\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={The Importance Of Impact In Organizational Changes On Management Accounting Change (Case Study Of Iranian Manufacturing Firms)},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2011-11 2011-10-19 (revised: November 2011 19 October 2011)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2011-11 2011-10-19}
\title{The Importance Of Impact In Organizational Changes On Management Accounting Change (Case Study Of Iranian Manufacturing Firms)}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Dr. Morteza  Ramazni}

             \affil[1]{  Faculty Member of Payame Noor University, Abhar Center, Zanjan, Iran}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 13 September 2011 Accepted: 8 October 2011 Published: 19 October 2011}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


Organizations involve technical chnges, humen sources development, and competitive markets. The purpose of this research is studying the amount importance of impact of Manufacturing firms changes on management accounting change. Present research has 4 independent variables that include 1- new accountants 2- new packaging 3- new products 4- weak financial performance which the method of this research is descriptive- survey and in applied kind that researcher uses to reach the research objectives 4 independent variables by use of testing effect on each one of the research variable on management accounting change and friedmon test for studying equal effect of variables and for studing effect of the case study firms size has used ANOVA variance analyze test. Result of the research indirect the effect of variables of research and firms size on the new packaging and weak performance.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{Management Accounting Changeh, Organizational Chnges, Manufacturing Firms, Iran}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{INTRODUCTION}]{INTRODUCTION}\par
anagers of firms product are under pressure to find the equilibrium ways for decreasing costs and improving quality, along with preserving profitability. In developed countries, firms couldn't beat these challenges, have stopped their operations of have been bought by other firms. Example of this situation occurred for one firm of 100 big Manufacturing firms in Australia between 1988 to 1993  {\ref (Adler and et, 2000)}.\par
Since 1985 discussion in academic and executive circles is about this object that in many Manufacturing firms, costing system isn't responsible for information requirements and analyzing for decisionmaking, and some times is argued that the costing systems are big obstacle in persormance of the new technology and perception of firms competitive advantage.\par
Procedures and new management philosophies, especially total quality management and system production just in time in many developed countries and some develoing countries, as well chnge in information technology, economic, business arena, has been significant impact in style of produce of products and style of function in costing stystems. And the new techniques like activing based costing, objective costing, life cycle costing, quality costing report, and strategic management account has invented and used.\par
There fore, despite the fact that firms for improvement their competitive advantage have performed new management methods that require change in the Manufacturing method and also in Manufacturing tool. But costing systems, thus face sever criticisms. In this article, along with brief review on management accounting literature evaluated studying the anount of importance of firms organizational changes that we evaluated 4 independent variables to reach research: 1.\par
New accountants 2.\par
New packaging 3.\par
New products 4.\par
Weak financial performance II. 
\section[{MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING CHANGE}]{MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING CHANGE}\par
Management accounting seeks to meet the decision needs of an entity's managers. In recent years, entities have been experiencing significant change in their organizational designs, their competitive environments and in their information technologies. In particular, developments in information technology have brought about innovation and change in the collection and analysis of information within and between organizations. Such change has implications for management accounting and management accounting change is potentially an integral part of organizational life in today's global and technology driven society. Almost twenty years ago,  {\ref Hopwood (1987: 207)} argued that 'very little is known of the processes of accounting change'. Subsequent studies have attempted to address this shortfall, for example  {\ref Pettigrew et al., 1992;}\hyperref[b12]{Cooper, 1990;}\hyperref[b34]{Scapens and Roberts, 1993;}\hyperref[b2]{Argyris and Kaplan, 1994;} {\ref Anderson, 1995;} {\ref Shields, 1995} Much has been written on the changing nature of management accounting practice \hyperref[b5]{(Bhimani, 1996;}\hyperref[b35]{Shields, 1997;}\hyperref[b9]{Burns and Vaivio, 2001)}. New management accounting techniques have emerged \hyperref[b6]{(Bjoornenak and Olson, 1999)} in response to changing business environments, along with new organizational designs, new information technologies and new competitive environments. Management accounting changes are usually viewed as arising out of economic imperatives.\par
In addition, the consequences of accounting technologies are often reduced to a logic of economic incentives and rational economic behavior. This perspective, however, fails to recognize that the origins and application of accounting techniques are not shaped by economic logic alone, but involve far more wide-ranging influences such as changing social, economic and political conditions \hyperref[b7]{(Burchell et al., 1980;} {\ref Neimark and Tinker, 1986;}\hyperref[b15]{Hopwood, 1987;}\hyperref[b32]{Preston, 1992;}\hyperref[b26]{Miller and O'Leary, 1990)}.\par
Studies of the process of accounting change address a number of issues, including the management of the process of change  {\ref (Pettigrew et al., 1992;}\hyperref[b12]{Cooper, 1990;}\hyperref[b34]{Scapens and Roberts, 1993;}\hyperref[b2]{Argyris and Kaplan, 1994;} {\ref Anderson, 1995;} {\ref Shields, 1995;}\hyperref[b1]{Anderson and Young, 1999)}; resistance to accounting change \hyperref[b34]{(Scapens and Roberts, 1993;}\hyperref[b25]{Markus, 1983;} {\ref Dent, 1991)}; and the role of technology in the implementation of new accounting systems  {\ref (Markus and Pfeffer,1983;}\hyperref[b30]{Orlikowski and Robey, 1991;}\hyperref[b29]{Orlikowski, 1992}). Many of these empirical studies again illustrate the complex sociotechnical forces that influence the process of accounting change. More recently,  offer a new framework for analyzing management accounting change which draws upon old institutional economics and structuration theory. 
\section[{III.}]{III.} 
\section[{ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE}]{ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE}\par
Case studies have presented the reorganization of the organizational structure as a facilitator for management accounting change . These findings are confirmed by field research (Laitinen, 2001; \hyperref[b23]{Luther and Longden, 2001)}. In contrast to these findings \hyperref[b11]{Cobb et al. (1995)} see that changed priorities hinder management accounting improvement. Because a changing organizational structure needs management capacities and is also followed by changed priorities, we see in these changes a barrier to management accounting change. The existing management accounting system must be adapted to the new organizational form and an improvement of methods or technology is hindered.\par
IV. 
\section[{LITERATURE REVIEW}]{LITERATURE REVIEW}\par
The basic purpose of accounting information is to help users make decisions. Management accounting is the branch of accounting that produces information for managers and forms an important integral part of the strategic process within an organisation. It involves the process of identifying, measuring, accumulating, analysing, preparing, interpreting, and communicating information that helps managers fulfill organizational objectives (Horngren, Sundem, Stratton, Burgstahler, \& Schatzberg, 2007). Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (UK) (2000) views management accounting as an integral part of management which requires the identification, generation, presentation, interpretation and use of information relevant to formulating business strategy, planning and controlling activities, decisionmaking, efficient resource usage, and performance improvement and value enhancement.\par
Since Hopwood (1987) asked for further research into accounting change there have been several studies which analyze aspects of management accounting change. \hyperref[b22]{Libby and Waterhouse (1996)} detected that little is known about the forces which induce or act to impede management accounting systems change. \hyperref[b3]{Atkinson et al. (1997)} saw one extremely fertile area for research in a systematic inquiry into facilitators and barriers.\par
Yakhou and Dorweiler (1995) recommended further research into why some companies are slower than others in adopting management accounting innovations. One of the first evidence based studies was published by , who identified in seven case studies, factors which cause management accounting change. In these findings \hyperref[b11]{Cobb et al. (1995)} missed the consideration of barriers-factors which hinder or prevent change and therefore developed an accounting change model based on a case study of a bank. Overall the processes of change are forced by a combination of random, systematic and internal factors .\par
In our study we test drivers and barriers that influence management accounting change.\par
We focus on a single industry, due to the fact that a single industry analysis has substantially higher internal validity than a cross-sectional analysis \hyperref[b20]{(Ittner et al., 2003)}. We selected the banking industry because \hyperref[b20]{Ittner et al. (2003)} argued that financial services firms are actively discussing their choice of performance measures and value drivers. Although banks have developed better measures for dealing with risks than other industries \hyperref[b4]{(Beasley et al., 2005)}. \hyperref[b36]{Williams and Seaman (2001)} found that the determinants of management accounting change cannot be generalized from the manufacturing and industrial sectors to the service sector. Also Al-Omiri and Drury (2007) reported that the financial services sector differs from other V. 
\section[{RESEARCH OBJECTIVES}]{RESEARCH OBJECTIVES}\par
This research is followed these objectives 1. Studying effective amount of organizational changes in management accounting changes in Manufacturing firms.\par
VI. 
\section[{RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS}]{RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS}\par
1. New accountants impact on managemen accounting change 2. New packaging impact on managemen accounting change 3. New products impact on managemen accounting change 4. Weak financial performance impact on managemen accounting change VII. 
\section[{RESEARCH METHODOLOGY}]{RESEARCH METHODOLOGY}\par
In this article, research methodology is descriptive-survey and in applied. In the direction of entrance to research district has also used field metod. In the direction of gathering required information in research has been also driven profit two primary and secondary data categories that in direction of secondary data, documents, evidences, books, articles, internet searching motors and cvonneted sites are collective circle. Techniques of interview and questionnaire have also used for gathering primary. Research data at statistical society simultaneously.\par
Random classified sampling method has been applied in the direction of selection of sample volume that in this research firm on base of firm size, small (under 10 individual forces), medium (10 to 50 individuals), large (50 to 150 individuals), extensively large (more than 150 individuals) firm are selected.\par
Research scientific society, active Manufacturing firms that the number 150 questionnaire is sent, that the number 112 questionnaire and their answers has made criterion for resulting of researcher.\par
Statictical analyze has been performed in two parts: descriptive and inferential. In the descriptive part, first for general identification case study sample (gender, age, experience of work, study of field, educational degree and number of human forces) frequency table of forming and approximately case study samples have described.\par
In inferential analyze part by use of test has paid to comparision of observed average of hypothesis seperatly.\par
If observer average, obtained average of study dample for all hypotheses is significaty is bigger than theroretical average (  With regard to values of table No.2 value P-value= 0/00 hypothesis zero in the level of error 5 percent is rejected. Means observed average is more equal than 3 and as partical average is more than 3 means theoretical average, thus can result that observed average (3.8214) is significantly more than 3.\par
In the other words in level of error 5 percent, researcher's hypothesis is accepted. Then could said that new packaging impact on managemen accounting change. c) Third hypothesis test : Avarage is less than number 3 (new products hasn't impact on management accounting change!)\par
: Avarage is more equal number 3 (new products impact on management accounting change!)\par
With regard to values of table No.2 value P-value= 0/00 hypothesis zero in the level of error 5 percent is rejected. Means observed average is more equal than 3 and as partical average is more than 3 means theoretical average, thus can result that observed average (3.8571) is significantly more than 3.\par
In the other words, in the level of error 5 percent, researcher's hypothesis is accepted. Then could said that new products impact on managemen accounting change. d) Fourth hypothesis test : Avarage is less than number 3 (weak financial performance hasn't impact on management accounting change!)\par
: Avarage is more equal number 3 (weak financial performance has effect om management accounting change!)\par
With regard to values of table No.2 value P-value= 0/00 hypothesis zero in the level of error 5 percent is rejected. Means observed average is more equal than 3 and as partical average is more than 3 means theoretical average, thus can result that observed average (3.9286) is significantly more than 3.\par
In the other words in the level of error 5 percent, researcher's hypothesis is accepted. Then could said that weak financial performance has effect on managemen accounting change. 
\section[{e) Testing equalization of research independent variables}]{e) Testing equalization of research independent variables}\par
For priovitizing and determining importance on each one of the research independent variables (factors involved in prevention of management accounting change) friedman's test has been used. This test suggestes that is there between rstraining factors, a factor of other factors more important or all equal in importance.  {\ref Researcher}   
\section[{RESEARCH FINDS AND RESULTS}]{RESEARCH FINDS AND RESULTS}\par
This article has followed presentation of surveying research results of active Manufacturing firms. Selected firms, also are small, medium, large and extensively large. Practiced results of testing research hypothesis indicate organizational changes have more important in management acoounting change.\par
For studying equalization of impact on research independent variables that has been used fridman test indicate that impact of research independent variables in equal.\par
In the direction of recognization impact of research main variables by firm size use ANOVA parametric that results of test indicate in the line with second and fourth variables (new packaging and weak financial performance).\par
In a general result could said that in Iranian firms 4 independent variables are more important in management accounting change and so, firms must attention to the new methods of management accounting defore their organizational changes. Because by entrance of the new products by oackaging and new facilities else old costing methods for decisionmaking aren't useful, firms, therefore for ncreasing competitive power in market and industry impose cost of management accounting change for themselves to use its benefit in future.\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{53}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png}
\caption{\label{fig_0}1+2+3+4+5 5 = 3}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
November 2011 1 industries significantly. Because Helliar et al. (2002) found that development in banks' profitability reporting systems was different from that in other industries, we have to discuss which factors mentioned in previous research into other industries are relevant for the banking industry. There are some earlier studies about management accounting design which also focused on the banking industry (e.g. Cobb et al., 1995; Grimmer, 2003; Helliar et al., 2002; Hussain and Hoque, 2002; Ittner et al., 2003). Luther and Longden (2001) showed that motives for management accounting change can differ from country to country. To avoid national bias, we focus our study on a specific language area.\end{longtable} \par
  {\small\itshape [Note: ©2011 Global Journals Inc. (US)]} 
\caption{\label{tab_1}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{No} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.05144429160935351\textwidth}P{0.008768913342503439\textwidth}P{0.015199449793672626\textwidth}P{0.03624484181568088\textwidth}P{0.6050550206327373\textwidth}P{0.033906464924346624\textwidth}P{0.009353507565337002\textwidth}P{0.016953232462173312\textwidth}P{0.018707015130674003\textwidth}P{0.05436726272352132\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Table No.2, T Test Statistics}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Description\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep n\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Std\tabcellsep t\tabcellsep d.f\tabcellsep Test Value\tabcellsep P-value\tabcellsep Result\tabcellsep \\
Hypotheses\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
First Hypothesis\tabcellsep 112\tabcellsep 3.4286\tabcellsep 0.94644\tabcellsep 4.792\tabcellsep 111\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 0.000\tabcellsep Accept\tabcellsep \\
Second Hypothesis Third Hypothesis Forth Hypothesis\tabcellsep 112 112 112\tabcellsep 3.8214 3.8571 3.9286\tabcellsep 0.76186 0.64175 0.80218\tabcellsep 11.410 14.135 12.250\tabcellsep 111 111 111\tabcellsep 3 3 3\tabcellsep 0.000 0.000 0.000\tabcellsep Accept Accept Accept\tabcellsep November 2011\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{5}{l}{1, Frequency of Firms Size Percent Frequency 3.6 4 50. 56 25 28 21.4 24 100 112 STATISTICAL ANALYZE a) First hypothesis test Firm Size >10 10 to 50 50 to 150 more than 150 Total VIII. H 0 : Avarage is less than number 3 (new accountants hasn't impact on management accounting changes!) H 1 : Avarage is more equal number 3 (new accountants impact on management accounting changes!) With regard to values of table No.2 value P-value= 0/00 hypothesis zero in level of error 5\% is rejected. Means observed average is more equal than 3 and as partical average is more than 3 means theoretical average, thus can result that observed average (3.4286) is significantly more than 3. On the other words in level of error 5 percent, researcher's hypothesis is accepted. Then could said that new accountants impact on managemen accounting change. b) Second hypothesis test H 0 : Avarage is less than number 2 (new}\tabcellsep Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XI Issue XI Version I\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{5}{l}{packaging hasn't impact on management accounting}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{change!)}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{H 1 : Avarage is more equal number 2 (new}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{5}{l}{packaging impact on management accounting change!)}\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_2}Table No .}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.08587628865979381\textwidth}P{0.1034020618556701\textwidth}P{0.10398625429553264\textwidth}P{0.36103092783505153\textwidth}P{0.030962199312714777\textwidth}P{0.03446735395189004\textwidth}P{0.04147766323024055\textwidth}P{0.033298969072164945\textwidth}P{0.016357388316151203\textwidth}P{0.03914089347079038\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{2}{l}{f) ANOVA Variance Analyze}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{Table No, 5 ANOVA Test}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Independent Variable\tabcellsep Source of Changing\tabcellsep Sum of Squares\tabcellsep df\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Mean square}\tabcellsep F\tabcellsep \tabcellsep P -Value\tabcellsep Result\\
New Accountants\tabcellsep Between Groups Within Groups\tabcellsep 1.524 97.905\tabcellsep 3 108\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0.508 0.907}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0.560}\tabcellsep 0.642\tabcellsep Reject\\
\tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 99.429\tabcellsep 111\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep Between Groups\tabcellsep 9.000\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{3.000}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{5.845}\tabcellsep 0.001\tabcellsep Accept\\
New Packaging\tabcellsep Within Groups\tabcellsep 55.905\tabcellsep 108\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0.513}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 64.429\tabcellsep 111\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep Between Groups\tabcellsep 0.857\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0.286}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{.688}\tabcellsep 0.561\tabcellsep Reject\\
New Products\tabcellsep Within Groups\tabcellsep 44.429\tabcellsep 108\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0.415}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 45.714\tabcellsep 111\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Weak Financial Performance\tabcellsep Between Groups Within Groups\tabcellsep 10.952 60.476\tabcellsep 3 108\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{3.651 0.560}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{6.520}\tabcellsep 0.000\tabcellsep Accept\\
\tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 71.429\tabcellsep 111\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{has used for test following}\\
IX.\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{reject and claim hypothesies: : Independent factors of research}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{(organizational changes factors in management}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{accounting change) for impact have equal importance!}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{: Independent factors of research}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{(organizational changes factors in management}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{accounting change) for impact haven't equal}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{importance!}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{With regard to table No.3 value df=3, P-value=}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{0/00 and prepared value chi-square= 34.557 could}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{resulted that acceptance at meaningful lavel 5\%}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{hypothesis}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{and hypothesis}\tabcellsep is rejected, Means\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{research independent variables (factors involved in}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{prevention of management accounting change) for}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{effect have equal importance could shown ranking order}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{of independent variables in table No.4.}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{5}{l}{Table No.3 Friedman Test Statistics}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep N\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 112\\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Chi-Square}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 34.557\\
\tabcellsep df\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{P-value}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep .000\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{5}{l}{Table No.4, Mean Ranking of Variable}\tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{Independent Variables Descriptive}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Weak financial performance}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{New packaging}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{New products}\tabcellsep New accountants\\
\tabcellsep Mean Rank\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4.19\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4.12\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{3.78}\tabcellsep 4.08\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_3}}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{© 2011 Global Journals Inc. (US)} 			\footnote{The Importance Of Impact In Organizational Changes On Management Accounting Change (Case Study Of Iranian Manufacturing Firms)} 			\footnote{The Importance Of Impact In Organizational Changes On Management Accounting Change (Case Study Of Iranian Manufacturing Firms) ©2011 Global Journals Inc. (US) Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume XI Issue XI Version I November 2011 1} 		 		\backmatter   			 
\subsection[{This page is intentionally left blank}]{This page is intentionally left blank}\par
The Importance Of Impact In Organizational Changes On Management Accounting Change (Case Study Of Iranian Manufacturing Firms) 			  			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Accounting]{b21}\label{b21} 	 		\textit{},  		 			Accounting 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00033-3}{10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00033-3}.  	 	 		\textit{Organizations and Society}  		28  (7-8)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[ Organizations and Society]{b28}\label{b28} 	 		\textit{},  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90038-9}{10.1016/0361-3682(87)90038-9}.  	 	 		\textit{Organizations and Society}  		12  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Atkinson et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		\textit{},  		 			A A Atkinson 		,  		 			R Balakrishnan 		,  		 			P Booth 		,  		 			J M Cote 		,  		 			T Groot 		,  		 			T Malmi 		,  		 			H Roberts 		,  		 			E Uliana 		,  		 			A Wu 		.  	 	 		\textit{New Directions in Management Accounting Research. Journal of Management Accounting Research}  		1997. 9 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Burns and Vaivio ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		\textit{},  		 			J Burns 		,  		 			J Vaivio 		.  	 	 		\textit{Management Accounting Research}  		2001. 12 p. .  	 	 (Management Accounting Change) 
\bibitem[Helliar et al. ()]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		‘A longitudinal case study of profitability reporting in a bank’.  		 			C Helliar 		,  		 			I Cobb 		,  		 			J Innes 		.  		 doi: 10.1006./bare.2001.0180.  	 	 		\textit{British Accounting Review}  		2002. 34 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Al-Omiri and Drury ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		‘A survey of factors influencing the choice of product costing systems in UK organizations’.  		 			M Al-Omiri 		,  		 			C Drury 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2007.02.002}{10.1016/j.mar.2007.02.002}.  	 	 		\textit{Management Accounting Research In Press, Corrected Proof}  		2007.  	 
\bibitem[Scapens and Roberts ()]{b34}\label{b34} 	 		‘Accounting control: a case study of resistance to accounting change’.  		 			R W Scapens 		,  		 			J Roberts 		.  	 	 		\textit{Management Accounting Research}  		1993. 4  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Yakhou and Dorweiler ()]{b37}\label{b37} 	 		‘Advanced Cost Management Systems: An Empirical Comparison of England, France, and the United States’.  		 			M Yakhou 		,  		 			V P Dorweiler 		.  	 	 		\textit{Advances in International Accounting}  		1995. 8 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ittner and Larcker ()]{b19}\label{b19} 	 		‘Assessing empirical research in managerial ccounting: a value-based management perspective’.  		 			C D Ittner 		,  		 			D F Larcker 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00026-X)}{10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00026-X)}.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Accounting and Economics}  		2001. 32  (1-3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Bhimani ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		 			A Bhimani 		.  		\textit{Management Accounting: European Perspectives},  				 (Oxford)  		1996. Oxford University Press.  	 
\bibitem[Burns and Scapens ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework’.  		 			J Burns 		,  		 			R W Scapens 		.  	 	 		\textit{Management Accounting Research}  		2000. 11 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Burns and Scapens ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		‘Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework’.  		 			J Burns 		,  		 			R W Scapens 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/mare.1999.0119}{10.1006/mare.1999.0119}.  	 	 		\textit{Management Accounting Research}  		2000. 11  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Beasley et al. ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		‘Enterprise risk management: an empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation’.  		 			M S Beasley 		,  		 			R Clune 		,  		 			D R Hermanson 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.10.001}{10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.10.001}.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Accounting and Public Policy}  		2005. 24  (6)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Grimmer ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		\textit{Gesamtbanksteuerungtheoretische und empirische Analyse des Status Quo in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz, Dissertation Wirtschaftswissenschaften},  		 			J U Grimmer 		.  		 urn:nbn:de:hbz:464-duett- 08162003-0100197.  		2003. Duisburg, Essen.  		 			Universität Duisburg-Essen 		 	 
\bibitem[Horngren et al. ()]{b38}\label{b38} 	 		 			C Horngren 		,  		 			G Sundem 		,  		 			W Stratton 		,  		 			D Burgstahler 		,  		 			J Schatzberg 		.  		\textit{Introduction to Management Accounting},  				 (New Jersey)  		2007. Pearson Prentice Hall.  	 	 (14th ed.) 
\bibitem[Cooper ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		‘Implementing an Activity-Based Cost System’.  		 			R Cooper 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Cost Management}  		1990. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Argyris and Kaplan ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		\textit{Implementing New Knowledge: The Case of Activity Based Costing, Accounting Horizons},  		 			C Argyris 		,  		 			R S Kaplan 		.  		1994. 8 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Orlikowski and Robey ()]{b30}\label{b30} 	 		‘Information technology and the structuring of organizations’.  		 			W J Orlikowski 		,  		 			D Robey 		.  	 	 		\textit{Information Systems Research}  		1991. 2  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Pettigrew ()]{b31}\label{b31} 	 		‘Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice’.  		 			A M Pettigrew 		.  	 	 		\textit{Organization Science}  		1990. 1  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Miller and Leary ()]{b26}\label{b26} 	 		‘Making Accountancy Practical, Accounting’.  		 			P Miller 		,  		 			T Leary 		.  	 	 		\textit{Organizations and Society}  		1990. 15  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Cobb et al. ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		‘Management accounting change in a bank’.  		 			I Cobb 		,  		 			C Helliar 		,  		 			J Innes 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/mare.1995.1009}{10.1006/mare.1995.1009}.  	 	 		\textit{Management Accounting Research}  		1995. 6  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Luther and Longden ()]{b23}\label{b23} 	 		‘Management accounting in companies adapting to structural change and volatility in transition economies: a South African study’.  		 			R G Luther 		,  		 			S Longden 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/mare.2001.0163}{10.1006/mare.2001.0163}.  	 	 		\textit{Management Accounting Research}  		2001. 12  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ittner et al. ()]{b20}\label{b20} 	 		\textit{Performance implications of strategic perfomrance measurement in financial services firms},  		 			C D Ittner 		,  		 			D F Larcker 		,  		 			T Randall 		.  		2003.  	 
\bibitem[Markus and Pfeffer ()]{b24}\label{b24} 	 		‘Power and the design and implementation of accounting and control systems’.  		 			M L Markus 		,  		 			J Pfeffer 		.  	 	 		\textit{Accounting, Organizations and Society}  		1983. 8  (2/3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Markus (1983)]{b25}\label{b25} 	 		‘Power, Politics and MIS Implementation’.  		 			M L Markus 		.  	 	 		\textit{Communication of A.C.M}  		1983. June. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Libby and Waterhouse ()]{b22}\label{b22} 	 		‘Predicting Change in Management Accounting Systems’.  		 			T Libby 		,  		 			J H Waterhouse 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Management Accounting Research}  		1996. 8 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Williams and Seaman ()]{b36}\label{b36} 	 		‘Predicting change in management accounting systems: national culture and industry effects. Accounting’.  		 			J J Williams 		,  		 			A E Seaman 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00002-2)}{10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00002-2)}.  	 	 		\textit{Organizations and Society}  		2001. 26  (4-5)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Shields ()]{b35}\label{b35} 	 		‘Research in Management Accounting by North Americans in the 1990s’.  		 			M D Shields 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Management Accounting Research}  		1997. 9 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Hopwood ()]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		‘The archaeology of accounting systems’.  		 			A G Hopwood 		.  	 	 		\textit{Accounting, Organizations and Society}  		1987. 12  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Preston ()]{b32}\label{b32} 	 		‘The Birth of Clinical Accounting: A Study of the Emergence and Transformations of Discourses on Costs and Practices of Accounting in U’.  		 			A M Preston 		.  	 	 		\textit{S. Hospitals, Accounting, Organizations and Society}  		1992.  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Orlikowski ()]{b29}\label{b29} 	 		‘The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations’.  		 			W J Orlikowski 		.  	 	 		\textit{Organization Science}  		1992. 3  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Anderson and Young ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘The Impact of Contextual and Process Factors on the Evaluation of Activity-Based Costing Systems, Accounting’.  		 			S W Anderson 		,  		 			S M Young 		.  	 	 		\textit{Organizations and Society}  		1999. 24 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Innes and Mitchell ()]{b17}\label{b17} 	 		‘The Process of Change in Management Accounting: Some Field Study Evidence’.  		 			J Innes 		,  		 			F Mitchell 		.  	 	 		\textit{Management Accounting Research}  		1990. 1 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Innes and Mitchell ()]{b18}\label{b18} 	 		‘The process of change in management accounting: some fields study evidence’.  		 			J Innes 		,  		 			F Mitchell 		.  	 	 		\textit{Management Accounting Research}  		1990. 1 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Burchell et al. ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘The Roles of Accounting in Organizations and Society, Accounting’.  		 			S Burchell 		,  		 			C Clubb 		,  		 			A Hopwood 		,  		 			J Hughes 		.  	 	 		\textit{Organizations and Society}  		1980. 5  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Niemark and Tinker ()]{b27}\label{b27} 	 		\textit{The Social Construction of Management Control Systems, Accounting, Organizations and Society},  		 			M Niemark 		,  		 			T Tinker 		.  		1986. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Bjoornenak and Olson ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘Unbundling Management Accounting Innovations’.  		 			T Bjoornenak 		,  		 			O Olson 		.  	 	 		\textit{Management Accounting Research}  		1999. 10 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Hopwood and Hoque ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		‘Understanding non-financial performance measurement practices in Japanese banks: A new institutional sociology perspective’.  		 			A G. ; M M Hopwood 		,  		 			Z Hoque 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570210425583}{10.1108/09513570210425583}.  	 	 		\textit{The archeology of accounting systems. Accounting, 18. Hussain},  				1987. 2002. 15 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Quattrone and Hopper ()]{b33}\label{b33} 	 		‘What does organizational change mean? Speculations on a taken for granted category’.  		 			P Quattrone 		,  		 			T Hopper 		.  	 	 		\textit{Management Accounting Research}  		2001. 12 p. .  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
