\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Predictive Testing for the Management of Hidden Costs in Organizations},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{1970-01-01 (revised: 01 January 1970)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{1970-01-01}
\title{Predictive Testing for the Management of Hidden Costs in Organizations}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Paulo  Deco}

             \author[2]{João Pitra dos Santos  Napoleão}

             \author[3]{Alcides Romualdo Neto  Simbo}

             \affil[1]{  Universidade 11 de Novembro}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 1 January 1970 Accepted: 1 January 1970 Published: 1 January 1970}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


The management of hidden costs in organizations requires compliance with the precepts of socio-economic theory, which imply reaching the four stages of investigation: situational diagnosis, strategic worksheet, prescription and predictive test. To this end, a proposal for a solution is conceived that suggests knowing its effectiveness through a test through reobservation of the motivations achieved among workers after implementing some measures contained in the presented solution. It is in this event that the investigation was developed, with the application of interventionist research, the frequency of malfunctions that cause hidden costs evaluated at 8,392, 259.29 Kz in the investigation carried out in December 2022 was observed and applied through the Plan of Priority Activities (PAP) tool, a short-term tool with seventy-two (72) proposed activities, however, it was tested with the frequency´s subsequent reobservation of the same dysfunctions. Forty-seven (47) took the name of strategic activity, those activities with a value that appeared in the range of 1.5 to 2 according to the results of the spss software, that can mitigate the frequency of dysfunctions and associated hidden costs. Therefore, the proposed solution became a solution to the diagnosed dysfunctions, as it was possible to verify the decrease in the frequency of malfunctions and hidden costs in the order of 4,251,442.27 Kz and as performing costs evaluated at 4,930,039.86 Kz in the research carried out in March 2023. This reduction resulted from the tendency of the solution's effectiveness, serving from now on as an application tool whenever dysfunctions are found, since it is flexible to adaptations according to the company's internal context.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{organizations, hidden cost management, solution and predictive test.}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\begin{textblock*}{10cm}(1.05cm,3cm)
{{\textit{CrossRef DOI of original article:}} \underline{}}
\end{textblock*}\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{I. Introduction}]{I. Introduction}\par
he production of accounting information linked to the costs that companies assume during operation is, therefore, fundamental when it comes to the concept of survival, continuity of the company, economic-financial and social satisfaction of shareholders and workers. This requirement is supported on the one hand by cost and management accounting through the recording of internal accounting economic facts, i.e. costs of a visible nature and on the other hand by socio-economic theory through the accounting recording of internal economic facts but, hidden nature that give rise to hidden costs, since external accounting economic facts are the responsibility of financial accounting to register them.\par
Costs of a visible nature are known to be easy to account for because they are, in principle, identifiable in the company's financial statements and in the different reports whenever a certain expense is assumed internally.\par
This reality is not analogous when it comes to accounting for hidden costs, because these costs are not, in principle, documented in the statements or even cost information reports, these are only subject to measurement through the use of socio-economic methodology. Therefore, this fact is achieved with the diagnosis of dysfunctional "pathologies" that prevent the normal company'sfunctioning.\par
Once known, they deserve an interpretation and, therefore, a prescription or even adoption of a conduct to be followed for their control, mitigation and termination, at least in the short term, since, in the medium and long term, they would happen again if they are not accompanied by judging from the permanence of interaction between the company's structures and the behavior of workers in the informal environment.\par
According to socio-economic theory, the identified malfunctions and the accounting of the hidden costs resulting from these malfunctions deserve treatment through the presentation of factual solutions taking into account the peculiar reality of each company. However, it obliges the conception of a solution to the identified dysfunctions in order to minimize them or even put an end to them in the short term, in the medium and long term to proceed with measures to monitor the company's operation.\par
Thought already approached by \hyperref[b23]{Savall \& Zardet (1987)}, when referring that, the socio-economic theory methodologically possesses theoretical and practical conditions to solve the dysfunctions that result in hidden costs during the functioning of the organizations, in that it presents the tools to choose given the reality of each company and, therefore, the explanatory variables of the solution domain. That is, did you diagnose a malfunction or pathology during the operation of the company? It interprets it and then solves the referred dysfunction for the ortho functioning of the company.\par
This condition takes us back to the algorithm followed by a doctor when dealing with a patient in the hospital. The patient is diagnosed by exposing him to the symptoms, the doctor questions and, in order to Abstract-The management of hidden costs in organizations requires compliance with the precepts of socio-economic theory, which imply reaching the four stages of investigation: situational diagnosis, strategic worksheet, prescription and predictive test. To this end, a proposal for a solution is conceived that suggests knowing its effectiveness through a test through reobservation of the motivations achieved among workers after implementing some measures contained in the presented solution. It is in this event that the investigation was developed, with the application of interventionist research, the frequency of malfunctions that cause hidden costs evaluated at 8,392, 259.29 Kz in the investigation carried out in December 2022 was observed and applied through the Plan of Priority Activities (PAP) tool, a short-term tool with seventytwo (72) proposed activities, however, it was tested with the frequency´s subsequent reobservation of the same dysfunctions. Forty-seven (47) took the name of strategic activity, those activities with a value that appeared in the range of 1.5 to 2 according to the results of the spss software, that can mitigate the frequency of dysfunctions and associated hidden costs. Therefore, the proposed solution became a solution to the diagnosed dysfunctions, as it was possible to verify the decrease in the frequency of malfunctions and hidden costs in the order of 4,251,442.27 Kz and as performing costs evaluated at 4,930,039.86 Kz in the research carried out in March 2023. This reduction resulted from the tendency of the solution's effectiveness, serving from now on as an application tool whenever dysfunctions are found, since it is flexible to adaptations according to the company's internal context. confirm or refute the diagnosis, resorts to interpretation through the results of the analyzes recommended by him. These results for the doctor serve as a barometer for the conclusions of the types of drugs to prescribe or even advise a conduct to be followed by the patient. This cycle does not stop there, if not, the doctor monitors the patient's evolution taking into account the given prescription or the recommended conduct. If it does not have substantiated positive effects in improving the patient's health, the doctor will certainly evolve to another prescription according to the degree of the drugs.\par
In the investigation of Deco, Napoleão, Tamo, \& Simbo (2023), malfunctions were diagnosed that caused hidden costs linked to the absenteeism indicator and, therefore, in this article, the results of all the indicators studied were presented, and then the proposed solution was presented. Those dysfunctions that, with the measurement of its effectiveness by means of a predictive test, weconcluded that the proposed solution is a solution to be able to reduce the dysfunctions that caused the hidden costs accounted for, naturally in a later period with reference to the same variables. 
\section[{a) Problematic Context}]{a) Problematic Context}\par
The need to see organizations as living beings, as Tamo (2014) refers, is imperative, as it provides positive indicators to approach the best management practices of organizations. This is a thought materialized in the socio-economic theory  {\ref Savall \& Zardet (1975)}, regardless of the fact that they did not equate organizations with human beings.\par
In this investigation, therefore, it was possible to sustain this thought, that of adopting the patient management model by the doctor, making the methodology richer and more proactive in favor of the survival and continuity of organizations, substantiated in the presentation of a proposal for solutions to malfunctions found and that cause hidden costs and that deserved a predictive test for its validation.\par
Allied to this, the concept of follow-up is also adopted, which derives from the idea of solutions to be proposed to safeguard a positive position that prevents the return of those dysfunctions that caused the aforementioned hidden costs.\par
At first, the object studied was unaware of the existence of dysfunctions of an occult nature, unaware of the theory that studies dysfunctions and, therefore, the possibility of existing in the investigative scope a feasible solution to the dysfunctions diagnosed to the specific reality of the company, constituting facts that animated the investigation and which resulted in the results presented below.\par
To this end, the solution conceived in the light of the company's reality was tested by developing a new investigation, in a period different from that of the first investigation, taking into account the same hidden cost indicators studied, the same diagnosed malfunctions that caused the hidden costs in view of the activities regarded as strategic because they are capable of addressing the malfunctions found or at least reducing their frequency.\par
With these questions verified by the studied object, he suggested proposing the following scientific question: how can a proposal for a solution to the diagnosed malfunctions be conceived to contribute to For this purpose, the general objective consisted of designing a proposed solution to the malfunctions found and which caused the hidden costs accounted for during the first investigation.\par
In order to achieve this objective, specific objectives were achieved by carrying out the following activities in the research space: to substantiate the theoretical basis that sustains the socio-economic theory; present the results of the first investigation object of a proposed solution; identify the explanatory and solution domain variables adaptable to the reality of the studied object; propose activities in each variable; verify the reliability and adjustment to normality of the new data structure; carry out a descriptive analysis to identify strategic activities; perform predictive testing of strategic activities; count the paid time (hours) without any counter-work taking into account the related indicator; accounting for hidden costs according to the time of each indicator; ensure the qualimetric approach for accounting for all costs incurred during operation from: determination of the production cost and cost price with and without hidden costs, determination of the analytical result without and with hidden costs and measuring the hidden costs weight resulting from predictive testing in the company's visible cost structure; reveal the visible and unknown economic performance provided by the predictive test. 
\section[{II. Materials and Methods}]{II. Materials and Methods} 
\section[{a) Theoretical Framework}]{a) Theoretical Framework}\par
Based on the investigations developed by the authors  {\ref Savall (1975)}; \hyperref[b22]{Savall (1979)}; \hyperref[b23]{Savall (1987)}, \hyperref[b18]{Savall \& Zardet (2009)} and \hyperref[b17]{Savall \& Zardet (2010)}, when stating that the structure variable overlaps the behavior variable, and that having a variation in structures can vary the way workers act, this reality makes the behaviorist theory to the detriment of the structuralist theory taken into account.\par
To support this thought \hyperref[b23]{Savall \& Zardet (1987)}, studied two identical structures, but produce different results in terms of personnel, given the differentiation of working conditions and levels of motivation that each structure provides to its workers. Thus, the central hypothesis lies in the behavior to be presented by the employees in face of the organizational structures placed at their disposal, hence  {\ref Savall et al (2008)} apud \hyperref[b6]{Moreno et al (2020)}, refer that the hypothesis that guides the socio-economic methodology recognizes the unofficial power of the company's employees, taking into account the organizational structures. For the successful measurement of hidden costs, the fundamental hypothesis rests around two concepts, one of which is added to this investigation: dysfunctions generated by the interaction between the behavior of workers and the structures of the organization in the informal sphere, time as the moment in which they occur and regulation of dysfunctions and the hidden costs generated.\par
The first concept, the malfunctioning that they are, is the result of the workers' unofficial power vis-à-vis the company's structures  {\ref Savall et al (2008)}, representing the difference between normal functioning and the real or effective functioning obtained by workers in the performance of their duties.\par
The second concept is variable time, which allows measuring hidden costs in the face of malfunctions. For the regularization of dysfunctions, time is taken as a unit (hours, minutes?) translated into currency \hyperref[b17]{Savall \& Zardet (2010)}.\par
This thought was applied by the author Lobo (1999), apud Oliveira et al (2019), when making an accounting connotation to hidden costs over time, noting that excessive overtime, excessive waiting hours in staff rotation, idleness due to production scheduling errors and consecutive time devoted to reducing failures and time spent to respond to customer complaints, are the basis for dealing with hidden costs in companies and organizations through the anticipated measurement of the corresponding time.\par
The third concept is, therefore, the hidden cost that is the result of malfunctions as the generating factor through the measurement ahead of time in the face of a certain indicator  {\ref Savall et al (2008)}; corroborating with the emphasis mentioned by \hyperref[b5]{Martins (2013)}, when he says that identifying hidden costs is the initial step for companies and knowledge-based organizations to achieve their objectives.\par
Thus, the hidden costs respect the expression of the informal power of the employees of the organizations that is expressed through behavior, Brand, Vivanco and González (2017) and that are grouped into five (5) components (Over wages, overtime, overconsumption, non-production and noncreation of potential) with also five (5) indicators of hidden costs (absenteeism, accidents at work, staff turnover, quality defects, deviation in direct productivity and idleness) at the time of their evaluation. 
\section[{III. Methodology}]{III. Methodology}\par
The research focuses on the management of organizations, referring to the main theory, which is socio-economic, and the accounting of visible costs was through absorption costing, according to the thoughts of Ferreira, Caldeira, Asseiceiro \& Vicente (2019), \hyperref[b1]{Caiado (2011)}, \hyperref[b27]{Tepa (2012)} and \hyperref[b5]{Martins (2013)} and, regarding hidden costs, was based on the socioeconomic method in the thinking defended by the authors  {\ref Savall et al (2008)} and Savall \& Zardet (2010) through a specific qualification for simultaneous management of costs in organizations.\par
Based on the thinking of Tamo (2012), the requirement of a peculiar methodology capable of leading the researcher to achieve research results and with quality is fundamental in the originality of empirical knowledge.\par
The viability of the investigation was achieved, as always, by bringing together works by various authors, such as: books, newspapers, scientific articles  
\section[{Hidden cost and hidden performance}]{Hidden cost and hidden performance}\par
Negotiation strategies with the environment and companies (proactive strategy as opposed to traditional) 
\section[{Regulation of malfunctions time identification}]{Regulation of malfunctions time identification}\par
Predictive Testing for the Management of Hidden Costs in Organizations that highlight the state of the art of the referenced theories, the results achieved for the second time in the field and which figured as the second structure of data to be analyzed and interpreted. The results were processed with software spss.\par
The software in the first instance was used to verify: reliability of the results achieved through Cronbachs Alpha and for the descriptive analysis of the data contained in the Capacity Grid, adapted to the competence grid of \hyperref[b17]{Savall \& Zardet (2010)}, also adapted to the Likert scale, in order to identify the strategic activities capable of mitigating the levels of hidden costs observed in the first analysis.\par
However, the average was used as a determining indicator in identifying activities understood as strategic with a tendency to reduce the frequency of appearance of dysfunctions that caused the high level of hidden costs accounted for.\par
The set of activities in each explanatory variable and domain of solution originated the elaboration of the Capacity Grid for each indicator adapted to the competence grid Savall \& Zardet (2010) and Tamo, (2012), resorting to the adaptation of the Likert scale where (1 -unimportant, 2-important) and, one (1) corresponds to "No" and two (2) corresponds to "Yes" in the structured interview carried out.\par
The strategic activities that can mitigate the dysfunctions that cause hidden costs are those that have average values that are in the range of 1.5 to 2 and are considered "important" and emphasize that the worker has little theoretical and practical knowledge on the referred variables and, therefore, the worker has difficulties in putting the knowledge into practice, meking it difficult for him to master the activities associated with the variables, thus causing dysfunctions that originate hidden costs through the generation of marginal time, hence the explanatory and domain variables solution in relation to the activities identified as being important and subject to re-observation after the mirror effect.\par
Activities with average values between 1 and 1.4 indicate that workers have theoretical and practical knowledge of explanatory and solution domain variables, and therefore, workers do not have difficulties in putting this knowledge into practice theorists. These activities cannot effectively cause hidden costs, hence they are not important in mitigating the frequency of malfunctions that cause hidden costs.\par
The interpretation of the results considers that, the higher value of the average score, the greater degree of the activity importance to the point of taking on the strategic name for the worker, and with that, thinking about monitoring it to mitigate the time of delays, absence and regulation of dysfunctions. 
\section[{a) Validation of Proposed Activities for Strategic Activities}]{a) Validation of Proposed Activities for Strategic Activities}\par
The verification of the activities pertinence in the proposed solution is conditioned by the average value to have to conclude whether or not it takes the name of strategic activity. For this purpose, the spss software was used to determine the average value of each activity.\par
To this end, the behavior of the same department workers was again observed, in March 2023, in order to measure the degree of motivation achieved by them after the company had improved some working conditions, given training, had reinforced security levels, improved channels and means of communication and ways of controlling, after the mirror effect that occurred in the first survey.\par
Therefore, only the significant indicators were re-observed, as well as the malfunctions that caused the hidden costs during the first investigation. Refers to the indicators: absenteeism, staff turnover, quality defects, deviation in direct productivity and idleness, taking into account the malfunctions that caused the hidden costs accounted for. 
\section[{b) Surveys, Techniques and Instruments Built for Data Collection}]{b) Surveys, Techniques and Instruments Built for Data Collection}\par
For data collection, two of the three techniques recommended in the socio-economic methodology were used and implemented simultaneously: participant observation and document analysis \hyperref[b17]{Savall \& Zardet (2010)}. Two instruments were built: questinaire, questionaire grid and an observation grid or card.\par
The questionaire was appliedto the department head and the three (3) heads of each shift, and with every worker whenever necessary during observation and accidentally by a group of two or thre technicians. The questionaire served as a basis for identifying the activities considered strategic, with the worker simply stating that this activity can motivate him to better perform his duties.\par
From the participant observation it was possible to re-observe the dysfunctions for each worker in order to account for the frequency of occurrence of each dysfunction of hidden costs through the observation grids. Therefore, each form corresponded to a worker, satisfying eighty-nine (89) copies and were coded with the first letters of the first name and last name of the observed.\par
Therefore, three (3) previously trained observation groups were created to collect data with the necessary quality and reliability, composed of four (4) 
\section[{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}]{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}\par
Volume XXIII Issue V Version I Year 2023( ) A © 2023 Global Journals\par
Following the thinking of  {\ref Savall, et al (2008)}, the research-intervention was applied as the main one and which allowed direct contact with the Port Company of Cabinda-EP, information/knowledge was co-produced between the researchers and the workers of the referred company.\par
elements, namely: the researcher, each shift manager (three managers) and two (2) department technicians.\par
And for the documentary analysis, we were provided with the payroll for the month of March 2023, shift scales, functional organization chart, vacation plans, financial execution and the company's status, which served as the basis for data collection. 
\section[{c) Practices for Accounting the Frequency of Results}]{c) Practices for Accounting the Frequency of Results}\par
It was possible to analyze and account for the frequency of dysfunctions, through the number of minutes, of hidden hours that each file contained, using the techniques of document analysis and analysis of questionair results according to \hyperref[b17]{Savall \& Zardet (2010)}, so that, if the exhaustion of the information analysis that each file presented, exhausting the analysis of all the information contained in the observation grid.\par
The documental analysis was fundamental in the analysis of the content they contained, enabling the calculation of the unit hours in each form, through the each factor frequency occurrence generating hidden cost taking into account its indicators: absenteeism, staff turnover, defects in quality, deviation in direct productivity and idleness.\par
With the payrolls, it was possible to extract the salary of the employees placed in the Operations Department in March 2023, identify the employees who were in full enjoyment of the disciplinary leave and the employees who earned overtime in the period under analysis; and with the statute it was possible to characterize the company, from its functioning to the knowledge of the procedures that regulate the operational activity of the Company, fact completed with its functional organigram.\par
With the interviews it was possible to analyse, identify the strategic activities and using the descriptive analysis of the spss software, for a precision of the results that were presented again to the heads of the department (mirror effect); as emphasized \hyperref[b17]{(Savall \& Zardet, 2010}) that the mirror effect is an important lever for the progress of the innovation process; if none of the actors does it, the analysis of the interviews would not be recognized; the status and competence of the interveners would be strongly questioned, which would slow down the efficiency of the process.\par
Thus, the hidden costs were accounted for in part together with the heads of the department, additional questionaire were organized with those in charge to calculate with them the hidden costs resulting from the frequencies that the cards presented during the mirror effect phase. 
\section[{d) Qualimetry in Cost Accounting}]{d) Qualimetry in Cost Accounting}\par
For the complete accounting of the visible and hidden costs that occurred in the services provided by the company during the period under analysis, the qualimetry was used that made it possible to incorporate hidden costs in the cost accounting and management maps, that is, the accounting of costs visible and simultaneous accounting of hidden costs was only possible for the purposes of calculating costs and results, incorporating both types of costs in the absorption costing maps. Thus, one can verify the complementarity between socio-economic theory and cost and management accounting in terms of cost management in organizations. 
\section[{e) Proposed Solution}]{e) Proposed Solution}\par
In this investigation, a solution proposal was set up by \hyperref[b17]{Savall \& Zardet (2010)}, which could at least mitigate the frequency of dysfunctions and, concomitantly, the hidden costs accounted for at the time of the first research in the company, since its complete elimination is a condition of medium and long term. For this, the Plan of Priority Actions tool was applied, using explanatory variables and solution domains, namely: improvement of competence, improvement of working conditions, control and improvement of internal communication in the company, through the formulation of a set of strategic activities substantiated to each of the explanatory and solution domain variables. When introducing the concept of the solution proposal, the result of the absenteeism indicator and other hidden cost indicators constitute, therefore, the bases of comparison with the results to be verified through the predictive test of the proposed solution to be conceived (PAP) according to the reality of the company and with that, conclude whether or not the referred solution proposal is effective. 
\section[{f) Hidden Costs AccountediIn the First Survey}]{f) Hidden Costs AccountediIn the First Survey} 
\section[{IV. Results and Discussion}]{IV. Results and Discussion} 
\section[{a) Data Confidence Level}]{a) Data Confidence Level}\par
Beforehand, it was necessary to verify the confidence level of the data in the results presented in the capacity grides of the absenteeism, staff rotation, quality defect, direct productivity deviation, and Idle indicators by observing the Cronbanch Alpha value obtained using the spss statistical software. The data collected as shown in the table above reveal a sufficient confidence level of Cronbach's Alpha, suggesting that the structure of the sample and the respective results obtained are confident. 
\section[{b) Conceived Solution Proposal Versus the Observed Hidden Costs}]{b) Conceived Solution Proposal Versus the Observed Hidden Costs}\par
In accordance with the precepts of socioeconomic theory and, with the objective of contributing to the mitigation of the levels of malfunctions found that cause the hidden costs accounted for, at this stage a proposal for a solution was constructed in accordance with the peculiar reality of the company with the in order to maximize economic, financial and social results through the level of hidden performing costs to be recovered. 
\section[{c) Proposed Explanatory and Solution Domain Variables}]{c) Proposed Explanatory and Solution Domain Variables}\par
As the hidden costs were categorized by indicators and each dysfunction is categorized in its indicator, then, it was possible to relate the activities proposed by each indicator of hidden costs. Therefore, it was understood to confine in four (4) families the six \hyperref[b5]{(6)} variables that explain the domain of solution of the hidden costs, as it can be seen below and that, controlled and improved, can excite the motivation of the workers.\par
Thus, the explanatory and solution domain variables of the factors that generate the hidden costs presented for mitigating the levels of dysfunction found were:\par
? Competence, working conditions, control and internal communication.\par
However, the explanatory variable implementation of the strategy was applied during the diagnosis process of hidden costs and which should be subsequently implemented at all levels of the company; the explanatory variable work organization is incorporated in the adequacy of jobs within the explanatory variable: working conditions, for better interdependence of the areas that make up the operations department; the time management variable was coupled to the control variable; and the variable integrated training was developed in the explanatory variable competence, while the variable communicationcoordination and concertation was summarized in the variable internal communication.\par
Therefore, the aforementioned explanatory and solution domain variables were associated with the strategic activities to be developed, and, satisfied and/or applied by the company, they mitigate the malfunctions that cause hidden costs. 
\section[{d) Activities Proposed in each Explanatory Variable}]{d) Activities Proposed in each Explanatory Variable}\par
Because the four (4) families or explanatory and solution domain variables are interactive among themselves, taking into account the dysfunctions and hidden costs, seventy-two (72) activities were proposed according to each indicator of hidden costs that were the subject of a structured interview with the eighty (89) employees assigned to the studied department.\par
However, the intention in the interviews was that each worker indicated or opined which or which activities, once implemented, can improve their behavior in the workplace and combined with the results of the "average" descriptive analysis, therefore, the 
\section[{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}]{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}\par
Volume XXIII Issue V Version I Year 2023( ) A © 2023 Global Journals\par
investigation concluded that they might or might not mitigate the levels of dysfunctions or at least reduce their frequency.\par
The hidden cost related to the overpayment component was not the subject of the creation of a strategy for its mitigation during the prescription phase because it depends on the Executive, that is, because it depends on the revision of the General Labor Law in force in the Republic of Angola. Refer to workers' benefits, such as the vacation subsidy, thirteenth month subsidy. 
\section[{e) Proposed Activities for the Absenteeism Indicator}]{e) Proposed Activities for the Absenteeism Indicator}\par
The table below illustrates the capacity grid relative to the results of the absenteeism indicator according to the structured interview carried out, for the purpose of measuring the level of reliability and descriptive analysis of the data to identify the strategic activities likely to mitigate the dysfunctions found and which originated the hidden costs observed in this indicator. As for absenteeism, it is necessary to highlight all the explanatory variables of the solution domain when the issue is addressing the dysfunctions that cause hidden costs. The hidden cost indicator absenteeism is explained by the improvement of workers' skills, the improvement of some working conditions, the performance evaluation and the dissemination of internal information through conventional channels, as can be seen in the The high levels of hidden costs found in the absenteeism indicator are mitigated, in part by improving the competence of workers, namely: training by necessity, training must take place in the workplace "on the job" and systematize the knowledge of each task carried out in that department. It should be based on improving working conditions by adhering to new technologies, adequate sanitary facilities, safety at the height of the type of work carried out and receiving compensatory wages for the exerted effort. Based on self-control based on performance assessment and dissemination of information using the company's official channels (windows, circulars and intranet) so that all department workers are aware of the instructions issued by those responsible in time. 
\section[{f) Results of the Descriptive Analysis to Identify Strategic Activities}]{f) Results of the Descriptive Analysis to Identify Strategic Activities}\par
With this, time will be well managed to the point that each professional performs their duties in a timely manner by improving arrival time (being punctual), improving absences (being diligent at work), which actually inhibits procrastination, providing more individual and consequently collective productivity. 
\section[{g) Activities Proposed for the Staff Rotation Indicator}]{g) Activities Proposed for the Staff Rotation Indicator}\par
According to the capacity grid below, it was understood that the company should monitor control and focus on internal communication using more efficient channels, measuring the level of reliability and adjustment to normality of the collected data. As can be seen in the table above, the worker answered affirmatively or negatively, the activities that may or may not motivate him. Therefore, they were the subject of descriptive analysis to find those that would be figured as strategic and capable of reducing the time to replace the colleague at the job.  
\section[{Source: Processed by Spss}]{Source: Processed by Spss}\par
According to the table above, in order to motivate workers so that they can show up at the ideal time to relieve their colleague, it is necessary to monitor control and carry out internal communication using more efficient channels. Therefore, adhering to the intratnet, showcases, circulars, briefing and internal phone calls and to a performance assessment combined with monitoring the performance of tasks is essential to be able to positively influence the worker, to the point of winning their job in the recommended time. The Table \hyperref[tab_6]{6} presents the results of the descriptive analysis for the identification of activities considered strategic according to the average value achieved.\par
The Table \hyperref[tab_7]{7} illustrates the capacity grid of the indicator defect in the quality of the results of the structured interview for the purpose of measuring the level of reliability and testing the normality of the results. Therefore, the mitigation of malfunctions and hidden costs accounted for in the quality defect indicator is explained in the improvement of skills levels (preferably providing on-the-job training, systematization of tasks), in the improvement of control levels (evaluating performance and monitoring achievement of activities to carry out the task on time and issue a report on its execution), improving some working conditions (opting for modern infrastructure, opting for equipment with the latest technology, improving safety in handling improvement of some working conditions, in the improvement of some control actions and in the improvement of internal communication, as can be seen in the Table \hyperref[tab_8]{8}. 
\section[{Absenteeism}]{Absenteeism}\par
equipment, improving lighting in the park and facilities, improvement of dormitory conditions, salary equity and salary improvement) and the option of communication processed via personal telephone (mobile phone), i.e., the responsible person must communicate with the technicians through an existing fixed telephone and at mobile of each worker when it comes to guidelines. 
\section[{k) Activities Proposed for the Direct Productivity Deviation Indicator}]{k) Activities Proposed for the Direct Productivity Deviation Indicator}\par
For the direct productivity deviation indicator, the company should monitor the variables: competence, working conditions, control and internal communication, as can be seen in the capacity grid of the structured interview.  
\section[{l) Results of the Descriptive Analysis to Identify Strategic Activities}]{l) Results of the Descriptive Analysis to Identify Strategic Activities}\par
It can be understood from the table below that, in order to combat the level of dysfunctions related to the deviation in direct productivity, the company must experience improvements in all explanatory and solution domain variables presented: Skills, working conditions, control and internal communication. The activities considered strategic can optimize the moments for making a decision on the part of those responsible for the Department and reduce the time to recover the equipment whenever it breaks down and help the workers to recover their work position as soon as possible after the meal period, due to the increased levels of control, improved working conditions, improved skills and adoption of more efficient internal communication channels. With this, workers will receive more knowledge substantiated in the know-how, know-how, know-how, through training linked to the explanatory variables and mastery of solutions to the malfunctions and hidden costs accounted for. According to the table above, the interviewees answered yes or no to the priority activities that the company must improve in order to increase motivation levels and consequently reduce the time spent at home compared to the vacation time granted by law.  
\section[{n) Results of the Descriptive Analysis to Identify Strategic Activities}]{n) Results of the Descriptive Analysis to Identify Strategic Activities} 
\section[{m) Proposed Activities for the Idleness Indicator}]{m) Proposed Activities for the Idleness Indicator}\par
The Table \hyperref[tab_11]{11} illustrates the capacity grid of the results of the structured interview for the idleness indicator for the purpose of measuring the level of reliability and the normality adjustment test.\par
There is good confidence in the data regarding the results found for the idleness indicator, as can be seen in the In order to monitor idleness, it is understood that the company must base its strategy on the continuous improvement of working conditions and, therefore, instill a communication culture through formal channels in addition to informal channels, as can be seen in the table above. duration of the same is foreseen, a measure also supported in the company's internal instructions. 
\section[{o) Plan of Priority Activities (Actions) Built}]{o) Plan of Priority Activities (Actions) Built}\par
In order to combat the identified dysfunctions and the hidden costs accounted for in the first survey, a solution proposal was constructed, through the identification of activities considered to be strategic capable of mitigating the identified dysfunctions or at least reducing their frequency and, consequently, the costs accounted for and, therefore, summarized at this stage through the Priority Activities Plan (PAP) tool, as can be seen below: Seventy-two (72) activities were proposed in the four (4) explanatory variables and domain of solution to the detected dysfunctions, and that, using the spss statistical software, it was possible to identify (47) strategic activities to be monitored by the company for the mitigation of the levels of malfunctions found and the hidden costs accounted for, which for that, as the PAP is usually short-term \hyperref[b18]{Savall \& Zardet (2009)}, in the second month after the first investigation, implemented thirty (30) of these strategic activities that made if you think about testing the prescription, that is, testing the effectiveness of these activities, as you can see in the table above, how they were implemented if they can help mitigate the malfunctions found or their frequency and consequently the hidden costs.\par
The identification of strategic activities combined with the fulfillment of the mirror effect substantiated in the presentation of the dysfunctions that caused the hidden costs of the first investigation made the company improve some working conditions aiming to increase the levels of satisfaction of the workers in their jobs, the control , skills and began to communicate with workers using more conventional channels, as can be seen in the tool: Plan of Priority Activities goes up. 
\section[{p) Predictive Testing of the Conceived Solution}]{p) Predictive Testing of the Conceived Solution}\par
In order to combat the malfunctions found and, at the same time, the hidden costs accounted for in December 2022, a proposal for a solution was conceived in March 2023 using the PAP tool, which, at this stage, highlighted its level of effectiveness, through re-observation of the same malfunctions that generated the hidden costs accounted for. However, the indicators were observed where the dysfunctions that originated the hidden costs were observed, refer to the indicators: absenteeism, staff turnover, quality defects, deviation in direct productivity and idleness. 
\section[{i. Time Accounting}]{i. Time Accounting}\par
The length of delay, absence from the workplace, correction of malfunctions by the workers was re-observed, and the work was done in addition to what was recommended in carrying out tasks in each of the eighty-nine (89) workers in the month of March 2023. This aim was achieved with the observation grid and summarized in the table immediately below, for each malfunction in relation to its hidden cost indicator for the days ahead of the analyzed month.  For this purpose, the Table15 presents the results of the time calculated for each malfunction observed.\par
According to the results in the Table \hyperref[tab_15]{15}, it is assumed that the company will be able to recover part of its productivity due to the decrease in the time lost in the observed malfunctions. 
\section[{ii. Determination of Production Cost without Hidden Costs}]{ii. Determination of Production Cost without Hidden Costs}\par
The Table16 shows the production cost and the cost price of the EPC-EP in March 2023 without incorporating the hidden costs to be accounted for, taking into account the identified cost items covered in cost and management accounting.    \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.16388174807197942\textwidth}P{0.2534704370179949\textwidth}P{0.12236503856041131\textwidth}P{0.008740359897172235\textwidth}P{0.05025706940874036\textwidth}P{0.09177377892030848\textwidth}P{0.15951156812339332\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{5}{l}{General Assessment of Accounted Hidden Costs (?1=58 Kwanza "kz")}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Sobrecargas\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Não produtos}\\
Components Indicators\tabcellsep Extra wages (1)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Overtime (2) Overconsumpti on (3)}\tabcellsep Non-productio n (4)\tabcellsep Not creating potential (5)\tabcellsep Total hidden costs (1)+ (2)+(3)+(4) +(5)\\
Absenteeism\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{5.681.308,80 2.752.092,82}\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 5.843.590,63\\
Work accidents\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\\
Staff rotation\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 539.268,62\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 498.368,75\\
Quality defects\tabcellsep 501.899,58\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 424.644,69\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_0}Table 1 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.6006666666666667\textwidth}P{0.15866666666666668\textwidth}P{0.09066666666666667\textwidth}}
Indicators\tabcellsep Alpha of Cronbach\tabcellsep Number of itens\\
Absenteeism Capacity\tabcellsep 0,729\tabcellsep 18\\
Staff rotation capacity\tabcellsep 0,871\tabcellsep 7\\
Capacity for quality defect\tabcellsep 0,832\tabcellsep 18\\
Capacity in direct productivity deviation\tabcellsep 0,797\tabcellsep 18\\
Idle capacity\tabcellsep 0,888\tabcellsep 11\\
Source: Processed by Spss\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{3} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.01906729634002361\textwidth}P{0.07727272727272727\textwidth}P{0.6071428571428571\textwidth}P{0.05820543093270366\textwidth}P{0.050177095631641085\textwidth}P{0.03813459268004722\textwidth}}
Indicator\tabcellsep Explanatory variable\tabcellsep Activities\tabcellsep Code\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Answers 1 2}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep training by need\tabcellsep Cm1\tabcellsep 47\tabcellsep 42\\
\tabcellsep Competence\tabcellsep On-the-job training offered by the person in charge\tabcellsep Cm2\tabcellsep 70\tabcellsep 19\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Systematization of knowledge of each task\tabcellsep Cm3\tabcellsep 54\tabcellsep 35\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Responsibility for each task\tabcellsep Cm4\tabcellsep 37\tabcellsep 52\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Modern and safe infrastructures\tabcellsep Ct1\tabcellsep 20\tabcellsep 69\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Modern and cutting-edge technology\tabcellsep Ct2\tabcellsep 66\tabcellsep 23\\
\tabcellsep Conditions of work\tabcellsep Healthy sanitary facilities Safety at work Fair and adequate compensation\tabcellsep Ct3 Ct4 Ct5\tabcellsep 71 78 77\tabcellsep 18 11 12\\
Absenteeim\tabcellsep \tabcellsep pay equity\tabcellsep Ct6\tabcellsep 21\tabcellsep 68\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep reward valence\tabcellsep Ct7\tabcellsep 28\tabcellsep 61\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Monitoring the completion of the task\tabcellsep C1\tabcellsep 26\tabcellsep 63\\
\tabcellsep Control\tabcellsep Performance evaluation\tabcellsep C2\tabcellsep 79\tabcellsep 10\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Request for results\tabcellsep C3\tabcellsep 40\tabcellsep 49\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Dissemination of information through conventional company channels\tabcellsep Ci1\tabcellsep 85\tabcellsep 4\\
\tabcellsep Internal Communication\tabcellsep Broadcasting a single message Dissemination of recognition of the merit of Workers\tabcellsep Ci2 Ci3\tabcellsep 24 36\tabcellsep 65 53\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Diffusion of reinforcement of values and good conduct in the Leadership\tabcellsep Ci4\tabcellsep 26\tabcellsep 63\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_2}Table 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{4} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.48939393939393944\textwidth}P{0.021794871794871794\textwidth}P{0.106993006993007\textwidth}P{0.04953379953379953\textwidth}P{0.09114219114219115\textwidth}P{0.09114219114219115\textwidth}}
Actividades\tabcellsep N\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Mean Standard Statístice deviation}\tabcellsep Statistical deviation\tabcellsep Statistical variation\\
Com1\textunderscore Training by necessity\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,76\tabcellsep 0,050\tabcellsep 0,475\tabcellsep 0,226\\
Com2\textunderscore On-job training\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,88\tabcellsep 0,044\tabcellsep 0,420\tabcellsep 0,176\\
Com3\textunderscore Systematization of the knowledge of each task\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,75\tabcellsep 0,051\tabcellsep 0,479\tabcellsep 0,230\\
Com4\textunderscore Accountability of the task\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,47\tabcellsep 0,051\tabcellsep 0,486\tabcellsep 0,236\\
Ct1\textunderscore Modern and safe infrastructure\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,28\tabcellsep 0,041\tabcellsep 0,386\tabcellsep 0,149\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_3}Table 4 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{4} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
:\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_4}Table 4}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{5} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.039451476793248945\textwidth}P{0.08786919831223629\textwidth}P{0.6114978902953586\textwidth}P{0.039451476793248945\textwidth}P{0.04662447257383966\textwidth}P{0.02510548523206751\textwidth}}
Indicator\tabcellsep Explanatory Variable\tabcellsep Strategic Activity\tabcellsep Code\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Answer s 1 2}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Performance evaluation/Monitoring in carrying out the task\tabcellsep C1\tabcellsep 21\tabcellsep 68\\
\tabcellsep Control\tabcellsep Performance evaluation\tabcellsep C2\tabcellsep 56\tabcellsep 33\\
staff\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Request for results\tabcellsep C3\tabcellsep 19\tabcellsep 70\\
rotation\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Dissemination of information through the company's conventional channels\tabcellsep Ci1\tabcellsep 66\tabcellsep 23\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Broadcasting a single message\tabcellsep Ci2\tabcellsep 16\tabcellsep 73\\
\tabcellsep Internal\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep Communicati on\tabcellsep Dissemination of recognition of the merit of Workers\tabcellsep Ci3\tabcellsep 24\tabcellsep 65\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Diffusion of reinforcement of values and good conduct in the Leadership\tabcellsep Ci4\tabcellsep 38\tabcellsep 51\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_5}Table 5 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{6} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.39574468085106385\textwidth}P{0.011702127659574468\textwidth}P{0.006382978723404255\textwidth}P{0.02127659574468085\textwidth}P{0.08085106382978724\textwidth}P{0.03723404255319149\textwidth}P{0.11702127659574468\textwidth}P{0.03723404255319149\textwidth}P{0.04468085106382978\textwidth}P{0.03723404255319149\textwidth}P{0.06063829787234042\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Number\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Non-parametric test (a,b) Mean Standar deviation}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{Most extremes are different Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Absolute Positive Negative}\tabcellsep Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{C1\textunderscore Self control}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,31\tabcellsep 0,412\tabcellsep 0,484\tabcellsep 0,484\tabcellsep -0,302\tabcellsep 4,569\tabcellsep 0,000\\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{C2\textunderscore Performance}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{evaluation/task}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,85\tabcellsep 0,434\tabcellsep 0,468\tabcellsep 0,284\tabcellsep -0,468\tabcellsep 4,419\tabcellsep 0,000\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{monitoring}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{C3\textunderscore Request results}\tabcellsep for\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,17\tabcellsep 0,446\tabcellsep 0,457\tabcellsep 0,457\tabcellsep -0,273\tabcellsep 4,316\tabcellsep 0,000\\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{Ci1\textunderscore Dissemination}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
of\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{information}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{through company's}\tabcellsep the\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,75\tabcellsep 0,355\tabcellsep 0,513\tabcellsep 0,340\tabcellsep -0,513\tabcellsep 4,844\tabcellsep 0,000\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{conventional}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{channels}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Ci2\textunderscore Single}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{message}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,29\tabcellsep 0,395\tabcellsep 0,495\tabcellsep 0,495\tabcellsep -0,314\tabcellsep 4,665\tabcellsep 0,000\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{broadcast}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{Ci3\textunderscore Dissemination}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{of workers' merit}\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,56\tabcellsep 0,467\tabcellsep 0,435\tabcellsep 0,435\tabcellsep -0,250\tabcellsep 4,105\tabcellsep 0,000\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{recognition}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{Ci4\textunderscore Dissemination}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{of reinforcement}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{of values and}\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,25\tabcellsep 0,479\tabcellsep 0,418\tabcellsep 0,418\tabcellsep -0,261\tabcellsep 3,944\tabcellsep 0,000\\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{good leadership}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{conduct}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_6}Table 6 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{7} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.017790697674418605\textwidth}P{0.09290697674418605\textwidth}P{0.5851162790697675\textwidth}P{0.061279069767441866\textwidth}P{0.05732558139534884\textwidth}P{0.03558139534883721\textwidth}}
Indicator\tabcellsep Explanatory variable\tabcellsep Strategic activity\tabcellsep Code\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Answers 1 2}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Training by need\tabcellsep Cm1\tabcellsep 55\tabcellsep 34\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep On-the-job training offered by the person in charge\tabcellsep Cm2\tabcellsep 40\tabcellsep 49\\
\tabcellsep Competence\tabcellsep Sistematização dos conhecimentos de cada tarefa\tabcellsep Cm3\tabcellsep 67\tabcellsep 22\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Responsibility for each task\tabcellsep Cm4\tabcellsep 38\tabcellsep 51\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Modern and safe infrastructures\tabcellsep Ct1\tabcellsep 44\tabcellsep 45\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Modern and cutting-edge technology\tabcellsep Ct2\tabcellsep 67\tabcellsep 22\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Healthy sanitary facilities\tabcellsep Ct3\tabcellsep 64\tabcellsep 25\\
\tabcellsep Conditions\tabcellsep Safety at work\tabcellsep Ct4\tabcellsep 71\tabcellsep 18\\
\tabcellsep of work\tabcellsep Fair and adequate compensation\tabcellsep Ct5\tabcellsep 69\tabcellsep 20\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_7}Table 7 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{8} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.5207285787583376\textwidth}P{0.07021549512570549\textwidth}P{0.028783991790661878\textwidth}P{0.0750128270908158\textwidth}P{0.039250897896357106\textwidth}P{0.04840944073884043\textwidth}P{0.05931246793227296\textwidth}P{0.008286300667008722\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Pay equity\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Ct6\tabcellsep 23\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Reward valence}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Ct7\tabcellsep 41\\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{5}{l}{Monitoring the completion of the task}\tabcellsep C1\tabcellsep 59\\
Control\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Performance evaluation Request for results}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep C2 C3\tabcellsep 31 39\\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{5}{l}{Dissemination of information through the company's conventional channels}\tabcellsep Ci1\tabcellsep 15\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Broadcasting a single message}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Ci2\tabcellsep 23\\
Internal Communication\tabcellsep \multicolumn{5}{l}{Dissemination of recognition of the merit of Workers}\tabcellsep Ci3\tabcellsep 52\\
\multicolumn{6}{l}{Diffusion of reinforcement of values and good conduct in the Leadership}\tabcellsep Ci4\tabcellsep 57\\
\multicolumn{4}{l}{j) Results of the Descriptive Analysis to Identify}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Strategic Activities\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{4}{l}{The decrease in paid time without any actual}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{4}{l}{work departure for the quality defect indicator is}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{4}{l}{explained by the improvement in workers' skills, in the}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Activities\tabcellsep \tabcellsep N\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Mean Standaed Statistics deviation}\tabcellsep Statistical deviation\tabcellsep Statistical variation\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Com1\textunderscore Training by necessity}\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,64\tabcellsep 0,047\tabcellsep 0,440\tabcellsep 0,194\\
Com2\textunderscore On-job training\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,74\tabcellsep 0,053\tabcellsep 0,501\tabcellsep 0,251\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Com3\textunderscore Systematization of the knowledge of each task}\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,79\tabcellsep 0,048\tabcellsep 0,457\tabcellsep 0,209\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Com4\textunderscore Accountability of the task}\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,64\tabcellsep 0,053\tabcellsep 0,501\tabcellsep 0,251\\
Ct1\textunderscore Modern and safe infrastructure\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,88\tabcellsep 0,053\tabcellsep 0,503\tabcellsep 0,253\\
Ct2\textunderscore Modern technology\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,68\tabcellsep 0,044\tabcellsep 0,420\tabcellsep 0,176\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Ct3\textunderscore Healthy sanitary facilities}\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,23\tabcellsep 0,040\tabcellsep 0,376\tabcellsep 0,142\\
Ct4\textunderscore Safety at work\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,69\tabcellsep 0,044\tabcellsep 0,412\tabcellsep 0,170\\
Ct5\textunderscore Fair and adequate compensation\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,56\tabcellsep 0,050\tabcellsep 0,475\tabcellsep 0,226\\
Ct6\textunderscore Wage equity\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,82\tabcellsep 0,048\tabcellsep 0,452\tabcellsep 0,204\\
Nt7\textunderscore Valency of the reward\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,34\tabcellsep 0,053\tabcellsep 0,503\tabcellsep 0,253\\
C1\textunderscore Self control\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,32\tabcellsep 0,044\tabcellsep 0,420\tabcellsep 0,176\\
C2\textunderscore Performance evaluation\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,69\tabcellsep 0,044\tabcellsep 0,412\tabcellsep 0,170\\
C3\textunderscore Request for results\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,77\tabcellsep 0,053\tabcellsep 0,497\tabcellsep 0,247\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Ci1\textunderscore Diffusion of information through conventional channels}\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,82\tabcellsep 0,048\tabcellsep 0,452\tabcellsep 0,204\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Ci2\textunderscore Single message broadcast}\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,62\tabcellsep 0,048\tabcellsep 0,452\tabcellsep 0,204\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Ci3\textunderscore Dissemination of workers' merit recognition}\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,26\tabcellsep 0,051\tabcellsep 0,483\tabcellsep 0,233\\
Ci4\textunderscore Dissemination of\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{reinforcement of values and good}\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,22\tabcellsep 0,047\tabcellsep 0,446\tabcellsep 0,199\\
leadership conduct\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Source: Processed by Spss\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_8}Table 8 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{9} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.020408163265306124\textwidth}P{0.07857142857142857\textwidth}P{0.6387755102040816\textwidth}P{0.060204081632653055\textwidth}P{0.05204081632653061\textwidth}}
Indicator\tabcellsep Explanatory variable\tabcellsep Strategic activity\tabcellsep Code\tabcellsep Answers 1 2\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Training by need\tabcellsep Cm1\tabcellsep 59\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep On-the-job training offered by the person in charge\tabcellsep Cm2\tabcellsep 45\\
\tabcellsep Competence\tabcellsep Sistematização dos conhecimentos de cada tarefa\tabcellsep Cm3\tabcellsep 58\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Responsibility for each task\tabcellsep Cm4\tabcellsep 49\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Modern and safe infrastructures\tabcellsep Ct1\tabcellsep 51\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Modern and cutting-edge technology\tabcellsep Ct2\tabcellsep 47\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Healthy sanitary facilities\tabcellsep Ct3\tabcellsep 73\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Safety at work\tabcellsep Ct4\tabcellsep 71\\
\tabcellsep Conditions\tabcellsep Fair and adequate compensation\tabcellsep Ct5\tabcellsep 57\\
Absenteeism\tabcellsep of work\tabcellsep Pay equity Reward valence\tabcellsep Ct6 Ct7\tabcellsep 41 39\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Monitoring the completion of the task\tabcellsep C1\tabcellsep 51\\
\tabcellsep Control\tabcellsep Performance evaluation Request for results\tabcellsep C2 C3\tabcellsep 79 61\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Dissemination of information through the company's conventional channels\tabcellsep Ci1\tabcellsep 58\\
\tabcellsep Internal Communicatio n\tabcellsep Broadcasting a single message Dissemination of recognition of the merit of Workers Diffusion of reinforcement of values and good conduct in the Leadership\tabcellsep Ci2 Ci3 Ci4\tabcellsep 56 48 50\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_9}Table 9 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{10} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.45313059033989267\textwidth}P{0.028130590339892667\textwidth}P{0.11100178890876565\textwidth}P{0.02280858676207513\textwidth}P{0.07526833631484794\textwidth}P{0.08819320214669052\textwidth}P{0.07146690518783541\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Year 2023\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Volume XXIII Issue V Version I\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep ( ) A\\
Actividades Com1\textunderscore Training by necessity Com2\textunderscore On-job training Com3\textunderscore Systematization of the knowledge of each task Com4\textunderscore Accountability of the task Ct1\textunderscore Modern and safe infrastructure Ct2\textunderscore Modern technology Ct3\textunderscore Healthy sanitary facilities Ct4\textunderscore Safety at work\tabcellsep N 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Mean Statistics Standaed deviation 1,72 0,052 1,55 0,051 1,71 0,042 1,58 0,053 1,63 0,053 1,78 0,035 1,85 0,039 1,95 0,019}\tabcellsep Statistical deviation 0,489 0,479 0,395 0,503 0,502 0,331 0,366 0,181\tabcellsep Statistical variation 0,239 0,230 0,156 0,253 0,252 0,110 0,134 0,033\tabcellsep Global Journal of Management and Business Research\\
Ct5\textunderscore Fair and adequate compensation\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,80\tabcellsep 0,048\tabcellsep 0,452\tabcellsep 0,204\\
Ct6\textunderscore Wage equity\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,34\tabcellsep 0,053\tabcellsep 0,499\tabcellsep 0,249\\
Nt7\textunderscore Valency of the reward\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,59\tabcellsep 0,053\tabcellsep 0,503\tabcellsep 0,253\\
C1\textunderscore Self control\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,48\tabcellsep 0,053\tabcellsep 0,501\tabcellsep 0,251\\
C2\textunderscore Performance evaluation\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,77\tabcellsep 0,036\tabcellsep 0,343\tabcellsep 0,118\\
C3\textunderscore Request for results\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,58\tabcellsep 0,053\tabcellsep 0,503\tabcellsep 0,253\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep © Global Journals\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_10}Table 10 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{11} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.02580357142857143\textwidth}P{0.08955357142857143\textwidth}P{0.5889285714285714\textwidth}P{0.05767857142857142\textwidth}P{0.05464285714285714\textwidth}P{0.03339285714285714\textwidth}}
Indicator\tabcellsep Explanatory variable\tabcellsep Strategic activity\tabcellsep Code\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Answers s 1 2}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Training by need\tabcellsep Ct1\tabcellsep 54\tabcellsep 35\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Modern and cutting-edge technology\tabcellsep Ct2\tabcellsep 82\tabcellsep 7\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Healthy sanitary facilities\tabcellsep Ct3\tabcellsep 70\tabcellsep 19\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Safety at work\tabcellsep Ct4\tabcellsep 72\tabcellsep 17\\
\tabcellsep Conditions\tabcellsep Fair and adequate compensation\tabcellsep Ct5\tabcellsep 68\tabcellsep 21\\
\tabcellsep of work\tabcellsep Pay equity\tabcellsep Ct6\tabcellsep 24\tabcellsep 65\\
Idleness\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Reward valence Dissemination of information through the company's conventional channels\tabcellsep Ct7 Ci1\tabcellsep 59 73\tabcellsep 30 16\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Broadcasting a single message\tabcellsep Ci2\tabcellsep 41\tabcellsep 48\\
\tabcellsep Internal Communicati\tabcellsep Dissemination of recognition of the merit of Workers\tabcellsep Ci3\tabcellsep 39\tabcellsep 50\\
\tabcellsep on\tabcellsep Diffusion of reinforcement of values and good conduct in the Leadership\tabcellsep Ci4\tabcellsep 35\tabcellsep 54\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_11}Table 11 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{12} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.3390710382513661\textwidth}P{0.013934426229508197\textwidth}P{0.10683060109289617\textwidth}P{0.038706739526411654\textwidth}P{0.15482695810564662\textwidth}P{0.038706739526411654\textwidth}P{0.046448087431693985\textwidth}P{0.038706739526411654\textwidth}P{0.07276867030965392\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep N\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Non-Parametric Test (a, b) Mean Standar Deviation}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{Most Extremes are Different Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Absolute Positive Negative}\tabcellsep Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)\\
Ct1\textunderscore Modern and safe infrastructure\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,58\tabcellsep 0,502\tabcellsep 0,354\tabcellsep 0,325\tabcellsep -0,354\tabcellsep 3,344\tabcellsep 0,000\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Ct2\textunderscore Modern technology 89}\tabcellsep 1,78\tabcellsep 0,331\tabcellsep 0,522\tabcellsep 0,354\tabcellsep -0,522\tabcellsep 4,924\tabcellsep 0,000\\
Ct3\textunderscore Healthy sanitary installations\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,89\tabcellsep 0,366\tabcellsep 0,509\tabcellsep 0,334\tabcellsep -0,509\tabcellsep 4,802\tabcellsep 0,000\\
Ct4\textunderscore Safety at work\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,87\tabcellsep 0,181\tabcellsep 0,540\tabcellsep 0,426\tabcellsep -0,540\tabcellsep 5,094\tabcellsep 0,000\\
Ct5\textunderscore Fair and adequate compensation\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,79\tabcellsep 0,452\tabcellsep 0,452\tabcellsep 0,267\tabcellsep -0,452\tabcellsep 4,264\tabcellsep 0,000\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_12}Table 12 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.5359322033898305\textwidth}P{0.017288135593220337\textwidth}P{0.0288135593220339\textwidth}P{0.043220338983050846\textwidth}P{0.043220338983050846\textwidth}P{0.043220338983050846\textwidth}P{0.05186440677966102\textwidth}P{0.043220338983050846\textwidth}P{0.043220338983050846\textwidth}}
Ct6\textunderscore Wage equity\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0,499\tabcellsep 0,372\tabcellsep 0,372\tabcellsep -0,308\tabcellsep 3,508\tabcellsep 0,000\\
Nt7\textunderscore Valency of the reward\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,59\tabcellsep 0,503\tabcellsep 0,343\tabcellsep 0,343\tabcellsep -0,337\tabcellsep 3,235\tabcellsep 0,000\\
Ci1\textunderscore Dissemination of\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
information through the company's conventional\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,64\tabcellsep 0,440\tabcellsep 0,463\tabcellsep 0,279\tabcellsep -0,463\tabcellsep 4,368\tabcellsep 0,000\\
channels\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Ci2\textunderscore Single message broadcast\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,24\tabcellsep 0,499\tabcellsep 0,372\tabcellsep 0,372\tabcellsep -0,308\tabcellsep 3,508\tabcellsep 0,000\\
Ci3\textunderscore Dissemination of\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
workers' merit\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,69\tabcellsep 0,457\tabcellsep 0,446\tabcellsep 0,446\tabcellsep -0,261\tabcellsep 4,211\tabcellsep 0,000\\
recognition\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Ci4\textunderscore Dissemination of\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
reinforcement of values and good leadership\tabcellsep 89\tabcellsep 1,34\tabcellsep 0,489\tabcellsep 0,401\tabcellsep 0,401\tabcellsep -0,279\tabcellsep 3,781\tabcellsep 0,000\\
conduct\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Source: Processed by Spss\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_13}Table 2 .}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{13} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.017993951612903226\textwidth}P{0.07540322580645162\textwidth}P{0.03170362903225807\textwidth}P{0.007711693548387097\textwidth}P{0.24677419354838712\textwidth}P{0.22792338709677418\textwidth}P{0.012852822580645162\textwidth}P{0.023991935483870967\textwidth}P{0.14994959677419356\textwidth}P{0.05569556451612903\textwidth}}
Indicators\tabcellsep Observed Dysfunctions\tabcellsep Explanatory\tabcellsep variables\tabcellsep Proposed activities\tabcellsep Average value\tabcellsep of the activity\tabcellsep Strategic activities\tabcellsep Strategic activities triggered immediately\tabcellsep Decrease or not of hidden costs\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep training by need\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{1,7629 training by need}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Absenteeism\tabcellsep Paid compensation time Paid vacation allowance time Thirteenth\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Competence Work conditions}\tabcellsep On-the-job training offered by the person in charge Systematization of the knowledge of each task Responsibility for each task Modern and safe infrastructures Modern and cutting-edge technology Healthy sanitary facilities Safety at work\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{On-the-job training offered by the person in charge Systematization of the knowledge of each task Modern and cutting-edge technology Healthy sanitary facilities 1,7989 Safety at work 1,8753 1,7517 1,4708 1,2798 1,6539 1,7764}\tabcellsep On-the-job training offered by the person in charge Systematization of the knowledge of each task Healthy sanitary facilities\tabcellsep See the results of predictive test\\
\tabcellsep month\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Fair and adequate\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{1,9764}\tabcellsep Fair and\tabcellsep Fair and\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_14}Table 13 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{15} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.13485045513654095\textwidth}P{0.5250325097529259\textwidth}P{0.08400520156046813\textwidth}P{0.07405721716514954\textwidth}P{0.03205461638491547\textwidth}}
Indicators\tabcellsep Departmentof Operations\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep Generating Factor\tabcellsep Minutes\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Hours Days}\\
Absenteeism\tabcellsep Vacation subsidy salary\tabcellsep 77 190,00\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{1 286,50 53,60}\\
\tabcellsep Overtime\tabcellsep 6 156,00\tabcellsep 102,60\tabcellsep 4,27\\
\tabcellsep Time of absence from the workplace due to illness, death, food and personal problems\tabcellsep 5 454,00\tabcellsep 90,90\tabcellsep 3,78\\
\tabcellsep Time spent by the supervisor to deliberate the production\tabcellsep \tabcellsep -\tabcellsep \\
Staff Rotation\tabcellsep Time spent replacing colleagues\tabcellsep 4 701,00\tabcellsep 78,35\tabcellsep 3,26\\
Quality Defects\tabcellsep Time spent by the supervisor to correct a failure\tabcellsep 3.585,6\tabcellsep 59,76\tabcellsep 2,49\\
Deviation In Direct Productivity\tabcellsep Differential time between recommended to carry out a task and the effective one\tabcellsep 3.051,6\tabcellsep 50,86\tabcellsep 2,11\\
\tabcellsep Time spent to recover damaged equipment (maintenance)\tabcellsep 7 836,00\tabcellsep 130,60\tabcellsep 5,44\\
\tabcellsep Time of lowest human productivity\tabcellsep 4070,4\tabcellsep 67,84\tabcellsep 2,82\\
Idleness\tabcellsep long vacation time\tabcellsep 2 880,00\tabcellsep 48,00\tabcellsep 2\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Souce: Observation of March 2023}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_15}Table 15 :}\end{figure}
 			\label{foot_0}\footnote{\label{foot_0} © 2023 Global Journals} 		 		\backmatter  			 \par
iii. Analytical Result without Hidden Costs Compulsing the visible cost headings assumed in the said period of analysis and in accordance with the cost analysis procedures in cost and management accounting, the analytical result is, therefore, the difference between sales and production cost plus administrative charges. Without including hidden costs, the analytical result is estimated at 68,643,749.31 Kz (sixty-eight million, six hundred and forty-three thousand, seven hundred and forty-nine, thirty-one cents). 
\subsection[{iv. Accounting for Hidden Costs}]{iv. Accounting for Hidden Costs}\par
To determine the hidden costs over time, it is essential to determine the hourly contribution of the margin on variable costs (CHMSCV).  There was a relative increase in personnel costs summarized in the increase in personnel wages, both in direct labor and in indirect labor, as well as production cost and cost price. For this purpose, the analytical result without the inclusion of hidden costs can be seen in the Table  {\ref 17}.\par
Total Business Days Worked/Month The hourly contribution of the margin on variable costs is estimated at Kz 2,219.60, as being crucial in the process of calculating hidden costs. This contribution corresponds to the cost of each hour worked by each worker, based on the variable costs incurred in production by the company. The reduction of hidden costs after implementing the proposed solution through strategic activities in the explanatory and solution domain variables means, on the one hand, the service provided begins to be humanized by increasing the productivity of workers and the company as a whole. By doing so, the company gains more economic, financial and social capacity through more liquidity for the company to meet its obligations to investors and in particular to its employees.\par
The reduction of hidden costs is motivated by the reduction of negative interactions between the company's structures and the behavior of workers, which provided improvements in operation, aiming to achieve the ortho-operation expected for customers through more presence of the worker in the workplace , less time to perform a task and regularize it, exciting the increase in productivity and consequently the company's results. 
\subsection[{v. Determination of Production Cost with Hidden Costs}]{v. Determination of Production Cost with Hidden Costs}\par
Predictive After determining the hidden costs of each indicator, it is in a position to calculate the cost of production and the cost price of the company, based on the visible and hidden costs incurred by the company during the month of March 2023, as can be seen in the Table  {\ref 20}: Production costs and the price of rose slightly to the detriment of improving skills, working conditions, control and internal communication, thus making it possible to reduce the frequency of malfunctions and consequently hidden costs, regardless of not being in the same proportions. The hidden or unknown economic performance is determined based on the visible costs and hidden costs accounted for in the period under analysis, as can be understood in the Table  {\ref 21}. 
\subsection[{vi. Unknown Economic Performance}]{vi. Unknown Economic Performance}\par
The hidden economic performance of the company is the result of the difference between the total cost of production with hidden costs and the total cost of production with only visible costs. Therefore, this difference constitutes the part of the value that the company loses in the present and that it would gain after monitoring the phenomena that cause the hidden costs, as being exactly the value accounted for costs to be obtained also in the difference between the total costs of production with the hidden costs and the cost of production without including hidden costs. 
\subsection[{vii. Analytical Result with Hidden Costs}]{vii. Analytical Result with Hidden Costs}\par
An analytical result of the company is observed with the inclusion of the hidden costs verified in the month of March 2023, through the inclusion of the determined unknown economic performance. The analytical result with the inclusion of hidden costs is grown from the unknown economic performance determined, as being, the total hidden costs calculated, since, in the beginning, they are costs and later they are performing costs. If the company operated at this level of productivity, there would be no malfunctions that would cause the hidden costs accounted for. 
\subsection[{V. Conclusion}]{V. Conclusion}\par
The intention was to build a proposed solution to the observed dysfunctions that originated the hidden costs accounted for in the investigation carried out in the period from December 5, 2022 to January 5, 2023, according to the precepts of socioeconomic theory, a solution proposal that deserved a test so that its effectiveness could be verified taking into account the peculiar reality of the company studied. Thus, as the hidden costs accounted for in the first investigation were evaluated at 8,392,259.29 Kz with the proposed solution undertaken versus the measures taken by the company, as the mirror effect was applied, the second investigation with test costumes for the proposed solution reveals a decrease in the frequency of malfunctions and how and also in the levels of hidden costs in the order of 4,251,442.27 Kz. The reduction in the frequency of malfunctions and hidden costs enhances the trend towards the effectiveness of the proposed solution. The value of performing hidden costs, that is, the amount of hidden costs recovered within the 8,392,259.29 Kz can be added to the company's operating costs, made possible by the increase in workers' productivity levels. This specific requirement predicted better economic, financial and social results for improving the lives of workers and the company as a whole. Therefore, the research on hidden costs, which was called a test because the solution had been conceived and applied beforehand, aimed to deepen knowledge (know-how) about socio-economic theory and its application (know-how), referring to to the socio-economic analysis of dysfunctions in order to better account for hidden costs, focusing on an attitude (knowing how to be and living) to achieve them, which contributed positively to the observation of the frequency of dysfunctions for the determination of hidden costs in the company studied.			 			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[ Revista FAIPE. V]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		\textit{},  	 	 		\textit{Revista FAIPE. V}  		9 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Oliveira et al. ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		\textit{},  		 			N R S Oliveira 		,  		 			A M M Gonçalves 		,  		 			C O Brandão 		,  		 			F S Sampaio 		,  		 			G F A Santos 		.  		2019.  	 
\bibitem[?Jornal Harvard-L`expansion strategic managment award]{b20}\label{b20} 	 		\textit{?Jornal Harvard-L`expansion strategic managment award},  		 \url{https://www.amazon.com}  		Paris. p. 47.  	 
\bibitem[A © 2023 Global Journals 12. Republic de Angola ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		\textit{A © 2023 Global Journals 12. Republic de Angola},  		 (Luanda-Angola)  		2015.  	 	 (Lei Geral do Trabalho) 
\bibitem[Caiado ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		 			A C P Caiado 		.  		\textit{Contabilidade analítica e de gestão. 6ª Edição, Áreas Editora, SA},  		2011. Lisboa.  	 
\bibitem[Deco et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		‘Contributions of Socio-Economic Theory in Hidden Costs Accounting in Companies and Organizations’.  		 			P Deco 		,  		 			J S Napoleão 		,  		 			K Tamo 		,  		 			A R N Simbo 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2023.161005}{10.4236/jssm.2023.161005}.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Service Science and Management}  		2023. 16 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Moreno et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘Costos ocultos relacionados com dis funcionamentos en la implantación de la estrategia de una empresa restaurantera’.  		 			S G Moreno 		,  		 			M A H Calzada 		,  		 			C C P Hernández 		.  	 	 		\textit{Revista FACE}  		2020.  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Deco ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		 			P Deco 		.  		\textit{Gestão de custos ocultos nas organizações-o tempo perdido},  		2023. Lisbon International press. 1ª Edição. Lisboa-Portugal.  	 
\bibitem[Brand et al. ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		\textit{El modelo socioeconóico como moderador del desempeno organizacional en la Pequena y Mediana Empresa familiar Mexicana},  		 			V Brand 		,  		 			J Vivanco 		,  		 			M González 		.  		2017. México: Estudio de caso en Aguascalientes. 76 p. .  		 			Revista Vértice Universitario 		 	 
\bibitem[Ferreira et al. ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		 			D Ferreira 		,  		 			C; Caldeira 		,  		 			J Asseiceiro 		,  		 			J Vieira 		,  		 			C Vicente 		.  		\textit{Contabilidade de gestão. Rei dos livros. 2ª Edição},  		2019. Portugal.  	 
\bibitem[importância de análise de custos para as empresas]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		\textit{importância de análise de custos para as empresas},  		 	 
\bibitem[Pérez and Jiménez ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		‘La importancia de las estruturas organizacionales en el desempeño empresariale: Un estudio de caso. XVI Congreso internacional de investigacion en ciencias de Administrativas. Tecnológico de Monterrey. México. Predictive Testing for the Management of Hidden Costs in Organizations 111’.  		 			C V T Pérez 		,  		 			M Jiménez 		.  	 	 		\textit{Global Journal of Management and Business Research}  		2012. XXIII.  	 	 (Version I Year 2023) 
\bibitem[Savall et al. ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		\textit{Le capitalisme socialment responsable existe},  		 			H Savall 		,  		 			M Peron 		,  		 			M Bonnet 		.  		2016. Caen: EMS.  	 
\bibitem[Savall and Zardet ()]{b23}\label{b23} 	 		‘Maetriser les coûts et les performances cachés’.  		 			H Savall 		,  		 			V Zardet 		.  	 	 		\textit{Le contrat d"activité périodiquement negociable},  		1987.  	 
\bibitem[Savall and Zardet ()]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		\textit{Maetriser les coûts et les performances cachés. 7ª Édition},  		 			H Savall 		,  		 			V Zardet 		.  		2020. Paris-França.  	 
\bibitem[Martins ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		 			E Martins 		.  		\textit{Contabilidade de custos. Atlas},  		 (São Paulo)  		2013.  	 
\bibitem[Savall and Zardet ()]{b19}\label{b19} 	 		\textit{Mastering hidden cost and Socio-Economic Performance},  		 			H Savall 		,  		 			V Zardet 		.  		2008.  	 
\bibitem[Savall and Zardet ()]{b17}\label{b17} 	 		\textit{Maîtriser les Coûts et les Perfomances Cachés},  		 			H Savall 		,  		 			V Zardet 		.  		2010. Paris.  	 
\bibitem[Savall et al. ()]{b21}\label{b21} 	 		\textit{Mejorar los desempeños ocultos de las empresas a través de una gestión socioeconómica},  		 			H Savall 		,  		 			V Zardet 		,  		 			M Bonnet 		.  		2008.  	 	 (Italia: OIT, ISEOR) 
\bibitem[Naibas and Naibais ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		 			C Naibas 		,  		 			F Naibais 		.  		\textit{Prática de contabilidade analítica e de gestão. 1ª Edição. Lidel-Edições Técnicas},  		2016. Portugal.  	 
\bibitem[Parra and Peña ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		 			J Parra 		,  		 			Y Peña 		.  	 	 		\textit{La teoría de los costos desempeño ocultos: Una aproximación teórica},  		2014. 15 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Savall ()]{b22}\label{b22} 	 		 			H Savall 		.  		\textit{Reconstruire l"entreprise: Analyse socio.économique des conditions de travail},  		 (Paris)  		1979. Dunod.  	 
\bibitem[Savall and Zardet ()]{b18}\label{b18} 	 		 			H Savall 		,  		 			V Zardet 		.  		\textit{Ingenería estratégica: un enfoque socioeconíco. Traducción, Primera edición},  		 (México, D.F))  		2009.  	 
\bibitem[Tamo ()]{b25}\label{b25} 	 		 			K Tamo 		.  		\textit{Gerir os Recursos Humanos entre Constrangimentos e Alternativas},  		2012. Luanda.  	 
\bibitem[Tamo ()]{b26}\label{b26} 	 		 			K Tamo 		.  		\textit{Metodologia de Investigação em Ciências Sociais},  		 (Luanda)  		2012.  	 
\bibitem[Tamo ()]{b24}\label{b24} 	 		 			K Tamo 		.  		\textit{Epistemologia da gestão. Capatê publicações, Lda. 1ª Edição},  		 (Luanda-Angola)  		2014.  	 
\bibitem[Tepa and Luanda ()]{b27}\label{b27} 	 		 			C D Tepa 		,  		 			S A Luanda 		.  		\textit{Contabilidade Analítica pormenorizada 2. Grupo Editorial Nexus},  		2012.  	 
\bibitem[Savall and Zardet ()]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		\textit{Traté de management socio-économique},  		 			H Savall 		,  		 			V Zardet 		.  		2021. Caen: EMS.  	 	 (Théorie et pratique) 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}