\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Funds Allocation Mapping and Corporate Social Responsibility Program (Program Kemitraan Dan Bina Lingkungan-Pkbl): Case in Indonesia},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2012-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2012)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2012-01-15}
\title{Funds Allocation Mapping and Corporate Social Responsibility Program (Program Kemitraan Dan Bina Lingkungan-Pkbl): Case in Indonesia}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Dr. Wahyu  Suparyono}

             \author[2]{Dr. Wahyu  Suparyono}

             \affil[1]{  Universitas Brawijaya (UB) Malang Indonesia}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 7 December 2011 Accepted: 2 January 2012 Published: 15 January 2012}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


A company should have a strong commitment in their PKBL implementation program.Results from several empirical studies concluded: companies that successfully implemented their PKBL programs tend to gain impacts for their financial and non-financial performance. Even though, there are still several companies that face hardships in implementing their PKBL programs. One of the main causes is the non-existence of data information system as the foundation for PKBL strategic planning. The aim of this study is to describe the mapping of funds allocation and PKBL program based on seven criteria: company reputation, conflict potency, income contribution, manpower absorption, business opportunity, region economy growth, and even distribution.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{mapping, funds allocation, PKBL program, criteria of funds allocation.}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
n Indonesia, aside of business ethic excuse, CSR implementation is based on the law of limited company n.40 year of 2007. As one of the BUMN (stated owned enterprises) in Indonesia, PT. Pelindo III has also implemented one of the government policy which is CSR program to increase company's environment management and to synergize with the government through their Program Kemitraan Bina Lingkungan (PKBL). Unfortunately, after 10 years of MDGs declaration, PKBL implementation is not running smooth. This is cause by not only the wide range of their operation region location, but also the complex state of society and environment they try to build. The problems faced by several manager and executor of PT. Pelindo III (Persero) is the non-existent of criteria condition making funds allocation decisions which will be given to their parents in each operation regions. As known that PT.\par
Pelindo III (Persero) is a stated owned enterprise that runs communication sector. They are given task, authority and responsibility to manage public harbor in seven provinces: East Java, Central Java, Bali, South Borneo, Central Borneo, East Nusa Tenggara and West Nusa Tenggara.\par
PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia III (Persero) that runs the core business as facilitator for port service holds the key role to assure the fluency of sea transport so by the provision of sufficient sea transportation facility, it will be able to propel and o excite economy activity of the country and society. In accordance with this role, vision and mission is being set to as a direction in achieving organization's objectives. To make the implementation of PKBL program works, research will be needed for the following goals: \hyperref[b0]{(1)} program mapping from corporation operation regional based on criteria consideration; company reputation, conflict potency, income contribution, manpower absorption, business opportunity, growth of region economy, and even distribution, (2) decision making of funds allocation based on set criteria, (3) deciding the amount of PKBL funds allocation just like the priority scale and needs based on existing criteria. All of these are expected to help succeeding government's policies in increasing pro poor, pro growth, pro job and pro environment. 
\section[{II.}]{II.} 
\section[{Literature Study}]{Literature Study}\par
At the end of the 20th century, CSR study has been getting massive attention from all circle and society. The Earth summit that was conducted in 1992 in Rio de Jenairo , Brazil, has agreed the change of development paradigm from economy development into sustainable development, basing on the protection of the environment, economy and social development as an obligation.\par
A big step in CSR context was done by Elkington (1997) through 3P (Profit, People, Planet) concept in 1998. This concept has a purpose that company responsibility is not limited to collecting profit but also to give positive contribution for the people and actively protecting the planet itself. The World Business council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) is an international institution with multinational companies as their member that defines CSR as an action based on ethical consideration directed to increase economy as well as to increase the quality of life for employees and their families and also to increase the quality of life of society in surroundings and in wider sense  {\ref (WBCSD, 2005)}.\par
WBCSD meeting in New York (2005) has created an agreement that CSR practice is a form of business world commitment to help UNO in implementing MDGs target. In Indonesia, other than ethical business matter, CSR implementation is base on the law of limited company N.40 year of 2007 on Limited Company chapter IV section 66 verse 2b and chapter V section 74 verse 1 explaining that company's annual report should reflect social responsibility. Even though government cannot change the direction for corporation CSR policies related to CSR connectivity with core business of a company, every program can be directed to achieve government's target in order to fulfill MDGs (Millenium Development Goals) achievement commitment in 2015.\par
The rationale for a more civilized corporation has already surfaced for quite some time as one of the voluntary approach placed in beyond compliance level. The implementation of CSR nowadays has a rapid development in Indonesia as a business response in seeing environment and social response aspect as an opportunity to increase their competitive quality as well as a part for risk management for their business sustainability. CSR implementation in Indonesia was existed in early 2000s, even though activities with the same essence has already implemented way back in 1970s with a variety of level, starting from the simplest such as donation to integration of business operation \hyperref[b16]{(Sumardiyono, 2007)}. In fact, CSR promotion in Indonesia has been marked by government's initiative and privates' \hyperref[b17]{(Uriarte, 2008)}. This means that CSR is well accepted. In Indonesia, companies are categorized into several stages; (1) most companies are in subservience stage in which they adopted policy-based compliance business working cost, (2) managerial stage, where they pay attention on social problems in their core management process, (3) several companies are in strategic steps, where companies integrating social issue into their core business strategy \hyperref[b17]{(Uriarte, 2008)}.\par
Partnership principle is actively requiring companies to work together with the society, central government, local authorities, and other related parties to achieve collective commitment based on trust and openness. All of this aims to achieve agreed goals and collective involvement. Companies work together with government, organization and other public institution in formulating partnership policies with the society just as participating in dialogue with said institutions to expect that rational and effective policies can be wellformulated. Companies are very respectful for every partnership activity that contributes to society and increasing company's social value.\par
In relation to environmental aspect, by modification from Program Penilaian Peringkat Kinerja Perusahaan (PROPER) there are four levels set by the ministry of environment: (1) black, this means companies run their business merely for their own sake and do not care for their surroundings, be it social or environmental aspect, (2) red, this means companies have the tendency to exploit resources more than what ecology, social and economy can support and collectively creating negative impact in regional and global level, (3) blue, this means companies take CSR to give positive impact for their businesses because CSR is seen as an investment and not as cost and (4) honeybee or green, which places CSR as core strategy and the heart of their business. CSR is not only a requirement but also a need for a company. Companies in this level believe that a business will sustain if they are having social capital aside of financial capital. PROPER is incentive and disincentive-based environmental control. This means that the announcement of PROPER attendants with green, blue, red and black is known by society, it will give an effect for their image just as their level. PROPER is an innovation in controlling contamination in industrial sector \hyperref[b16]{(Sumardiyono, 2007)}.\par
Moreover, based on many literature consideration and empirical studies as well as focus group discussion, funds allocation mapping and PKBL in PT. Pelindo III (Persero) has agreed on seven criteria. This considers statements from several experts and findings from several empirical researches. Tilt (1994) stated that stakeholders pressure influences CSR exposure, forming corporate image  {\ref (Branco \& Rodriguez, 2006;}\hyperref[b4]{Cerin, 2002;}\hyperref[b10]{Fombrun \& Shanley, 1990)},  {\ref Juholin (2005)}, and also influencing or influenced by organization's objectives achievement \hyperref[b13]{(Moir, 2001)}.  {\ref Choi, et al. (2010)} considers physical environment and social factors. While \hyperref[b8]{Dowling \& Pfeffer (1975)} added that a company needs to own a legitimate strategy that can be adopted when they are facing hardships on their legitimacy or when they see gaps in their legitimacy. There is a contradiction however that CSR can be seen as business orientation \hyperref[b15]{(Silberhorn \& Warren, 2007)}. By this, PT. Pelindo III (Persero) needs to consider company's reputation aspect as well as conflict potency, income contribution, manpower absorption, business opportunity, region economy growth and even distribution. 
\section[{III.}]{III.} 
\section[{Research Methodology}]{Research Methodology}\par
Methods used in this study is survey method which is by giving away questionnaire to managers and the implementers of PKBL PT. Pelindo III (Persero) on seven provinces in Indonesia. The type of this research is descriptive research because it was meant to obtain the description on (1) program mapping from corporation operation region is 9 PKBL distributor branches based on the criteria of company reputation, conflict potency, income contribution, manpower absorption, business opportunity, region economy growth, and event distribution, (b) decision making of funds allocation based on set criteria, (2) determining the amount of PKBL based on priority scale and needs based on set criteriawith the result of this study, it is hoped that there will be a built data and information system as a foundation for strategic planning of PKBL PT. Pelindo III (Persero) to help local authority in formulating many development policies in regions. The population is all managers and implementers staff PKBL PT. Pelindo III (Persero) from seven provinces in Indonesia. Sample used in this research is part of population with relative characteristics and is considered able to represent the population. Sampling technique used in this study is stratified random sampling which is a technique where the samples are taken from population by observing each stratum in population \hyperref[b11]{(Hair et al., 1995)}. The amount of samples in this study is 60 respondents originated from managers and implementers of PKBL Pt. Pelindo III (Persero) in 9 PKBL distributor branches. Statistic technique in this research is Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The use of AHP is requiring logic consistency in making comparison between criteria \hyperref[b2]{(Anderson et al., 2005}\hyperref[b1]{(Anderson et al., : 2003))}. From consistency calculation result, it is known that value of CR < 0.10, so the comparison between criteria has fulfilled logic consistency requirement. Thus, the validity of this research's result is accountable. 
\section[{IV.}]{IV.} 
\section[{Results And Discussion}]{Results And Discussion}\par
This sub chapter will discuss on 60 data that has been gathered. Next is descriptive analysis with AHP technique. Just as known, PT. Pelabuhan III (Persero) is centered in Surabaya. To the day of this research was conducted, the main office still lacks the correct criteria for (1) program mapping from corporation operation region is 9 PKBL distributor branches based on the criteria of company reputation, conflict potency, income contribution, manpower absorption, business opportunity, region economy growth, and event distribution, (b) decision making of funds allocation based on set criteria, (2) determining the amount of PKBL based on priority scale and needs based on set criteria. Hence why this research is important. There are nine PKBL distributor branches of PT. Pelindo III (Persero): Tanjung Perak, Tanjung Intan, Banjarmasin, Tanjung Wangi, Benoa, Kupang, Sampit and Lembar. 
\section[{a) Pair Wise Comparison Between Criteria}]{a) Pair Wise Comparison Between Criteria}\par
This research used two data input categories for the implementation of AHP method which is pair wise comparison matrix between criteria and pair wise comparison of each alternative for each criteria. The matrix can be seen in the following Table  {\ref 1}. 
\section[{Table 1 : Matrix of Pair wise Comparison between Criteria i. Criteria Valuation}]{Table 1 : Matrix of Pair wise Comparison between Criteria i. Criteria Valuation}\par
Criteria valuation is used to determine which criteria is the most significant. This is done by dividing each comparison value with total value. Data input is matrix of pair wise comparison between criteria. Matrix of value between criteria is presented in Table \hyperref[tab_1]{2}. This matrix is arranged by assuming that the amount of value from all criteria is 1 or 100\%. Criteria with the highest score is the one with the highest priority.  From the matrix of value between criteria, it is known that income contribution criteria received highest proportion with the value of 0.31462 or 31.46\%. this shows that income contribution criteria is considered the most important/significant and with its high value (close to 50\%), experience factor may also be considered as a decisive selecting factor of PKBL funds allocation. Meanwhile, manpower absorption gained the lowest value of 3.66\%. After the value between criteria is known, next step is arranging matrix of relative value comparison between criteria for each PT. Pelindo III (Persero) branches. There are 9 brances with 7 criteria, so that means there are valuations on 9 alternatives and 7 criteria. This valuation focused on determining how significant each PT. Pelindo III (Persero) branches are as PKBL distributors. On a scale of 1 to 9, with 9 as the highest number showing that the branch is seen as the most able and takes the highest position to fulfill the criteria more than any other branches. The first step is by giving comparison on alternative in every criteria and then determining the value. Respectively as following: i. Reputation Tanjung Perak 0,432767 0,265823 0,375469 0,394737 0,388601 0,686275 0,233333 0,272727 0,235294 3,285026 36,50\% Tanjung Emas 0,061824 0,037975 0,015019 0,02193 0,025907 0,038126 0,033333 0,015152 0,088235 0,3375 3,75\% Tanjung Intan 0,086553 0,189873 0,075094 0,197368 0,07772 0,022876 0,133333 0,136364 0,147059 1,066241 11,85\% Banjarmasin 0,072128 0,113924 0,025031 0,065789 0,07772 0,038126 0,1 0,227273 0,088235 0,808227 8,98\% Tanjung Wangi 0,086553 0,113924 0,075094 0,065789 0,07772 0,038126 0,166667 0,045455 0,088235 0,757564 8,42\% Benoa 0,072128 0,113924 0,375469 0,197368 0,233161 0,114379 0,166667 0,227273 0,205882 1,706251 18,96\% Kupang 0,061824 0,037975 0,018773 0,02193 0,015544 0,022876 0,033333 0,015152 0,029412 0,256818 2,85\% Sampit 0,072128 0,113924 0,025031 0,013158 0,07772 0,022876 0,1 0,045455 0,088235 0,558527 6,21\% Lembar 0,054096 0,012658 0,015019 0,02193 0,025907 0,01634 0,033333 0,015152 0,029412 0,223846 2,49\% Total   Tanjung Perak 0,267176 0,223881 0,209302 0,314685 0,189873 0,365854 0,172414 0,2 0,333333 2,276518 25,29\% Tanjung Emas 0,267176 0,223881 0,209302 0,314685 0,189873 0,121951 0,172414 0,2 0,238095 1,937377 21,53\% Tanjung Intan 0,089059 0,074627 0,069767 0,034965 0,113924 0,04065 0,103448 0,12 0,142857 0,789298 8,77\% Banjarmasin 0,089059 0,074627 0,209302 0,104895 0,189873 0,121951 0,103448 0,12 0,142857 1,156013 12,84\% Tanjung Wangi 0,053435 0,044776 0,023256 0,020979 0,037975 0,04065 0,103448 0,04 0,015873 0,380392 4,23\% Benoa 0,089059 0,223881 0,209302 0,104895 0,113924 0,121951 0,172414 0,12 0,047619 1,203045 13,37\% Kupang 0,053435 0,044776 0,023256 0,034965 0,012658 0,02439 0,034483 0,04 0,015873 0,283836 3,15\% Sampit 0,053435 0,044776 0,023256 0,034965 0,037975 0,04065 0,034483 0,04 0,015873 0,325413 3,62\% Lembar 0,038168 0,044776 0,023256 0,034965 0,113924 0,121951 0,103448 0,12 0,047619 0,648108 7,20\% Total  From Table \hyperref[tab_5]{6} and Figure \hyperref[fig_2]{2}, it is known that to fulfill manpower absorption criteria as an impact of PKBL funding, Tanjung Perak is also seen as the best branch with the value of 25.29\%. Next is Tanjung Emas (21.59\%) and Tanjung Benoa (13.37\%) as well as Banjarmasin (12.84\%). While for other branches, they are still below 10\%.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 1\par
iii. Conflict Potency For conflict potency criteria, Tanjung Intan is the most vulnerable branch on conflict potency by 32.24\%. This is why if conflict potency aspect is the only criteria to be considered in allocating PKBL funds, Tanjung Intan will have the biggest portion. This assessment shows that conflict potency criteria is indirectly related with two previous criteria. So that the selection from Tanjung Perak drastically change to Tanjung Intang if seen from just one criteria. While Benoa and Sampit is still very conducive so there will be non need of large PKBL funds because each of them gained low scores (2.17\% and 2.72\%). Tanjung Perak 0,13757 0,558087 0,079848 0,230769 0,245902 0,2 0,222615 0,25 0,235955 2,161 24,01\% Tanjung Emas 0,019653 0,079727 0,13308 0,138462 0,147541 0,175 0,222615 0,15625 0,168539 1,241 13,79\% Tanjung Intan 0,687848 0,23918 0,39924 0,230769 0,344262 0,175 0,371025 0,21875 0,235955 2,902 32,24\% Banjarmasin 0,027514 0,026576 0,079848 0,046154 0,016393 0,075 0,024735 0,03125 0,101124 0,429 4,76\% Tanjung Wangi 0,027514 0,026576 0,057034 0,138462 0,04918 0,075 0,024735 0,09375 0,101124 0,593 6,59\% Benoa 0,017196 0,01139 0,057034 0,015385 0,016393 0,025 0,010601 0,03125 0,011236 0,195 2,17\% Kupang 0,045857 0,026576 0,079848 0,138462 0,147541 0,175 0,074205 0,09375 0,101124 0,882 9,80\% Sampit 0,017196 0,015945 0,057034 0,046154 0,016393 0,025 0,024735 0,03125 0,011236 0,245 2,72\% Lembar 0,019653 0,015945 0,057034 0,015385 0,016393 0,075 0,024735 0,09375 0,033708 0,352 3,91\% Total This also applies for Lembar and Banjarmasin in which only gained less than 5\% value, meaning that these branches are safe. This shows that the use of PKBL in Tanjung Intan, Perak and Emas will have positive influence on conflict potency in the society.   Tanjung Perak 0,353535 0,445545 0,36 0,314685 0,225806 0,294118 0,230769 0,283019 0,355932 2,86341 31,82\% Tanjung Emas 0,117845 0,148515 0,12 0,314685 0,16129 0,176471 0,164835 0,169811 0,152542 1,525995 16,96\% Tanjung Intan 0,117845 0,148515 0,12 0,104895 0,096774 0,176471 0,098901 0,056604 0,152542 1,072547 11,92\% Banjarmasin 0,117845 0,049505 0,12 0,104895 0,096774 0,176471 0,164835 0,169811 0,152542 1,152679 12,81\% Tanjung Wangi 0,050505 0,029703 0,04 0,034965 0,032258 0,019608 0,010989 0,018868 0,016949 0,253845 2,82\% Benoa 0,070707 0,049505 0,04 0,034965 0,096774 0,058824 0,098901 0,169811 0,050847 0,670335 7,45\% Kupang 0,050505 0,029703 0,04 0,020979 0,096774 0,019608 0,032967 0,018868 0,016949 0,326353 3,63\% Sampit 0,070707 0,049505 0,12 0,034965 0,096774 0,019608 0,098901 0,056604 0,050847 0,597911 6,64\% Lembar 0,050505 0,049505 0,04 0,034965 0,096774 0,058824 0,098901 0,056604 0,050847 0,536925 5,97\%    Tanjung Perak 0,430696 0,41112 0,461974 0,679172 0,192661 0,195822 0,2 0,223881 0,22314 3,018465 33,54\% Tanjung Emas 0,086139 0,082224 0,197989 0,027167 0,192661 0,195822 0,175 0,223881 0,173554 1,354436 15,05\% Tanjung Intan 0,061528 0,027408 0,065996 0,045278 0,082569 0,117493 0,175 0,223881 0,173554 0,972707 10,81\% Banjarmasin 0,086139 0,41112 0,197989 0,135834 0,192661 0,195822 0,175 0,223881 0,173554 1,791999 19,91\% Tanjung Wangi 0,061528 0,011746 0,021999 0,019405 0,027523 0,007833 0,075 0,014925 0,008264 0,248224 2,76\% Benoa 0,086139 0,016445 0,021999 0,027167 0,137615 0,039164 0,075 0,014925 0,123967 0,542421 6,03\% Kupang 0,053837 0,011746 0,009428 0,019405 0,009174 0,013055 0,025 0,014925 0,024793 0,181364 2,02\% Sampit 0,086139 0,016445 0,013199 0,027167 0,082569 0,117493 0,075 0,044776 0,07438 0,537169 5,97\% Lembar 0,047855 0,011746 0,009428 0,019405 0,082569 0,117493 0,025 0,014925 0,024793 0,353215 3,92\% Total 
\section[{27\%}]{27\%}1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9,000 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 1\par
April received bigger funds than other branches so it will automatically make them to have more experience in seeing new business potency as the effect from PKBL funds allocation in their partnership. This is not the sole possibility, other is that Tanjung Perak is in the second biggest city in Indonesia so it is possible for them to have more business opportunities than other branches.    {\ref 6}, it is known that based on region economic growth opportunity criteria, Tanjung Perak is the best option with 30\% value followed by Banjarmasin (20.12\%) and Tanjung Emas (14.9\%). Other branches scored lower than 12\% which means there are very small amount of PKBL contribution in these branches for region economic growth. 
\section[{Perak}]{Perak}\par
Assessment value close to 50\& shows that by allocating PKBL in Tanjung Perak will be trust that there will be more business opportunity to surface as business development of PT. Pelindo III (Persero). This is possible if based on the fact that Tanjung Perak is tested in knowing company's external condition more than other branches so they have the best possibility in getting more opportunities. Tanjung Perak 0,355781 0,350195 0,238095 0,522388 0,189189 0,211268 0,203883 0,376884 0,252632 2,700316 30,00\% Tanjung Emas 0,118594 0,116732 0,142857 0,058043 0,135135 0,211268 0,145631 0,226131 0,189474 1,343864 14,93\% Tanjung Intan 0,071156 0,038911 0,047619 0,034826 0,081081 0,023474 0,087379 0,025126 0,094737 0,504308 5,60\% Banjarmasin 0,118594 0,350195 0,238095 0,174129 0,189189 0,211268 0,145631 0,226131 0,157895 1,811126 20,12\% Tanjung Wangi 0,050826 0,023346 0,015873 0,024876 0,027027 0,023474 0,009709 0,015075 0,010526 0,200732 2,23\% Benoa 0,118594 0,038911 0,142857 0,058043 0,081081 0,070423 0,145631 0,025126 0,094737 0,775402 8,62\% Kupang 0,050826 0,023346 0,015873 0,034826 0,081081 0,014085 0,029126 0,015075 0,010526 0,274765 3,05\% Sampit 0,071156 0,038911 0,142857 0,058043 0,135135 0,211268 0,145631 0,075377 0,157895 1,036272 11,51\% Lembar 0,044473 0,019455 0,015873 0,034826 0,081081 0,023474 0,087379 0,015075 0,031579 0,353215 3,92\% Total 
\section[{33\%}]{33\%}1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 1 
\section[{vi. Region Economic Growth Opportunity}]{vi. Region Economic Growth Opportunity}\par
There is a possibility that because Tanjung Perak has already received bigger funds than other branches so it will automatically make them to have more experience in growing region economic as the effect from PKBL funds allocation in their partnership. This is not the sole possibility, other is that Tanjung Perak is in the second biggest city in Indonesia so the multiplier effect from PKBL funds implementation higher than any other branches. This notion is supported by the data that all other branches is not placed in cities where the industrial area is not as advanced as Surabaya. Assessment value close to 50\% shows that by allocating PKBL in Tanjung Perak will influence region economic growth faster and more effective than other branches. This is probably based on criteria of region economic which is business opportunity where Tanjung Perak got the highest value, this means Tanjung Perak has the highest value as well for this criteria than other branches. Tanjung Perak 0,030303 0,015873 0,008499 0,014085 0,022901 0,022222 0,061224 0,027027 0,034483 0,237 2,63\% Tanjung Emas 0,090909 0,047619 0,127479 0,014085 0,038168 0,2 0,061224 0,027027 0,034483 0,641 7,12\% Tanjung Intan 0,151515 0,015873 0,042493 0,126761 0,022901 0,022222 0,102041 0,027027 0,034483 0,545 6,06\% Banjarmasin 0,090909 0,142857 0,014164 0,042254 0,038168 0,022222 0,061224 0,027027 0,034483 0,473 5,26\% Tanjung Wangi 0,151515 0,142857 0,212465 0,126761 0,114504 0,2 0,102041 0,243243 0,057471 1,351 15,01\% Benoa 0,090909 0,015873 0,127479 0,126761 0,038168 0,066667 0,102041 0,081081 0,057471 0,706 7,85\% Kupang 0,151515 0,238095 0,127479 0,211268 0,343511 0,2 0,306122 0,243243 0,517241 2,338 25,98\% Sampit 0,090909 0,142857 0,127479 0,126761 0,038168 0,066667 0,102041 0,081081 0,057471 0,833 9,26\% Lembar 0,151515 0,238095 0,212465 0,211268 0,343511 0,2 0,102041 0,243243 0,172414 1,875 20,83\% This phenomenon happends because there are many programs used by Tanjung Perak so event distribution I needed for other branches especially if they are serving ship.    
\section[{Conclusion}]{Conclusion}\par
The seven criteria can be used as corporate consideration in decision making for program mapping from corporate operation region based on the criteria of: company reputation, conflict potency, income contribution, manpower absorption, business opportunity, region economic growth, even distribution and decision making of funds allocation based on set criteria. 
\section[{VI.}]{VI.} 
\section[{Suggestion}]{Suggestion}\par
This research recommends stated owned enterprises in indonesia to base their funds allocation and PKBL programs on beneficial criteria for stakeholders PKBL funds allocation pattern must be appropriate with priority and need scales from stakeholders perception To gain legitimacy, company may explain their PKBL activity into their annual reports and other company's documents to form corporate image \hyperref[b3]{(Branco \& Rodrigues, 2006;}\hyperref[b4]{Cerin, 2002)} and to ensure their stakeholders through national/regional/local media such as publicity, social activity, official website and other supporting activy. \hyperref[b0]{Abbot \& Monsen (1979)}   
\section[{Limitation}]{Limitation}\par
This research is a case study research, hence there are few limitations: (1) the result used primary data with perception measurement, and also originated from one company, (2) this research suffers bias in data interpretation and presenting facts because of author's subjectivity.\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png}
\caption{\label{fig_0}Figure 1 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2}\includegraphics[]{image-3.png}
\caption{\label{fig_2}Figure 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{43}\includegraphics[]{image-4.png}
\caption{\label{fig_3}Figure 4 . 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{44}\includegraphics[]{image-5.png}
\caption{\label{fig_4}Figure 4 . 4 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{5}\includegraphics[]{image-6.png}
\caption{\label{fig_6}Figure 5 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{7}\includegraphics[]{image-7.png}
\caption{\label{fig_7}Figure 7 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{9}\includegraphics[]{image-8.png}
\caption{\label{fig_8}Figure 9 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{3} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
b) Comparison Of Relative Value Between The\\
Alternatives For Each Criterion\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_2}Table 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{4} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.15675482487491066\textwidth}P{0.06197283774124375\textwidth}P{0.044960686204431735\textwidth}P{0.014581844174410292\textwidth}P{0.03584703359542531\textwidth}P{0.012151536812008578\textwidth}P{0.04313795568263045\textwidth}P{0.034631879914224444\textwidth}P{0.047390993566833454\textwidth}P{0.06622587562544675\textwidth}P{0.07959256611865617\textwidth}P{0.08870621872766261\textwidth}P{0.07047891350964974\textwidth}P{0.052859185132237314\textwidth}P{0.04070764832022873\textwidth}}
Criteria\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Reputattion}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Manpower absorption}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Conflict Potency\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Branch Income contribution}\tabcellsep Branch opportunity business\tabcellsep Growth Region Economic\tabcellsep Distributiion\tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep Mean\\
Reputation\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,064378}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,483871}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,021097\tabcellsep 0,011407\tabcellsep 0,098039\tabcellsep 0,057471\tabcellsep 0,93626\tabcellsep 0,13375\\
Manpower\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
absorption\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,012876}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,04}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,053763}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,021097\tabcellsep 0,019011\tabcellsep 0,098039\tabcellsep 0,011494\tabcellsep 0,25628\tabcellsep 0,03661\\
Conflict potency\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,021459}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,12}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,16129\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,738397\tabcellsep 0,171103\tabcellsep 0,098039\tabcellsep 0,172414\tabcellsep 1,48270\tabcellsep 0,21181\\
Branch Income\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Contribution\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,450644}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,28}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,032258}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,147679\tabcellsep 0,39924\tabcellsep 0,490196\tabcellsep 0,402299\tabcellsep 2,20232\tabcellsep 0,31462\\
Branch\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Opportuniy business}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,321888}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,12}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,053763}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,021097\tabcellsep 0,057034\tabcellsep 0,098039\tabcellsep 0,011494\tabcellsep 0,68332\tabcellsep 0,09762\\
Region Economic\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Growth\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,064378}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,04}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,16129\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,029536\tabcellsep 0,057034\tabcellsep 0,098039\tabcellsep 0,287356\tabcellsep 0,73763\tabcellsep 0,10538\\
Distribution\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,064378}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,053763}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,021097\tabcellsep 0,285171\tabcellsep 0,019608\tabcellsep 0,057471\tabcellsep 0,70149\tabcellsep 0,10021\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 7,00000\tabcellsep 1,00000\\
Reputation\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Emas}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Intan}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Banjarmas in}\tabcellsep Tanjung Wangi\tabcellsep Benoa\tabcellsep Kupang Sampit\tabcellsep Lembar\\
Tanjung Perak\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 7\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 6\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 6\tabcellsep 7\tabcellsep 6\tabcellsep 8\\
\multicolumn{4}{l}{Tanjung Emas 0,142857143}\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,333\tabcellsep 0,33333333 0,33333333\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0,33333333\tabcellsep 3\\
Tanjung Intan\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 5\\
Banjarmasin\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{0,166666667}\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,3333333}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0,33333333\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 3\\
Tanjung Wangi\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0,33333333\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 3\\
Benoa\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{0,166666667}\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 7\\
Kupang\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{0,142857143}\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,25\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,3333333}\tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0,33333333\tabcellsep 1\\
Sampit\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{0,166666667}\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,3333333}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 3\\
Lembar\tabcellsep 0,125\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{0,333333333}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{0,3333333 0,33333333 0,14285714}\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0,33333333\tabcellsep 1\\
Total\tabcellsep \multicolumn{7}{l}{2,310714286 26,33333333 13,316667}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{15,2 12,8666667 8,74285714}\tabcellsep 30\tabcellsep 22\tabcellsep 34\\
Reputatiton\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Perak}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Emas}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Intan}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Banjarma sin}\tabcellsep Tanjung Wangi\tabcellsep Benoa\tabcellsep Kupang Sampit Lembar Jumlah\tabcellsep mean\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_3}Table 4 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{5} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
ii. Manpower Absorption\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_4}Table 5 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{6} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.14220532319391632\textwidth}P{0.02585551330798479\textwidth}P{0.06463878326996197\textwidth}P{0.06463878326996197\textwidth}P{0.02262357414448669\textwidth}P{0.08726235741444867\textwidth}P{0.06787072243346008\textwidth}P{0.3070342205323194\textwidth}P{0.02262357414448669\textwidth}P{0.02262357414448669\textwidth}P{0.02262357414448669\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Reputation\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 19\%\tabcellsep 3\%\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{6\% 2\%}\tabcellsep 37\%\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Perak Tanjung Emas Tanjung Intan}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Banjarmasin}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Wangi}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Benoa}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 8\%\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{9\%}\tabcellsep 12\%\tabcellsep 4\%\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Kupang Sampit Lembar}\tabcellsep \\
Manpower absorption\tabcellsep Tanjung\tabcellsep Tanjung Emas\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Intan}\tabcellsep Banjarmas in\tabcellsep Tanjung Wangi\tabcellsep Benoa\tabcellsep Kupang\tabcellsep Sampit\tabcellsep Lembar\\
Tanjung Perak\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 7\\
Tanjung Emas\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_5}Table 6 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{7} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_6}Table 7 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{8} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_7}Table 8 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{9} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_9}Table 9 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{10} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_10}Table 10 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.19193548387096773\textwidth}P{0.006854838709677419\textwidth}P{0.006854838709677419\textwidth}P{0.006854838709677419\textwidth}P{0.006854838709677419\textwidth}P{0.006854838709677419\textwidth}P{0.006854838709677419\textwidth}P{0.5895161290322581\textwidth}P{0.006854838709677419\textwidth}P{0.006854838709677419\textwidth}P{0.006854838709677419\textwidth}P{0.006854838709677419\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{2}{l}{iv. Income Contribution}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Total\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 9\tabcellsep 1\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Perak}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Emas}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Intan}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Banjarmasin}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Wangi}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Benoa\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Kupang\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Sampit\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Lembar\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_12}24\% 14\% 32\% 5\% 6\% 2\% 10\% 3\% 4\% Conflict Potency}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{11} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_13}Table 11 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{12} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
This notion is understandable because the\\
portion is close to 50\%, while other branches is far\\
behind. Even for 5 branches, they arestill below 10\%:\\
Tanjung Wangi, Benoa, Kupang, Sampit and Lembar.\\
v. Branch Business Opportunity\\
Tanjung Perak is seen as the best option with\\
33.54\% value. Next is Banjarmasin (19.9\%), Tanjung\\
Emas (15.05\%) and Tanjung Intan (10.81\%). There is a\\
possibility that because Tanjung Perak has already\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_14}Table 12 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{13} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_15}Table 13 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{15} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_17}Table 15 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{16} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.14123867069486404\textwidth}P{0.0398036253776435\textwidth}P{0.08089123867069486\textwidth}P{0.05906344410876133\textwidth}P{0.02824773413897281\textwidth}P{0.02824773413897281\textwidth}P{0.05264350453172205\textwidth}P{0.0256797583081571\textwidth}P{0.08731117824773414\textwidth}P{0.033383685800604225\textwidth}P{0.0937311178247734\textwidth}P{0.07447129909365559\textwidth}P{0.05264350453172205\textwidth}P{0.05264350453172205\textwidth}}
Distribu\tabcellsep Tanjung\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Emas}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Intan}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Banjarmas in}\tabcellsep Tanjung Wangi\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Benoa\tabcellsep Kupang\tabcellsep Sampit\tabcellsep Lembar\\
Tanjung Perak\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,333333333}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,3333333}\tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,33333333\tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep 0,33333333\tabcellsep 0,2\\
Tanjung Emas\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{0,3333333 0,33333333}\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep 0,33333333\tabcellsep 0,2\\
Tanjung Intan\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,333333333}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,33333333 0,333333 0,33333333\tabcellsep 0,2\\
Banjarmasin\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,3333333}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{0,33333333 0,33333333}\tabcellsep 0,2\tabcellsep 0,33333333\tabcellsep 0,2\\
Tanjung Wangi\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 0,333333\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 0,333333\\
Benoa\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,333333333}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,33333333}\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0,333333\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0,333333\\
Kupang\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 3\\
Sampit\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0,33333333}\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0,333333\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0,333333\\
Lembar\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 0,333333\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 1\\
Total\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{33}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{7}{l}{21 23,533333 23,666667 8,73333333}\tabcellsep 15 3,266667 12,3333333\tabcellsep 5,8\\
Distribution\tabcellsep Tanjung Perak\tabcellsep Tanjung Emas\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Intan}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Banjarma sin}\tabcellsep Tanjung Wangi\tabcellsep Benoa\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Kupang Sampit Lembar Total}\tabcellsep mean\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_18}Table 16 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.05509259259259259\textwidth}P{0.2833333333333333\textwidth}P{0.01574074074074074\textwidth}P{0.02361111111111111\textwidth}P{0.035416666666666666\textwidth}P{0.01574074074074074\textwidth}P{0.03148148148148148\textwidth}P{0.019675925925925923\textwidth}P{0.003935185185185185\textwidth}P{0.3541666666666667\textwidth}P{0.003935185185185185\textwidth}P{0.003935185185185185\textwidth}P{0.003935185185185185\textwidth}}
tion\tabcellsep Perak\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
April\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Total\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 9\tabcellsep 1\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 9\%\tabcellsep 3\%\tabcellsep 11\%\tabcellsep 4\%\tabcellsep 30\%\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Tanjung Perak Tanjung Emas Tanjung Intan\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Banjarmasin\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2\%\tabcellsep 20\%\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Wangi Benoa}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 15\%\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Kupang\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 6\%\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Sampit Lembar\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{9}{l}{Figure 4.6 : PKBL Allocation Funds based on region economic growth}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_19}Region economic growth Opportunity}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{17} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.09381898454746136\textwidth}P{0.06567328918322296\textwidth}P{0.07693156732891833\textwidth}P{0.07880794701986756\textwidth}P{0.09850993377483443\textwidth}P{0.08818984547461368\textwidth}P{0.16136865342163353\textwidth}P{0.06754966887417219\textwidth}P{0.060982339955849896\textwidth}P{0.05816777041942605\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Distribution}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 9\%\tabcellsep 21\%\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{3\% 7\% 6\% 5\%}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Perak Tanjung Emas Tanjung Intan Banjarmasin}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{26\%}\tabcellsep 15\%\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Tanjung Wangi Benoa}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 8\%\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Kupang Sampit}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Lembar}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Keterangan\tabcellsep reputation\tabcellsep Manpower absorption\tabcellsep Conflict Potency\tabcellsep Contibution Income\tabcellsep business Branch Opportunity\tabcellsep growth Region economic\tabcellsep Distribution\tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep Mean\\
Tanjung Perak\tabcellsep 0,3417\tabcellsep 0,0648\tabcellsep 0,3560\tabcellsep 0,7007\tabcellsep 0,2292\tabcellsep 0,2213\tabcellsep 0,0184\tabcellsep 1,9321\tabcellsep 27,60\%\\
Tanjung Emas\tabcellsep 0,0351\tabcellsep 0,0552\tabcellsep 0,2044\tabcellsep 0,3734\tabcellsep 0,1028\tabcellsep 0,1101\tabcellsep 0,0500\tabcellsep 0,9311\tabcellsep 13,30\%\\
Tanjung Intan\tabcellsep 0,1109\tabcellsep 0,0225\tabcellsep 0,4781\tabcellsep 0,2625\tabcellsep 0,0739\tabcellsep 0,0413\tabcellsep 0,0425\tabcellsep 1,0316\tabcellsep 14,74\%\\
Banjarmasin\tabcellsep 0,0841\tabcellsep 0,0329\tabcellsep 0,0706\tabcellsep 0,2821\tabcellsep 0,1361\tabcellsep 0,1484\tabcellsep 0,0369\tabcellsep 0,7911\tabcellsep 11,30\%\\
Tanjung Wangi\tabcellsep 0,0788\tabcellsep 0,0108\tabcellsep 0,0978\tabcellsep 0,0621\tabcellsep 0,0188\tabcellsep 0,0165\tabcellsep 0,1053\tabcellsep 0,3901\tabcellsep 5,57\%\\
Benoa\tabcellsep 0,1775\tabcellsep 0,0343\tabcellsep 0,0322\tabcellsep 0,1640\tabcellsep 0,0412\tabcellsep 0,0636\tabcellsep 0,0551\tabcellsep 0,5678\tabcellsep 8,11\%\\
Kupang\tabcellsep 0,0267\tabcellsep 0,0081\tabcellsep 0,1454\tabcellsep 0,0799\tabcellsep 0,0138\tabcellsep 0,0225\tabcellsep 0,1823\tabcellsep 0,4786\tabcellsep 6,84\%\\
Sampit\tabcellsep 0,0581\tabcellsep 0,0093\tabcellsep 0,0404\tabcellsep 0,1463\tabcellsep 0,0408\tabcellsep 0,0849\tabcellsep 0,0650\tabcellsep 0,4447\tabcellsep 6,35\%\\
Lembar\tabcellsep 0,0233\tabcellsep 0,0185\tabcellsep 0,0579\tabcellsep 0,1314\tabcellsep 0,0268\tabcellsep 0,0289\tabcellsep 0,1461\tabcellsep 0,4329\tabcellsep 6,18\%\\
Total\tabcellsep 0,9363\tabcellsep 0,2563\tabcellsep 1,4827\tabcellsep 2,2023\tabcellsep 0,6833\tabcellsep 0,7376\tabcellsep 0,7015\tabcellsep 7,0000\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_20}Table 17 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_21}}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XII Issue VII Version I © 2012 Global Journals Inc. (US)} 		 		\backmatter  			 
\subsection[{April}]{April}\par
Based on Figure  {\ref 8}, it can be seen that PKBL funds allocation for each branch can be classified into three groups: first group is 3rd class PKBL fund which are: Tanjung Wangi, Benoa, Kupang, Sampit and Lembar (5 branches), where each branch only holds value less than 8\% from total PKBL budget by PT. Pelindo III (Persero). If totaled, these branches will only receive 33\% from PKBL funds. While the second group is 2nd class for the following branches: Tanjung Emas, Tanjung Intan and Banjarmasin (3 branches), where each branch only holds to 15\% or less from PKBL funds. Meanwhile, these are 5 criteria with logical connection from: reputation, income contribution, conflict potency, branch business opportunity, manpower absorption and region economic growth. If a certain branch has a high conflict potency so it will need bigger PKBL fund. If the effect of fund in muffling conflict is on point, it will influence company repitation and increase PT. Pelindo III(Persero) profit, because safe harbour will help the customers feel safe either.\par
From different perspective, this safe situation will directly help branch business development and also increase region economic growth. Economic increase and business development will be very effective if this branch is in area with rapid economic growth potency, such as Tanjung Perak. This is shown by quantitative analysis result numerically that in these 5 criteria, Tanjung Perak has always been the branch with highest score. The summary for each branch and each criteria can be seen from Table  {\ref 4} 			 			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Choi]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		\textit{},  		 			Jong-Seo Choi 		.  		 	 
\bibitem[Cerin ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		\textit{},  		 			P Cerin 		.  	 	 		\textit{Communication in Corporate Environmental Management}  		2002. 9 p. .  	 
\bibitem[ World Business Council for Sustainability Developement ()]{b18}\label{b18} 	 		\textit{},  	 	 		\textit{World Business Council for Sustainability Developement}  		2005. WBCSD.  	 
\bibitem[Anderson ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		‘A Multi-Tactic Approach to Manage Weed Population Dynamics in Crop Rotations’.  		 			R Anderson 		.  	 	 		\textit{Agronomy journal}  		2005. 97  (6)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Anderson et al. ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		\textit{An Introduction to Management Science, Quantitative Approaches to Decision making},  		 			D R Anderson 		,  		 			D J Sweeney 		,  		 			T A Williams 		.  		2003. Mason, Ohio: South Western. p. .  	 	 (10th ed.) 
\bibitem[Eklington ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		\textit{Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21aacaentury Bussiness},  		 			J Eklington 		.  		1997. Oxford, Ux K: Capstone.  	 
\bibitem[Yin ()]{b19}\label{b19} 	 		\textit{Case Study Research Design and Method},  		 			R Yin 		.  		2003. California: Sage Publication.  	 	 (2nd Edition) 
\bibitem[Kwak and Choe (2010)]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		\textit{Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from Korea},  		 			Young-Min Kwak 		,  		 			Chongwoo Choe 		.  		2010. April 2010. 22159 p. 6.  		 			Pusan National University, Pusan National University, Monash University 		 	 
\bibitem[Branco et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		‘CSR and Resource Based-Percpectives’.  		 			M Branco 		,  		 			L Dan 		,  		 			Rodrigues 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Business Ethics}  		2006. 69 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Silberhorn and Warren ()]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		‘Defining Corporate Social Responsibility, A View from Big Companies in Germany and UK’.  		 			R Silberhorn 		,  		 			Warren 		.  	 	 		\textit{European Business Review}  		2007. 19  (5)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Arruda et al. ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘Ethical Standards in Advertising: A Worldwide Perspective’.  		 			De Arruda 		,  		 			Maria Cecilia Coutinho 		,  		 			Dan De Aruda 		,  		 			Marcelo Leme 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Business ethics}  		1999. 19 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Sumardiyono ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		‘Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Community Development Dalam Perolehan Proper Hijau (Studi Kasus di PT. Pupuk Kaltim Bontang), tesis, Magister Ilmu Lingkungan, Undip Semarang 17. Tilt, C. A, 1994’.  		 			E Sumardiyono 		.  	 	 		\textit{Accounting, Auditing and Accountibility Journal}  		2007. 7  (4)  p. .  	 	 (The Influence of External Presure Groups on Corporate Social Disclosure, Some Empirical Evidence) 
\bibitem[Juholin ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		‘For Business or The Good of All? A Finnish Approach to CSR’.  		 			E Juholin 		.  	 	 		\textit{Corporate Governance Journal}  		2004. 4  (3) .  	 
\bibitem[Hair et al. ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		\textit{Funds Allocation Mapping and Corporate Social Responsibility Program (Program Kemitraan Dan Bina Lingkungan-Pkbl): Case in Indonesia 11},  		 			J F Hair 		,  		 			R E Anderson 		,  		 			R Tathan 		,  		 			W C Black 		.  		1995. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.  	 	 (Multivariate Data Analysis, Fourth Edition) 
\bibitem[Abbot and Monsen ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		‘On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self-Reported an Methode of Measurement Corporate Social Involvement’.  		 			W F Abbot 		,  		 			R J Monsen 		.  	 	 		\textit{Academy of Management Journal}  		1979. 22 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Dowling and Pfeffer ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behaviour’.  		 			J Dowling 		,  		 			J Pfeffer 		.  	 	 		\textit{Pacific Sociological Review}  		1975. 18 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Uriarte (2008)]{b17}\label{b17} 	 		 			F Uriarte 		.  		\textit{Corporate Social Responsibility in ASEAN, LCF CSR CONFERENCE},  				 (Manila, Philippines)  		2008. July 2008. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Indonesia ()]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		\textit{UU Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas},  		 			Pemerintah Indonesia 		.  		2007.  	 
\bibitem[Moir ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		‘What Do We Mean By Corporate Social Responsibility ?’.  		 			L Moir 		.  	 	 		\textit{Corporate governance Journal}  		2001. 1  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Fombrun and Shanley ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		‘What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy’.  		 			C Fombrun 		,  		 			M Shanley 		.  	 	 		\textit{Academy of Management Journal}  		1990. 33  (2)  p. .  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
