The Study of Fund Disbursement by NABARD in Uttar Pradesh

Table of contents

1. I. Introduction

he major problem in agricultural sector is unavailability of finance at right time, due to this farmer faces difficulty to arrange resources in cultivation on time and sometime they failed to arrange the financial support for their farming activities which results in poor production. If farmers avail the credit facilities in proper amount on time then the scenario of agricultural sector may be changed.

This argument has been empirically examined in many studies these are-"Despite the significant strides achieved in terms of spread, network and outreach of rural financial institutions, the quantum of flow of financial resources to agriculture continues to be inadequate (Golait, 2007)". "This situation brings out the fact that the existing institutional arrangement for credit delivery is not adequate and suitable to address the agrarian distress in the country (Barah and Sirohi, 2011)". "Reserve Bank of India (2006) also reported that one common factor that can be seen across all regions is that manifestation of economic distress is primarily through indebtedness." "In this context it is pertinent to mention that the Planning Commission of India in the Approach Paper to 11th Five Year Plan 2007-2012 observed that 'there is evidence that farm debt is increasing much faster than farm incomes' (Government of India 2006)". These studies focuses that there is still need of reform.

The National Bank for Agricultural and Rural development has been set up as an apex body to support and regulate agricultural credit in India. But the present study is covering the role of NABARD in finance disbursement to Uttar Pradesh only.

2. II. Objective And Hypothesis

As discussed in the previous sections the impact of availability of finance to agricultural sector: 1) To know the role of NABARD in refinance disbursement to agricultural sector in Uttar Pradesh. 2) To know the role of NABARD in refinance to various activities in Uttar Pradesh.

Based on these observations, we have formulated a hypothesis, which is as follows:

As aforementioned, the NABARD is an apex institution in agricultural rural development in India. That is why the hypothesis has been framed to know the contribution of NABARD in Uttar Pradesh.

3. C

Uttar Pradesh is the largest food grain producing State of the country contributing about 19% of the total food grains of the country. It is the highest producer of wheat and second highest producer of rice. The State is also the largest milk producing state, accounting for nearly 17 per cent of the total milk production. U.P is the second largest sugarcane producer of India after Maharashtra accounting for about 28% of total production in the country.

? H0: There is no significant difference in financial assistance among different agricultural activities plans and programs of NABARD in Uttar Pradesh. ? H1: There lies a significant difference in financial assistance among different agricultural activities plans and programs of NABARD in Uttar Pradesh.

4. III. Research Methodology

The total disbursements by NABARD in Uttar Pradesh have been divided into four categories then analyses have been conducted. The analysis of Purpose-wise refinance disbursement by NABARD with the help of CAGR shows that the Non-Farm Sector had been the priority areas for the bank with a highest CAGR of 10.94% during the period under study. This Sector had been on the top in almost all the years on the basis of absolute amount of disbursement. Allied to agriculture sector come next with a CAGR score of 6.10% followed by Agriculture Sector (CAGR -4.16%), having the lowest share in assistance in terms of both percentage and absolute amount. The Other Sector is the only region exposing a lowest negative CAGR of -7.79%. Hence, it can safely be concluded that allied to agriculture sector and Non-Farm Sector constitute the preference Sector in the eyes of the bank as far as the agriculture and rural area is concerned. The Purpose-wise distribution of finance can be visualized with the help of Figures-which express that the Non-farm sector has been a priority sector for NABARD particularly after 2005-06 to 2010-12 though, its share declined during 2011-12 in comparison to 2010-11. The figure is the proof of the fact that Agriculture Sector is the most neglected Sector while Allied to agriculture and Non-Farm Sector got assistance better than the other sector.

5. IV. Analysis and Testing of Hypothesis

6. V. Results and Discussions

The analysis of Purpose -wise refinance disbursement by NABARD with the help of CAGR shows that the Non-Farm Sector had been the priority areas for the bank with a highest CAGR of 10.94% during the period under study. This Sector had been on the top in almost all the years on the basis of absolute amount of disbursement. Allied to agriculture sector comes next with a CAGR score of 6.10% followed by Agriculture Sector (CAGR-4.16%), having the lowest share in assistance in terms of both percentage and absolute amount. The Other Sector is the only region exposing a lowest negative CAGR of -7.79%. Hence, it can safely be concluded that allied to agriculture sector and Non-Farm Sector constitute the preference Sector in the eyes of the bank as far as the agriculture and rural area is concerned. The Purpose-wise distribution of finance can be visualized with the help of Figure-which express that the Non-farm sector has been a priority sector for NABARD particularly after 2005-06 to 2010-12 though, its share declined during 2011-12 in comparison to 2010-11. The figure is the proof of the fact that Agriculture Sector is the most neglected Sector while allied to agriculture and Non-Farm Sector got assistance better than the other sector. From the study of Purpose wise different agricultural plans and programmes in the disbursement of funds it has been seen that NABARD has disbursed less money towards farm sector as compared to Non-farm and allied to agriculture sector.

Figure 1. Table 1 :
1
NABARD Fund Disbursement in
Uttar Pradesh
Agriculture Allied to Agriculture Non Farm Sector (NFS) Others
Sector/Purpose/ Activity 2000-01 2001-2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 CAGR
Agriculture
Minor irrigation 9794 15791 18436 18463 12841 6108 9857 5448 10688 7719 4794
Land development 1 10 6103 427 1814 663 2036 9746 2196 90 154
Farm Mechanisation 43009 25094 18724 12011 10371 42971 26843 12802 19188 18880 15307
Plantation & Horticulture 3436 7498 5916 6244 8312 10263 6216 8342 8242 8130 8381
Other Agriculture 5654 5097 4395 26062 53036 40223 22484 4784 9940 10041 10137
Total 61894 53490 53574 63207 86374 100228 67436 41122 50254 44860 38773 -4.16%
Allied to Agriculture
Fisheries 280 427 389 353 337 512 268 121 1008 210 110
Animal Husbandry 19173 30791 34610 26531 29289 24552 15824 14525 27687 26459 24662
Poultry 3143 6060 7737 8886 10008
Storage/Market Yard 55 1234 1307 96 2547
Waste land Development (Forestry) 117 Nil Nil Nil Nil
Total 19453 31218 34999 26884 29626 25064 19407 21940 37739 35651 37327 6.10%
Non Farm Sector (NFS)
SGSY Non Farm Sector 5406 10405 6177 5137 7384 7460 3145 1322 1213
SC-ST-AP-Non Farm Sector 648 167
Non Farm Sector 5286 6818 21522 25398 22090 20104 24400 21617 25253 49697 32295
Total 10692 10692 27699 30535 29474 27564 28193 23106 25253 49697 33508 10.94%
Others
Non Conventional Energy (Bio Gas Plant) Nil Nil 2 1
Self help Group 559 813 1292 1553 1883 2043 1815 4022 1760
AH (Others) 624 701 1295 518 123
Agriclinics and Agri Business 10 Nil 106
Total 559 813 1292 1553 1883 2043 2449 4723 1297 2279 229
Total Disbursement 92598 102744 117564 122179 147357 154899 117485 90891 114543 132487 109837 -7.79%
(Sources: Statistical Statement of NABARD)
Figure 2. Table 1 .
1
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00% Agriculture Allied to Agriculture Non Farm Sector Others
(NFS)
-5.00%
-10.00%
2 (b): ANOVA
Expenditure
Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 1.886E10 3 6.286E9 48.123 .000
Within Groups 5.225E9 40 1.306E8
Total 2.408E10 43
Mean Square Source: Researcher's Calculations
Note: *Significant at 5 per cent level of significance

Appendix A

  1. Annual Report 2007-08, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Head Office. NABARD 2008.
  2. Economic Survey. Ministry of Finance, 2008. 2007-08. Government of India.
  3. Role of NABARD in Development of Rural India, M A Arrawatia . http://www.indianmba.com/Faculty_Column/FC1219/fc1219.html 2010.
  4. Agricultural credit in India: Status, issues and future agenda, Reserve Bank of India Bulletin, Rakesh Mohan . 2004. November.
  5. Current issues in agriculture credit in India: An Assessment, Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, Ramesh Golait . 2007. 28.
  6. Report of Ministry of Agriculture State of Indian Agriculture, p. .
  7. Report of the Steering Committee on Agriculture for 11 th Five-Year Plan. Yojana Bhavan 2007a.
Date: 2018-01-15