\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={A Study on the Group Level Workplace Spirituality of the College Teachers with Special Reference to Engineering Colleges in Namakkal District},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2016-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2016)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2016-01-15}
\title{A Study on the Group Level Workplace Spirituality of the College Teachers with Special Reference to Engineering Colleges in Namakkal District}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{R. Florence  Bharathi}

             \author[2]{Dr. M. G. Saravana  Raj}

             \affil[1]{  Muthayammal Engineering College}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 15 December 2015 Accepted: 2 January 2016 Published: 15 January 2016}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


The emerging paradigm called ?Workplace Spirituality? is interpreted by many in many ways. The recent researches on ?Workplace Spirituality? reveal that there is a common set of theme that most of the sources agree upon. Most of the researchers in this field use reference from ?The Handbook of workplace Spirituality and Organizational Performance? by Giacalone and Jurwierokz (2003). Ashmos and Duchon(2000) describe workplace Spirituality as involving three levels, individual, work-unit and organization-wide. The work-unit dimension (group level) entails how much employees have a sense of connection and community with their management, principal, head of the department, colleagues and students; as well as assessing the extent to which they are caring and encouraging.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{workplace, spirituality, teachers, interpersonal relationship, engineering college.}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
ngineering colleges of any country acts as a backbone for that country as it provides skilled human resource. Higher education sector, especially the engineering colleges today are facing global challenges from a dynamic environment characterized by rapid technological change. Engineering colleges are in need of producing skilled and corporate ready graduates. It is the need of the hour for the management of these engineering colleges to focus more on developing the performance of the teaching staff. This is made possible by creating an environment that inculcates good interpersonal relationship.\par
Interpersonal relationship of teaching staff in college includes the relationship with the management, Principal, Head of the department, colleagues and the students. The quality of the relationship is essential for the healthy developments of teachers and students alike. We know for example that teacher learning thrives when principals facilitate accommodating and safe organization culture. Productive environment is characterized by supportive and warm interactions throughout the college. Positive interpersonal relationships have been proposed as a buffer against stress and risk, instrumental help for tasks, emotional support in daily life, companionship in shared activities and a basis for social and emotional development. Therefore, positive interpersonal relationship leads to better group level workplace spirituality. The researcher believed that the employees who have good interpersonal relationship with the management, the principal, the head of the department, the colleagues and the students would have good organizational behavior which is the indicator of group level workplace spirituality. 
\section[{II.}]{II.} 
\section[{Objectives a) Primary objective}]{Objectives a) Primary objective}\par
To find out the group level workplace spirituality of the college teachers with special reference to Engineering Colleges in Namakkal District. 
\section[{b) Secondary objectives}]{b) Secondary objectives}\par
? To find out the interpersonal relationship of the college teachers with the management. ? To find out the interpersonal relationship of the college teachers with the principal. ? To find out the interpersonal relationship of the college teachers with the head of the department. ? To find out the interpersonal relationship of the college teachers with their colleagues. ? To find out the interpersonal relationship of the college teachers with their students. 
\section[{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}]{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}\par
Volume XVI Issue III Version I Year ( ) 
\section[{A c) Research Methodology}]{A c) Research Methodology}\par
In the present study, extensive use of both primary and secondary data was made systematically. For collecting primary data, field survey technique was used in the study area i.e in Namakkal District. Firsthand information pertaining to the respondents' socioeconomic background, general details related to the job, factors contributing to the interpersonal relationship of the teaching staff with the management, principal, head of the department, colleagues and the students. The primary data was collected from the engineering college teachers, using stratified random sampling method. The survey was conducted with 100 respondents from Namakkal district. 
\section[{d) Sources of Data Collection}]{d) Sources of Data Collection}\par
Primary Data: The primary data was collected with the help of a structured questionnaire which was administered for this purpose. The questionnaire was prepared after pre-testing with a pilot survey through preliminary interviews with about 20 respondents, and was further critically analysed. The finally redrafted questionnaire was administered among the engineering college teachers. Secondary Data: The secondary data was collected from various published and unpublished research reports, text books, magazines, journals and dailies, internet web resources, other published and unpublished sources of information. 
\section[{e) Analytical Framework}]{e) Analytical Framework}\par
The data collected were organized as simple tables and further analysed with the help of appropriate statistical tools such as -Percentage Analysis, Weighted Average Method, Correlation \& Regression Analysis, Chi-square Test, etc., for logical interpretation of the data collected. 
\section[{f) Limitations of the Study}]{f) Limitations of the Study}\par
? Since the research was based only on the Namakkal District, the same results may not be generalized over the whole universe. ? As the topic is very vast and so does its constraints that make the report tough one to cover all area. ? Due to time constraints and busy schedules of the teaching staff it was difficult to interact with them completely. ? Collection of data from the respondents could be done only when they are in their workplace. ? Many respondents do not like to give information relating to interpersonal relationship. Inference: From Table \hyperref[tab_3]{4}, it is inferred that among the level of agreement with the statement that concerns with the interpersonal relationship with the Colleagues, most of the respondents agree that they have no problem in communicating with my colleagues (WA = 29.89). 
\section[{III.}]{III.} 
\section[{Data Analysis and Interpretation}]{Data Analysis and Interpretation}\par
Table  {\ref 5} : Level of agreement with the statements that concerns with the interpersonal relationship with the Students. 
\section[{Source: Primary data}]{Source: Primary data}\par
Inference: From Table  {\ref 5}, it is inferred that among the level of agreement with the statements that concerns with the interpersonal relationship with the Students, most of the respondents agree with the opinion that Listen and understand the teaching (WA = 32.01). Inference: It is noted from the above table that the 'p' value is less than 0.01 and hence the result is significant at 1 \%. Hence the hypothesis 'Gender of the respondents and the staff members work as a team to ensure students' development are not associated' does not hold well. From the analysis it is concluded that there is highly significant association was found between the Gender of the respondents and the staff members work as a team to ensure students' development.\par
IV. 
\section[{Findings}]{Findings}\par
? 54\% 0f the respondents are male and 46\% are female. ? Most of the respondents are in the age group of 25-35 years (39\%). ? Most of the respondents (74\%) belong to Hindu religion. ? Most of the respondents' educational qualification is Post Graduate degree (68\%). ? 65\% of the respondents are married. ? Most of the respondents' designation is Assistant Professor (64\%). ? Most of the respondents income lies between Rs.15,000 and Rs.30,000. ? 48\% of the respondents teaching experience lies between 6 and 10 years. ? Among the level of agreement with the statement that concerns with the Management, utilize the potential of the staff members gets greater weighted average (29.56) and treat all the staff members equally gets the lowest weighted average (14.54). ? Among the level of agreement with the statement that concerns with the Principal, Conduct the staff meeting periodically gets greater weighted average (31.20) and Provide creative and innovative ideas gets the lowest weighted average (19.23). ? Among the level of agreement with the statement that concerns with the Head of the Department, Handle the difficult students effectively gets greater weighted average (30.65) and Encourage faculty interaction outside the world (college) gets the lowest weighted average (18.58). ? Among the level of agreement with the statement that concerns with the interpersonal relationship with the Colleagues, most of the respondents agree that they have no problem in communicating with their colleagues (WA = 29.89).\par
? Among the level of agreement with the statements that concerns with the interpersonal relationship with the Students, most of the respondents agree with the opinion that Listen and understand the teaching (WA = 32.01). ? From the Pearson Correlation it is inferred that there is no evidence when the age of the respondents increase the attitude of the students to get support and guidance from the staff members increases. ? From Chi-square analysis it is concluded that highly significant association was found between the Gender of the respondents and the staff members work as a team to ensure students' development.\par
V. 
\section[{Suggesions}]{Suggesions}\par
An individual spends around seven to eight hours at his workplace and it is practically not possible for him to work all alone. One needs people to talk to and discuss various issues at the workplace. The individual has to be motivated in teams in order to increase the productivity. The Management, Principal and the Head of the Department should frequently conduct formal and informal meetings with the teaching staff and the students for inculcating a good interpersonal relationship. 
\section[{VI.}]{VI.} 
\section[{Conclusion}]{Conclusion}\par
An association between individuals working together in the same organization is called interpersonal relationship. Research says productivity increases manifold when individuals work in groups as compared to an individual working alone. Employees must get along well for a healthy ambience at the workplace. The teaching staff must communicate with each other effectively for a healthy relationship. From the research, it is found that the interpersonal relationship of the teaching staff in the engineering colleges in Namakkal district is moderate and the management of the engineering colleges should take measures to improve the interpersonal relationship which would improve the group level workplace spirituality of the teaching staff.\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.13719298245614034\textwidth}P{0.3593859649122807\textwidth}P{0.15061403508771928\textwidth}P{0.18342105263157896\textwidth}P{0.0193859649122807\textwidth}}
Year\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
54\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Volume XVI Issue III Version I\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Global Journal of Management and Business Research ( ) A\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Demographic variables Gender Male Female Age Upto 25 Years 25 -35 years 35 -45 years 45 -55 years Above 55years Religion Hindu Muslim Christian Educational Qualification: UG PG M.Phil Ph.D Marital Status Single Married}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Frequency Percentage 54 46 46 7 7 39 39 28 28 18 18 8 8 74 74 12 12 14 14 3 3 68 68 10 10 19 19 35 35 65 65 54}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Teaching Assistant\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 3\\
\tabcellsep Designation\tabcellsep Assistant Professor Associate Professor\tabcellsep 64 23\tabcellsep 64 23\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Professor\tabcellsep 10\tabcellsep 10\\
\tabcellsep Income Level\tabcellsep Upto Rs.15,000 Rs.15,000 -Rs.30,000\tabcellsep 15 51\tabcellsep 15 51\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_0}Table 1 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
  {\small\itshape [Note: Source: Primary dataInference: From the Table2, it is inferred that among the level of agreement with the statement that concerns with the Management, utilize the potential of the staff members gets greater weighted average (29.56) and treat all the staff members equally gets the lowes t weighted average (14.54).]} 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{3} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
2016\\
Year\\
Volume XVI Issue III Version I\\
( ) A\\
Global Journal of Management and Business Research\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_2}Table 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{4} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.05282485875706215\textwidth}P{0.7075329566854991\textwidth}P{0.08964218455743879\textwidth}}
S.No.\tabcellsep Attributes\tabcellsep Weighted Average\\
1\tabcellsep My colleagues trust each other\tabcellsep 20.32\\
2\tabcellsep I have no problem in communicating with my colleagues\tabcellsep 29.89\\
3\tabcellsep My colleagues help me to manage conflict\tabcellsep 24.54\\
4\tabcellsep The staff members of our college work as a team to ensure students' development\tabcellsep 24.54\\
5\tabcellsep The feedback from my colleagues helps me to develop my teaching skill\tabcellsep 29.65\\
6\tabcellsep I have no problem in giving feedback to my colleagues\tabcellsep 28.78\\
7\tabcellsep My colleagues support me in my professional difficulties\tabcellsep 27.89\\
8\tabcellsep My colleagues support me in my personal difficulties\tabcellsep 29.76\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Source: Primary data}\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_3}Table 4 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{6} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.06403145695364237\textwidth}P{0.5769867549668874\textwidth}P{0.09076986754966887\textwidth}P{0.11821192052980131\textwidth}}
Year\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
56\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Volume XVI Issue III Version I\tabcellsep S.No 1\tabcellsep Attributes Have good attitude towards academic work\tabcellsep Weighted Average 28.58\\
( ) A\tabcellsep 2 3\tabcellsep Listen and understand my teaching Prepare well for the university examinations\tabcellsep 32.01 31.67\\
Global Journal of Management and Business Research\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Inference: Hence the calculated Pearson Correlation is Negative (-0.0114) there is no evidence that when the age of the respondents increase the attitude of the 4 Does not hesitate to get support and guidance from the staff members H 0 : There is no significant relationship between the Marital Status and the staff members work as a team to ensure students' development 30.98 5 Have respect for staff members 29.67 6 Feel free to interact with the staff members 30.98 Factor Pearson Correlation Value Remarks Age / Does not hesitate to get support and guidance from the staff members -0.0114 Inverse Relationship}\\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{students to get support and guidance from the staff members increases. Chi -Square Test}\tabcellsep H a : There is significant relationship between the Marital Status and the staff members work as a team to ensure students' development\\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Testing the dependency of the Marital Status}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{and the staff members work as a team to ensure}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{students' development}\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_4}Table 6 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{7} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.085\textwidth}P{0.4533333333333333\textwidth}P{0.02125\textwidth}P{0.11333333333333333\textwidth}P{0.17708333333333334\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Table No.4.6.1b : chi square Test}\tabcellsep \\
Factor\tabcellsep Calculated Chi-square value\tabcellsep DF\tabcellsep 'p' Value\tabcellsep Remarks\\
Gender\tabcellsep 12.4\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep < 0.001\tabcellsep Highly Significant\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_5}Table 7 :}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{© 2016 Global Journals Inc. (US)} 			\footnote{© 2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) 1} 		 		\backmatter  			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Jurkiewicz and Giacalone ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘A Values Framework for Measuring the Impact of Workplace Spirituality on Organizational Performance’.  		 			Carole L Jurkiewicz 		,  		 			Robert A Giacalone 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Business Ethics}  		2004. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Jurkiewicz and Giacalone ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		‘A values framework for measuring the impact of workplace spirituality on organizational performance’.  		 			C L Jurkiewicz 		,  		 			R A Giacalone 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Business Ethics}  		2004. 49  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Giacalone et al. ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		\textit{From advocacy to science: The next steps in workplace spirituality research -Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality},  		 			R A Giacalone 		,  		 			C L Jurkiewicz 		,  		 			L W Fry 		.  		2004. Newbury Park.  	 
\bibitem[Shankar (2010)]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘Individual spirituality, workplace spirituality and work attitudes -An empirical test of direct and interaction Effects’.  		 			Badrinarayan Shankar 		,  		 			Pawar 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Business and Management}  		March 2010. 5  (3) .  	 
\bibitem[Pawar ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		‘Individual spirituality, workplace spirituality and work attitudes, An empirical test of direct and interaction effects’.  		 			B S Pawar 		.  	 	 		\textit{Leadership \& Organization Development Journal}  		1999. 30  (8)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Marques et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		 			Joan Marques 		,  		 			Satinder Dhiman 		,  		 			King 		,  		 			Richard 		.  		\textit{The Workplace and Spirituality: New Perspectives on Research and Practice},  				 (SkyLight Paths, Woodstock, VT)  		2009.  	 
\bibitem[Mustapha1 ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		‘Measuring Job Satisfaction from the Perspective of Interpersonal Relationship and Faculty Workload among Academic Staff at Public Universities in Kelantan, Malaysia’.  		 			Noraani Mustapha1 		.  	 	 		\textit{Entrepreneurship Vision 2020: Innovation, Development Sustainability, and Economic Growth},  				2014. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Benefiel ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		\textit{Soul at work: Spiritual leadership in organizations},  		 			M Benefiel 		.  		2005. New York: Seabury Books.  	 
\bibitem[Fry et al. ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘Spiritual leadership and army transformation: theory, measurement, and establishing a baseline’.  		 			L W Fry 		,  		 			S Vitucci 		,  		 			M Cedillo 		.  	 	 		\textit{Leadership Quarterly},  				2005. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Dr et al. (2005)]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘Spirituality in the Workplace: Developing an Integral Model and a Comprehensive Definition’.  		 			Joan Dr 		,  		 			Dr Marques 		,  		 			Dr. Richard Satinder Dhiman 		,  		 			King 		.  		 pg. 81.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of american academy of business}  		sep 2005.  	 
\bibitem[Bhirawa (2014)]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		\textit{The relationship between spirituality and work attitude: An empirical study},  		 			Adi Unggul Bhirawa 		.  		April 2014. 4.  	 
\bibitem[Tagavi and Janani ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		‘The relationship between workplace spirituality and the organizational climate of physical education teachers in the city of Tabriz’.  		 			Laya Tagavi 		,  		 			Hamid Janani 		.  	 	 		\textit{Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences}  		 2231-6345.  		2014. 4  (S3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Biberman ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		\textit{Work and spirit: A reader of new spiritual paradigms for organizations},  		 			J Biberman 		.  		2000. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press.  	 
\bibitem[Milliman et al. ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		‘Workplace spirituality and employee Work attitudes: An exploratory empirical assessment’.  		 			J Milliman 		,  		 			A J Czaplewski 		,  		 			J Ferguson 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Organizational Change Management}  		2003. 16  (4)  p. .  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
