DI refers to net inflows of investment in an economy of a country. It is the sum of equity capital, reinvestment of earnings, long term and short term capital. It usually involves participation in management, joint ventures, transfer of technology and experience. GDP refers to the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given period. It is often considered an indicator of growth and standard of living for a country. Inflation when the price of most goods and services continues to rise upward. It is measured by the consumer price index (CPI). SAARC the South Asian Association for regional cooperation is an organization of south Asian nations. It was founded in December 1985 and dedicated to economic, technological, social and cultural development by emphasizing collective self reliance. Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives and Sri Lanka are its founding members. Afghanistan joined the SAARC in 2005. Its head quarter is in Kathmandu, Nepal. The SAARC region is the home of fifth humanity with vast natural and human resources. It has the potential of becoming a vibrant region in the world by its resources like manpower, technological, agricultural and mineral assets further it has an attractiveness for tourism and historical art and cultural civilization.
Author : MBAE , E-mail : [email protected] . Author : MBAE , E-mail : [email protected] . Author : MBAE , E-mail : [email protected] . Author : MBAE , E-mail : [email protected] Author : Assistant Professor , E-mail : [email protected].
The University of Lahore. (2000) founded that the increase in FDI inflows in South Asia were associated with a many-fold increase in the investment by national investors, suggesting that there exist linkage effects between FDI and GDP the impact of FDI on GDO growth is found to be negative prior to 1980, mildly positive for early eighties and strongly positive over the late eighties and nineties.
Jyun-Yi, Wu and Hsu Chin-Chiang (2008) they examine whether the FDI promote the economic growth by using threshold regression analysis. The empirical analysis shows that FDI alone play an ambiguous role in contributing to economic growth based on a sample of 62 countries covering the period from 1975 to 2000 and find that initial GDP and human capital are important factor in explaining FDI. FDI is found to have a positive and significant impact on growth when host countries have better level of initial GDP and human capital. Laura Alfaro at el (2003) they examine the various links among FDI and GDP growth. They explore whether countries with better financial systems can exploit FDI more efficiently. Using empirical analysis using cross-country data between 1975 and 1995 shows that FDI alone 2010) they founded that in SAARC FDI from outside is more important than in intra regional investments in most the countries (the only exception is Nepal) where Indian investments dominated. The concept of some region can be applicable to increase intra regional FDI. The FDI has a significant impact on GDP of SAARC countries. Muhammad Zahid Awan at el (2010) they found that FDI in Pakistan is considered as a vital source of external capital flows to meet saving-investment gap and exportimport gap as well. They examine the overall impact of FDI inflows into the economy of Pakistan by using annual time series data for the period of 1971 to 2008. They concluded that debt servicing and GDP found statistically insignificant and it seems that these variables have no significant impact on FDI inflows into Pakistan.
F - ? ? ? ? ¥ ¥ ? ? ? ? playsThe aim of this research is to examine the impact of FDI ON GDP In SAARC. This paper also examined the trend of foreign Direct Investment inflows with respect to GDP growth and inflation of SAARC. For this we collect the Data of FDI, Inflation and GDP from the SAARC countries for the period from 2001 to 2010.
In this research we want to know that the growth of the SAARC country depends on FDI and inflation or not so we develop following hypothesis.
Assumption: Intercept and slop coofficient are constant over time over country .
V. In table we have regression statistics of our proposed model. The results suggests that the overall model is significant at level of significance because its p value is 0.00 Further, the R-square of this model is at a higher node i.e., 0.800, which suggest that the only 20.% variation in this model is unexplained while the remaining variation of this model is explained by FDI and CPI. Moreover the CPI has a positive impact on GDP but insignificant so we ignore CPI and make analysis between GDP and FDI. While making country wise analysis we find that overall impact of FDI on GDP growth positive and significant but only Maldives shows inverse impact of FDI on its GDP because of negative FDI Figure in some years also the p value of Nepal above the significant level but the model is positive in respect to the GDP to FDI.
India is a large economy having strong industrial and agricultural development which makes India at the top of the SAARC countries in respect with GDP and growth. Pakistan is at 2 nd position in SAARC with respect to GDP then Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Maldives and Bhutan respectively at the GDP Chart in SAARC.
FDI in SAARC countries increased heavily from the years 2000 and above as the growing infrastructure and investment opportunities in the whole region especially in Indian emerging markets and attractive investment opportunities force external investors to invest in Indian economy secondly Pakistan also have a good attraction and positive investment facilities for foreign investors. After that Bangladesh and Sri Lanka also have a positive attraction for foreign investments. This increasing trend continue till 2007 and 2008 but as the world economic conditions and slump in American and European Markets the investment inflow decrease in all over the world which also effect the SAARC so the top countries like India and Pakistan also show a huge decline in FDI from 2007 to 2010.
Growth of any country depends upon investments, increasing assets and infrastructure. Foreign Direct investment in an economy shows that there is a good trend of investment which ultimately results in increasing the GDP and growth of the country as we have found in our research that increasing trend of FDI also increases the GDP of the

| Nuzhat Falki (2009) examined the Impact of FDI |
| on Economic Growth of Pakistan. She collected the data |
| of FDI from the Handbook of Pakistan Economy-2005 |
| published by the State of Pakistan and the World Bank |
| Development indicators-2008 from 1980 to 2006 with |
| variables of domestic capital, foreign owned capital and |
| labor force. With the help of endogenous growth theory |
| and applying the regression analysis she concluded that |
| FDI has negative statically insignificant relationship |
| between GDP and FDI inflows in Pakistan. Anokye M. |
| Adam & George Tweneboah (2009) examined the |
| Foreign Direct Investment and Stock Market |
| Development in Ghana's they collected the data of |
| market capitalization as a proportion of GDP, Ghana |
| cedi- |
FDI and economic growth: the role of localFinancial markets, Laura Alfaroa, Areendam Chandab, Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcanc. Selin Sayek Journal of International Economics 2004. (64) p. .
Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and growth: new evidence from Latin America. European Journal of Political Economy 2003. 19.
Regional Economic Integration and FDI in South Asia: Prospects and Problems. Aradhna Aggarwal Working Paper July 2008. 218.
Impacts of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries, Muawya Ahmed Hussein. Impact of foreign Direct Investment on Shares Market Value in Amman Exchange Market, 2010. April 2009. 2 p. . (International Review of Business Research Papers)
A Note on Causal Relationship between FDI and Savings in Bangladesh. Theoretical and Applied Economics 2010. XVII (11) .
The Impact of FDI on Economic Growth under Foreign Trade Regimes: A Case Study of Pakistan, Zeshan Atique, Mohsin Hasnain Ahmad, And Usman Azhar. The Pakistan Development Review 2004. 43 (4) . (Part II)