital like organizational strategies, structure, and culture help the organization to achieve its organizational objectives \hyperref[b35]{(Nuryaman, 2015)}. In agreement with numerous studies, the results confirmed that relational capital significantly predicted organizational performance \hyperref[b53]{(Yang and}\hyperref[b53]{Lin, 2009 and}\hyperref[b51]{Wu et al., 2012)}. Inconsistent with \hyperref[b19]{Hashim et al. (2015)}, the present study found a significant influence of human capital and structural capital on organizational performance. In general, many positive outcomes of intellectual capital found in the literature in correlation to OP \hyperref[b52]{Sivalogathasan, 2013 and}\hyperref[b50]{Wanjala, 2013)}. Smriti and Das (2017) concluded that IC is a predictor of organization's profitability not organization's productivity or market value. \section[{VI. Conclusion, Recommendations and Limitations}]{VI. Conclusion, Recommendations and Limitations}\par The results showed that intellectual capital dimensions, human capital, structural capital, and relational capital play a significant role in improving hospitals performance. That is, the intellectual capital is no less important than the economic capital. Based on these results, the study give advice to organizations in general, specially hospitals to pay more attention to their intellectual capital using their human resource practices like training and development programs, staffing, and motivation with a focus on people knowledge, skills, experiences, innovation, creativity, and job evaluation, individual and job fit, problem-solving, organizational structure, supporting infrastructure, and long-term effective relationships with customers, suppliers, and other stakeholders. However, the results of this study were drawn based on crosssectional data. Future research should conduct a longitudinal study to explore the influence of IC on OP in a given period of time. Additionally, the results were revealed base on a sample consisted of participants selected from hospitals. It is recommended to study the impact of IC as a whole construct, or its dimensions on OP using samples from different sectors.\begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{1}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png} \caption{\label{fig_0}Figure 1 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{2}\includegraphics[]{image-3.png} \caption{\label{fig_2}Figure 2 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_1}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}} a) Definition of intellectual capital\\ IC has been defined from different perspectives as\\ can be seen in Table 1. In 2008, The Organization for\\ Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defined\\ IC as an economic value proceeded from two types of\\ intangibles which are organizational and human capitals.\\ Wang and Chang (2005) indicated that IC is a key\\ component engenders organization's value. Zéghal and\\ Maaloul (2010) classified IC as the entire accessible\\ knowledge can be utilized by the organization to create\\ value. Conceptually, Wu et al. (2012) regarded IC as a set\\ of organization-related abilities integrated with three types\\ of capitals; human, structural and relational capital.\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_3}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{1} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.29864864864864865\textwidth}P{0.5513513513513514\textwidth}} Authors\tabcellsep Definitions\\ OECD (2000)\tabcellsep Economic value results for organizational and human capitals.\\ Wang and Chang (2005)\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_4}Table 1 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{2} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.34376538146021324\textwidth}P{0.31099261689909763\textwidth}P{0.19524200164068908\textwidth}} Authors\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Dimensions\\ Wang and Chang (2005)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Human capital, customer capital, innovation capital, and process capital.}\\ Cabrita and Bontis (2008)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Human capital, structural capital, and relational capital}\\ Yang and Lin (2009) Wu and Sivalogathasan (2013)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Human capital, organizational (structural) capital, and relational (social) capital}\\ Khalique et al. (2011a)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Human capital, structural capital, and customer capital}\\ Sumedrea (2013) Wanjala (2013)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Human capital, structural capital, and customer (external) capital}\\ Nuryaman (2015)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Human capital, structural capital, and customer capital}\\ Gogan et al. (2016)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Human capital, structural capital, and relational capital}\\ i. Sub-dimensions of human capital\tabcellsep \tabcellsep (Wang and Chang, 2005; Yang and Lin, 2009; Sumedrea,\\ \multicolumn{2}{l}{Human capital(HC), as a key element of IC, has}\tabcellsep 2013; Wanjala, 2013; Nuryaman, 2015 and Koc, 2017).\\ \multicolumn{2}{l}{been defined as a collection of employee characteristics}\tabcellsep According to Wanjala (2013), HC is considered the major\\ \multicolumn{2}{l}{and abilities revealed in forms of knowledge, skills,}\tabcellsep part of intellectual capital. Examples of these\\ \multicolumn{2}{l}{experiences, education, creativity, commitment, innovation,}\tabcellsep characteristics and abilities or sub-dimensions of HC are\\ \multicolumn{2}{l}{life and business-related attitudes, and motivation, etc.}\tabcellsep shown in\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_5}Table 2 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{33} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.7465372507869884\textwidth}P{0.02675760755508919\textwidth}P{0.07670514165792235\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Year\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Volume XVII Issue V Version I\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep ( )\\ \multicolumn{2}{l}{Authors Wang and Chang (2005) Yang and Lin (2009) Sumedrea (2013) Nuryaman (2015) Koc (2017) ii. Sub-dimensions of structural capital Employee education Employee knowledge, skills and experience. Sub-dimensions of HC Employee motivation and commitment Intellectual ability, creativity and innovation Technical knowledge, job evaluation, creativity, team work, initiatives, problem-solving, analytical and conceptual thinking. creation as vital sub-dimensions of SC. Table 4 shows}\tabcellsep Global Journal of Management and Business Research\\ Structural capital (SC) refers to organization-\tabcellsep examples of HC sub-dimensions.\\ based intangible assets like efficiency, effectiveness,\tabcellsep \\ innovativeness, culture, knowledge, strategies, procedures,\tabcellsep \\ patents, trade secrets, information and network systems\tabcellsep \\ etc. (Cabrita and Bontis, 2008;Yang and Lin,\tabcellsep \\ 2009;Sumedrea, 2013;Nuryaman, 2015 and Koc,\tabcellsep \\ 2017).Lee et al. (2015) added problem-solving and value\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: A]} \caption{\label{tab_6}Table 3 .Table 3 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.21158798283261804\textwidth}P{0.6384120171673819\textwidth}} Authors\tabcellsep Sub-dimensions of SC\\ Yang and Lin (2009)\tabcellsep Process effectiveness, knowledge integrating and sharing\\ Sumedrea (2013)\tabcellsep Databases, organizational procedures, trademarks, organizational strategies related infrastructure.\\ Lee et al. (2015)\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_7}Table 4 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{5} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.22376325088339222\textwidth}P{0.6262367491166078\textwidth}} Authors\tabcellsep Sub-dimensions of RC\\ Wang and Chang (2005)\tabcellsep Contribution of customers to growth in sales\\ Cabrita and Bontis (2008)\tabcellsep Relationships with stakeholders\\ Yang and Lin (2009)\tabcellsep Internal relationships among individuals within the organization and external relationships between the organization and other organizations.\\ Amiri et al. (2010) cited in Khalique et al. (2011a)\tabcellsep Customer loyalty and satisfaction.\\ Nuryaman (2015)\tabcellsep Relationships with internal and external parties\\ Koc (2017)\tabcellsep Brands, business name, distribution channels, license and franchising agreements, customer loyalty.\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_8}Table 5 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}} H1: human capital has a significant impact on\\ organizational memory.\\ f) Structural capital and OP\\ Gogan et al. (2016) studies relationships among\\ human capital, structural capital, relational capital and\\ organizational performance and found a significant\\ association between the structural capital of IC and OP.\\ According to Yang and Lin (2009), Khalique et al. (2011a),\\ Ghatak (2013) and Awan and Saeed (2015) structural\\ capital has a significant influence on OP. On the other\\ hand, Hashim et al. (\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_10}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_11}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{6} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.49903225806451607\textwidth}P{0.060322580645161286\textwidth}P{0.15629032258064515\textwidth}P{0.07403225806451613\textwidth}P{0.060322580645161286\textwidth}} Variables\tabcellsep Items\tabcellsep Mean (SD)\tabcellsep Alpha *\tabcellsep AVE **\\ Human capital (HC)\tabcellsep 1-5\tabcellsep 4.23 (0.587)\tabcellsep 0.774\tabcellsep 0.69\\ Structural capital (SC)\tabcellsep 6-10\tabcellsep 3.86 (0.780)\tabcellsep 0.814\tabcellsep 0.70\\ Relational capital (RC)\tabcellsep 11-15\tabcellsep 4.01 (1.010)\tabcellsep 0.798\tabcellsep 0.71\\ Organizational performance (OP)\tabcellsep 16-20\tabcellsep 3.97 (0.851)\tabcellsep 0.836\tabcellsep 0.68\\ * Acceptance level of alpha: alpha > 0.70\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ ** Acceptance value of AVE: AVE > 0.5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_12}Table 6 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{7} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.6213004484304933\textwidth}P{0.10291479820627802\textwidth}P{0.07242152466367713\textwidth}P{0.04192825112107623\textwidth}P{0.011434977578475336\textwidth}} Variables\tabcellsep HC\tabcellsep SC\tabcellsep RC\tabcellsep OP\\ Human capital (HC)\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Structural capital (SC)\tabcellsep 0.579 **\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Relational capital (RC)\tabcellsep 0.668 **\tabcellsep 0.643 **\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep \\ Organizational performance (OP)\tabcellsep 0.496 **\tabcellsep 0.428 **\tabcellsep 0.399 **\tabcellsep -\\ ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_13}Table 7 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{8} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.6352150537634409\textwidth}P{0.11881720430107526\textwidth}P{0.09596774193548387\textwidth}} Model\tabcellsep Tolerance *\tabcellsep VIF **\\ Human capital (HC)\tabcellsep 0.331\tabcellsep 3.120\\ Structural capital (SC)\tabcellsep 0.284\tabcellsep 4.016\\ Relational capital (RC)\tabcellsep 0.294\tabcellsep 4.770\\ * Tolerance is accepted at value > 0.1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ ** VIF is accepted at value < 10\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_14}Table 8 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{9} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.5456331877729258\textwidth}P{0.1707423580786026\textwidth}P{0.06310043668122271\textwidth}P{0.0705240174672489\textwidth}} Model\tabcellsep Standardized Coefficients -Beta\tabcellsep t\tabcellsep Sig.\\ Human capital\tabcellsep 0.274\tabcellsep 11.314\tabcellsep 0.000\\ Structural capital\tabcellsep 0.287\tabcellsep 9.112\tabcellsep 0.000\\ Relational capital\tabcellsep 0.239\tabcellsep 7.845\tabcellsep 0.001\\ \multicolumn{2}{l}{Dependent variable: organizational performance}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ R 2 : 0.761\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Df (total): 471\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ F: 63.59, Sig.: 0.000\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_15}Table 9 :}\end{figure} \footnote{© 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) 1} \footnote{© 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US)} \footnote{The Impact of Intellectual Capital Dimensions on Organizational Performance of Public Hospitals in Jordan} \backmatter \subsection[{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}]{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}\par Volume XVII Issue V Version I Year ( ) A \begin{bibitemlist}{1} \bibitem[Badrabadi and Akbarpour ()]{b6}\label{b6} ‘A study on the effect of intellectual capital and organizational learning process on organizational performance’. H Badrabadi , T Akbarpour . \textit{African Journal of Business Management} 2013. 7 (16) p. . \bibitem[Mumtaz and Abbas ()]{b33}\label{b33} ‘An empirical investigation of intellectual capital affecting the performance: A case of private universities in Pakistan’. S Mumtaz , Q Abbas . \textit{World Applied Sciences Journal} 2014. (7) p. . \bibitem[Noordin and Mohtar ()]{b34}\label{b34} ‘An exploratory of the intangible assets: methods of measuring intellectual capital’. M Noordin , S Mohtar . \textit{International Journal of Humanities, and Applied Sciences} 2013. 2 (2) p. . \bibitem[Zéghal and Maaloul ()]{b55}\label{b55} ‘Analysing value added as an indicator of intellectual capital and its consequences on company performance’. D Zéghal , A Maaloul . \textit{Journal of Intellectual Capital} 2010. 11 (1) p. . \bibitem[Janosevic et al. ()]{b23}\label{b23} ‘Analysis of intellectual capital practices in Serbia’. S Janosevic , V Dzenopoljac , S Dimitrijevic . \textit{Actual Problems of Economics} 2013a. 6 (144) p. . \bibitem[Yidiz and Karakas ()]{b54}\label{b54} ‘Defining methods and criteria of measuring business performance: A comparative research between the literature in Turkey and foreign’. S Yidiz , A Karakas . \textit{Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences} 2012. 58 p. . \bibitem[Koc ()]{b28}\label{b28} ‘Differentiation of leadership manager behavior between industries in terms of intellectual capital (Tourism and Automotive Sector Example)’. H Koc . \textit{Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies} 2017. 5 (1) p. . \bibitem[Yang and Lin ()]{b53}\label{b53} ‘Does intellectual capital mediate the relationship between HRM and organizational performance? Perspectives of a healthcare industry in Taiwan’. C Yang , C Lin . \textit{The International Journal of Human Resource management} 2009. 20 (9) p. . \bibitem[Hashim et al. ()]{b19}\label{b19} ‘Effect of intellectual capital on organizational performance’. M Hashim , I Osman , S Alhabshi . \textit{Procedia-Social and Behavioural Journal} 2015. 211 p. . \bibitem[Abdullahi et al. ()]{b0}\label{b0} ‘Empirical review on the determinants influencing firm performance in developing countries’. M Abdullahi , A Abubakar , R Aliyu , M Umar . \textit{International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications} 2015. 5 (6) p. . \bibitem[Lin ()]{b30}\label{b30} ‘How does intellectual capital affect organizational performance?’. Y Lin . \textit{International Journal of Business and Social Science} 2015. 6 (7) p. . \bibitem[Elfar et al. ()]{b15}\label{b15} ‘How knowledge management implementation affects the performance of Egyptian construction companies’. A Elfar , A Elsaid , E Elsaid . \textit{The Journal of Applied Business Research} 2017. 33 (3) p. . \bibitem[Seleim et al. ()]{b42}\label{b42} ‘Human capital and organizational performance: A study of Egyptian Software companies’. A Seleim , A Ashour , N Bontis . \textit{Management Decision} 2007. 45 (4) p. . \bibitem[Ghatak ()]{b16}\label{b16} \textit{Impact of intangibles on bank's performance. Elixir Finance Management}, A Ghatak . 2013. 59 p. . \bibitem[Smriti and Das ()]{b45}\label{b45} ‘Impact of intellectual capital on business performance: Evidence from India pharmaceutical sector’. N Smriti , N Das . \textit{Polish Journal of Management Studies} 2017. 15 (1) p. . \bibitem[Ogbo et al. ()]{b37}\label{b37} ‘Impact of intellectual capital on organizational performance: Evidence from Nigeria Banking sector’. A Ogbo , J Ezeobi , A Ituma . \textit{JORIND} 2013. 11 (2) p. . \bibitem[Al-Dujaili ()]{b1}\label{b1} ‘Influence of intellectual capital in the organizational innovation’. M Al-Dujaili . \textit{International Journal on Innovation, Management and Technology} 2012. 3 (2) p. . \bibitem[Wu and Sivalogathasan ()]{b52}\label{b52} ‘Innovation capability for better performance: Intellectual capital and organization performance of the Apparel industry in Sri Lanka’. X Wu , V Sivalogathasan . \textit{Journal of Advanced Management Science} 2013. 1 (3) p. . \bibitem[Hermawan et al. ()]{b20}\label{b20} ‘Integration of intellectual capital and knowledge management and its impact on business performance pharmaceutical’. S Hermawan , W Hariyanto , Sumartik . \textit{Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma} 2015. 6 (3) p. . \bibitem[Oecd ()]{b36}\label{b36} ‘Intellectual assets and value creation’. Oecd . \textit{Synthesis report} 2008. OECD. \bibitem[Khalique et al. ()]{b26}\label{b26} ‘Intellectual capital \& financial performance: An empirical study on the Oil \& gas sector of Pakistan’. M Khalique , M Zia-Ur-Rahman , M Abrar , M Khan , M Kharal . \textit{International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting} 2011a. 4 (1) p. . \bibitem[Sharabati et al. ()]{b43}\label{b43} ‘Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan’. A Sharabati , S Jawad , N Bontis . \textit{Management Decision} 2010. 48 (1) p. . \bibitem[Cabrita and Bontis ()]{b10}\label{b10} ‘Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry’. M Cabrita , N Bontis . \textit{Int. J. Technology Management} 2008. 43 (1-3) p. . \bibitem[Janosevic et al. ()]{b22}\label{b22} \textit{Intellectual capital and financial performance in Serbia. Knowledge and Process Management}, S Janosevic , V Dzenopoljac , N Bontis . 2013b. 20 p. . \bibitem[Mondal and Ghosh ()]{b32}\label{b32} ‘Intellectual capital and financial performance of Indian banks’. A Mondal , S Ghosh . \textit{Journal of Intellectual Capital} 2012. 13 (4) p. . \bibitem[Amin et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} ‘Intellectual capital and financial performance of pharmaceutical firms in Pakistan’. S Amin , S Aslam , M Makki . \textit{Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences} 2014. 34 (2) p. . \bibitem[Ozkan et al. ()]{b38}\label{b38} ‘Intellectual capital and financial performance: A study of the Turkish banking sector’. N Ozkan , S Cakan , M Kayacan . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.03.001}{10.1016/j.bir.2016.03.001}. \url{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.03.001} \textit{Borsa Istanbul Review} 2016. \bibitem[Joshi et al. ()]{b24}\label{b24} ‘Intellectual capital and financial performance: An evaluation of the Australian financial sector’. M Joshi , C Daryll , J Sidhu , M Kansal . \textit{Journal of Intellectual Capital} 2013. 14 (2) p. . \bibitem[Sumedrea ()]{b47}\label{b47} ‘Intellectual capital and firm performance: A dynamic relationship in crisis time’. S Sumedrea . \textit{Procedia-Economic and Finance} 2013. 6 p. . \bibitem[Al-Musali and Ismail ()]{b2}\label{b2} ‘Intellectual capital and its effect on financial performance of banks: Evidence from Saudi Arabia’. M Al-Musali , K Ismail . \textit{Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences} 2014. 164 p. . \bibitem[Chen et al. ()]{b13}\label{b13} ‘Intellectual capital and new product development’. C Chen , T Liu , M Chu , Y Hsiao . \textit{Journal of Engineering and Technology Management} 2014. 33 p. . \bibitem[Saeed et al. ()]{b41}\label{b41} ‘Intellectual capital and organizational performance: An empirical study in Telecom sector in Pakistan’. R Saeed , A Sami , R Lodhi , A Iqbal . \textit{Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research} 2013. 18 (4) p. . \bibitem[Bramhandkar et al. ()]{b9}\label{b9} ‘Intellectual capital and organizational performance: An empirical study of the pharmaceutical industry’. A Bramhandkar , S Erickson , I Applebee . \textit{The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management} 2007. 5 (4) p. . \bibitem[Wang and Chang ()]{b49}\label{b49} ‘Intellectual capital and performance in casual models: Evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan’. W Wang , C Chang . \textit{Journal of Intellectual Capital} 2005. 6 (2) p. . \bibitem[Awan and Saeed ()]{b5}\label{b5} ‘Intellectual capital and research performance of universities in southern Punjab-Pakistan’. A Awan , K Saeed . \textit{European Journal of Business Innovation Research} 2015. 2 (6) p. . \bibitem[Bontis et al. ()]{b8}\label{b8} ‘Intellectual capital and the nature of business in Malaysia’. N Bontis , W Keow , S Richardson . \textit{Journal of Intellectual Capital} 2000. 1 (1) p. . \bibitem[Bontis and Fitz-Enz ()]{b7}\label{b7} ‘Intellectual capital ROI: A casual map of human capital antecedents and consequents’. N Bontis , J Fitz-Enz . \textit{Journal of Intellectual Capital} 2002. 3 (3) p. . \bibitem[Mention ()]{b31}\label{b31} ‘Intellectual capital, innovation and performance: A systematic review of the literature’. A Mention . \textit{Business and Economic Research} 2012. 2 (1) p. . \bibitem[Stewart ()]{b46}\label{b46} \textit{Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations}, T Stewart . 1997. Doubleday New York, NY, U.S.A. \bibitem[Pucci et al. ()]{b40}\label{b40} ‘Measuring the relationship between marketing assets, intellectual capital, and firm performance’. T Pucci , C Simoni , L Zanni . \textit{J. Manage. Gov} 2015. 19 p. . \bibitem[Hair et al. ()]{b18}\label{b18} ‘PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet’. J Hair , C Ringle , M Sarstedt . \textit{Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice} 2011. 19 (2) p. . \bibitem[Khalique et al. ()]{b25}\label{b25} ‘relationship of intellectual capital with the organizational capital of pharmaceutical companies in Pakistan’. M Khalique , J Shaari , A Isa , A Ageel . \textit{Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences} 2011b. 5 (12) p. . \bibitem[Pett and Wolf ()]{b39}\label{b39} ‘SME performance: A case for internal consistency’. T Pett , J Wolf . \textit{Journal of Small Business Strategy} 2007. 18 (1) p. . \bibitem[Aramburu et al. ()]{b4}\label{b4} ‘Structural capital, innovation capability and company performance in technology-based Colombian firms’. N Aramburu , J Saenz , C Blanco . \textit{Cuadernos de Gestion} 2015. 15 (1) p. . \bibitem[Shiu ()]{b44}\label{b44} ‘The application of the value added intellectual coefficient to measure corporate performance: evidence from technological firm’. H Shiu . \textit{International Journal of Management} 2006. 23 (2) p. . \bibitem[Taie ()]{b48}\label{b48} ‘The effect of intellectual capital management on organizational competitive advantage in Egyptian hospitals’. E Taie . \textit{International Journal of Business and Social Sciences} 2014. 5 (2) p. . \bibitem[Chein ()]{b12}\label{b12} ‘The effect of organizational performance on the intellectual capital accumulation of Taiwan listed Biotechnology companies: Organizational citizen behavior as a moderator’. Y Chein . \textit{The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning}, 2013. 9 p. . \bibitem[Lee et al. ()]{b29}\label{b29} ‘The effects of the accumulation of intellectual capital on organizational performance: Using productivity as the moderator’. Y Lee , M Wu , C Chao . \textit{International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management} 2015. 39 (1) p. . \bibitem[Curado et al. ()]{b14}\label{b14} \textit{The financial crisis of banks (before, during, and after): An intellectual capital perspective. Knowledge and Process Management}, C Curado , M Guedes , N Bontis . 2014. 21 p. . \bibitem[Gogan et al. ()]{b17}\label{b17} ‘The impact of intellectual capital on organizational performance’. L Gogan , A Artene , I Sarca , A Draghici . \textit{Procedia-Social and Behavioral Journal} 2016. 221 p. . \bibitem[Hudgins ()]{b21}\label{b21} ‘The impact of intellectual capital on the performance of U.S. property-casualty insurance companies’. M Hudgins . \textit{Business and Economics Journal} 2014. 5 (4) p. . \bibitem[Nuryaman ()]{b35}\label{b35} ‘The influence of intellectual capital on the firm's value with the financial performance as intervening variable’. Nuryaman . \textit{Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences} 2015. 211 p. . \bibitem[Kianto et al. ()]{b27}\label{b27} ‘The interaction of intellectual capital assets and knowledge management practices in organizational value creation’. A Kianto , P Ritala , J Spender , M Vanhala . \textit{Journal of Intellectual Capital} 2014. 15 (3) p. . \bibitem[Wanjala ()]{b50}\label{b50} ‘To assess the effect of intellectual capital on organizational performance in the manufacturing sector’. J Wanjala . \textit{International Journal of Research in Commerce, IT \& Management} 2013. 3 (12) p. . \bibitem[Wu et al. ()]{b51}\label{b51} ‘To verify how intellectual capital affects organizational performance in listed Taiwan IC Design companies with considering the moderator of corporate governance’. M Wu , Y Lee , G Wang . \textit{The Journal of Global Business Management} 2012. 8 (1) p. . \bibitem[Chang and Lee ()]{b11}\label{b11} ‘Verification of the influence of intellectual capital upon organizational performance of Taiwan listed info-electronics companies with capital structure as a moderator’. C Chang , Y Lee . \textit{The Journal of International Management Studies} 2012. 7 (1) p. . \end{bibitemlist} \end{document}