The Effects of Firms' Characteristics on the Growth of Medium and Small Business in Developing Country (Case Study Ethiopia) Chalchissa Amentie ? , Emnet Negash ? & Lalise Kumera ? Abstract-The effects of firms' characteristics on the growth of medium and small business in developing country. This study is important to both academic research and policy development because of the significant contribution these businesses could make to economic development, the growth of employment and the generation of new innovations. For research design; cross-sectional, descriptive and inferential designs study were used in the study. The study used both primary and secondary data. Pertaining to data analysis the researchers used quantitative data analysis techniques mainly descriptive analysis using percentages, tables and mean were employed. While for inferential statistics like, chi-square and ANOVA were used to test the statistically significant difference (independency) of variables, and statistically significant mean difference among different business sectors. Hence, as per result of this study majority of small and medium enterprise were far from raw materials. The farness of the firms from raw material may negatively affect their growth of small and medium business Majority of the small and medium businesses in Ethiopia are either owned by a single individual or are family businesses. This may have negative effects on the growth of the business because the lack of team work and skill sharing. As per the one -way ANOVA test made (F=0.046, DF=1, N=315, p>0.05), there is no statistically significant mean difference of firm growth based on type of sectors of business they involved. This shows the sector in which the enterprise operates is can be not the determinants of enterprise growth. The ability to success of small and medium enterprises and their years of operations have no strong association (X 2 = 60.83, DF=10, p=0.000, V=0.3110,). In short, ability to growth of one firm does not strongly depend on its years of operations. # I. # Back Ground of the Study and Statement Problem edium and small businesses are strategically important for entrepreneurship development because they curb the monopolistic power of large enterprises and increase the competitiveness of the market. They also act as the seed beds for entrepreneurial skill development (UN-ECE, 1997). The contribution of these businesses to innovation, economic growth, and job creation in most parts of the world is well documented. Thus, providing support to small businesses is a prudent approach to create new employment opportunities. Despite the mentioned fact above, the growth of SMEs faces a number of constraints that hinders its rapid growth and development, which ultimately reduce the weight of its potential contribution to the national economy. Such factors are entrepreneurial characteristics, absence of BDS, social linkages, marketing problems, and absences of proper business plan due to knowledge or other reasons (Gurmeet & Rakesh, 2008: 120-136;Beyene, 2007: 25-27;Linda & Robert, 1998: 10-12). In addition, Werotew (2010: 226-237) also noted that 'environmental factors such as social, economic, cultural, political, legal and technologies along with, internal (personal) factors like individual attitudes, training and technical know-how are all the constraints that are challenging the success of Ethiopian SMEs. Entrepreneurship, which is recognized to be a change agent and the fourth factor of production that brings together land, labor and capital, makes a significant contribution to the pace of nation's economic development. However, this important factor of production is not being utilized properly in Ethiopia (ILO, 2003). The challenges of youth entrepreneurs globally are remarkably similar; and this necessitates investigation into the financial and non-financial support required to enable their success. Schoof (2006) argues that there exist five key constraints and barriers to entrepreneurship development in general: social and cultural attitude towards entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship education, access to finance/start-up financing, administrative and regulatory framework, and business assistance and support. Llisterri et al (2006; 5) also note that lack of experience and resources causes early failure of business. Similarly, Ethiopian entrepreneurs have largely the same combination of difficulties, in the main access to capital for starting or scaling up projects, lack of business and technical skills, unavailability of operational space, non-existence of mentors and limited access to markets (Beyene, 2007). Prior research documented that SMEs play a significant role in the economy of a country. Consequently, the performance of the SME sector is closely associated with the performance of the nation. There has been more written about small business growth in recent M years than any other aspect of management. One of the main reasons is the contribution of expanding enterprises to economic development and unemployment reduction, which generally has attracted the attention of researchers and policy makers in many countries (Bernice & Meredith, 1997: 37-64). However, access to finance and managerial skill are problem becomes a challenge to small and medium enterprises in developing country (ILO, 2003). But as finding of Beyene (2007), internal attributers (personal and business related) and external attributers (governmental, access to market, infrastructure) factors were affected the success of the small and medium enterprises. In addition, SMEs in Ethiopia are constrained and failed to succeed by a number of factors (Washiun & Paul, 2011: 233-246;Gurmeet & Rakesh, 2008: 120-136) such as unfavorable legal and regulation condition, lack of access to market, poor access to quality business infrastructure, problems of raw materials and lack of working capital are among many factors Even though scholars note that, the safe way is to have comprehensive measures of success than relying on a single indicator in dealing with the growth of small and medium enterprises, studies (Gebreeyesus, 2009: 46;Solomon, 2004: 51) conducted so far in line with this issue give more emphasis to single measurement criteria of growth as methodology. And even special focus is given to the determinants of performance of manufacturing enterprise, but such assessment do not guarantee to conclude about determinant factors of growth /success of SMEs in whole sector. In addition, though there are some studies which directly or indirectly assessed the growth determinants of SMEs, they have reached to different conclusions for similar research issue for example concerning the effect of education of the business owner (Garoma, 2012: 177;Tiruneh, 2011: 12) which is necessitated to have further study. It implies that the studies conducted in other specific area do not guarantee to conclude about the picture of the rest parts of the world, especially at country level. # II. # Literature Review a) A Perspective on Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship is more than the mere creation of business. The characteristics of seeking opportunities, taking risks beyond security, and having the tenacity to push an idea through a reality combine into a perspective that permeates entrepreneurs. An entrepreneurial perspective can be developed in individuals. This perspective can be exhibited inside or outside an organization, in profit or not-for-profit enterprises, and in business or non-business activities for the purpose of bringing forth creative ideas. Thus, entrepreneurship is an integrated concept that permeates an individual's business in an innovative manner. It is this perspective that has revolutionized the way business is conducted at every level and in every country (Kuratiko & Hodgetts, 2004:3). The symbol of business tenacity and achievement is entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurs were the pioneers of today's business successes. Their sense of opportunity, their drive to innovate, and their capacity for accomplishment have become the standard by which free enterprise is now measured. The standard has been held throughout the entire world. Entrepreneurs will continue to be critical contributors to economic Kodicara 2008). Small businesses gather information mostly through secondary data using the owner-manager's formal and informal contacts (Gibb and Davies, 1993). In the absence of functional specialists, small businesses perform their business activities with less expertise than large businesses (Freel, 2000). Past research has also found that only a few small businesses have the potential to grow (Hall, 1995).Small businesses cannot offer the challenging careers and the attractive remuneration packages offered by large companies (Koppar, 2003). Nor can they offer the same opportunities for training and skill development (Koppar, 2003, Webster, Walker, & Barrett, 2005 cited in Kodicara 2008). Despite these distinct disadvantages, employees in small and medium businesses claim more personal satisfaction from the freedom, flexibility and the more congenial work environment that is found in such businesses (Shuster, 2000). Gopalan (2003), highlighted the critical importance of selecting the right location when starting a business, as it significantly influences success and failure. Past studies that examined the influence of urban and rural locations on small business performance have agreed that resources required for growth such as specialist production factors, specialist managers, or sub-contractors are easier to find in urban areas than in rural areas (Dahlquist et al., 1999 higher population density in urban areas also provides a relatively larger market potential as compared to rural areas. Thus it is expected that small businesses located in urban areas would have a greater opportunity to grow. However, some studies have found small and medium businesses in rural locations generate higher employment growth rates (Heinonen, Nummela, & Pukkinen, 2004). The other drawbacks of location areas are the distance to buyers, suppliers, services and the lack of training providers (Wickham, 2004). # III. # Research Methodology a) Research Design The cross-sectional was used in the study. Furthermore, to achieve the objective, the study manipulated both descriptive and inferential statistics were employed. # b) Sampling Method and Sampling size To select the sample of respondents, the combination of non-probability (convenience) and probability (stratified) sampling methods was employed one after the other. Five industrial zones (towns) were selected as samples of population by convenience sampling method. The sample selected zones were: Mojo, Sebata, Gelan, Adama and Dire Dawa are taken. Then after, researchers had taken stratified random sampling technique. The criterion for creation of strata was type of sectors respondents. Three strata namely workers in manufacturing, service and trade sectors in selected area in Ethiopia was used as respondents. All respondents from all stratums were chosen using simple random sampling method. Description: N = required sample size z = confidence level at 95% (standard value of 1.96) E = margin of error (maximum error tolerable) to within .05 p =population proportion at which the sample size is maximum (at p=0.5 and q=0.5, p*q=0.25) Where q=1-p Hence, to identify the necessary information, more than or equal 386 samples of respondents must be selected. Since, 386 samples were selected by simple random from all selected sample of enterprises. A well-structured questionnaire for survey was used as tools of data collections from selected respondents. # IV. # Result and Discussion To identify the how firms' characteristics affect small and medium enterprise in Ethiopia, the openended question was used and finding was analyzed as follow # a) Descriptive Analysis Under this topic, provincial location and firms' ownership are discussed in table1 and table2 respectively. As table-1 shows percentage of the 73.9 % of firms were not near to raw material while 23.9% were near to raw material. And 76.1% of firms were near to market while 21.7% were not near to market. From this it possible to conclude that farness of the firms from raw material may negatively affect their growth of small and medium business. = = = E pq z n As per table 2 above the majority of businesses were sole proprietorships (84.8%). The remainders were fairly evenly divided among partnership (8.7%), public quoted firms (4.3%), and private limited liability enterprises (2.2%). Where there were partnerships, in most cases, the partners were members of the same family (93.5%). This indicates that an overwhelming majority of the small and medium businesses in Ethiopia are either owned by a single individual or are family businesses. This may have negative effects on the growth of the business because the lack of team work and skill sharing. In addition, Westhead, (1995) the findings of a number of studies show a positive association between diverse or diluted ownership and levels of employment growth (Birley & Westhead, 1990;Westhead & Birley, 1995). Small medium businesses owned by several people are more inclined to grow than the businesses owned by a single person (Shuster, 2000). This difference in growth, Heinonen, Nummela, & Pukkinen, (2004) explained, is due to the greater variety, balance and synergy of skills provided by the team of owner-managers. # b) Inferential Statistics Analysis In inferential statistics chi-square and one -way ANOVA were used. Chi-square was used to test for independence or association of some variables. While ANOVA used to test the mean difference (variation) of among different sectors of enterprises. The following hypotheses were tested as follows. # HO (1): There is no significant mean difference on SMEs growth in rela tion to the difference in sector type. # HO (2): There is no strong significant relationship between the ability success of SMEs and firms years of operations. As per the one -way ANOVA test made (F=0.045, DF=1, N=315, p>0.05), there is no statistically significant mean difference of firm growth based on type of sectors of business they involved. The hypothesis (1): There is no significant mean difference on MSEs growth in relation to the difference in sector type. Was accepted. This shows the sector in which the enterprise operates is can be not the determinants of enterprise growth. But this finding contradict with Cabal (1995) stated, services sector enterprises were growing less rapidly and manufacturing were growing more rapidly than trading. As a result of table 4 show, chi-square test made (X 2 = 60.83, DF=10, p=0.000), there is statistically significant difference between ability to growth and firms' years of operations. In addition, as Cramer's V test in table 5 indicates (V=0.3110) the strength of association between two variables is low. Event though, there is statistically significant difference between ability to success and firms' years of operations the association between two variables is not strong. # Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XVI Issue VI Version I # Year ( ) Here, hypothesis2. There is no strong significant relationship between the ability success of MSEs and firms years of operations is accepted. Therefore, the ability to success of small and medium enterprises and their years of operations have no strong association. In short, ability to success of one firm does not strongly depend on its years of operations. V. # Conclusion The main objective of this study was to determine how firms' characteristics affects the growth of medium and small business in developing country. Hence, as per result of this study majority of small and medium enterprise were far from raw materials. The farness of the firms from raw material may negatively affect their growth of small and medium business Majority of the small and medium businesses in Ethiopia are either owned by a single individual or are family businesses. This may have negative effects on the growth of the business because the lack of team work and skill sharing. As per the one -way ANOVA test made (F=0.046, DF=1, N=315, p>0.05), there is no statistically significant mean difference of firm growth based on type of sectors of business they involved. This shows the sector in which the enterprise operates is can be not the determinants of enterprise growth. The ability to success of small and medium enterprises and their years of operations have no strong association (X 2 = 60.83, DF=10, p=0.000, V=0.3110,). In short, ability to growth of one firm does not strongly depend on its years of operations. # VI. Limitations and Further Research Recommendation Several limitations were considered when interpreting the results of this research project. Accordingly, some firms' characteristics affects small and medium business growth are multidimensional. The influence of some of these factors on small and medium business growth could be either independent or interdependent. For further study it is possible to study the correlation of different variables but this study did not test the correlation variables. The data was collected from different sites as well as from different types of business sectors. This is difficult to specifically determine the internal factors affect the growth of each sectors and one site. Further studies should specifically study variable affects the growth of each sectors. Due to resource constraints, the cross-sectional study conducted did not examine the variables that impact the growth small and medium businesses as they move from one stage to another. To see change growth or live cycle of the small and medium business longitudinal studies is needed. growth through theirleadership, management, innovation, research anddevelopment effectiveness, job creation, competiti-veness, productivity, and the formation of new industries(Kuratiko & Hodgetts, 2004:3; Sexton & Kasarda,1992:48, 53-54 cited in Stanislous, 2008)b) YearVolume XVI Issue VI Version I( )Global Journal of Management and Business Research -1 : Firms' locationNear to raw materialNear to market (customers)FrequencyPercentFrequencyPercentValidyes7723.924576.1no23873.97021.7MissingSystem72.272.2Total322100.0322100 2Types of ownershipFrequencyPercentSole Proprietor27384.8Private Limited Liability Company72.2Public company144.3Partnership288.7Total322100.0 3ANOVA 4Chi-Square TestsValuedfAsymp. Sig. (2-sided)Pearson Chi-Square60.826 a10.000Likelihood Ratio58.93310.000Linear-by-Linear Association24.6961.000N of Valid Cases315a. 2 cells (15.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16. 5ValueApprox. Sig. © 2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) The Effects of Firms' Characteristics on the Growth of Medium and Small Business in Developing Country (Case Study Ethiopia)© 2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) The Effects of Firms' Characteristics on the Growth of Medium and Small Business in Developing Country (Case Study Ethiopia)© 2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) 1 © 2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) 1 This page is intentionally left blank * Small businesses do plan and it pays off RAckelsberg PArlow Long Range Planning 18 5 1985 * critical analysis and modelling of small business performance RAlasadi .AAbdelrahim 2007 * Value systems, strategies and performance of small and medium size businesses IBamberger European Small Business Journal 1 4 1983 * Planning and financial performance among small businesses in a growth industry JBracker BKeats JPearson Strategic Management Journal 9 6 1988 * Growth and performance contrasts between "types" of small business SBirley PWesthead ournal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability 11 7 1990 Strategic Management Journal * The portable MBA in entrepreneurship WDBygrave Enterprise and small business: Principles practice and policy SonsWiley & DCarter James-Evans New York; Harlow Prentice Hall 1994 * Effects of styles, strategies, and systems on the growth of small businesses RChaganti RGCook WJSmeltz Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship 7 2 2002 * Regulation and the entrepreneurial development KWChilton The environment for entrepreneurship. Lexington, M.A: Lexington Books CAKent 1984 * Introduction to Business Management GJCronje GSDu Toit MD CMotlatla 2005 Oxford University Press Cape Town; Southern Africa * Organisational characteristics and small businesses' performance revisited PCragg MKing Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1988 Winter * Learning by doing -An exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning JCope GWatts International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 5 3 2000 * Initial conditions as predictors of new venture performance: A replication and extension of Cooper et al. study, 44 th World Conference of the International Council for Small Business JDahlquist PDavidsson JWiklund 1999. June Naples * Empirical analysis of business growth factors using Swedish data PDavidsson BKirchhoff -JHatemi AGustavsson H Journal of Small Business Management 40 4 2002 * Small business growth: Recent evidence and new directions MDobbs RTHamilton International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 13 5 2007 * New firm growth and performance GWDunkelberg WACooper JWDennis 1997 * NCChurchill JAHornaday BAKirchoff Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research CJKrasner KHVesper Boston, Mass Babson college * Long-term entrepreneurship patterns: A national study of black and white female entry and stayer status differences ADolinsky RCaputo KPasumarty Journal of Small Business Management 34 1 1994 * New business growth performance WCDunkelberg ACCooper CWoo WDennis Frontiers of entrepreneurship research NCChurchill JAHornaday BKirchhoff OJKrasher &K HVesper Boston, Massachusetts Babson College 1987 * Determinants Of Microenterprise Success Inthe Urban Informal Sector Of Addis Ababa BFGaroma 2012 Erasmus University Rotterdam * Innovation and microenterprise growth in Ethiopia .MGebreeyesus 2009 Research Paper. UNU-WIDER * Key factors in the design of policy support for small and medium enterprises development process: An overview AAGibb Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 15 1993 * Small businesses' training and competitiveness: Building upon the small business as a learning organisation AAGibb International Small Business Journal 15 3 1997 * Providing effective help for infant businesses in areas of high unemployment JGill International Small Business Journal 7 1 1988 * SMITs: From infancy to adulthood SGopalan IIMB Management Review 15 1 2003 * Does strategic planning improve company performance? Long Range Planning GEGreenley 1986 19 * Entrepreunership and SMEs in Ethiopia:Evaluating the role,prospects and problems faced by women in this Emergent sector SGurmeet BRakesh Gender in management. International jornal 23 2 2008 * Growth and attributing factors of micro and small enterprises (the case of wood and metal work in addis ababa town) KHabte PG. Jimma: Jimma university 2012 * The contribution of intangible resources to small business success RHall Journal of General Management 16 4 1991 * Upperechelons: The organization as reflection of its top managers DCHambrick PAMason Academy of Management Review 9 2 1984 * Regional development and small business success in rural western Australia FHaslam-Mckenzie MRyan Paper presented at the ICSB Wold Conference June, Brisbane, Australia 2000 * To grow or not to grow? An analysis of internationally growth oriented Finnish SMEs JHeinonen NNummela TPukkinen EIBA Annual Conference. Solvenia 2004. December * The triple c approach to local industrial policy JHumphrey HSchmitz World Development 24 12 1996 * Profile of Employment and Poverty ILO Publications East Africa Multi -Disciplinary Advisory Team (EAMAT) Nigeria,Ghana, Tanzania, Kenya, and Uganda. Geneva 2003 ILO * Training needs of Indian SMEs: Assessment and action plan SKJain Conference Proceedings of ICSB 49th World Conference. Pretoria Pretoria 2004. June * To grow or not to grow -On the external growth of small businesses BJohannisson 1991 * Gender and organisational performance: Determinants of small business survival and success ALKalleberg KTLeicht Academy of Management Journal 34 1 1991 * Conceptualising a model to promote post start-up small business growth in Sri Lanka, PhD thesis at The University of Canterbury Konjit AKodicara 2008. 2009. 2009 Addis Abaaba women in the development of micro & small enterprises to ensure sustainable development & food security * Growth plans in small businesses in Turky: Individual and environmental influences MKKozan DOksoy OOzsoy Journal of Small Business Management 44 1 2006 * ICT adoption and SME growth in New Zealand SLocke Journal of American Academy of Business 4 1/2 2004 * Small business growth: Intention, ability and opportunity AMorrison JBreen SAli Journal of Small Business Management 41 4 2003 * Business Management-A Value Chain Approac Pretoria: VanSchaik G &Nieman ABennett 2002 * Training and the small business, in enterprise and small business HMatlay 2000 * Enterprise and small business InSCarter & DJones-Evans Prentice-Hall Harlow: Financial Times * Characteristics of high and low growth small and medium sized businesses Meorgen SPSS-Introductory statistics: use and Interpretation MahwahLondon DJ RMacrae 2007. 1992 3 * Performance, business size, and management problem solving JNunnally Journal of Small Business Management Boston: Allyn and Bacon. New Jersey Orser, B. J., Hogarth-Scott, S., & Riding, A. L. 1967. 2000. October * Competitive strategy: Techniques for analysing industries and competitors MEPorter 1980 Free Press New York * Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance MEPorter 1985 Free Press New York * Networks -Resources and small business growth: The experience in Sri Lanka SPPremaratne Journal of Small Business Management 39 4 36373 2001 * Product lifecycle considerations and the nature of strategic activities in entrepreneurial businesses RBRobinson JAPearce WSolomon Journal of Business Venturing 1 1986. 2004 * Addis Abab school of graduate studies AddisAbaba * Small businesses check in LAShuster Civil Engineering 70 8 66 2000 * Characteristics distinguishing high growth ventures RSiegel ESiegel ICMacmillan Journal of Business Venturing 8 2 1993 * an empirical investigation into the factors affecting the performance of small and medium enterprises in the manufacturing sector of Harare ZStanislous 2008 Zimbabwe MBA thesis University of Fort Hare * Strategic and operational planning, uncertainty, and performance in small businesses DSmallbone PWyer CBShrader CLMulford VLBlackburn Journal of Small Business Management S. Storey, D. J. 27 4 2000. 1994. 1989 Growth and development in the small firm * Journal of monetary economics-High inflation and the allocation of resources MTommasi 1999. Dec 1999 44 * Analysis of the Success Factors of Micro and Small Business Enterprises in Addis Ababa. masters ATiruneh 2011 Addis Ababa University * Are strategic assets contributions or constraints for SMEs to go international? An empirical study of the US manufacturing sector CTseng PSTansuhaj JRose Journal of American Academy of Business 5 1/2 2004 * SMEs: Their role in foreign trade LigthelmTustin &Martins WVan 2005. 1997. September 8, 2014 Unisa Press Pretoria; UN-ECE Marketing Research in Practice. Retrieved * Education, training and the growth of the owner-managed business: some recent evidence from Ireland, Internationalising Entrepreneurship Education and Training Conference JWalsh 1994. July Stirling * Growth Determinants of Women owned micro and small scale Enterprises in Addis Ababa. international jornal of economic developement research and investement RWashiun IPaul 2011 12 * Entrepreneurship: An Engine for Sustainable Growth,Development, prosperity and Good Governance BAWerotew 2010 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 1st ed * Expected consequences of growth and their effect on growth willingness in different samples of small firms Wiklund Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2004 27 * Firm growth, size, age and behaviour in Japanese manufacturing TYasuda Small Business Economics 24 1 2005