Non-Performing Loans Portfolio in the Banking Sector of Bangladesh and Recovery Status: A Study on Rangpur Region

Table of contents

1. Introduction

on-performing loans refer to those loans from which banks no longer receive interest and/or installment payments as scheduled. It is a loan for which the principal or interest payment remained overdue for a period of time. A NPL is either in default or close to being default. A loan is non-performing when payments of interest and principal are past due by 90 days or more, or at least 90 days of interest payments have been capitalized, refinanced or delayed by agreement, or payments are less than 90 days overdue, but there are other good reasons to doubt that payments will be made in full (IMF 2005).NPLs are known as Non-performing because the loan ceases to "perform" or generate income for the bank. Choudhury (2002) stated that the non-performing loan is not a "uniclass" but rather a "multiclass" concept, which means that NPLs can be classified into different varieties usually based on the "length of overdue" of the said loans. NPLs can be viewed as a typical byproduct of financial crisis. They are not a main product of the lending function but rather an accidental occurrence of the lending process, one that has enormous potential to deepen the severity and duration of financial crisis and to complicate macroeconomic management (Woo,2000).

The performance of the financial sector of our country heavily depends on the performance of banks. It is known to all that the entire non-performing loans shrink the profitability of banks. NPL don't contribute to the income of the banks, rather these loans decrease the loan able fund of the banks. NPL also stops the recycling banking business.

A poor banking system can't help the economic development of a country. Despite massive injection of loans to the national economy, the contribution of financial sector to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) remained at dismal level. This laden loan contributes to GDP by unhealthy and inefficient financial situation. Non-professional handling of assets both by SOCBs and PCBs was reported as the main reasons for the accumulation of loan default problem in Bangladesh (Alam and Jahan, 1999).

Bangladesh Bank (BB) as a central regulatory authority of banks in Bangladesh plays important role in monitoring and supervision by providing guidelines, circulars and circular letters time to time. BB provides circular on single borrower exposure limit, syndicate financing, bridge financing etc. Now banks are not permitted to approve large loans in favor of any individual or group of borrowers in excess of 50 percent of their total capital. Loans, which have been classified as bad/loss for 5 years or more that must be written off by the banks in order to clean the defaulted loan from their affairs. Hundred percentage provisions have been kept against that write off loan.

2. II.

Literature Review Banik and Das (2015) concluded that though percentage of classified loan is increasing among commercial banks, the amount of POCL is higher in state -owned commercial banks than that of private commercial banks. Islam (2012), in a study on Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation found that 97.6 percent of the variability in the volume of classified loans can be explained by total advances, provisions, legal charges and spread. The variable legal charge was found to be statistically insignificant. Parvin (2011) stated that NPLs in Bangladesh reveals that the banking sector of Bangladesh is yet to get out of its NPL mess, although substantial improvement has been noticed recently. Adhikary (2006) found immediate consequence of large amount of NPLs in the banking system is bank failure as well as economic slowdown. The causes of non-performing loans are usually attributed to the lack of effective monitoring and supervision on the part of banks, lack of effective lenders' recourse, weakness of legal infrastructure, and lack of effective debt recovery strategies.

Ezaz (2006) revealed their study that the loan default is quite enormous in the banking sector. They analyzed the issues governing the recovery rate and procedure with respect to Islamic Banking while comparing with the conventional baking principles amongst NCBs, PCBs and ICB. Hou (2001) argued that there is no global standard to define non-performing loans at the practical level variations exist in terms of the classification system, the scope, and contents. Such problem potentially adds to disorder and uncertainty in the NPL issues. Non-performing loans have non-linear negative effect on banks' lending behavior.

Afroz & Uddin (2010) found in their empirical study that from the views of employees of the banks those steps taken to prevent loan classification and provisioning requirements are not sufficient; due to lack of persuasion the rate of willful defaulters is high. Hassan & Reza (1997) prepared a study on comparison of commercial Banks of Bangladesh in respect to several dimension of deposit, they identified, in 1983 PCBs were allowed to start the banking activities for the betterment than the services of NCBs. Moti et al. (2012) conducted a study on credit management and found that a key requirement for effective credit management is the ability to intelligently and efficiently manage customer credit lines. Sikder et al. (2006) studied on the operational performance of the Bangladesh Krishi Bank and evaluated in terms of some indicators viz. deposit mobilization, loan disbursement, loan recovery and profit and found that the operational performance of the bank is very poor due to some lending procedural drawbacks reaching the profit target fixed by the authority concerned.

Lots of researches have been made on nonperforming loan. Researchers identified some variables which are related to non-performing loan. Research on comparative study between SOCBs and PCBs are made as well. In this paper researcher will try to highlight NP Lsscenario of banks operating seven districts of Rangpur division. The present paper has given attention more to select Rangpur division because lots of research has been conducted but exclusively for Rangpur division yet no research has been done. For availability of data seven districts of Rangpur has been chosen. The study tries to show the present status through a descriptive analysis relating to NPLs of the selected area.

3. III.

4. Objectives of the Study

The major objective of this study is to represent the overall scenario of total loan disbursement, NPLs& recovery status of banks in the seven districts of Rangpur region. This study also attempts to achieve the following specific objectives:

5. Methodology

This paper has been made based on secondary sources like research works of individuals, different publications, journal of different institutions, Bangladesh Bank survey etc. Forty one commercial banks both from state owned and private have been selected purposively from the seven districts of Rangpur division except Gaibandha district to represent the NPLs and their recovery system.

V.

6. Discussion, Analysis and Findings

Rangpur, a district of northern region, has economic value for its contribution to the development of Bangladesh by supplying valuable resources. There are approximately 41 banks operating in Rangpur division. Most of the banks do have several branches. The data used here are consolidated data of the bank branches of those 41 banks. Here data are categorized in various ways and a discussion has been given after the data is captured in a table. In terms of NPL, RAKUB is at the top position whereas Sonali and Rupali Bank is at the second and third position. RAKUB's NPL amount is 64356.67lac, Sonali Bank's NPL amount is 24541.00 lac and Rupali Bank has 14114.99lac taka. But percentage of NPL in terms of total loan disbursement, BDBL is at the top position whereas Bangladesh Commerce bank (BCB) is at the second and BASIC Bank is at the third position.

7. Global Journal of Management and Business Research

Volume XX Issue I Version I Year 2020 ( ) C BDBL, BCB and Basic bank's classified loan is almost 73.40%, 59.45% and 51.42% respectively.

In the above table, few banks have no NPL because they newly operating in Rangpur division. They newly disburse loan to the clients. For being NPL, time is most important factor. Status of law-suit of Banks (in lac taka) Table 4:

8. Number Number Number

Table 4 depicts the law-suit status of banks for recovery of defaulted loan from their defaulted borrower, how many suits are settled and how many new suit made and what is the claim amount of those suit. Banks made suit against their default borrower for recovering classified loan. Different types of suits can be made under different laws and act like certificate suit and orthor in suit. As per the categories of the loan banks made different suits. Banks made lots of suits for recovering their defaulted loan except BCB, Premier, One, Meghna, NRB, First Security, Union and South Bangla Agriculture & Commerce bank. At the end of the second quarter in2017, RAKUB has 8774 suits which is highest in number among all of the banks and its claim amount is 10518.73 lac taka. RAKUB gives a large number of agricultural loans to the farmers. The size of this loan is very small. For recovery of those loans RAKUB made a large number of suits. From the above table it is clear that state owned commercial banks have large number of suit compare to the private commercial banks. But by the few suits private commercial banks claim huge amount of taka. Private commercial banks loan portfolio is smaller in number than state owned commercial banks but they financed more than SOCBs. That's why when PCBs loans become classified and they suit a file against them the claim amount is very high. Table 5 represents the amount of total loan disbursement, NPL of those banks who have NPL more than 10%.At the end of the second quarter of 2017, 15 banks have NPL more than 10% of their total loan outstanding. BDBL has the maximum NPL which was 73.40% and Dhaka Bank has the minimum NPL which was10.65%. RAKUB has the highest amount of NPL and Premier Bank has the lowest amount of NPL. Table 6 represents the amount of total loan disbursement, NPL of those banks have NPL less than 10%. At the end of the second quarter in 2017, 26 banks have classified loan less than 10%. Southeast Bank has the maximum NPL which was 9.77%. Few banks newly started their operation in Rangpur division that's why they don't have any NPL like Meghna Bank, NRB commercial Bank, First security Islami Bank, Union Bank and South Bangla Agriculture & commerce bank. RAKUB has the highest amount of NPL and Premier Bank has the lowest amount of NPL. Sonali Bank is at the top in terms of amount of NPL which was 24541. 00 lac taka. Table 7 provides the scenario of the top ten defaulters at the end of June 2017.The highest amount of NPLis given by Basic Bank Ltd. to its top ten borrowers which is Taka. 10232.16 lac and 95.12% and lowest amount given by Karmosangsthan Bank which is Taka. 69.99 lac and 6.39%.

Figures in Table 7 expose the figures of total loan disbursement of banks, amount of classified loan among those disbursements and how much taka is centralized to the top ten defaulters of the banks. It appears that the highest amount of classified loan is given by Sonali Bank Ltd. which is Taka.5943lac and lowest amount is from One bank Ltd. which is Taka.5.07 lac. The highest percentage of credit hold by top ten borrowers of the banks is 100%, that means those banks all classified loan is concentrated to only ten borrowers. Bangladesh Commerce Bank, Premier Bank, AB Bank, One Bank and Social Is lami Bank have 100% credit to their ten borrowers. The classified loan is highest 100% and lowest is 24.21% respectively.

9. VI.

10. Findings

Major findings are given below:

? NPL is very high in SOCBs rather than PCBs in Rangpur region (

11. Recommendations

Banks play vital role in the economy of Bangladesh. Non-performing loan and other obstacles face by banks create barrier to making profit. From this study it was found that t reasons behind non-performing loans are pressure from political parties, poor monitoring & controlling system of SOCBs, improper management, concentration on a particular area, improper sanctioning, lack of timely action, delay in disbursement of credit, unwillingness of borrowers etc. On the basis of these problems some recommendations are given by the researcher for mitigating nonperforming loan to the commercial banks operating in Rangpur region. Those are given below: So SOCBs also gives special focus to all credit like PCBs and try to reduce huge number of credit line.

? For huge number of credits, default cases also in huge in number compared to PCBs. For recovery of those default credits, SOCBs file large number of law-suit but their volume is lower than PCBs. It is very much difficult to operate those law-suit and most of the cases it is not viable. ? Large loan default case is much higher in PCBs than SOCBs. This happens when PCBs managers try to catch a big fish. For fulfilling their yearly target in loan disbursement and profit earnings, they gives loan in higher amount to the another banks customers. Here an unhealthy competition has grown as lots of PCBs newly started but new entrepreneurs are not grown. PCBs should avoid this unhealthy competition and try to find out more reliable entrepreneurs. They should invest in versatile business such as small and cottage industries.

12. VIII.

13. Conclusion

As a small country, Bangladesh already has 57 scheduled banks. There are many non-scheduled banks and financial institutions also operated their businesses. Rangpur, a new division, does not have massive industrialization for its geographic location. Although few new industries has been established but not in large number. In these circumstances, new entrepreneurs are not commencing to start a large scale business. Recently new number of commercial banks have been started their business to disburse big-volume-loan in the study area and searching those kinds of enterprises for lending. Therefore, unhealthy competition begins among the managers of PCBs rather than SOCBs as they required to fulfill their yearly targets. Banks should be more cautious in selecting entrepreneurs by scrutinize the previous history and ability. Banks business mostly depends on the smooth recovery of the loan. SOCBs are in deep water by NPL by losing their capital. A very few number of banks NPL are more than 50%. This is alarming for the bank industry. Government tries to keep running banks by injecting fund every year. If PCBs face this problem severely, the situation may be worsening. Necessary precaution, real time solution and sufficient guidelines should be taken for make over the situation. Bangladesh bank can play a vital role in mitigating this problem. Government should have taken positive initiative to make new industries as well as entrepreneurs in Rangpur region so that banks find new opportunities for investment.

14. Global Journal of Management and Business Research

Volume XX Issue I Version I Year 2020 ( ) C

Figure 1. Table 1 :
1
S.N Name of the Bank Total Loan Disbursement Amount of Classified loan Classified loan %
1 AB Bank 37437.65 503.74 1.35%
2 Agrani Bank 100816.56 9712.73 9.63%
3 Al-ArafahIslami Bank 32837.83 2622.52 7.99%
4 Bank Asia 6938.02 302.18 4.36%
Figure 2. Table 2 :
2
Last quarter Present quarter
S.N Name of the Bank (January-March/2017) Total Loan Classified loan % Total Loan (April-June/17) Classified loan %
1 Sonali 262916 24792 9.43% 271558 24541 9.04%
2 Agrani 96285.68 11088.23 11.52% 100816.56 9712.73 9.63%
3 IFIC 24577.98 1728.61 7.03% 18210.81 1062.2 5.83%
4 AB 39408.79 373.4 0.95% 37437.65 503.74 1.35%
5 One 4196.57 3.46 0.08% 5038.81 5.07 0.10%
6 Trust 28027.32 554.98 1.98% 30615.89 625.56 2.04%
7 DBBL 6200.94 155.24 2.50% 4877.63 120.11 2.46%
8 Brac 15492 728.97 4.71% 35797.6 1399.75 3.91%
9 Mercantile 23497.82 927.68 3.95% 25385.12 998.32 3.93%
Standard 31256.57 1052.96 3.37% 43288.62 1741.35 4.02%
Meghna 2454.74 0 0.00% 4419.49 0 0.00%
EBL 3858.65 51.54 1.34% 4141.02 119.26 2.88%
Bank Asia 6277 278.19 4.43% 6938.02 302.18 4.36%
Prime 11992.33 620.43 5.17% 13497.95 645.19 4.78%
Uttara 31043.76 2709.26 8.73% 34806.29 3071.38 8.82%
MTBL 18460.56 1098.09 5.95% 18011.7 1234.33 6.85%
NBL 37088.19 2799.62 7.55% 37510.29 2790.59 7.44%
Southeast 7764.01 953.31 12.28% 8341.34 815 9.77%
UCBL 8174.65 825.3 10.10% 7388.01 659.43 8.93%
South Bangla 4669.25 0 0.00% 6256.8 0 0.00%
NRB Commercial 1047.65 0 0.00% 953.61 0 0.00%
Islami 192430 2179.7 1.13% 210634.8 2610 1.24%
Al-ArafahIslami 35196.39 2685.22 7.63% 32837.83 2622.52 7.99%
Social Islami 16307.47 243.48 1.49% 18688.25 457.53 2.45%
First Security 1293.99 0 0.00% 1297.6 0 0.00%
Union 101.81 0 0.00% 1051 0 0.00%
Janata 72613 9492.85 13.07% 75089.48 8442.53 11.24%
Rupali 59325.16 12558.1 21.17% 64557.62 14114.99 21.86%
RAKUB 223625.51 44399.06 19.85% 235743.77 64356.67 27.30%
Kormoshantan 8888.35 1088.44 12.25% 8989.54 1096.14 12.19%
Basic 20841.48 9598.25 46.05% 20918.71 10757.07 51.42%
BDBL 12905.92 9125.28 70.71% 12526.62 9193.92 73.40%
Jamuna 23199.92 2189.66 9.44% 21106.07 2984.91 14.14%
The City 17281.35 1623.47 9.39% 19662.66 2817.66 14.33%
Dhaka 12539.34 1529.96 12.20% 13458.91 1432.95 10.65%
Figure 3. Table 2
2
Figure 4. Table 3 :
3
Non-Performing Loans Portfolio in the Banking Sector of Bangladesh and Recovery Status: A Study on
Rangpur Region
36 NCC 11687.1 2087.66 17.86% 10982.58 2243.66 20.43%
Year 2020
11
S.N 1 Name of the Bank Sonali Bank Ltd. Amount of Classified loan 24541.00 Recovery Amount 2255.00 Recovery % 9.19% Volume XX Issue I Version I
2 Agrani Bank 9712.73 2443.45 25.16% ( ) C
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 IFIC Bank AB Bank One Bank Trust Bank Dutch Bangla Bank Brac Bank Mercantile Bank Standard Bank Meghna Bank Estern Bank Bank Asia Prime Bank Uttara Bank 1062.20 503.74 5.07 625.56 120.11 1399.75 998.32 1741.35 0 119.26 302.18 645.19 3071.38 86.94 0.15 0.63 11.93 1.10 55.28 46.23 51.13 0 2.84 0 4.98 88.30 8.18% 0.03% 12.43% 1.91% 0.92% 3.95% 4.63% 2.94% 0.00% 2.38% 0.00% 0.77% 2.87% Global Journal of Management and Business Research
16 Mutual Trust Bank 1234.33 11.41 0.92%
17 National Bank 2790.59 41.38 1.48%
18 Southeast Bank 815.00 2.57 0.32%
19 UCBl 659.43 165.92 25.16%
© 2020 Global Journals
Figure 5. Table 3
3
74 lac taka, which is 6. 74% of its NPL. Agrani Bank is at
the second position. Agrani Bank recovers 2443. 45 lac
taka which is 25. 16% of its NPL. Sonali Bank hold the
third position in recovering classified loan and it is 2255.
00 lac, which is 9.19% of its total NPL. Highest
percentage of recovery done by Premier bank and it is
242.93 lac taka out of 335.96 lac taka. A very few
number of banks recover double digit percentage while
others recovery performance is single digit. The lowest
amount of recovery done by AB Bank Limited which is 0.
03% of its total NPL.
Figure 6. Table 5 :
5
S.N Name of the Bank Total Loan Classified loan %
1 Janata 75089.48 8442.53 11.24%
2 Rupali 64557.62 14114.99 21.86%
3 RAKUB 235743.77 64356.67 27.30%
4 Kormoshantan 8989.54 1096.14 12.19%
5 Basic 20918.71 10757.07 51.42%
6 BDBL 12526.62 9193.92 73.40%
7 Jamuna 21106.07 2984.91 14.14%
8 The City 19662.66 2817.66 14.33%
9 Dhaka 13458.91 1432.95 10.65%
10 NCC 10982.58 2243.66 20.43%
11 Pubali 36071.63 5006.08 13.88%
12 Commerce 2219.76 1319.67 59.45%
13 Premier 2943 335.96 11.42%
14 Shahjalal Islami 17310.4 2537.18 14.66%
15 Exim 12124.4 2662.46 21.96%
Source: Quarterly review, BB 2017
Figure 7. Table 6 :
6
S.N Name of the Bank Present quarter(April-June/17) Total Loan Classified loan %
1 Sonali 271558.00 24541.00 9.04%
2 Agrani 100816.56 9712.73 9.63%
3 IFIC 18210.81 1062.2 5.83%
4 AB 37437.65 503.74 1.35%
5 One 5038.81 5.07 0.10%
6 Trust 30615.89 625.56 2.04%
7 DBBL 4877.63 120.11 2.46%
8 Brac 35797.6 1399.75 3.91%
Figure 8. Table 7 :
7
Year 2020
Volume XX Issue I Version I
( ) C
S.N. Name of the Bank Total Outstanding 1 Sonali 271558.00 2 Agrani 100816.56 3 IFIC 18210.81 4 AB 37437.65 5 One 5038.81 6 Trust 30615.89 7 DBBL 4877.63 8 Brac 35797.60 9 Mercantile 25385.12 10 Standard 43288.62 Total classified loan 24541.00 9712.73 1062.20 503.74 5.07 625.56 120.11 1399.75 998.32 1741.35 Amount in Top ten classified loan 5943.00 3454.26 907.04 503.74 5.07 449.53 48.28 412.60 543.57 882.04 % (of top ten defaulter's) 2.19% 3.43% 4.98% 1.35% 0.10% 1.47% 0.99% 1.15% 2.14% 2.04% % (of non-performing loan) 24.22% 35.56% 85.39% 100.00% 100.00% 71.86% 40.20% 29.48% 54.45% 50.65% Global Journal of Management and Business Research
11 Meghna 4419.49 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00%
12 EBL 4141.02 119.26 100.05 2.42% 83.89%
13 Bank Asia 6938.02 302.18 299.18 4.31% 99.01%
14 Prime 13497.95 645.19 520.79 3.86% 80.72%
15 Uttara 34806.29 3071.38 1571.85 4.52% 51.18%
Figure 9.
VII.
Figure 10.
? Loan recovery is very much important for banks. If
banks fail to recover its credit, then banks losses its
assets as well as its earnings. PCBs loan recovery
status is much higher than SOCBs. This may
happen for PCBs management's responsibilities
levied by them. PCBs management's responsibilities
are much higher than SOCBs managements
because PCB's management jobs duration depends
on their performance. For that reason, PCBs
managements scrutinize all the steps in giving loan
from the beginning. It starts from proper borrower
selection. It reduces the chance of being defaulted.
Second step is Proper documentation. Proper
documentation is essential for loan disbursement.
Without proper documentation, it is not possible for
banks to recover loan by taking legal action. Faulty
documentation creates faulty credit line for banks.
So documentation must be needed for smooth
supervision and efficient lending.
? SOCBs given lots of credit in diversified area
compared to the PCBs. This high number of credit
makes difficulties for proper supervision and
monitoring.
1
2

Appendix A

  1. https://idlc.com/mbr/article.php?id=167 Surge in nonperforming loans in banking sector: Learning from neighboring countries on combating NPL, 2020. 9 January 2020.
  2. Effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution on the recovery of non-performing loans under Artha Rin Adalat: A study on nationalized commercial banks in Bangladesh (Doctoral dissertation, A Islam . 2019. University of Dhaka
  3. On Financial Sector Reform in Emerging Markets: Enhancing Creditors' Rights and Securitizing Non-Performing Loans in the Indian Banking Sector-An Elephant's Tale. A S Pasricha . Buff. L. Rev 2007. 55 p. 325.
  4. Bangladesh Non Performing Loans Ratio. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/bangladesh/non-performing-loans-ratio Ceicdata.com. Retrieved 2003 -2020. 2020. 9 January 2020. (Data & Charts)
  5. https://www.bb.org.bd/pub/ Bb.org.bd. Retrieved, 2020. 8 January 2020.
  6. Nonperforming loans in the banking sector of Bangladesh: realities and challenges. Bangladesh Institute of Bank Management, B K Adhikary . 2006. 4 p. .
  7. A comparative study of financial performance of banking sector in Bangladesh. An application of CAMELS rating system, B Nimalathasan . 2008. 2 p. 133. Universitatii Bucuresti. Analele. Seria Stiinte Economicesi Administrative
  8. Classified loans and Recovery Performance: A comparative study between SOCBs and PCBs in Bangladesh. B P Banik , P Das . The cost and ManagementJournal 2015. 43 (3) p. .
  9. Causes of non-performing loan and effects on banking sector | daily sun, https://www.daily-sun.com/post/311639/2018/05/27/Causes-of-nonperforming-loan-and-effects-on-banking-sector 2020. 9 January 2020. (Daily Sun)
  10. Non-performing loans in banking sector of Bangladesh: causes and effect, D Majumder . 2014.
  11. Comperative analysis of loan recovery among nationalized, private and is lamic commercial banks of Bangladesh, E Ahmed , Z Rahman , R I Ahmed . 2006.
  12. Efficiency Through Competition: Comparison of commercial Banks. Hassan & Reza . Journal of Business Studies 1997. 16 (1) p. . DU
  13. Effectiveness of credit management system on loan performance: empirical evidence from micro finance sector in Kenya. H O Moti , J S Masinde , N G Mugenda , M N Sindani . International Journal of Business 2012. 2 (6) p. . (Humanities and Technology)
  14. Loan loss provisioning system in Bangladesh banking: A critical analysis. J Podder , A Mamun . Managerial Auditing Journal 2004. 19 (6) p. .
  15. The financial sector reform of Bangladesh. K Hassan . Thoughts on Economics 1994. 3 (1-2) p. .
  16. Loan Recovery and Performance of Commercial Banks: A. M A Siddiqua , M N Zaman . Study on Jamuna Bank Limited (JBL) & Janata Bank Limited (JB),
  17. Two approaches to resolving nonperforming assets during financial crises, M D Woo . 2000. International Monetary Fund.
  18. The economic consequence of non-performing loans. The Daily Star, M Emran . https://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/economics/news/the-economic-consequence-non-performing-loans-1797394 2019. 9 January 2020.
  19. Rising non-performing loans. The Daily Star, M Mujeri . https://www.thedailystar.net/news/opinion/perspective/rising-non-performing-loans-1619257 2018. 9 January 2020.
  20. An Analytical Review of Non-Performing Loan: Bangladesh and Global Perspectives. M O Faruk , M S Islam . Annual Banking Conference, 2016. 2015.
  21. Non performing loans-its causes, consequences and some learning, M S Islam , N C Shil , M Mannan . 2005.
  22. Non-Performing Loan and Management Guidelines for Remedies: An Empirical View of Bank Employees, N Afroze , G M Uddin . 2008.
  23. Non-performing loans in our banking sector | daily sun, https://www.daily-sun.com/printversion/details/417862/2019/08/25/Nonperforming-loans-in-our-banking-sector 2020. 9 January 2020. (Daily Sun)
  24. Default Loan Culture in the Banking Sector of Bangladesh. Nurul M D Alam , S B Jahan . Bank Paricrama 1999. 34 (4) p. .
  25. The Perspective of Loan Default Problems of the Commercial Banking Sector of Bangladesh: A Closer look into the Key Contributory Factors, R Chowdhury , B K Dhar . 2012. 18 p. . University of Science and Technology Annual (USTA)
  26. Non-performing loans and terms of credit of public sector banks in India: An empirical assessment. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, R Rajan , S C Dhal . 2003. 24 p. .
  27. Implication of the Legal Framework Guiding Loan Recovery. S A Khan , Q G M Farooqi . Banking Research Series 2011. 2011. p. .
  28. Banking Sector Performance in Bangladesh (Doctoral dissertation, S I Ahmed . 2006. East West University
  29. A Study of the Operational Performance of Bangladesh Krishi Bank. Sikder , Z Alam . Journal of Business Administration 2006. p. . (IBA,DU,32(1,2)
  30. Nonperforming loans of commercial banks in Bangladesh, S Parven . 2011.
  31. Loan Classification, Provisioning Requirement and Recovery Strategies: A comparative Study on Bangladesh and India. T A Choudhury , B K Adhikary . Seminar Paper, 2002. January. p. . Bangladesh Institute of Bank Management
  32. Relationship between non-performing loans and macroeconomic factors with bank specific factors: a case study on loan portfolios-SAARC countries perspective. W Anjom , A M Karim . ELK Asia Pacific Journal of Finance and Risk Management 2016. 7 (2) p. .
  33. The nonperforming loans: some bank-level evidences. Y Hou , D Dickinson . 4th International Conference on Applied Financial Economics, (Samos Island, Greece
    ) 2007. August.
Notes
1
© 2020 Global Journals
2
Non-Performing Loans Portfolio in the Banking Sector of Bangladesh and Recovery Status: A Study on Rangpur Region
Date: 2020-01-15